温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/zh_cn/66062.html
点击访问原文链接

The End of Tokenization Illusion: How Vitalik’s Four Quadrants Rewrite the AI×Crypto Script | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
The End of Tokenization Illusion: How Vitalik’s Four Quadrants Rewrite the AI×Crypto Script | Bee Network Login 热门新闻 备忘录启动板 人工智能代理 德西 TopChainExplorer 给 Newbee 100 倍金币 蜜蜂游戏 重要网站 必备应用程序 加密货币名人 德平 新手必备 陷阱探测器 基本工具 高级网站 交流 NFT 工具 你好、, 签出 Web3 宇宙 游戏 DApp 蜂巢 成长平台 生态 搜索 英语 充值金币 登录 下载 Web3 大学 游戏 DApp 蜂巢 生态 家•分析•正文 The End of Tokenization Illusion: How Vitalik’s Four Quadrants Rewrite the AI×Crypto Script分析2周前发布怀亚特 6,609 37 After two years, Vitalik has posted on Twitter again. Following up on the research report from two years ago, I’d like to share some thoughts. Even the date is exactly the same, February 10th.

Two years ago, Vitalik actually implicitly expressed that he wasn’t very optimistic about the various “Crypto Helps AI” trends that were popular at the time. The three major narratives in the circle back then were computing power assetization, data assetization, and model assetization. My research report two years ago mainly discussed some observed phenomena and doubts regarding these three narratives in the primary market. From Vitalik’s perspective, he was more bullish on “AI Helps Crypto”.

The examples he gave at the time were:

AI as a participant in games; AI as a game interface; AI as game rules; AI as a game objective; Over the past two years, we have made many attempts in “Crypto Helps AI”, but with little effect. Many sectors and projects ended up just – issuing a token and calling it a day, lacking real Product-市场 Fit (PMF). I call this the “tokenization illusion”.

1. Computing Power Assetization – Most cannot provide commercial-grade Service Level Agreements (SLAs), are unstable, and frequently go offline. They can only handle simple, small-to-medium model inference tasks, mostly serving niche markets. Revenue is not linked to the token…

2. Data Assetization – High friction, low willingness, and high uncertainty on the supply side (retail users). The demand side (enterprises) requires structured, context-dependent professional data suppliers with trust and legal liability. It’s difficult for DAO-led Web3 projects to provide this.

3. Model Assetization – Models themselves are non-scarce, replicable, fine-tunable, rapidly depreciating process assets, not final-state assets. Hugging Face itself is a collaboration and dissemination platform, more like “GitHub for ML” rather than an “App Store for models”. Therefore, projects attempting to tokenize models via a “decentralized Hugging Face” have mostly ended in failure.

Additionally, over these two years, we have tried various forms of “verifiable inference”, which is a classic case of a solution looking for a problem. From ZKML to OPML to Game Theory, etc., even EigenLayer shifted its Restaking narrative to Verifiable AI.

But it’s largely similar to what happened in the Restaking sector – few AVSs (Actively Validated Services) are willing to pay continuously for extra verifiable security.

Similarly, verifiable inference is mostly about verifying “things that nobody really needs verified”. The threat model on the demand side is extremely vague – who exactly are we defending against?

AI output errors (model capability issues) far outnumber cases of AI output being maliciously tampered with (adversarial problems). As we’ve seen from various security incidents on platforms like OpenClaw and Moltbook recently, the real problems stem from:

Incorrect policy design Excessive permissions granted Unclear boundaries Unexpected interactions from tool combinations  … Scenarios like “the model being tampered with” or “the inference process being maliciously rewritten” are almost non-existent, imagined nails for the verifiability hammer.

I posted this chart last year, not sure if any old-timers remember.

The ideas Vitalik presented this time are clearly more mature than two years ago, also due to the progress we’ve made in various directions like privacy, X402, ERC8004, prediction markets, etc.

We can see that the four quadrants he outlined this time, half belong to “AI Helps Crypto” and the other half to “Crypto Helps AI”, no longer leaning heavily towards the former as it did two years ago.

Top-left and bottom-left – Utilizing Ethereum’s decentralization and transparency to solve AI’s trust and economic collaboration problems

 1.Enabling trustless and private AI interaction (Infrastructure + Survival): Using technologies like ZK, FHE to ensure the privacy and verifiability of AI interactions (not sure if the verifiable inference I mentioned earlier counts).

 2. Ethereum as an economic layer for AI (Infrastructure + Prosperity): Enabling AI agents to conduct economic payments, hire other bots, post collateral, or establish reputation systems through Ethereum, thereby building a decentralized AI architecture not limited to a single giant platform.

Top-right and bottom-right – Utilizing AI’s intelligent capabilities to optimize the user experience, efficiency, and governance of the 加密 ecosystem: 

3. Cypherpunk mountain man vision with local LLMs (Impact + Survival): AI as a user’s “shield” and interface. For example, local LLMs can automatically audit smart contracts, verify transactions, reducing reliance on centralized front-ends, and safeguarding individual digital sovereignty.

4. Make much better markets and governance a reality (Impact + Prosperity): AI deeply participating in prediction markets and DAO governance. AI can act as efficient participants, amplifying human judgment by processing information at scale, solving various market and governance issues like insufficient human attention, high decision-making costs, information overload, and voter apathy.

Previously, we were desperately trying to make Crypto Help AI, while Vitalik stood on the other side. Now we finally meet in the middle, though it seems unrelated to various XX tokenizations or so-called AI Layer1s. Hopefully, looking back at today’s post in two years, there will be some new directions and surprises.

本文来源于互联网： The End of Tokenization Illusion: How Vitalik’s Four Quadrants Rewrite the AI×Crypto Script

#分析# 加密# 以太坊# 市场# 代币# 工具# web3© 版权声明文章版权归作者所有，未经允许请勿转载。 上一篇 Commercials during the American Spring Festival Gala all look like scams 下一篇 ICE, Parent Company of NYSE, Makes Major Moves with Index Futures Contracts and Predictive Market Sentiment Tools 相关文章 比特币杂志抨击 $特朗普：只要能用来赚钱，特朗普就喜欢加密货币 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 87,496 126 Elon Musk to Co-Lead Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency (D.O.G.E) 行政 149,773 158 Planet Daily | US court rules that sanctions on Tornado Cash smart contracts are illegal; MicroStrategy founder Michael 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 37,436 Investment decision: Buy Bitcoin or Ethereum? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 30,557 5 Airdrop Weekly Report | Kite AI will open for airdrop applications on November 3; 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 14,561 1 LBANK EDGE is launched: exploring potential assets and creating a new level of liquidity 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 29,619 2 无评论 您必须登录后才能发表评论！ 立即登录 没有评论... Bee.com 全球最大的 Web3 门户网站 合作伙伴 硬币卡 Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive 装甲 下载蜜蜂网络APP，开始web3之旅 白皮书 角色 常见问题 © 2021-2026.保留所有权利。. 隐私政策 | 服务条款 下载蜜蜂网络 APP 并开始 web3 之旅 全球最大的 Web3 门户网站 合作伙伴 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 白皮书 角色 常见问题 © 2021-2026.保留所有权利。. 隐私政策 | 服务条款 搜索 搜索InSite链上社会新闻 热门推荐： 空投猎人 数据分析 加密货币名人 陷阱探测器 简体中文 English 繁體中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 简体中文

智能索引记录