温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/zh_cn/65692.html
点击访问原文链接

After breaking below key support levels, where does Bitcoin find its next floor? | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
After breaking below key support levels, where does Bitcoin find its next floor? | Bee Network Login 热门新闻 备忘录启动板 人工智能代理 德西 TopChainExplorer 给 Newbee 100 倍金币 蜜蜂游戏 重要网站 必备应用程序 加密货币名人 德平 新手必备 陷阱探测器 基本工具 高级网站 交流 NFT 工具 你好、, 签出 Web3 宇宙 游戏 DApp 蜂巢 成长平台 生态 搜索 英语 充值金币 登录 下载 Web3 大学 游戏 DApp 蜂巢 生态 家•分析•After breaking below key support levels, where does Bitcoin find its next floor? After breaking below key support levels, where does Bitcoin find its next floor?分析4 周前更新怀亚特 7,761 16 Original Compilation: AididiaoJP, Foresight News

Bitcoin spot trading volume remains sluggish. Despite the price falling from $98,000 to $72,000, the 30-day average volume remains weak. This reflects insufficient market demand and a lack of effective absorption of selling pressure.

Core Viewpoints Bitcoin has confirmed a breakdown, with the price falling below the true market average, shifting market sentiment to cautious defense. On-chain data shows initial accumulation signs in the $70,000 to $80,000 range, while a dense cost concentration zone has formed between $66,900 and $70,600, which could act as a short-term buffer against selling pressure. Investor loss-selling has intensified. As the price continues to decline, more holders are being forced to cut losses and exit. Persistently weak spot trading volume further indicates insufficient market absorption capacity and a lack of effective digestion of sell orders. The futures market has entered a phase of forced deleveraging, with large-scale long liquidations exacerbating market volatility and downward pressure. Institutional capital inflows have significantly weakened. Net inflows into ETFs and related funds have shrunk, unable to provide sustained buying support as they did during the previous rally phase. The options market continues to reflect high expectations for downside risk. Implied volatility remains elevated, and rising demand for put options shows strong risk-aversion sentiment. With market leverage being cleared while spot demand remains weak, the price remains fragile. Any rebound may be merely a technical correction rather than a trend reversal. On-Chain Data Observations Following last week’s analysis pointing out the downside risk after the market failed to reclaim the $94,500 short-term cost basis, the price has now clearly fallen below the true market average.

Breaking Below Key Support

The true market average (the average cost basis of actively circulating supply, excluding long-dormant tokens) has served as a key support line multiple times during this correction.

The loss of this support confirms the deterioration of market structure since late November. The current pattern resembles the phase in early 2022 when the market transitioned from consolidation to a deep correction. Weak demand coupled with persistent selling pressure indicates the market is in a fragile equilibrium.

From a medium-term perspective, the price range is gradually narrowing. Resistance lies near the true market average at approximately $80,200, while support is around the realized price of $55,800, a level that has historically attracted long-term capital inflows.

Potential Demand Zone Analysis

As the market structure resets, the focus shifts to potential levels for stabilization on the downside. The following on-chain metrics help identify zones where a potential interim bottom might form:

The UTXO Realized Price Distribution shows significant accumulation by new investors in the $70,000 to $80,000 range, indicating willingness to buy the dip in this zone. Below that, a dense cost concentration exists between $66,900 and $70,600. Historically, such cost concentration zones often act as short-term support bands.

市场 Stress Indicators

The Realized Loss metric directly reflects the level of investor stress. The current 7-day average realized loss has exceeded $1.26 billion daily, indicating an increase in panic selling after the market broke below key support.

Historical experience shows that peaks in realized loss often coincide with exhaustion in selling. For example, during the recent rebound from $72,000, daily losses briefly exceeded $2.4 billion. Such extreme values often correspond to short-term inflection points.

Comparison with Historical Cycles

The Relative Unrealized Loss indicator (the proportion of unrealized loss to total market cap) helps compare market stress across different cycles. Historical bear market extremes typically exceed 30%, with cycle bottoms in 2018 and 2022 even reaching 65%-75%.

This indicator has now risen above its long-term average (around 12%), showing that investors with cost bases above the current price are under pressure. However, reaching historical extreme levels usually requires a systemic risk event on the scale of the LUNA or FTX collapse.

Market Dynamics Spot and futures trading volumes remain low, while the options market continues to focus on downside protection.

Institutional Capital Turns to Net Outflows

As prices have fallen, demand from major institutional investors has noticeably weakened. Spot ETF inflows have slowed, and corporate and government-related capital flows are also decreasing, indicating reduced willingness for incremental capital to enter the market.

This contrasts sharply with the previous rally phase, where sustained capital inflows provided support for price appreciation. The current shift in capital flows further confirms the lack of new capital entering the market at current price levels.

Spot Trading Volume Remains Thin

Despite the price falling from $98,000 to $72,000, the 30-day average trading volume has not expanded significantly. This indicates a lack of sufficient buying absorption during the decline.

Historically, genuine trend reversals are often accompanied by a significant expansion in spot trading volume. The current volume has only slightly recovered, suggesting market activity is still dominated by position reduction and risk aversion, rather than active accumulation.

Insufficient liquidity makes the market more sensitive to selling pressure, meaning even medium-sized sell orders can trigger larger price declines.

Forced Liquidations in the Futures Market

The derivatives market has seen large-scale long liquidations, setting the highest record since the start of this decline. This indicates that as prices fell, leveraged long positions were forcibly cleared, exacerbating the downward momentum.

It is worth noting that liquidation activity was relatively mild during November-December, suggesting leverage was gradually being rebuilt. The recent surge marks the market’s entry into a forced deleveraging phase, where forced liquidations have become a primary factor influencing price.

Whether prices can stabilize going forward depends on whether the deleveraging process is sufficient. A genuine recovery requires the intervention of spot buying; relying solely on position unwinding is unlikely to form a sustained rebound.

Short-Term Volatility Remains Elevated

When the price tested the previous high of $73,000 (now turned support), short-term implied volatility rose to around 70%. Volatility levels over the past week are about 20 volatility points higher than two weeks ago, with the entire volatility curve shifting upwards.

Short-term implied volatility consistently exceeding recent realized volatility indicates investors are willing to pay a premium for short-term protection. This repricing is particularly evident in near-term contracts, showing risk concentration here.

This reflects more a demand for protection against sudden declines rather than a clear directional view. Traders’ reluctance to sell short-term options in large quantities keeps the cost of downside protection elevated.

Sustained Increase in Put Option Demand

The volatility repricing shows a clear directional bias. The skew of put options relative to call options has widened again, indicating the market is more focused on downside risks than rebound opportunities.

Even with prices holding above $73,000, option flows remain concentrated in protective positions. This biases the implied volatility distribution negatively, reinforcing the market’s defensive tone.

Volatility Risk Premium Turns Negative

The 1-week volatility risk premium has turned negative for the first time since early December, currently around -5, compared to around +23 a month ago.

A negative risk premium means implied volatility is lower than realized volatility. For option sellers, this turns the profit from time decay into a loss, forcing them to hedge more frequently, which in turn increases short-term market pressure.

In this environment, options trading no longer plays a stabilizing role for the market and may instead exacerbate price volatility.

Change in Premium for $75,000 Put Options

The $75,000 strike put option has become a focal point for the market, with this level being repeatedly tested. The net buying premium for put options has increased significantly, a process that has advanced in three stages, each synchronized with price declines lacking effective rebounds.

The situation is different for longer-dated options (over 3 months): selling premiums have begun to exceed buying premiums, indicating traders are willing to sell high volatility in forward contracts while continuing to pay a premium for short-term protection.

Summary After failing to reclaim the key level of $94,500, Bitcoin broke below the true market average of $80,200, entering a defensive state. As the price fell into the $70,000 range, unrealized profits contracted and realized losses increased. Although initial accumulation signs appeared in the $70,000-$80,000 range and a dense holding zone formed in the $66,900-$70,600 area, persistent loss-selling indicates market sentiment remains cautious.

In the derivatives market, selling pressure shows disorderly characteristics, with large-scale long liquidations confirming the leverage reset process. While this helps clear speculative froth, it is insufficient on its own to form a solid bottom. The options market reflects heightened uncertainty, with rising put demand and high volatility indicating investors are preparing for continued volatility.

The key to future price action still lies in spot demand. Without seeing an increase in spot participation and sustained capital inflows, the market will continue to face downward pressure, and any rebounds may lack sustainability. Until fundamentals improve, risks remain skewed to the downside. A genuine recovery requires time, sufficient turnover of holdings, and a substantive restoration of buyer confidence.

本文来源于互联网： After breaking below key support levels, where does Bitcoin find its next floor?

Related: The Big Year for Crypto IPOs: The Path to Public Markets for “Pick-and-Shovel” Players

In 2025, crypto companies raised $3.4 billion in the U.S. stock market. Circle and Bullish each raised over $1 billion, and Gemini surged 14% on its Nasdaq debut. By January 2026, BitGo rang the opening bell on the NYSE, jumping 24.6% on its first day with a market cap of $2.6 billion. These pioneers proved one thing: Wall Street is willing to pay for compliant crypto infrastructure. The pipeline for 2026 is even thicker. Kraken, Consensys, and Ledger are all queuing up for IPOs, with valuations ranging from billions to $20 billion. Even the security auditing firm CertiK announced its IPO plans at Davos. Exchanges, wallets, custody, security… the “water sellers” of the crypto industry are collectively heading to the public markets. When will these companies go public, what are…

 

#分析# 比特币# 市场# 代币© 版权声明文章版权归作者所有，未经允许请勿转载。 上一篇 AI is Paying Humans to Do That 下一篇 CZ Zhao Targeted by Gray Industry 相关文章 Why Is the Crypto Market Up Today? 罗章明 33,806 2 Claude takes the championship; the truth behind the showdown of 6 major AI grid strategies | OKX & AiCoin live trading review 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 19,508 1 Will South Korea’s Nine-Year Ban Lifting Reignite a $10 Billion “Kimchi Premium 2.0”? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 10,168 2 U.S. “Swift Capture” of Maduro: A Guide to Investing Amid Geopolitical Turmoil 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 10,247 XRP Price’s Recovery Threatens $400 Million Liquidations For Traders 罗章明 33,738 2 ETHTaipei 2025: Vitalik attends the conference to explore the frontiers of Ethereum technology and ecological innovation 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 38,726 无评论 您必须登录后才能发表评论！ 立即登录 没有评论... 最新文章 Did Jane Street “Manipulate” BTC? Decoding the AP System, Understanding the Power Struggle Behind ETF Creation and Redemption Pricing 21 小时前 654 Stop Comparing Bitcoin to Gold—It’s Now a High-Volatility Software Stock 21 小时前 703 Matrixport Research: $25 Billion Gamma Unwinding Imminent, Liquidity Yet to Return Behind the Rebound 21 小时前 653 ERC-5564: Ethereum’s Stealth Era Has Arrived, Receiving Addresses No Longer ‘Exposed’ 21 小时前 543 Hong Kong Regulatory Green Light: Asseto Enables DL Holdings to Achieve Compliance for Two RWA Business Implementations 21 小时前 623 热门网站TempoLighterGAIB滑翔机普朗克雷尔斯BCPokerVooi Bee.com 全球最大的 Web3 门户网站 合作伙伴 硬币卡 Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive 装甲 下载蜜蜂网络APP，开始web3之旅 白皮书 角色 常见问题 © 2021-2026.保留所有权利。. 隐私政策 | 服务条款 下载蜜蜂网络 APP 并开始 web3 之旅 全球最大的 Web3 门户网站 合作伙伴 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 白皮书 角色 常见问题 © 2021-2026.保留所有权利。. 隐私政策 | 服务条款 搜索 搜索InSite链上社会新闻 热门推荐： 空投猎人 数据分析 加密货币名人 陷阱探测器 简体中文 English 繁體中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 简体中文

智能索引记录