温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/zh_cn/60494.html
点击访问原文链接

The battle for computing power sovereignty: How will decentralization reshape the future landscape of AI? | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
The battle for computing power sovereignty: How will decentralization reshape the future landscape of AI? | Bee Network Login 热门新闻 备忘录启动板 人工智能代理 德西 TopChainExplorer 给 Newbee 100 倍金币 蜜蜂游戏 重要网站 必备应用程序 加密货币名人 德平 新手必备 陷阱探测器 基本工具 高级网站 交流 NFT 工具 你好、, 签出 Web3 宇宙 游戏 DApp 蜂巢 成长平台 生态 搜索 英语 充值金币 登录 下载 Web3 大学 游戏 DApp 蜂巢 生态 家•分析•The battle for computing power sovereignty: How will decentralization reshape the future landscape of AI? The battle for computing power sovereignty: How will decentralization reshape the future landscape of AI?分析4 个月前更新怀亚特 15,310 6 Original translation: Gonka.ai

Currently, the competition for the future of artificial intelligence is focused on a key area: computing power. Startups, research institutions, and Fortune 500 companies are all vying for limited GPU resources. This clearly indicates that the next race in AI has shifted from algorithms to the acquisition of computing power. What was once a debate about concepts has now evolved into a substantive struggle for computing resources.

Computing power: The “new power grid” of the AI era If we compare AI to the electricity of the new era, then computing power is the power grid that supports its operation. However, this “power grid” that determines the lifeline of innovation is controlled by a few giants. They not only determine the allocation and pricing of GPUs, but also, to a large extent, which innovative projects can survive.

According to Reuters, orders for Nvidia’s next-generation Blackwell GPUs have surpassed 3.6 million, with the majority going to major cloud service providers. The barrier to entry for smaller startups and public institutions is becoming increasingly high.

Power Structure: Nvidia’s Hidden Empire Nvidia currently controls approximately 94% of the GPU market, making it an indispensable infrastructure behind almost all modern AI systems. More notably, the company recently disclosed that just two “unnamed” direct customers contributed 39% of its quarterly revenue.

This centralization has transcended the commercial realm, reshaping the entire innovation ecosystem. It determines who can participate in innovation, the speed at which costs decrease, and which countries will gain an advantage in the future AI economy. The global frenzy for AI chips has led to supply shortages and soaring prices, further narrowing the survival space for small businesses.

The solution: The rise of decentralized computing networks Faced with this dilemma, a growing number of researchers and entrepreneurs are rethinking how computing power is allocated. David Liberman, co-founder of the Gonka protocol, points out: “In an efficient market, all products tend to become commoditized, driving down profits and prices to a minimum sustainable level. To enable AI to achieve this, we can draw inspiration from Bitcoin—not as a financial asset, but as a blueprint for building large-scale decentralized infrastructure.”

This analogy is quite insightful: “Today, Bitcoin miners collectively operate 26 gigawatts of data centers, a scale exceeding the combined construction of Microsoft, Google, and Amazon over decades. Meanwhile, advancements in Bitcoin mining hardware have reduced computing power costs by hundreds of thousands of times. If the same transformation could be achieved for AI computing power, AI could become truly accessible and affordable for everyone on Earth.”

Practical Challenges: The Paradox of Distributed Systems However, the road to decentralization is not without its challenges. A 2025 study by Galaxy Research showed that, under certain workloads, decentralized networks can outperform centralized cloud services, but verification and reliability remain significant challenges.

Researchers at the nonprofit research organization EPOCH AI call this phenomenon the “paradox of distributed systems”: the more open a system is, the more coordination is needed. Without rigorous verification mechanisms and performance-linked incentives, community-run networks can become inefficient or manipulated.

Governance dilemma: Will power be recentralized? History suggests that decentralized systems may gradually revert to centralization, as power tends to gravitate towards areas with concentrated capital and production capacity. The Liberman brothers acknowledge that even decentralized systems can unintentionally favor large participants.

“No one can unilaterally change the rules of Bitcoin or Ethereum; any change requires broad consensus,” they explained. “Some design rules do give mining pools an advantage, leading to a concentration of power. Therefore, when building the Gonka protocol, we deliberately avoided mechanisms such as delegation.”

Geopolitical Dimension: Political Considerations of Computing Power Sovereignty The issue of computing power has evolved into a significant geopolitical issue. Liberman revealed, “Our discussions with government officials in four countries revealed that they increasingly view decentralization as the only viable path to defending their national sovereignty in a context of relying on global AI infrastructure.”

“Their concern isn’t about control itself, but rather the monopolistic positions of the US and China—monopolies that could isolate them from the prosperity brought by AI. Decentralization is the only way to ensure their citizens equally enjoy the full benefits of AI.”

Future Vision: Two Possible AI Worlds When asked about future development directions, the Liberman brothers described two possible futures: one is that a few large laboratories in China and the United States control most of the world’s AI computing power; the other is that open networks will ignite a new wave of hardware innovation, reducing computing power costs by thousands of times and distributing it more evenly around the world.

“In the decentralized future, large cloud companies will still have a place, but they will no longer be able to charge such high premiums for computing power access,” they added.

Conclusion: The Reshaping of the Right to Innovation This battle for computing power is essentially about the right to innovation and the inclusiveness of technology. As AI becomes the core driving force of the future, ensuring the openness and fairness of computing networks will determine the innovation landscape and wealth distribution of the next decade. Those participants who can solve the problem of democratizing computing power will not only achieve commercial success but also shape the direction of the entire artificial intelligence era.

In this race to determine the future, decentralized computing networks are emerging as a vital hope for breaking monopolies and achieving technological inclusion. Their ultimate success depends not only on technological innovation but also, and perhaps more importantly, on the design of governance mechanisms and the building of global community consensus.

Original link

本文来源于互联网： The battle for computing power sovereignty: How will decentralization reshape the future landscape of AI?Recommended Articles

Related: 24-Hour Hot Coins and News | US initial jobless claims decline, but labor demand remains sluggish and unemployment reach 1. Popular CEX currencies Top 10 CEX trading volume and 24-hour price changes: BTC: -3.16% ETH: -4.59% SOL: -6.74% XRP: -4.88% XPL: +1,172.50% BNB: -5.47% DOGE: -5.40% ADA: -3.61% SUI: -5.20% AVAX: -11.34% 24-hour price increase list (data source: OKX): XPL: +2,454.80% SPK: +12.32% SATS: +8.13% HUMA: +6.30% AIDOGE: +6.22% ZENT: +4.82% OKB: +3.96% BARD: +3.28% KAIA: +1.54% ICE: +1.26% 24-hour cryptocurrency stock price increase list (data source: MyStonks): Qualigen Therapeutics, Inc. (QLGN.M): +33.09% Mawson Infrastructure Group Inc. (MIGI.M): +17.55% Mercurity Fintech Holding Inc. (ticker: MFH.M): +15.81% ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD.M): +14.71% T-Rex 2X Inverse MSTR Daily (Symbol: MSTZ.M): +14.18% MP Materials Corp. (MP.M): +10.61% Intel (INTC.M): +10.35% GraniteShares ETF Trust GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF (ticker: CONI.M): +8.93% TSLA Daily 2x Short (Ticker: TSLQ.M): +8.92% ProShares UltraShort…

#分析# 比特币# 以太坊# 市场# 初创公司© 版权声明文章版权归作者所有，未经允许请勿转载。 上一篇 USDe issuance plummeted by $6.5 billion; will Ethena still dare to use it? 下一篇 Deciphering Monad's 18-page sales document: How does the 0.16% market-making stake support a $2.5 billion FDV? 相关文章 The Rise and Future of Perp DEX: A Structural Revolution in On-Chain Derivatives 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 11,514 The world’s biggest Bitcoin hater has retired. 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 16,290 1 Ten years ago, Pantera bought 2% of the worlds BTC at a minimum of $65. What is the founder of Pantera thinking today? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 35,348 2 比特币抵押贷款，$6.6 万亿美元的新蓝海 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 27,012 5 Elections, Oil Prices, and the Money Printer: Why Bitcoin Only Cares About Trump 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 12,101 1 Jim Chanos, the “cynical” strategist on Wall Street, pulled off a perfect move: shorting MSTR and going long on BTC. 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 15,893 1 无评论 您必须登录后才能发表评论！ 立即登录 没有评论... 最新文章 Did Jane Street “Manipulate” BTC? Decoding the AP System, Understanding the Power Struggle Behind ETF Creation and Redemption Pricing 9小时前 331 Stop Comparing Bitcoin to Gold—It’s Now a High-Volatility Software Stock 9小时前 456 Matrixport Research: $25 Billion Gamma Unwinding Imminent, Liquidity Yet to Return Behind the Rebound 9小时前 422 ERC-5564: Ethereum’s Stealth Era Has Arrived, Receiving Addresses No Longer ‘Exposed’ 9小时前 358 Hong Kong Regulatory Green Light: Asseto Enables DL Holdings to Achieve Compliance for Two RWA Business Implementations 9小时前 390 热门网站TempoLighterGAIB滑翔机普朗克雷尔斯BCPokerVooi Bee.com 全球最大的 Web3 门户网站 合作伙伴 硬币卡 Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive 装甲 下载蜜蜂网络APP，开始web3之旅 白皮书 角色 常见问题 © 2021-2026.保留所有权利。. 隐私政策 | 服务条款 下载蜜蜂网络 APP 并开始 web3 之旅 全球最大的 Web3 门户网站 合作伙伴 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 白皮书 角色 常见问题 © 2021-2026.保留所有权利。. 隐私政策 | 服务条款 搜索 搜索InSite链上社会新闻 热门推荐： 空投猎人 数据分析 加密货币名人 陷阱探测器 简体中文 English 繁體中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 简体中文

智能索引记录