温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/zh_cn/59263.html
点击访问原文链接

S&P gives Strategy a B- rating. Why is the leading DAT considered junk by institutions? | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
S&P gives Strategy a B- rating. Why is the leading DAT considered junk by institutions? | Bee Network Login 热门新闻 备忘录启动板 人工智能代理 德西 TopChainExplorer 给 Newbee 100 倍金币 蜜蜂游戏 重要网站 必备应用程序 加密货币名人 德平 新手必备 陷阱探测器 基本工具 高级网站 交流 NFT 工具 你好、, 签出 Web3 宇宙 游戏 DApp 蜂巢 成长平台 生态 搜索 英语 充值金币 登录 下载 Web3 大学 游戏 DApp 蜂巢 生态 家•分析•S&P gives Strategy a B- rating. Why is the leading DAT considered junk by institutions? S&P gives Strategy a B- rating. Why is the leading DAT considered junk by institutions?分析4 个月前更新怀亚特 17,487 13 Author｜Azuma ( @azuma_eth )

On October 27, Eastern Time, S&P Global rated Bitcoin Treasury Strategy (formerly Microstrategy, stock code MSTR) for the first time.

Embarrassingly, as the absolute leader in the DAT field, Strategy only received an issuer credit rating of B- – in other words, in the eyes of S&P, Strategy is a “junk” with an extremely high risk of default.

S&P and its rating system S&P, Moody’s and Fitch are known as the world’s three major rating agencies and are currently recognized as one of the most authoritative credit rating agencies in the international financial market.

According to S&P, its credit ratings primarily reflect its forward-looking opinion on the creditworthiness of the issuer and its debt, typically focusing on analyzing the issuer’s ability and willingness to fulfill its financial commitments. Creditworthiness encompasses a variety of factors, including the likelihood of default, potential external support, repayment priorities, and recovery rates.

S&P usually has ten main grades for long-term credit ratings, from high to low: AAA, AA, A, BBB, BB, B, CCC, CC, C, D. Except for AAA and CC and below, each grade can also be fine-tuned using the “+” or “-” symbol to indicate different high and low levels under the same grade.

It is generally believed that the two sub-grades of BBB- and BB+ are regarded as a dividing line. BBB- and above belong to “Investment Grade”, while BB+ and below belong to “Speculative Grade”, or more bluntly, “Junk Bond”.

Obviously, the B- that Strategy got is still some distance away from BB+…

Why does S&P not approve the Strategy? In its rating 文章 for Strategy, S&P detailed the reasons for giving it a B- rating.

In S&P’s view, Strategy has problems such as excessive business concentration, a large proportion of Bitcoin holdings, insufficient US dollar liquidity, and extremely weak risk-adjusted capital. Although the company has strong financing capabilities in the capital market and prudently manages its capital structure, it is not enough to offset the above negative impacts. After comprehensive consideration, it gave a judgment of B-.

S&P highlighted that Strategy’s Bitcoin strategy creates a natural currency mismatch—it holds a significant amount of Bitcoin (a long position) while its debt and dividend obligations are denominated in US dollars (a short position). Strategy faces debt maturities, interest payments, and preferred stock dividends in US dollars, yet its primary asset is Bitcoin. While Strategy maintains a certain amount of US dollar holdings on its balance sheet, this is primarily used to support operating expenses for its software business, with any remaining cash invested in Bitcoin.

Furthermore, S&P’s treatment of Bitcoin assets in its risk-adjusted capital (RAC) calculation resulted in Strategy’s negative RAC, a key factor contributing to its negative assessment of its capital and profitability. S&P explained that it deducted Bitcoin assets from equity when calculating adjusted common equity because it believes Bitcoin carries significant market risk uncorrelated with traditional market risks. Given that the majority of Strategy’s assets are in Bitcoin and that its holdings are expected to continue to grow, it believes capital issues will remain a major weakness for the company.

S&P also noted that Strategy’s operating cash flow was negative $37 million in the first six months of 2025. The company’s primary source of profit is the appreciation in the value of its Bitcoin holdings, which generate no cash flow, while its software business is roughly flat in terms of earnings and operating cash flow. S&P believes this situation is unlikely to change in the foreseeable future.

At the end of the rating, S&P also added the possibility of adjusting the rating of Strategy.

Over the next 12 months, the rating could be downgraded if:

Strategy’s ability to raise capital from the capital markets is hampered (whether due to a significant decline in Bitcoin’s valuation or for other reasons); We believe the company faces increased risk in managing the maturities of its out-of-the-money convertible bonds. An upgrade of the rating is unlikely in the next 12 months. In the long term, an upgrade of the rating is possible in the following circumstances:

Strategy Company significantly improved US dollar liquidity; Reduce the use of convertible bonds; Even when the Bitcoin market is under pressure, it can still maintain strong capital market financing capabilities. Strategy and market response Regarding the obviously negative rating result given by S&P, Strategy is quite optimistic.

Strategy founder Michael Saylor generously forwarded the relevant news on his personal X account and celebrated that “Strategy became the first digital asset treasury company to be rated by a mainstream credit rating agency.”

However, some financial institutions that are deeply involved in the 加密currency field are not satisfied with S&P’s rating.

Matthew Sigel, head of digital asset research at VanEck, said that although Strategy’s business model is indeed vulnerable to shocks (currency price fluctuations), the company’s current debt repayment ability is not a problem .

Bitwise consultant Jeff Park’s opinion is more direct. He believes that S&P’s RAC calculation method for Strategy is unreasonable . Strategy’s core business is to hoard coins for appreciation, and there is no reason to deduct Bitcoin assets from equity.

In short, even though cryptocurrencies have begun to gradually integrate into the traditional financial world, there are still many frictions surrounding issues such as accounting methods and rating processing, and these contradictions will take longer to collide and resolve.

What is worth celebrating now is that Digital Asset Treasury has opened the door to mainstream rating agencies, as obtaining a rating is usually a necessary step for many pension funds and other institutional investors to enter the investment market. Although Strategy is currently rated “junk”, there is still a potential possibility of an upward adjustment, which may be an opportunity to attract more new funds to enter the market.

本文来源于互联网： S&P gives Strategy a B- rating. Why is the leading DAT considered junk by institutions?Recommended Articles

Related: Complete market review and order placement within two minutes. How does Pump.fun live streaming reshape the trading scen Author | Ethan ( @ethanzhang_网页3) In recent days, the popularity of “Pump.fun Live Broadcast” has continued to rise. On September 14th, co-founder Alon stated on X that the platform’s concurrent live streams had surpassed Rumble, reaching a market share approaching 1% of Twitch and approximately 10% of Kick. Simultaneously, the underlying mechanism underwent a structural overhaul : Project Ascend changed creator commissions from a flat 0.05% to a dynamic rate based on market capitalization—a maximum of 0.95% for small-cap creators, falling back to 0.05% as they scale. This seamlessly connects the “attention → transaction volume → streamer income” chain. On September 16th, the PUMP platform announced that “over $4 million was distributed to creators yesterday, the majority going to first-time creators,” prompting a surge in “first-time streamers” testing the waters.…

#分析# 比特币# 加密# 市场© 版权声明文章版权归作者所有，未经允许请勿转载。 上一篇 Crypto Stock Weekly Report: American Bitcoin Corp, a Bitcoin mining company backed by the Trump family, increased its ho 下一篇 155 Altcoin ETFs Await Approval: Can Institutional Funds Awaken the "Sleeping Bull Market"? 相关文章 Matrixport Market Observation: Macroeconomic stabilization and continued inflow of traditional funds have contributed to 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 34,166 Kyle Criticizes Hyperliquid, Arthur Hayes Responds with a $100K Bet 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 7,455 1 ENSO：构建链上捷径，区块链的下一个前沿领域 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 39,196 2 million ETH squeezed into the staking exit queue, what exactly happened? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 28,240 Hot money pours in, liquidity soars, and GMGN helps you make millions of dollars in this booming market 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 38,929 3 InfoFi Gold Digging Guide: In addition to Kaito, what other Alpha gameplays are there? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 35,158 2 无评论 您必须登录后才能发表评论！ 立即登录 没有评论... 最新文章 Did Jane Street “Manipulate” BTC? Decoding the AP System, Understanding the Power Struggle Behind ETF Creation and Redemption Pricing 17 小时前 543 Stop Comparing Bitcoin to Gold—It’s Now a High-Volatility Software Stock 17 小时前 655 Matrixport Research: $25 Billion Gamma Unwinding Imminent, Liquidity Yet to Return Behind the Rebound 17 小时前 608 ERC-5564: Ethereum’s Stealth Era Has Arrived, Receiving Addresses No Longer ‘Exposed’ 17 小时前 536 Hong Kong Regulatory Green Light: Asseto Enables DL Holdings to Achieve Compliance for Two RWA Business Implementations 17 小时前 591 热门网站TempoLighterGAIB滑翔机普朗克雷尔斯BCPokerVooi Bee.com 全球最大的 Web3 门户网站 合作伙伴 硬币卡 Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive 装甲 下载蜜蜂网络APP，开始web3之旅 白皮书 角色 常见问题 © 2021-2026.保留所有权利。. 隐私政策 | 服务条款 下载蜜蜂网络 APP 并开始 web3 之旅 全球最大的 Web3 门户网站 合作伙伴 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 白皮书 角色 常见问题 © 2021-2026.保留所有权利。. 隐私政策 | 服务条款 搜索 搜索InSite链上社会新闻 热门推荐： 空投猎人 数据分析 加密货币名人 陷阱探测器 简体中文 English 繁體中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 简体中文

智能索引记录