温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/zh_cn/55743.html
点击访问原文链接

BTC’s death domino: When Treasury companies go from “diamond hands” to the vanguard of sell-offsRecommended Articles | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
BTC’s death domino: When Treasury companies go from “diamond hands” to the vanguard of sell-offsRecommended Articles | Bee Network Login 热门新闻 备忘录启动板 人工智能代理 德西 TopChainExplorer 给 Newbee 100 倍金币 蜜蜂游戏 重要网站 必备应用程序 加密货币名人 德平 新手必备 陷阱探测器 基本工具 高级网站 交流 NFT 工具 你好、, 签出 Web3 宇宙 游戏 DApp 蜂巢 成长平台 生态 搜索 英语 充值金币 登录 下载 Web3 大学 游戏 DApp 蜂巢 生态 家•分析•BTC’s death domino: When Treasury companies go from “diamond hands” to the vanguard of sell-offsRecommended Articles BTC’s death domino: When Treasury companies go from “diamond hands” to the vanguard of sell-offsRecommended Articles分析6 年前更新怀亚特 23,094 21 编译自Odaily星球日报（ @OdailyChina )

Translator | Dingdang ( @XiaMiPP )

Editor’s Note: Over the past few months, BTC treasury companies have been viewed as key drivers of the 加密 market and a strong foundation supporting Bitcoin prices. However, this reality may be far less robust than imagined. When price volatility and shareholder pressure combine, even treasury companies can instantly shift from “guardians” to “sellers.” This article attempts to deduce the potential market path for BTC treasury companies over the next 6–12 months. Core assumptions:

Entities: 10 BTC treasury companies, holding Bitcoin of varying sizes, with market-to-net-value (mNAV) multiples in the range of 1.0x–5.0x. Difference: Company quality is determined by financial size and management conviction/marketing capabilities. Background: The initial price of Bitcoin was $120,000. Core logic: Once some companies choose to sell BTC to repurchase stocks, it will trigger a reflexive cycle: price drops → mNAV is under pressure → more companies are forced to sell → selling intensifies → prices fall further.

The original text is as follows Assume there are 10 BTC treasury companies holding Bitcoin. They trade at varying premiums (mNAV multiples) on the secondary market, ranging from 1.0x to 5.0x. At this point, the BTC price is $120,000. Their quality varies, with “quality” depending on the size of the treasury, as well as management’s conviction and marketing capabilities.

Some low-quality BTC treasury companies were the first to fall below 1.0 x mNAV. For teams lacking firm conviction, the most logical move was to sell some Bitcoin and repurchase shares. After all, this could increase net asset value per share in the short term. Note that these companies sold some BTC at $120,000.

As a result of the aforementioned sell-off, the Bitcoin price fell back to $115,000 (this price is primarily used for illustrative purposes). Due to the high beta correlation with BTC, some other treasury companies (including those that had previously repurchased shares) saw their mNAV values continue to decline. Consequently, another four or five companies sold Bitcoin to repurchase shares, at a price of $115,000.

The market gradually realized that perhaps eight or nine out of ten companies were more concerned with short-term shareholder defense than long-term BTC accumulation. Investors began to anticipate the consequences of these companies collectively selling 30% to 50% of their holdings. After all, even MSTR had fallen to a 0.5x valuation at its 2022 low. Consequently, BTC was quickly repriced to $100,000, and most treasury companies fell below 1.0x.

Some mid-quality treasury companies, previously hesitant, began to feel pressure from both the market and shareholders to maintain their mNAV and joined the sell-off. At this time, the market saw approximately $500 million to $1 billion in Bitcoin sell-offs per week. Even high-quality companies (such as MSTR, 3350, and XXI) struggled to defend their positions with buy orders when the price fell to around 1.2x. BTC fell to $90,000.

The entire treasury company ecosystem, including high-quality players, saw its BTC/USD ratio fall below 1.0x. MSTR preferred shares fell below $0.70 to $1 par, and there were even rumors that Saylor was considering suspending dividends. Some companies previously considered staunch holders (such as 3350 and XXI) also began selling Bitcoin to cover operating costs. BTC plummeted to $80,000.

By this point, most low-quality treasury firms had nearly emptied their BTC coffers. Early “bottom-pickers” began to enter the market, but the cruelty of the reflexive cycle lies in the fact that the sell-off would spread up the quality chain, further amplifying its scale and speed. As mid- and high-quality firms also capitulated completely, the largest Bitcoin holders began to enter the market, with weekly selling pressure reaching $1.5 billion to $3 billion.

It’s important to note that, in addition to MSTR, BTC Treasury companies collectively hold approximately 350,000 比特币s, worth approximately $40 billion at current prices. This sell-off is long enough to continue, and if MSTR is forced to participate, the sell-off will be even more brutal, potentially sending BTC down to $70,000.

Possible results The lowest-quality companies actually benefited because they were forced to sell their BTC first, avoiding lower prices. The problem is that once they sell, the company ceases to be an “iterative BTC treasury” and becomes a “one-time valuation gamble.” Even a single sale would damage their reputation as a “diamond hand treasury company,” significantly reducing future capital inflows. If you believe BTC still has the potential for a 30-40% compound annual growth rate (which I do!), then holding on will ultimately be fine. Currently, I believe Saylor is the only company that will desperately hold onto BTC, but there may be other candidates (such as 3350 or NAKA). However, until the majority of the sell-off is complete, it’s not worth a long-term bullish position for any treasury company. The worst hit are the middle-of-the-roaders. They are neither radical “sharks” nor have enough faith. In the above scenario, these companies (such as MARA, RIOT, SMLR) will be sold in stages (6) to (7), with an average selling price of about $75,000. This logic also applies to treasury companies for other assets, but ETH may be an exception. This is because ETH treasury companies are oligopolistic: BMNR and SBET hold approximately 75% of treasury ETH (90% if DYNX and BTBT are included). This makes it possible for them to form some kind of coordination or “collusion” to avoid a vicious cycle of selling. While the likelihood of such an agreement ultimately being maintained is low, the probability of success increases with greater concentration. This is analogous to the banking consortium that was involved in the Archegos meltdown in traditional finance. Aggressive banks (like Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank) were the first to liquidate their positions, resulting in far better outcomes than slower-moving players (like Credit Suisse and Nomura) who attempted to coordinate their exits. Note: The target price of BTC here is not $70,000. The price in the article is only used to illustrate the deduction scenario.

本文来源于互联网： BTC’s death domino: When Treasury companies go from “diamond hands” to the vanguard of sell-offsRecommended Articles

Related: Understanding the Key Points of ETH Treasury Operations: Not Holding, But StakingRecommended Articles Author | Dingdang ( @XiaMiPP ) From SharpLink Gaming to BitMine, the ETH treasury strategies of publicly listed companies have driven a new growth narrative for ETH, pushing the price of ETH from a peak of $2,100 to $3,940, an increase of over 87%. A new trend is emerging: the focus of corporate treasury strategies is quietly shifting from “holding” to “staking .” This will reshape people’s perception of the “activity” of crypto assets: ETH will no longer be seen as a static reserve, but as a productive asset with sustainable output. SharpLink Gaming is a pioneer in this trend. Since launching its ETH treasury strategy on June 2nd, the company has staked all of its approximately 438,190 ETH. To date, it has accumulated approximately 722 ETH in staking rewards,…

#分析# 比特币# 加密# 市场© 版权声明文章版权归作者所有，未经允许请勿转载。 上一篇 Who Will Carry the Solana Flag? A Look at the Candidates for Solana's "Tom Lee"Recommended Articles 下一篇 The revelation of the interest rate cut cycle: looking at the structural opportunities in the crypto market from histori 相关文章 热门What signals did the Federal Reserve’s latest Fintech meeting send? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 19,849 ETH falls below $4,100. Is it a “continued fall” or a bottoming out?Recommended Articles 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 23,502 1 Full transcript of Vitalik Buterin’s speech: A 30-minute introduction to Ethereum (2025 version) 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 18,485 Listed companies follow the trend and buy cryptocurrencies. What are the potential returns and risks? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 28,688 2 National-Level Players Enter the Arena: The 2025 Revelation of Uncontrolled Crypto Crime 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 10,777 A Conversation with Pantera: The Logic Behind Spending $1.25 Billion on Solana TokensRecommended Articles 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 23,290 3 无评论 您必须登录后才能发表评论！ 立即登录 没有评论... 最新文章 Did Jane Street “Manipulate” BTC? Decoding the AP System, Understanding the Power Struggle Behind ETF Creation and Redemption Pricing 17 小时前 547 Stop Comparing Bitcoin to Gold—It’s Now a High-Volatility Software Stock 17 小时前 652 Matrixport Research: $25 Billion Gamma Unwinding Imminent, Liquidity Yet to Return Behind the Rebound 17 小时前 602 ERC-5564: Ethereum’s Stealth Era Has Arrived, Receiving Addresses No Longer ‘Exposed’ 17 小时前 530 Hong Kong Regulatory Green Light: Asseto Enables DL Holdings to Achieve Compliance for Two RWA Business Implementations 17 小时前 599 热门网站TempoLighterGAIB滑翔机普朗克雷尔斯BCPokerVooi Bee.com 全球最大的 Web3 门户网站 合作伙伴 硬币卡 Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive 装甲 下载蜜蜂网络APP，开始web3之旅 白皮书 角色 常见问题 © 2021-2026.保留所有权利。. 隐私政策 | 服务条款 下载蜜蜂网络 APP 并开始 web3 之旅 全球最大的 Web3 门户网站 合作伙伴 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 白皮书 角色 常见问题 © 2021-2026.保留所有权利。. 隐私政策 | 服务条款 搜索 搜索InSite链上社会新闻 热门推荐： 空投猎人 数据分析 加密货币名人 陷阱探测器 简体中文 English 繁體中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 简体中文

智能索引记录