温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/zh_cn/54934.html
点击访问原文链接

It’s 2025, and VCs don’t want to invest in crypto-native projects anymoreRecommended Articles | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
It’s 2025, and VCs don’t want to invest in crypto-native projects anymoreRecommended Articles | Bee Network Login 热门新闻 备忘录启动板 人工智能代理 德西 TopChainExplorer 给 Newbee 100 倍金币 蜜蜂游戏 重要网站 必备应用程序 加密货币名人 德平 新手必备 陷阱探测器 基本工具 高级网站 交流 NFT 工具 你好、, 签出 Web3 宇宙 游戏 DApp 蜂巢 成长平台 生态 搜索 英语 充值金币 登录 下载 Web3 大学 游戏 DApp 蜂巢 生态 家•分析•正文 It’s 2025, and VCs don’t want to invest in crypto-native projects anymoreRecommended Articles分析7 年前更新怀亚特 22,020 63 编译自Odaily星球日报Golem（ @网页3_golem )

In 2025, 加密currency will see the dawn of mainstream adoption. With the US GENIUS Act signed into law, the crypto market finally has clear stablecoin regulation, and mainstream institutions are actively adopting cryptocurrencies. Compared to the past 10 years, it’s a win!

As crypto crosses the chasm, early-stage venture capital is starting to see more crypto-adjacent projects , rather than just crypto-native ones . “Crypto-native” refers to projects built by “crypto experts” for “crypto experts,” while “crypto-adjacent” refers to projects that use crypto within other, larger, traditional sectors. This is the first time I’ve witnessed this shift in my career, and this post will discuss the key differences when building the two approaches.

Projects built for crypto-native users To date, the most successful crypto products have almost all been built for crypto-native users: Hyperliquid, Uniswap, Ethena, Aave, and so on. Like any subculture, crypto technology is so cutting-edge that those outside the crypto-native bubble can’t “get” it or become enthusiastic, daily users . Only crypto-native developers, working on the front lines, have the risk tolerance and willingness to personally test every new product, enduring the rigors of hacking, online fraud, and so on.

Most traditional Silicon Valley venture capital firms previously passed on crypto-native projects because they believed the total addressable market (TAM) of crypto-native users was too small. This was true, as crypto technology was still in its very early stages of development. At the time, there were virtually no on-chain applications, and the term “DeFi” wasn’t coined until October 2018 in a San Francisco group chat.

But entrepreneurs at the time had to cling to hope, hoping that macro tailwinds would eventually arrive and significantly increase the total addressable market (TAM) for crypto-native applications. Sure enough, the DeFi summer of 2020 arrived. Liquidity mining, coupled with the zero-interest rate era of 2021, rapidly expanded the market for crypto-native applications. Overnight, every venture capitalist in Silicon Valley, driven by FOMO, flocked to the cryptocurrency space and sought advice from crypto VCs, hoping they could make up for the missed opportunities of the previous four years.

Yet, both then and today, the total addressable market (TAM) for crypto-native apps remains quite small compared to the non-cryptocurrency market. The number of crypto users on X (a prominent social media platform in the crypto space) is likely only in the tens of thousands at most. Therefore, to reach nine figures in annual revenue (ARR), the average revenue per user (ARPU) must be extremely high. This leads to the following important fact:

The core of crypto-native applications is to be built for heavy crypto users.

Every successful crypto-native product exhibits an extreme power-law distribution of user usage. Last month, the top 737 users (0.2% of total users) accounted for half of OpenSea’s trading 体积 ; the top 196 users (0.06% of total users) accounted for half of Polymarket’s trading 体积 .

As a founder of a crypto-native project, what should keep you awake at night is how to retain your core users, rather than attracting new ones . This goes against the traditional Silicon Valley mindset, which focuses on user growth, such as the number of daily active users (DAU).

But user retention in the crypto space has always been difficult. Core users are often profit-driven and respond well to incentives. This makes it easy for emerging competitors to emerge out of nowhere and erode your market share simply by poaching a few of your core users. Examples like Blur and OpenSea, Axiom and Photon, and LetsBonk and Pump.fun all illustrate this fact.

All of this suggests that crypto-native products are far less defensible than Web 2 , and everything is open source, making them easily copyable. Crypto-native projects come and go, rarely lasting more than a single cycle, or even a few months. Founders who become wealthy after a token offering (TGE) often quietly exit their projects and turn to angel investing as a post-retirement pursuit.

The only secret to retaining core users is continuous product innovation, staying one step ahead of the competition. Seven years later, Uniswap remains competitive by consistently rolling out innovative features that delight its core users: V3 centralized liquidity, followed by UniswapX, Unichain, and V4 hooks. Despite building a decentralized exchange (DEX), one of the most crowded and competitive sectors in the crowded and competitive crypto industry, Uniswap continues to stand out.

Building Converged Encryption Applications Past attempts to apply blockchain technology to larger, real-world markets, such as supply chain management or interbank payments, have failed due to premature adoption. Fortune 500 companies have experimented with blockchain in their innovation labs, but haven’t been serious enough to truly deploy it at scale in production. Remember those popular slogans like “Blockchain is not Bitcoin” and “Distributed Ledger Technology”?

Today, we’re seeing a 180-degree shift in incumbents’ attitudes toward crypto. Major banks and corporations are launching their own stablecoins. The Trump administration’s regulatory clarity has opened the “Overton Window” for mainstream cryptocurrency adoption. Cryptocurrency is no longer the unregulated Wild West of finance.

For the first time in our careers, we will see more crypto-integrated projects than crypto-native projects. And for good reason, the biggest wins in the coming years will likely come from crypto-integrated projects rather than crypto-native projects, as traditional financial markets have IPOs in the tens of billions of dollars, while crypto TGEs are in the hundreds of millions to billions of dollars .

Examples of such projects include :

Fintech companies using stablecoins for cross-border payments; Robotics companies using DePIN incentives for data collection; A consumer goods company using zero-knowledge transport layer security (zkTLS) to verify private data; …… What these projects have in common is that they treat encryption technology as a feature rather than a product .

In the crypto-integrated industry, heavy users are still important, but their influence is diminishing. When crypto becomes merely a function, the success of a project becomes less about crypto itself and more about whether the entrepreneur is a deep expert in the crypto-integrated industry and understands the key factors. Let’s take fintech as an example.

Fintech is all about securing distribution channels with favorable unit economics (CAC/LTV). Emerging crypto fintech startups today constantly worry that a more established non-crypto fintech company with broader distribution channels will adopt crypto as a feature, crushing them or driving up their CACs, making them uncompetitive. Furthermore, unlike crypto-native projects, they can’t save themselves by issuing a token that trades well based on narrative.

Ironically, crypto payments have long been a less attractive category, but the period leading up to 2023 is a prime time to start crypto fintech companies and seize distribution channels. After Stripe acquired Bridge, we saw founders of crypto-native companies pivot from DeFi to payments, but they were inevitably killed off by former Revolut employees who were well versed in fintech techniques.

What should crypto VC do? What does crypto-integration mean for crypto VCs? It’s important not to adversely select founders who would be passed over by non-crypto VCs, as crypto VCs are often fools who don’t have a deep understanding of non-crypto native industries. This adverse selection largely manifests itself in selecting crypto-native founders who have recently turned to crypto-integration.

But the uncomfortable truth is that the cryptocurrency space, in general, tends to adversely select founders who are unable to succeed in Web 2.

Historically, a good way for crypto VC founders to capitalize on arbitrage is to seek out talent outside of Silicon Valley networks. These individuals lack stellar resumes (think Stanford, Stripe) and are not adept at pitching to VCs, but they possess a deep understanding of crypto-native culture and have built a passionate online community. Hayden left Siemens’ mechanical engineering department to learn Vyper and create Uniswap. Stani founded Aave (formerly ETHLend) while completing law school in Finland.

But the founder archetype of a successful crypto-integrated project is very different from that of a crypto-native project. They aren’t the Wild West financial cowboys who are deeply versed in the intricacies of the crypto-native industry and able to cultivate a cult of personality around themselves and their token networks. Instead, they are likely to be more mature, business-savvy founders who may come from traditional industries and have unique go-to-market strategies for acquiring users. As the crypto industry matures, so too will the next wave of successful founders.

Inspiration for entrepreneurs of fusion crypto projects The Telegram ICO in early 2018 perfectly exemplified the divergence in thinking between Silicon Valley venture capitalists and crypto-native venture capitalists. Firms like Kleiner Perkins, Benchmark, Sequoia, Lightspeed, and Redpoint invested in Telegram because they believed it had the users and distribution channels to become a dominant application platform. Meanwhile, nearly all crypto-native venture capitalists passed on the platform. The crypto industry currently has no shortage of consumer applications. However, the vast majority of these applications are not areas venture capital is willing to support due to a lack of sustainable revenue. For these types of businesses, founders should not seek venture capital but instead bootstrap and find a path to profitability. Then, in the months before the consumer trend shifts, they can continue to capitalize on the current spending spree and print money. Nubank, a digital banking platform based in Brazil, had an unfair advantage because they entered the fintech space before the term was even clearly 定义ned. Similarly, they competed for users with Brazil’s incumbent banks, not with other fintech startups. Brazilians were so fed up with their existing banks that they switched to Nubank immediately after its product launch, giving Nubank the rare combination of near-zero customer acquisition costs (CAC) and product-market fit. If you’re building a stablecoin neobank for emerging markets, you shouldn’t be based in San Francisco or New York. You need to be physically present in those countries, interacting with users. That’s actually a good initial screening criterion. 本文来源于互联网： It’s 2025, and VCs don’t want to invest in crypto-native projects anymoreRecommended Articles

Related: The DeFi Godfather controls a US stock company with $2.03 million, and the management launches a counterattack

LQR House, a publicly traded liquor retailer located in Miami Beach, Florida, has not been doing well lately. On July 14, 2025, documents from the U.S. Securities and 交流 Commission (SEC) showed that Compound founder Robert Leshner used his personal funds to purchase approximately 600,000 shares of Nasdaq-listed company LQR House Inc. (LQR), with a shareholding ratio of 56.9%, making him the largest shareholder. According to the Form 13D filed, Leshners investment totaled approximately $2.03 million, with some of the shares purchased through Interactive Brokers at $3.77 per share. The news sent LQR House shares up 45% in trading on Monday and to $10 by the close of trading on Wednesday, a three-fold increase from the purchase price. However, Leshners acquisition was not smooth sailing, and soon a capital offensive…

 

#分析# 比特币# 加密# 定义# 交易所# 市场# 初创公司# 代币# web3© 版权声明文章版权归作者所有，未经允许请勿转载。 上一篇 了解 ETH 财务操作要点：不是持有，而是押注推荐文章 下一篇 Crypto Baptism: Meet Wall StreetRecommended Articles 相关文章 Polymarket Developer Essentials: 18 Core Open-Source Tool Libraries Validated in Practice 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 8,351 BitMart VIP Insights | 十月加密货币市场回顾与热点话题分析 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 17,745 Matrixport Market Watch: Finding Support Amidst Pressure, Crypto Market Enters a Critical Observation Period 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 16,845 Fed Rate Cut Expectations: Why Employment Data Isn’t a Key Factor 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 18,878 1 稳定币市场报告：市值持续增长，但流入速度明显放缓 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 39,383 Lawyer CZ recounts the behind-the-scenes story of the “amnesty”. 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 15,572 无评论 您必须登录后才能发表评论！ 立即登录 没有评论... Bee.com 全球最大的 Web3 门户网站 合作伙伴 硬币卡 Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive 装甲 下载蜜蜂网络APP，开始web3之旅 白皮书 角色 常见问题 © 2021-2026.保留所有权利。. 隐私政策 | 服务条款 下载蜜蜂网络 APP 并开始 web3 之旅 全球最大的 Web3 门户网站 合作伙伴 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 白皮书 角色 常见问题 © 2021-2026.保留所有权利。. 隐私政策 | 服务条款 搜索 搜索InSite链上社会新闻 热门推荐： 空投猎人 数据分析 加密货币名人 陷阱探测器 简体中文 English 繁體中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 简体中文

智能索引记录