温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/zh_cn/54810.html
点击访问原文链接

Bringing LST to Wall Street: Solana ETF’s “Staking Hack” CampaignRecommended Articles | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
Bringing LST to Wall Street: Solana ETF’s “Staking Hack” CampaignRecommended Articles | Bee Network Login 热门新闻 备忘录启动板 人工智能代理 德西 TopChainExplorer 给 Newbee 100 倍金币 蜜蜂游戏 重要网站 必备应用程序 加密货币名人 德平 新手必备 陷阱探测器 基本工具 高级网站 交流 NFT 工具 你好、, 签出 Web3 宇宙 游戏 DApp 蜂巢 成长平台 生态 搜索 英语 充值金币 登录 下载 Web3 大学 游戏 DApp 蜂巢 生态 家•分析•Bringing LST to Wall Street: Solana ETF’s “Staking Hack” CampaignRecommended Articles Bringing LST to Wall Street: Solana ETF’s “Staking Hack” CampaignRecommended Articles分析7 年前更新怀亚特 23,8211 47 Author | Ethan ( @ethanzhang_web 3 )

On May 20 of this year, the SEC pressed the pause button for the first time, requiring 21 Shares, Bitwise, VanEck and Canary Capital ‘s spot Solana ETF to wait a little longer – the reason being that “more time is needed to evaluate legal and policy issues.”

Less than a month later, the tide suddenly turned. On June 11th, multiple sources familiar with the matter revealed that the SEC had verbally notified all potential issuers , stating that they must submit a revised S-1 within the next week and provide their comments within 30 days . The SEC specifically requested additional descriptions of “in-kind redemption” and “pledge,” clearly implying that “pledges are negotiable.”

Soon, large asset management companies responded collectively: six institutions including Franklin Templeton, Galaxy, Grayscale, VanEck, and Fidelity submitted updated versions of S-1 on June 13-14; the term “Staked ETP” appeared for the first time in the SEC’s trace document, and pledge became one of the chapter titles.

On June 16, CoinShares joined the battle and became the eighth applicant; on June 24, 灰度 wrote down a 2.5% management fee rate in the new version of S-1, using “high fee + high brand” to bet that it would be the first to pass.

Entering July, the pace of SOL ETF has clearly accelerated:

July 7th – CoinDesk revealed that the SEC set a hard deadline of “end of July submission” in order to approve the first batch of spot SOL ETFs before October 10th . July 8 – Fidelity application was delayed 35 days “pending additional documentation”; July 28th — Grayscale applications are postponed again, with the new deadline falling to October 10th; July 29th — Cboe BZX filed two 19b-4s at once: ① Canary Staked INJ ETF; ② Invesco × Galaxy Spot Solana ETF , clarifying the “spot + staking” dual insurance; July 31st – ① Jito Labs + Bitwise + Multicoin + VanEck + Solana Institute submitted an open letter to the SEC Crypto Asset Task Force, officially advocating for “Staked ETP”; ② 21 Shares simultaneously submitted a revised S-1 on the same day, completing the pledge terms at the last minute (see SEC archive documents). At this point, the back-and-forth of “two delays + three rounds of revisions + four new applications” has been completed in two months – pushing the core issue we are going to discuss today to the forefront: Is it feasible to include Liquid Staking 代币 (LST) in an ETF?

Why: Why do LSTs desperately want to enter ETFs?
LST List and Current Status

Note: APR is the data from the official website of each LST issuer on August 1. This data will change in real time and is subject to actual presentation.

Triple benefits
Passive funds = long-term lock-up

The larger the ETF, the more it can transform LST into a pool of funds where investors can earn continuous returns without any intention of reducing their holdings. For Jito and Marinade, this directly adds billions of long-term stake, allowing the protocol to maintain stable commissions and naturally boosting TVL.

Deep jump in liquidity

The ETF will continue to change hands in the secondary market, and the LST corresponding to the fund shares will require daily subscription and redemption to make markets. 市场 makers will simultaneously build the depth of LST/SOL and LST/USDC , providing LST with a thicker bottom than the DeFi pool.

Brand credibility spillover

Entering the SEC compliance framework means being “endorsed by Wall Street.” Once the JitoSOL/mSOL name begins appearing in public documents like I/Os and N-CSRs, the cost of due diligence for ordinary institutions plummets, and LST is upgraded from a “niche DeFi credential” to a “recordable financial asset.”

What is the impact? Three main lines of analysis
Solana: Security + Valuation Double Improvement
The pledge rate will increase – based on the data from H1 2025, if the first batch of spot SOL ETFs raises a total of US$5 billion and 80% is allocated to LST, the chain will have an additional 24 million pledged SOLs (based on 167 USD/SOL) at one time, and the pledge rate will increase from 66% to nearly 71%, and the network’s Nakamoto coefficient will also rise. The valuation anchor “yield” —a staking APR of ≈ 7%—has become a segment of the DeFi risk-free yield curve. Buyers can use a simplified discount of “SOL current price / 7%” rather than a pure beta parabola, which is more valuable for the sector. For other ETFs:

Conclusion: If the SOL LST ETF passes first, the ETH camp will be forced to write more detailed “native staking” clauses, and the BTC ETF can only continue to rely on lowering fees to maintain its attractiveness.

For buyers of ETFs:
Get three benefits with one ticket – spot beta + 7%+ annualized return + secondary market liquidity; for accounts with heavy compliance constraints such as Family Office/pension funds, this is the first “high-yield PoS ticket you can buy”. Tax & Settlement Friendly – Staking income is often taxed as capital gains rather than operating income in the 40 Act/33 Act structure, which is better than personal on-chain staking. Fee wars —currently disclosed fees range from Grayscale’s 2.5% to an expected 0.9% (industry speculation stems from the VanEck framework). Whoever offers the highest returns will attract orders . Bitcoin ETFs have already seen fees swell to 0.19-0.25%, and the fee war is poised to spread. Is the appeal strong enough? What are the risks?

Based on the above data, the probability of passing the review is approximately 60-70%. At the same time, the author believes that in order to successfully pass the review, the issuer should provide at least three types of response plans in the S-1:

Option 1: Discount Circuit Breaker Threshold

It is recommended to set an upper limit for the deviation of the LST market price from the reference NAV (for example: ± 5%); once the threshold is reached, primary market subscriptions/redemptions are suspended and a “spread adjustment” or cash creation backup process is initiated to ensure that fund shares remain aligned with the value of the underlying assets.

Option 2: NAV calculation and calibration

At least two independent data sources should be introduced: an on-chain oracle (such as Chainlink) + a compliant custodian/market maker (such as Coinbase Prime, Cumberland, etc.); 10-second updates are recommended, and redundancy and failover plans should be disclosed to facilitate regulators to assess price distortion risks.

Option 3: Contract Risk Coverage

At the smart contract level, in addition to annual third-party audits, you can consider purchasing Lloyd’s of London, Nexus Mutual , or equivalent insurance policies to cover extreme situations such as hacker attacks and collateral penalties; and clearly state the claims process, insurance limit, and trigger conditions in the prospectus to allow investors and regulators to have quantitative expectations of potential losses.

(Note: The above measures are a “reference framework” proposed by the author based on public cases and common industry practices. Specific thresholds and technical routes still require further communication and determination between the issuer and the SEC.)

Conclusion
From “blacklisting” in May to “promoting” the launch in July, the SEC reversed course in just 70 days: no longer dwelling on “whether” to list, it began discussing “how”—for the first time, the footnotes to “Crypto ETF 2.0” included staking and LST. Meanwhile, on the other side of the table, 加密 players, with “an open letter and a revised S-1,” told Wall Street: “We understand maximizing capital efficiency better than you do.” The next step depends on whether regulators are willing to allow this “high-yield, low-maintenance” staking game to truly enter retirement funds and 401(k)s.

If it is really released, it will not only be a victory for Solana, but also a milestone for the PoS narrative to move from the chain to the exchange and from geeks to institutions.

本文来源于互联网： Bringing LST to Wall Street: Solana ETF’s “Staking Hack” CampaignRecommended Articles

Related: ETH vs SOL: Crypto War in 2025, Trillion Capital Bet on the New and Old OrderRecommended Articles Author | Ethan ( @ethanzhang_网页3 ) “2021 is the year of Layer 1’s dominance, and 2024 is the year of Meme’s carnival. So, where will the main market trend go in 2025?” The answer to this hotly debated question on the X platform is being clearly revealed by mainstream capital: With the successful legislation of the GENIUS Act and the formal inclusion of stablecoins in the U.S. sovereign regulatory framework, a new multi-dimensional financial narrative integrating “stablecoin × RWA × ETF × DeFi” is rising strongly. In this profound evolution of cross-chain finance, the core focus is no longer Bitcoin or Meme coin, but the battle between Ethereum and Solana over the old and new order. The two public chains have essential differences in technical architecture, compliance strategy, expansion path,…

#分析# 比特币# 加密# 定义# 交易所# 市场# 代币# web3© 版权声明文章版权归作者所有，未经允许请勿转载。 上一篇 Trump's tariff bomb exploded, and the crypto market went into "defense mode." Where will the market go in August?Recomme 下一篇 The Satoshi Nakamoto statue theft: A farce with a 0.1 BTC rewardRecommended Articles 相关文章 安全投资从这里开始：DeFi 质押欺诈预防指南 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 40,074 风险投资人自述：我是如何错失虚拟经济百倍回报机遇的？ 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 39,848 1 Bitcoin Tests $90,000 Levels Amid Speculation Around Trump’s Crypto Summit 罗章明 40,484 2 Solana 2025 Report Card: Annual Revenue of $15 Billion, Surpassing the Sum of “Hyperliquid + Ethereum” 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 11,875 Tracing the Decoupling of $XUSD: Balancer Vulnerability and the Butterfly Effect of DeFi Leverage 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 32,701 New security module Umbrella is launched, how will Aave staking security change? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 26,950 1 1 条评论 您必须登录后才能发表评论！ 立即登录 总管 客人 哈哈

3周前 最新文章 UniSat Releases Phase Updates and Upgrades, Continuously Building the Bitcoin Ecosystem 1 天前 1,088 Jack Dorsey’s Company: 4,000 White-Collar Workers Are Being Replaced by AI 1 天前 924 Latest Stablecoin Report: Real Distribution and Flow Are Far More Important Than Supply 1 天前 872 Sui DeFi’s “Three-Engine” Revolution: How New Capabilities, New Assets, and New Programs Are Building the Future of On-Chain Finance? 1 天前 784 On-chain Investigator ZachXBT Confirms: Axiom Employees Exploited Internal Privileges for Insider Trading 1 天前 769 热门网站TempoLighterGAIB滑翔机普朗克雷尔斯BCPokerVooi Bee.com 全球最大的 Web3 门户网站 合作伙伴 硬币卡 Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive 装甲 下载蜜蜂网络APP，开始web3之旅 白皮书 角色 常见问题 © 2021-2026.保留所有权利。. 隐私政策 | 服务条款 下载蜜蜂网络 APP 并开始 web3 之旅 全球最大的 Web3 门户网站 合作伙伴 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 白皮书 角色 常见问题 © 2021-2026.保留所有权利。. 隐私政策 | 服务条款 搜索 搜索InSite链上社会新闻 热门推荐： 空投猎人 数据分析 加密货币名人 陷阱探测器 简体中文 English 繁體中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 简体中文

智能索引记录