温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/zh_cn/51353.html
点击访问原文链接

Circle and Tether may not be competing with the same species, the stablecoin value realization hierarchy model says | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
Circle and Tether may not be competing with the same species, the stablecoin value realization hierarchy model says | Bee Network Login 热门新闻 备忘录启动板 人工智能代理 德西 TopChainExplorer 给 Newbee 100 倍金币 蜜蜂游戏 重要网站 必备应用程序 加密货币名人 德平 新手必备 陷阱探测器 基本工具 高级网站 交流 NFT 工具 你好、, 签出 Web3 宇宙 游戏 DApp 蜂巢 成长平台 生态 搜索 英语 充值金币 登录 下载 Web3 大学 游戏 DApp 蜂巢 生态 家•分析•Circle and Tether may not be competing with the same species, the stablecoin value realization hierarchy model says Circle and Tether may not be competing with the same species, the stablecoin value realization hierarchy model says分析9个月前更新怀亚特 28,5611 26

Original author | Nathan ( @proofofnathan )

Compiled by | Odaily Planet Daily ( @OdailyChina )

Translator | Dingdang ( @XiaMiPP )

Editors note: Since Circle announced its listing, an invisible boundary in the stablecoin market has been officially drawn: USDC and USDT have begun to take two different development paths. With compliance and transparency as its core, USDC has gradually embedded itself into the U.S. financial system and become a permitted dollar serving institutional users and financial technology scenarios; while USDT, relying on its extensive on-chain liquidity and deep market foundation, continues to play a key role in global transactions, payments, and asset hedging scenarios.

This difference actually reflects the different priorities of value realization of stablecoins in different markets. For some users, compliance and programmability are crucial; for others, liquidity, accessibility, and permissionless usage experience are the top priority. Therefore, we need a new cognitive model to understand how different types of users realize value through stablecoins. This is exactly what the Hierarchy of Stablecoin Value Realization is about.

Although everyone benefits from stablecoins in different ways, ultimately these benefits come from four core value propositions: low cost, high speed, no permission required, and programmability.

The original author Nathan explained in another article The What and Why of Programmable Money : Programmable money is money that can set behavioral logic like code. It is a stable currency and the fuel of smart contracts. It can set: when, why, and how to transfer money. And all of this no longer depends on banks, no longer depends on trust, but only on the code itself.

These four value propositions correspond to four core usage scenarios: storage, payment, transfer, and income .

The Hierarchy of Value Realisation is a new cognitive model that explains what different types of users value most in stablecoins.

This article will focus on two user groups: people who need stablecoins and people who dont need stablecoins so much , namely: emerging market users and Western market users.

Two major user groups of stablecoins

Simply put, in emerging markets , stablecoins are building a new financial infrastructure; in Western markets, stablecoins are more of a supplement and are integrated into existing financial technology (Fintech) and traditional financial systems (TradFi).

This rule is widely applicable to both emerging stablecoin projects and established players.

Based on this, we can outline different value realization levels for the two types of users respectively.

1. Value realization levels of users in Western markets

The Western market mainly corresponds to the Global North countries: they are politically stable, have a developed financial system, and most people have bank accounts and can earn interest on their savings.

In these markets, “ programmability ” is the core driver of stablecoin innovation. This is similar to the explosion of the Internet, iPhone, or smart contracts: programmability brings new financial innovation, and financial innovation is what the Western world loves and excels at.

The second is “ speed ”. The settlement speed of cross-border or local payments has long been an important challenge in the Fintech field. Settlement delays consume liquidity and bring opportunity costs, so it ranks second in Western markets.

“ Cost ” ranked third. Although reducing transfer costs is a major attraction of stablecoins, transaction fees in Western markets are not high, far less than the outrageous $115 fee for a $200 remittance in emerging markets.

“ No permission required ” is the least important in Western markets, as the vast majority of people already have bank accounts and can easily pay with cash or transfers, so they don’t need to rely on stablecoins to obtain financial services.

所以， Circle and USDC have more advantages in the Western market. As a company that is essentially fintech-oriented, Circle emphasizes programmability, low cost and efficiency, which are in line with the usage preferences of Western users. Today, more and more Western companies choose to develop based on USDC when building stablecoin solutions.

此外， yield has gradually become an additional concern for Western users. Since they are accustomed to earning interest from bank deposits, they will question why they cannot earn similar returns by holding stablecoins.

This is completely different in emerging markets, where users are more concerned about the currency stability brought by stablecoins, especially the ability to obtain US dollars, rather than the returns.

According to the author: In fact, yield has never been a decisive factor in the success of stablecoins in these markets. As industry analysts point out, the reason why USDT has become the worlds most liquid stablecoin is that it does not need to distribute treasury bond returns to users, and it can dominate with its strong accessibility and deep liquidity foundation. For many users in areas with high inflation or capital constraints, avoiding the risk of local currency depreciation is far more realistic than an annualized 3% interest. They are more concerned about: Can I safely convert my assets into US dollars, can I transfer them at any time, and can I use them locally.

Therefore, in these areas where there is real product-market fit, the liquidity of stablecoins is far more important than profitability . Liquidity tends to be concentrated, eventually forming a network effect for the top stablecoins. This is why stablecoins like USDT can still be widely adopted around the world even if they lack a profit mechanism.

2. Value realization level of users in emerging markets

Compared with the West, emerging markets (the “global South”) have relatively weak financial foundations, widespread and severe local currency inflation, and low banking service penetration.

The emergence of stablecoins allows users in these regions to freely obtain, transfer and use stable currencies such as the US dollar for the first time, which was unimaginable in the past.

所以， 未经许可的 is the core and most transformative value proposition for users in emerging markets. Whether or not they have a bank account, users can directly access the US dollar system, thereby unlocking financial freedom.

The second is low cost. In emerging markets, cross-border remittance fees remain high. For example, when a father sends money home to support his family, the handling fee may eat up a large part of the transfer amount. Stablecoins greatly reduce this remittance cost.

The third is speed. The current cross-border transfer system is inefficient, and it often takes days or even weeks for funds to arrive. Stablecoins can achieve transfers in seconds, solving the life and economic difficulties caused by delayed funds.

Finally, there is programmability. Although this value proposition also has a profound impact on emerging markets (such as unlocking insurance, lending, contract payment and other services), its perceived value in the short term is slightly lower than the first three.

总之， Tethers USDT shines in emerging markets. Tether provides critical financial services to millions of people without bank accounts through freely usable, widely accepted and highly liquid USDT. Its success is precisely based on the realization of these basic value points.

Summary

Circle is adapted to the Western market because it better fits the needs of fintech companies;

Tether serves a wider user base, especially those who truly rely on stablecoins.

In other words, Circle wins in terms of “tool attributes” and Tether wins in terms of “survival needs”.

This article is sourced from the internet: Circle and Tether may not be competing with the same species, the stablecoin value realization hierarchy model says

Related: Gate Research Institute’s April on-chain data interpretation: Solana transactions are active, Ethereum funds are returni summary • In April, Solana maintained an average of over 93 million transactions per day, reaching a total of 2.8 billion transactions as of April 30, continuing to lead the entire chain. • Among the capital flow data of various public chains in April, as of April 28, Ethereum recorded a net inflow of over US$904 million, ranking first in the entire network. • Wallet addresses holding more than 10,000 BTC have a cumulative score between 0.9 and 1, indicating an almost full net buying state. • The net growth value of BTC UTXO continued to turn positive, indicating a recovery in momentum, with new addresses still maintaining at an average of 300,000 per day, with the rebound mainly driven by existing users. • As of April 28, a total…

#分析# 市场# 工具© 版权声明文章版权归作者所有，未经允许请勿转载。 上一篇 A brief discussion on the Bitcoin Core transaction relay controversy. Why should we support it? 下一篇 InfoFi's Dilemma in the Attention Economy 相关文章 Odaily exclusive interview with Jarsy: How does Robinhood in the Pre-IPO field break the private equity investment thres 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 26,509 1 热门Bloomberg Chief Financial Writer: The premium of US stocks involving cryptocurrencies is staggering? What can retail inv 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 25,838 7 Bitcoins market value surpasses Amazon, and global listed companies are in a war to hoard coins 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 27,031 4 Why did the New York Stock Exchange invest $2 billion in Polymarket? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 19,697 2 $2.8 billion in net profit cannot mask the mNAV crisis: Strategy’s battle to defend its Nasdaq 100 index. 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 24,980 1 Layer-2: Unleashing the potential of Ethereum and reshaping contract transactions 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 43,493 1 条评论 您必须登录后才能发表评论！ 立即登录 #BeelieverGHA3E34 客人 Oky

6 年前 最新文章 Blockchain etabliert sich als Schlüsseltechnologie in klassischen Branchen 14小时前 697 Polymarket vs Kalshi: Who is the King of Prediction Markets? 23小时前 859 CRCL Surges 35%: Circle’s Q4 EPS Exceeds Expectations by 169%, AI + Stablecoin Moat Continues to Deepen 23小时前 715 Jane Street Halts “10 AM Dump,” BTC Stages Strong V-Shaped Rebound, Surging Toward $70K 23小时前 754 From Terra’s Collapse to the “10 AM Smash”: How Jane Street Played Both Continents’ Markets? 23小时前 672 热门网站TempoGAIBLighter滑翔机普朗克雷尔斯BCPoker风筝人工智能 Bee.com 全球最大的 Web3 门户网站 合作伙伴 硬币卡 Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive 装甲 下载蜜蜂网络APP，开始web3之旅 白皮书 角色 常见问题 © 2021-2026.保留所有权利。. 隐私政策 | 服务条款 下载蜜蜂网络 APP 并开始 web3 之旅 全球最大的 Web3 门户网站 合作伙伴 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 白皮书 角色 常见问题 © 2021-2026.保留所有权利。. 隐私政策 | 服务条款 搜索 搜索InSite链上社会新闻 热门推荐： 空投猎人 数据分析 加密货币名人 陷阱探测器 简体中文 English 繁體中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 简体中文

智能索引记录