温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/zh/66290.html
点击访问原文链接

Starting from HyperLiquid: What Kind of Exchange Does RWA Truly Need? | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
Starting from HyperLiquid: What Kind of Exchange Does RWA Truly Need? | Bee Network Login 熱門新聞 Meme Launchpad AI 代理商 DeSci 熱門鏈瀏覽器 新人必讀 衝百倍幣 蜜蜂遊戲 必備網站 必備APP 必關大神 DePIN 新人必備 教我避坑 基本工具 深度網站 交易所 NFT 工具 你好， 登出 Web3宇宙 遊戲 DApp 蜂巢 增長平台 生態 搜尋 英語 Coins儲值 登入 下載 Web3大學 遊戲 DApp 蜂巢 生態 家•分析•Starting from HyperLiquid: What Kind of Exchange Does RWA Truly Need? Starting from HyperLiquid: What Kind of Exchange Does RWA Truly Need?分析3天前更新懷亞特 2,849 16 In 2025, the hottest topics were undoubtedly HyperLiquid and Aster. There are many external explanations for their explosive popularity, with some rather unique perspectives. However, to understand the fundamental reasons for their success, it might be easier to look at it from a product perspective. After interpreting this, can we extend this logic to RWA DEXes? If so, how should we approach upgrading and extending it? This article aims to clarify these points as much as possible.

Interpreting the Essence of HyperLiquid and Aster’s Explosive Popularity The fundamental reason for the explosive popularity of Aster and Hyperliquid can be summed up in one sentence: They are not “better DEXes,” but rather “the first to place the [sovereignty] of an exchange on-chain.” Simply put, from a product perspective, it’s not about performance, fees, or UI/UX. It’s that: There has been a structural change in “who controls trading.”

Why Did HyperLiquid Explode in Popularity? You’ve probably heard these points: a self-developed L1 with high performance; a CLOB that feels like a CEX with low latency, good depth, and excellent user experience. But these only explain why it’s “good to use,” not why it “exploded in popularity.” After in-depth research on HyperLiquid by the Go2Mars PRI (Product Research Institute), a conclusion was reached: The real explosive point of HyperLiquid is that it changed “trading sovereignty.”

In traditional CEXes/DEXes, boundaries related to trading—such as listing, delisting, risk control, liquidation logic, rule changes, and trading suspensions—are actually controlled by the platform. The actual controller is the platform. In other words, “users participating in trading are merely passive participants.”

What did Hyperliquid do? It broke down the “core powers of an exchange” into modules that can be constrained by on-chain rules. The key isn’t “decentralization,” but rather: Can the rules be unilaterally modified? Can they be manually intervened in extreme situations? Hyperliquid’s core signal is: “Even the system itself cannot arbitrarily change the rules.”

Throughout 2025 and earlier history, one type of event frequently occurred: too many trading interventions in the name of “compliance / risk control / risk management.” The result of such actions is that profits are rolled back, positions are liquidated, markets are halted, and rules are retroactively changed. This made high-frequency traders / institutions / smart money realize for the first time: they were bearing “institutional risk,” not market risk.

The essential appeal of Hyperliquid is “I only bear market risk, not platform will.” This is a qualitative change in the product itself. Therefore, what exploded for Hyperliquid wasn’t user count, but rather: the migration of professional traders, large capital willing to operate naked, strategies that can be deployed long-term, and extremely strong system predictability. This is the “on-chain-ization of exchange credit.”

Why Did Aster Explode in Popularity? We can clearly understand one thing: Aster’s explosive popularity is different from Hyperliquid’s. On the surface, the Aster product appears to be: a new-generation derivatives DEX, modular, with good UX, and novel mechanism design. But in reality, these are not the core reasons. The point Aster truly hit is: “The abstract upgrade of trading behavior.” To summarize in one sentence: Aster isn’t selling trading; it’s selling “the encapsulation of trading capability.”

Traditional exchanges give users: order placement rights, order cancellation rights, leverage rights. Aster gives users: strategy-level interfaces, conditional execution, risk structure templates, and behavioral combination permissions. Simply put, users are not “trading”; they are: invoking a set of “market behavior capabilities.”

The reason Aster was able to explode in popularity is essentially because: users have changed. Most users are not novices or gamblers, but rather “strategy users / agents / automated systems.” Trading behavior is no longer manual; it’s systematic. Aster is essentially: providing a “legal, stable, and composable trading execution environment” for AI / Bots / Agents / quantitative systems.

Product Insights from Hyperliquid and Aster Can this type of product continue? The answer is yes, of course. But not by copying them directly. What can continue is not the form, but three underlying logics: trading sovereignty must be verifiable; trading is not a “page behavior” but a “system capability”; an exchange itself is an “institutional product.” Hyperliquid actually solves the issue of “institutional untrustworthiness.” It addresses: Will the platform change the rules? Aster solves the issue of “insufficient abstraction of trading capability.” It addresses: Can trading be invoked by a system?

Previously, in an article published by Go2Mars PRI titled “Web3 is Entering the Rule Generation Period,” it was mentioned that the next stage of Web3 is not an explosion point, but an access point; not a traffic portal, but an institutional portal.

Now that we basically understand the fundamental reasons for Hyperliquid and Aster’s explosive popularity, can we use this logic to return to the RWA sector, which has been hyped for over two years, and explore the direction of RWA exchanges?

Do RWA 交換s Exist? Strictly speaking, “true RWA exchanges” hardly exist to date.

Why do the so-called RWA DEXes/CEXes we see now “not look like exchanges”? Because most are stuck on three things: unclear legal liability, non-closed-loop clearing and execution, and unnatural liquidity.

Let’s explain these three things separately:

Unclear Legal Liability: Who is the issuer? Who guarantees authenticity? Who is responsible for defaults? These are not clear. Non-Closed-Loop Clearing and Execution: On-chain settlement, off-chain non-performance, ultimately relying on law, rendering on-chain rules ineffective—it becomes a complete joke. Unnatural Liquidity: No market making, no continuous quoting, more like “private placement shares.” Based on research and historical review by Go2Mars PRI, we believe a “true RWA exchange” must possess: on-chain clearing rights > off-chain ownership; defaults can be handled automatically; RWA itself is a “cash flow instrument,” not an “asset certificate.” Let’s explain these three basic logics:

On-Chain Clearing Rights > Off-Chain Ownership: It’s not “I own this asset,” but rather: “When rules are triggered, I have the right to execute a certain outcome.” For example: profit priority, collateral disposal rights, cash flow distribution rights. Defaults Can Be Handled Automatically: Default execution here certainly doesn’t rely on law or courts, but rather on: staking, margin, risk pools, advance compensation, front-loading default costs instead of pursuing accountability after the fact. RWA Itself is a “Cash Flow Instrument,” Not an “Asset Certificate”: What can be traded in RWA is not “real estate / debt,” etc., but “cash flow prioritization rights.” Cash flow prioritization rights refer to the agreement on who gets paid first, how much, and how much risk they bear. The core lies in the recombination of risk and return. Cash flow prioritization rights can be said to be the most crucial point within RWA. So, based on the current situation, are there products “close to the correct form”? The answer is yes, but they are still in the semi-finished product stage. They typically manifest as: not called exchanges, not emphasizing RWA, but already doing: on-chain cash flow distribution, risk layering, automatic clearing. Therefore, in the future, true RWA exchanges likely won’t be called RWA exchanges.

For RWA and RWA exchanges, the problem to solve is not “asset tokenization,” because that is a very simple task. The problem to solve is “the on-chain-ization of the institutions of liability, clearing, and default.” Can default, execution, and cash flow prioritization be taken over and executed by programs?

Conclusion: The Endgame of RWA is Not “Asset 代幣ization,” but “Institutional Tokenization” Looking back at the explosive popularity of Hyperliquid and Aster, essentially they were not “building a better exchange,” but accomplishing something deeper—turning the institution of an exchange into on-chain rules.

Hyperliquid solves: Will the platform change the rules? Aster solves: Can trading be invoked by a system? What a true RWA exchange needs to solve is a harder problem: Can default, liability, and cash flow prioritization be taken over by programs? If this problem cannot be solved, RWA will forever remain an “asset display layer.” If this problem is solved, RWA will become an “institutional finance layer.”

Over the past two years, the market focused attention on “how to tokenize assets”—real estate, debt, notes, fund shares, income rights, mines, power plants… But these are just appearances. What is truly valuable is not the asset certificate, but the execution structure of cash flows. Who gets distributed first? Who bears the first loss? What are the default trigger conditions? Is execution automatic? Is clearing irreversible? These questions are essentially “institutional problems,” not “asset problems.” If defaults still have to go back to court, if performance still relies on human judgment, if clearing can still be negotiated and modified—then the so-called RWA DEX is just a traditional financial product with a blockchain UI. That’s not an upgrade; it’s packaging.

A true RWA exchange might not look like what we’re familiar with. It might not emphasize “decentralization,” might not promote “rich asset variety,” and might not even be called an “exchange.” But it must possess three things: rules exist before assets, clearing rights outweigh ownership, default costs are front-loaded instead of pursued after the fact. When these conditions are met, RWA will no longer be “on-chain private placement shares,” but a composable cash flow market. Then, the object of trading will no longer be “a certain project,” but “a certain risk structure.” Not “buying an asset,” but “buying a segment of cash flow prioritization rights.”

If Web3 is entering the “rule generation period,” then RWA’s mission is: to transform the most core, most hidden, and most human parts of traditional finance—default handling and profit prioritization—into verifiable, composable, and executable program structures. When the institution itself becomes the product, when clearing logic becomes an interface, when risk structures can be pieced together like Lego, RWA will truly become a new financial paradigm, not a shell of old finance.

Perhaps, a true RWA exchange won’t explode with “asset scale,” but will attract capital with “institutional credibility.” Just as Hyperliquid attracted the migration of professional traders, the future RWA structure market will attract: capital unwilling to bear institutional risk, institutions hoping for transparent risk structures, and AI / Agent / quantitative systems needing programmable cash flows. When cash flows can be understood by algorithms, when defaults can be executed automatically, when clearing can be priced in advance—that will be the true explosive point for RWA.

So, the question is not: Can RWA build an exchange? Rather, it is: Who will be the first to thoroughly write “liability, default, and clearing” into on-chain rules? When that day comes, RWA will no longer be a narrative sector, but will become a new institutional financial base layer. And that is the true upgrade and evolution.

本文源自網路： Starting from HyperLiquid: What Kind of Exchange Does RWA Truly Need?

Related: OKX “Welcome the God of Wealth” Spring Festival Event Heats Up, Quick Guide to Participate and Share the 10 Million USDT Prize Pool OKX has grandly launched the “Welcome the God of Wealth” Spring Festival special event, with a total prize pool of up to 10 million USDT across three major activities. Whether you are a newbie or an old friend, OKX has prepared limited-time holiday activities and super-sized benefit surprises full of sincerity for everyone. Not only are the rewards generous, but the operations are also simple, making it easy for everyone to get started. Come quickly to pocket the New Year’s good luck and multiple rewards; if you miss it, you’ll have to wait another year! Go directly to the “Welcome the God of Wealth” event collection Crypto enthusiasts have their own “Collect Five Blessings” activity! The first event of OKX’s “Welcome the God of Wealth” campaign, the “Collect Five Blessings”…

#分析#交換#市場#代幣# 網路3© 版權聲明文章版权归作者所有，未经允许请勿转载。 上一篇 24H Hot Cryptocurrencies and Key News｜Stripe Reportedly Considers Acquiring PayPal; Meta Plans to Return to Stablecoin Market in the Second Half of This Year (February 25) 下一篇 Deciphering the Ten Major Bearish Factors in the Crypto Market: How Severe Is This "Guangmingding" Siege? 相關文章 Crypto October 2025 Guide: Easily Understand Market TrendsRecommended Articles 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 20,055 Ethereum’s revenue plummeted 75%: a sign of recession or the pain of transformation? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 19,819 2 Q3投融資回顧：一級市場下行，Q4或將迎來拐點 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 42,278 3 Written after the hacker attack: Is there any risk-free return in the DeFi world? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 25,003 2 After Singapore “expelled its guests”, has Hong Kong become the “crypto-friendly capital of East Asia”? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 29,467 2 BitMEX 慶祝成立 10 週年，成為連續營運時間最長且沒有任何損失的加密貨幣交易所 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 37,629 暫無評論 您必須先登入才能發表評論！ 立即登入 暫無評論... 最新的文章 UniSat Releases Phase Updates and Upgrades, Continuously Building the Bitcoin Ecosystem 1 天前 1,259 Jack Dorsey’s Company: 4,000 White-Collar Workers Are Being Replaced by AI 1 天前 1,145 Latest Stablecoin Report: Real Distribution and Flow Are Far More Important Than Supply 1 天前 1,049 Sui DeFi’s “Three-Engine” Revolution: How New Capabilities, New Assets, and New Programs Are Building the Future of On-Chain Finance? 1 天前 994 On-chain Investigator ZachXBT Confirms: Axiom Employees Exploited Internal Privileges for Insider Trading 1 天前 907 熱門網站TempoLighterGAIB滑翔機普朗克雷爾斯BCPokerVooi Bee.com 全球最大的 Web3 入口網站 合作夥伴 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko 幣活 盔甲 下載Bee Network APP開啟您的Web3之旅 白皮書 角色 常問問題 © 2021-2026.版權所有。. 隱私政策 | 服務條款 下載蜜蜂網路APP 並開始 web3 之旅 全球最大的Web3入口網站 合作夥伴 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 白皮書 角色 常問問題 © 2021-2026.版權所有。. 隱私政策 | 服務條款 搜尋 搜尋站內鏈上社群媒體新聞 熱門推薦： 擼毛打金 數據分析 必關大神 教我避坑 繁體中文 English 简体中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 繁體中文

智能索引记录