温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/zh/65441.html
点击访问原文链接

Tiger Research: Driven by a Liquidity Vacuum Leading to Sharp Sell-offs, Why Has Bitcoin Failed to Rebound? | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
Tiger Research: Driven by a Liquidity Vacuum Leading to Sharp Sell-offs, Why Has Bitcoin Failed to Rebound? | Bee Network Login 熱門新聞 Meme Launchpad AI 代理商 DeSci 熱門鏈瀏覽器 新人必讀 衝百倍幣 蜜蜂遊戲 必備網站 必備APP 必關大神 DePIN 新人必備 教我避坑 基本工具 深度網站 交易所 NFT 工具 你好， 登出 Web3宇宙 遊戲 DApp 蜂巢 增長平台 生態 搜尋 英語 Coins儲值 登入 下載 Web3大學 遊戲 DApp 蜂巢 生態 家•分析•Tiger Research: Driven by a Liquidity Vacuum Leading to Sharp Sell-offs, Why Has Bitcoin Failed to Rebound? Tiger Research: Driven by a Liquidity Vacuum Leading to Sharp Sell-offs, Why Has Bitcoin Failed to Rebound?分析4 周前更新懷亞特 7,677 16 重點 Bitcoin fell from $87,000 to $81,000 on January 29th and continued to drop below the $80,000 mark. Microsoft’s disappointing earnings report dragged down the Nasdaq, leading to a breach of Bitcoin’s key realized price support near $87,000. 市場 speculation about Kevin Warsh’s potential nomination as Fed Chair triggered downward pressure, although actual policy might not be as hawkish as feared. Regulatory sentiment towards 加密貨幣 remains friendly, but with the $84,000 level lost, near-term downside risks cannot be ignored. Bitcoin Lags in the Rebound

Bitcoin experienced two sharp declines in a short period. Around 9 AM ET on January 29th, Bitcoin began sliding from around $87,000; by 10 AM the next day, it had dropped to approximately $81,000, a decline of about 7%. The overall crypto market weakened, and investor sentiment deteriorated sharply.

This movement was not due to a single negative signal but rather a dual shock from traditional financial market turbulence and monetary policy uncertainty. The first decline was triggered by earnings shocks from major tech companies, while the second stemmed from concerns about a potential leadership change at the Federal Reserve.

A common underlying factor behind both declines is the continued contraction in trading volume across Bitcoin spot and futures markets. With low liquidity, even minor shocks can trigger excessive price volatility. Stocks and commodities rebounded quickly after brief pullbacks, but Bitcoin failed to follow suit.

Currently, the market is shunning Bitcoin. Trading volume continues to shrink, selling pressure persists, and price recovery is becoming increasingly difficult to sustain.

First Shock: AI Bubble Concerns Spill into Bitcoin

Bitcoin came under pressure starting January 29th, driven by a sharp decline in the Nasdaq index. Microsoft’s Q4 earnings falling short of expectations reignited market fears about excessive froth in AI-related investments. As panic spread, investors began reducing exposure to risk assets. Bitcoin, with its inherently high volatility, experienced a particularly sharp drop.

The critical factor that made this decline especially damaging was the specific price level Bitcoin lost. During the sell-off, it breached a crucial structural support level—the Active Realized Price.

At the time, this level was around $87,000. The Active Realized Price excludes long-dormant holdings and instead calculates the average cost basis based on tokens actively circulating in the market. In other words, it represents the breakeven point for currently active traders. Once breached, most active participants simultaneously fall into a loss. Bitcoin decisively broke through this line.

Second Shock: The Warsh Effect

Around 8 PM ET on January 29th, Bitcoin experienced another sharp decline, rapidly falling from $84,000 to $81,000. Bloomberg and Reuters reported that President Trump was preparing to nominate Kevin Warsh as the next Federal Reserve Chair, with a formal announcement scheduled for January 30th.

Kevin Warsh is widely perceived by the market as a hawk. During his tenure as a Fed Governor from 2006 to 2011, he consistently opposed quantitative easing, warning of its inflationary risks. He resigned in 2011 when the Fed launched its second round of QE.

Speculation about Warsh’s nomination was interpreted as conflicting with Trump’s desire for rate cuts, immediately sparking concerns about tighter liquidity. Cryptocurrencies have historically performed well during periods of abundant liquidity—when investors are willing to allocate more capital to high-risk assets. The prospect of Warsh steering the Fed spread fears of liquidity tightening. In an already liquidity-starved market, investors promptly began selling.

Short-Term Correction, Medium-to-Long-Term Momentum Remains Intact

While market concerns about Warsh’s hawkish reputation persist, the actual implementation of policy may not be as forceful as anticipated.

In a Wall Street Journal column, Warsh proposed a compromise approach: limited rate cuts combined with balance sheet contraction. This framework attempts to find a balance between Trump’s desire for rate cuts and Warsh’s inflation discipline. The implication is an overall hawkish tilt but with some flexibility on the path of interest rates.

Therefore, the total number of rate cuts might be fewer than under Powell’s tenure, but a return to full-blown tightening is unlikely. Even if Warsh becomes Chair, the Fed is expected to maintain a basic direction of gradual easing.

Simultaneously, friendly crypto policies from the SEC and CFTC are gradually being implemented. Allowing cryptocurrency investments into 401(k) retirement accounts could open the floodgates to as much as $1 trillion in potential capital inflows. The rapid progress of digital asset market structure legislation is also noteworthy.

In the short term, uncertainty remains. Bitcoin is likely to continue following the ups and downs of the stock market. With the $80,000 level breached, further downside risks cannot be ruled out. However, once the stock market enters a consolidation phase, Bitcoin may once again become a favored alternative investment. Historically, whenever tech stocks stall due to bubble fears, capital often rotates into alternative assets.

What remains unchanged is arguably more important. Looking at a longer time horizon, global liquidity continues to expand, and institutional policy stances towards crypto remain firm. Strategic accumulation at the institutional level continues methodically, and the Bitcoin network itself faces no operational issues. The current pullback is merely a short-term overreaction amplified by thin liquidity and does not undermine the foundation of the medium-to-long-term bullish trend.

原文連結： Tiger Research

本文源自網路： Tiger Research: Driven by a Liquidity Vacuum Leading to Sharp Sell-offs, Why Has Bitcoin Failed to Rebound?

Related: Matrixport Research: Bitcoin Falls into Bear Market Territory, Could a Weakening Dollar Become the Next Pivot? Price Structure Under Pressure: Selling Pressure Not from Institutions, but Dispersed Speculative Losses Over the past six months, Bitcoin has failed to strengthen in sync with gold and other risk assets. Since June 2025, sustained selling by early holders was once considered the primary suppressing factor. However, starting in October, as gold accelerated its upward move and Bitcoin entered a correction, it became clear that a single factor could no longer explain the current divergence. The flash crash on October 10, 2025, served as a significant watershed. This event led to a notable widening of cross-asset relative pricing and inter-exchange price spreads, squeezing the risk budgets of market makers and market-neutral capital, thereby weakening short-term liquidity. It is noteworthy that there is little indication of concentrated losses among major trading…

#分析#比特幣# 加密#市場#代幣© 版權聲明文章版权归作者所有，未经允许请勿转载。 上一篇 24H Hot Cryptocurrencies and Key News｜U.S. House Speaker: Confident of securing enough votes to end partial government s 下一篇 Matrixport Research: Bitcoin Falls into Bear Market Territory, Could a Weakening Dollar Become the Next Pivot? 相關文章 24H 熱門代幣與重點新聞｜本週將解鎖超過 $1 億值的相關代幣；預測市場生態系統 Tot 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 12,562 1 Foreign KOLs’ Ways to Cut Leeks: Clustering, Building Momentum, and ConcealingRecommended Articles 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 23,309 Quick Look at Virtuals’ New Launch Mechanisms: Pegasus, Unicorn, and Titan 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 13,459 1 SEC New Rule Countdown: How Will the “Innovation Exemption” Drive Coinbase’s Acquisition Strategy? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 18,990 2 Ripple chiseled open a crack in the wall, but Swift simply tore down the entire wall. 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 15,329 2 BTC hits a new high again, ETH stands up again, is the dawn of the altcoin season beginning to appear? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 27,569 3 暫無評論 您必須先登入才能發表評論！ 立即登入 暫無評論... 最新的文章 Did Jane Street “Manipulate” BTC? Decoding the AP System, Understanding the Power Struggle Behind ETF Creation and Redemption Pricing 16 小時前 533 Stop Comparing Bitcoin to Gold—It’s Now a High-Volatility Software Stock 16 小時前 648 Matrixport Research: $25 Billion Gamma Unwinding Imminent, Liquidity Yet to Return Behind the Rebound 16 小時前 593 ERC-5564: Ethereum’s Stealth Era Has Arrived, Receiving Addresses No Longer ‘Exposed’ 16 小時前 526 Hong Kong Regulatory Green Light: Asseto Enables DL Holdings to Achieve Compliance for Two RWA Business Implementations 16 小時前 560 熱門網站TempoLighterGAIB滑翔機普朗克雷爾斯BCPokerVooi Bee.com 全球最大的 Web3 入口網站 合作夥伴 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko 幣活 盔甲 下載Bee Network APP開啟您的Web3之旅 白皮書 角色 常問問題 © 2021-2026.版權所有。. 隱私政策 | 服務條款 下載蜜蜂網路APP 並開始 web3 之旅 全球最大的Web3入口網站 合作夥伴 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 白皮書 角色 常問問題 © 2021-2026.版權所有。. 隱私政策 | 服務條款 搜尋 搜尋站內鏈上社群媒體新聞 熱門推薦： 擼毛打金 數據分析 必關大神 教我避坑 繁體中文 English 简体中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 繁體中文

智能索引记录