温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/zh/62798.html
点击访问原文链接

BitMEX Alpha: Will Western Union be an asymmetric trading opportunity in the stablecoin sector? | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
BitMEX Alpha: Will Western Union be an asymmetric trading opportunity in the stablecoin sector? | Bee Network Login 熱門新聞 Meme Launchpad AI 代理商 DeSci 熱門鏈瀏覽器 新人必讀 衝百倍幣 蜜蜂遊戲 必備網站 必備APP 必關大神 DePIN 新人必備 教我避坑 基本工具 深度網站 交易所 NFT 工具 你好， 登出 Web3宇宙 遊戲 DApp 蜂巢 增長平台 生態 搜尋 英語 Coins儲值 登入 下載 Web3大學 遊戲 DApp 蜂巢 生態 家•分析•BitMEX Alpha: Will Western Union be an asymmetric trading opportunity in the stablecoin sector? BitMEX Alpha: Will Western Union be an asymmetric trading opportunity in the stablecoin sector?分析2 个月前更新懷亞特 16,581 5 However, when investors try to find the best targets to profit from the stablecoin narrative, the most obvious one—Circle ($CRCL)—may not offer the best risk-reward ratio. Instead, Western Union (WU), a long-established giant with a so-called “outdated” remittance business but double-digit dividend yields, is quietly positioning itself in the stablecoin trend by focusing on distribution channels.

In today’s article, we will delve into how to better capitalize on the growth potential of stablecoins: Does value lie in the minting of stablecoins, or in the control of the “last mile” distribution channels?

Current application scenarios for stablecoins
The “last mile” problem: Will Western Union be an asymmetric trading opportunity in the stablecoin race?
Stablecoins have become one of the few “clean” products in the 加密貨幣currency space. Their supply has reached $250 billion and is expected to continue to grow, with daily settlement volumes reaching tens of billions of dollars, and their role as the internet’s “dollar API” is becoming increasingly clear.

However, when investors try to find the best assets to profit from the stablecoin narrative, the most obvious code—Circle ($CRCL)—may not offer the best risk-reward ratio. Instead, Western Union (WU), a long-established giant with a so-called “outdated” remittance business but double-digit dividend yields, is quietly cutting in the opposite direction, integrating itself into this grand trend of stablecoins.

In today’s article, we will delve into how to better capitalize on the growth potential of stablecoins: Does the value lie in the minting of stablecoins, or in the control of the **”last-mile distribution” channel**?

Modern applications of stablecoins
Currently, the highest trading volume for stablecoins is still concentrated within the cryptocurrency market:

Data from TD Economics shows:

● Approximately 90% of stablecoin trading volume is related to transactions, staking, and institutional settlement between exchanges, trading desks, and DeFi protocols.

● Less than 10% are used for “real-world” payments.

● Of these, P2P and remittances account for only about 3% of the cash flow.

Therefore, the claim that “stablecoins will kill traditional finance (TradFi)” is premature at present. Currently, real-world payments are still primarily conducted through banks, money transfer operators, and card network organizations.

To deliver on its hyped expectations, stablecoins must penetrate and replace existing real-world use cases. Mainstream forecasts suggest that stablecoins will account for approximately 20% of cross-border payments by 2030, as blockchain transfers can reduce underlying settlement costs by up to 70% compared to traditional correspondent banking models.

Cross-border payments will be one of the most promising use cases for stablecoin expansion. We believe the current adoption gap in stablecoins is primarily due to distribution channels , which is precisely the area where Western Union has been leading for over 170 years—and where Circle hopes USDC will reach.

Circle’s dilemma: the cost of purchasing distribution channels
Circle’s business model is quite typical: issue USDC, invest the reserves in short-term Treasury bonds, and earn net interest margin (NIM). However, as an infrastructure provider lacking a native user base, Circle faces a high ” distribution tax .”

Because Circle doesn’t own end customers, it must acquire them through purchasing channels. To promote USDC, Circle was forced to offer incentives for exchanges and wallets to prioritize its token over competitors like USDT. This dynamic is most evident in its relationship with Coinbase. Publicly disclosed information shows that Coinbase, merely acting as a distribution funnel, took the majority of the economic benefits generated by USDC reserves—typically over 50% of total interest income.

This reveals the fragility of its profitability quality—as the supply of USDC expands, Circle’s “distribution, trading and other” costs are also growing aggressively, at a rate that even exceeds the traditional operating leverage effect.

Essentially, Circle is a utility provider, but its marginal customer acquisition cost remains high because each new user requires a revenue-sharing agreement. The company is valued as a high-growth fintech firm, but its revenue is heavily reliant on partners who control customer relationships. Even as Circle builds its own L1 and banking licenses, these still require attractive subsidies to draw in users.

Circle’s advantages are real:
● It boasts one of the most trusted fiat-backed stablecoins;

● Stable regulatory position;

● As the second most widely circulated stablecoin, it has been deeply integrated into cryptocurrency trading and on-chain infrastructure.

However, its disadvantages are also obvious:
● Lack of retail distribution channels;

● Heavily reliant on partners such as Coinbase;

● Revenue depends not only on USDC adoption rates, but also on how much profit it retains after paying fees to partners.

Western Union: New Wine in Old Bottles
Western Union’s approach to stablecoins has been largely overlooked by the market: it already possesses the distribution channels that Circle is paying to acquire.

It has mastered the distribution network:
● It has hundreds of thousands of physical locations in more than 200 countries/regions.

● Deeply penetrate the immigration remittance corridor with huge cash transaction volumes.

● Possessing a compliance system and licensing portfolio that is extremely difficult to replicate, especially in high-risk jurisdictions.

Most importantly, Western Union can reach customers without paying a cut to Coinbase. It has been the default choice for customers in many remittance corridors for decades.

Currently, Western Union monetizes its distribution network through traditional technology and economic models: cash remittance fees plus FX spreads . This profitability is substantial, explaining why Western Union remains a highly profitable and cash-flow-rich company despite the challenges posed by the growth of stablecoins.

Now, it is layering stablecoin technology on top of it.

Western Union, through the launch of its own stablecoin, USDPT, and the establishment of a “Digital Asset Network,” has achieved the following:

● The front end (brand, agents, trusted payment outlets) remains unchanged;

● The backend (settlement channel and float) has been migrated to the stablecoin model.

This gives Western Union two leverages that cannot be combined at the same time:

Where it has its own distribution channels, it can still charge fees and spreads. It can start monetizing using float and on-chain settlement, just like stablecoin issuers. Circle must pay high costs for distribution and then try to maximize its share of float revenue; while Western Union already has distribution channels and profits from them, and the current stablecoin float is equivalent to adding an additional revenue stream for it.

Western Union Execution Risks: Spread Addiction vs. Blockchain Efficiency
In 1975, Kodak engineer Steven Sasson invented the first digital camera. When he demonstrated it to company executives, the response he received became a textbook example of corporate suicide: “This thing is great—but don’t tell anyone.”

To protect its highly profitable film business, Kodak shelved this technology. They chose a cash cow while ignoring the inevitable shift where high-tech products would reduce costs and replace older ones, ultimately becoming a relic of the past when the transformation finally arrived.

Today, Western Union ($WU) stands on the same precipice. Can it cannibalize its traditional cash cow business in order to survive digital transformation?

Spread Addiction vs. Blockchain Efficiency: As shown in the diagram above, Western Union’s profitability heavily relies on foreign exchange spreads—the markup on currency exchange. The stablecoin narrative promises near-zero settlement costs, but for Western Union, efficiency presents a conflict of interest. If they were to shift to transparent on-chain channels, they could potentially compress the foreign exchange spreads that drive their profit margins.

Valuation Analysis: Value Trap vs. Growth Trap
The divergence in valuation between these two entities presents a typical case of market inefficiency.

Western Union is priced as a troubled company. A P/E ratio of only 4 and a dividend yield of 10% suggest the market has already priced in the expectation that its franchise will be slowly and inevitably eroded by digital disruptors. This view focuses primarily on the ” innovator’s dilemma “—the fear that digital wallets will cannibalize Western Union’s highly profitable cash business. While this view isn’t entirely without merit (digital business accounts for about 15% of revenue and is growing, while retail cash is weakening), it seems to ignore the option value of a stablecoin business transformation.

Conversely, Circle’s pricing is based on perfect expectations , embedding optimistic assumptions about its long-term market share and the sustainability of its unregulated seigniorage in a high-interest-rate environment. Investors are paying a premium for a future in which Circle not only outperforms Tether but also contends with the inevitable issuance of bank-issued stablecoins and central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).

Conclusion: Consider going long on Western Union ($WU) transfers.

For traders building portfolios around the argument that “stablecoins will revolutionize cross-border finance,” investing in a well-established giant with abundant distribution resources is worth one-seventh of the valuation of a capital-intensive stablecoin issuer.

● Circle represents a high-beta, pure stablecoin exposure in the stablecoin category, but it is not the absolute leader in stablecoins and comes with significant concerns about margin compression.

Western Union represents a deep, asymmetric bet on the application of this technology. It offers a “free call option” on its digital transformation success, cushioned by massive cash flow and a low valuation assuming failure. If Western Union can successfully integrate stablecoin channels to defend profit margins and streamline settlement processes, its subsequent valuation multiple expansion could outpace the linear growth trajectory of pure issuers.

In the race to digitize the dollar, whoever wins the users wins the market . Western Union has users; while Circle is still acquiring users through “subsidies”.

本文源自網路： BitMEX Alpha: Will Western Union be an asymmetric trading opportunity in the stablecoin sector?

Related: A step-by-step guide to the second phase of the Brevis mission. Author | Asher ( @Asher_0210 ) On the evening of November 2nd, Brevis, which has received Vitalik Buterin’s investment of $7.5 million, announced on the X platform that the second phase of its mission has been launched . Users can earn Brevis Spark points by completing designated interactive tasks with 10 partner projects. Next, Odaily will guide you step-by-step through the second phase of the Brevis interactive task. Brevis: An “intelligent engine” featuring the concept of an “infinite computing layer”. Brevis is an off-chain computing engine built on zero-knowledge proofs, positioned as an “infinite computing layer for Web 3 and everything.” Simply put, Brevis makes smart contracts “smarter,” shifting from passive execution to active computation, saving computational costs and improving efficiency. This, in turn, facilitates user interaction with the protocol,…

#分析# 加密# 脫機#交換#市場#代幣© 版權聲明文章版权归作者所有，未经允许请勿转载。 上一篇 Odaily 編輯團隊茶會 (12月17日) 下一篇 Say Goodbye to Mnemonic Phrase Anxiety: Understand How Account Abstraction Can Refactor the Web3 Experience 相關文章 新的Structural Choices Amid Continued Volatility: Bitcoin Range Trading and HYPE Swing Opportunities | Invited Analysis 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 4,553 4 BTC ETFs are facing selling pressure, but it’s not a bear market yet. 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 20,267 1 Why is ETH Treasury more likely to rise than Strategy? How to choose between SBET and BMNR? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 33,036 3 2026 年展望 (第二部分)：比特幣，從數位黃金到中性價值儲備的定價權轉移 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 9,526 Stablecoins: A boon or a hindrance to financial inclusion? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 17,657 Elections, Oil Prices, and the Money Printer: Why Bitcoin Only Cares About Trump 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 12,027 1 最新的文章 Did Jane Street “Manipulate” BTC? Decoding the AP System, Understanding the Power Struggle Behind ETF Creation and Redemption Pricing 1小時前 85 Stop Comparing Bitcoin to Gold—It’s Now a High-Volatility Software Stock 1小時前 110 Matrixport Research: $25 Billion Gamma Unwinding Imminent, Liquidity Yet to Return Behind the Rebound 1小時前 103 ERC-5564: Ethereum’s Stealth Era Has Arrived, Receiving Addresses No Longer ‘Exposed’ 1小時前 107 Hong Kong Regulatory Green Light: Asseto Enables DL Holdings to Achieve Compliance for Two RWA Business Implementations 1小時前 92 熱門網站TempoLighterGAIB滑翔機普朗克雷爾斯BCPokerVooi Bee.com 全球最大的 Web3 入口網站 合作夥伴 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko 幣活 盔甲 下載Bee Network APP開啟您的Web3之旅 白皮書 角色 常問問題 © 2021-2026.版權所有。. 隱私政策 | 服務條款 下載蜜蜂網路APP 並開始 web3 之旅 全球最大的Web3入口網站 合作夥伴 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 白皮書 角色 常問問題 © 2021-2026.版權所有。. 隱私政策 | 服務條款 搜尋 搜尋站內鏈上社群媒體新聞 熱門推薦： 擼毛打金 數據分析 必關大神 教我避坑 繁體中文 English 简体中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 繁體中文

智能索引记录