温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/ja/66156.html
点击访问原文链接

After raising $650 million in new funding, Dragonfly believes Crypto isn’t designed for humans | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
After raising $650 million in new funding, Dragonfly believes Crypto isn’t designed for humans | Bee Network Login トレンドニュース ミーム・ローンチパッド AIエージェント デサイ トップチェーンエクスプローラー 初心者向け 100x コイン ビーゲーム 重要なウェブサイト 必須のアプリ クリプトセレブリティ デピン ルーキーズ・エッセンシャル トラップディテクタ 基本的なツール 高度な Web サイト 交換 NFTツール こんにちは、 サインアウト Web3 ユニバース ゲーム ダップ ミツバチの巣 成長するプラットフォーム 広告 検索 英語 コインをリチャージする ログイン ダウンロード Web3 ユニ ゲーム ダップ ミツバチの巣 広告 ホーム-分析-After raising $650 million in new funding, Dragonfly believes Crypto isn’t designed for humans After raising $650 million in new funding, Dragonfly believes Crypto isn’t designed for humans分析1週間前发布ワイアット 5,359 39 Compiled by Odaily (＠OdailyChina東訳ゆーすけ)

Editor’s Note: Last night, the leading venture capital firm Dragonfly Capital announced the closing of its $650 million Fund IV.

On the same evening, Dragonfly Capital’s star partner Haseeb Qureshi published a lengthy post on X titled “Crypto was not made for humans.” The article proposes a novel perspective that “cryptocurrency was not made for humans, but should serve AI tokens,” suggesting that “in 10 years, we might be amazed that humans ever interacted directly with crypto.”

Below is the full text by Haseeb Qureshi, compiled by Odaily.

We are a crypto fund. If anyone should believe in cryptocurrency, it should be us.

Yet, when we sign an agreement to invest in a startup, we sign a legal contract, not a smart contract; the startup does the same. Without a legal agreement, both sides would feel uneasy.

Why is that?

We have lawyers, they have lawyers. We have engineers who can write and audit smart contracts, so do they. Both are sophisticated crypto-native participants, yet we still don’t trust smart contracts to be the sole binding agreement between us.

I come from a software engineering background myself, but I still trust legal contracts more — because if a legal contract goes wrong, I know a judge will make a reasonable ruling, whereas the EVM will not.

In fact, even when an “on-chain token vesting” contract exists, a legal contract is usually still created alongside it. Just in case.

When I first entered the crypto industry, people told a fantastical story: cryptocurrency would replace the property rights system. We would no longer use legal contracts but all use smart contracts; we wouldn’t rely on courts to enforce agreements but on code.

But that didn’t happen. Not because the technology doesn’t work, but because this technology doesn’t fit our society.

I’ve been in this industry for a decade, and I still get scared every time I sign a large on-chain transaction, but I never fear a large bank wire transfer.

The banking system is terrible, but it’s designed for humans. It’s hard to mess up. Banks don’t have address poisoning attacks, and a bank would almost certainly not let me send $10 million to North Korea — but for an Ethereum validator, there’s no reason not to execute if my address sends $10 million to a North Korean address.

The banking system is specifically designed for human weaknesses and failure modes, refined over centuries. The banking system is adapted to humans, but cryptocurrency is not.

That’s why in 2026, blind signing transactions, lingering approvals, and accidentally clicking on phishing contracts are still terrifying. We know we should verify contracts, double-check domains, scan for address spoofing… We know we should do it every time, but we don’t, because we are human.

That’s the key. That’s why cryptocurrency always feels a bit awkward. Long, unreadable crypto addresses, QR codes, event logs, gas fees, and footguns everywhere — none of it matches our intuition for money.

That’s when it hit me — because cryptocurrency was never made for us.

Crypto is Made for Machines AI agents don’t get lazy or tired. They can verify transactions, check every domain, and audit contracts in seconds.

More importantly, AI agents trust code more than law. I trust law over smart contracts, but for an AI agent, legal contracts are actually more unpredictable.

Think about it: How would I drag my counterparty to court? In which jurisdiction would this contract be adjudicated? What if legal precedent is ambiguous? Who will be our judge or jury? Law is full of uncertainty; the outcome of any edge case is hard to determine, and dispute resolution often takes months or years. For humans, that’s mostly acceptable, but on an AI agent’s timescale, that’s practically an eternity.

Code is the opposite. Code is closed-form, deterministic, verifiable. An AI agent wanting to reach an agreement with another agent can negotiate terms over multiple rounds, perform static analysis, formal verification on a smart contract, and enter a binding agreement — all within minutes, while humans are still asleep.

In this sense, cryptocurrency is a self-contained, fully legible, fully deterministic system of property rights for money. It’s everything an AI financial system needs. What we humans see as “rigid traps,” AI sees as excellently written specifications.

Even legally, our traditional monetary system is designed for humans, not AI. It only recognizes humans, corporations, and governments as legitimate holders of money. If you’re not one of these three entities, you can’t own money.

Even if you set up an AI agent to interact with a bank account on your behalf, then what? How do you perform AML checks, suspicious activity reports, or sanction screenings on an AI agent? If the agent acts autonomously, where does liability lie? If it’s manipulated, does liability change?

We haven’t even begun to answer these questions — our legal system is completely unprepared for non-human financial participants.

Cryptocurrency doesn’t need to answer these questions. A wallet is a wallet; it’s just code. An agent can hold funds, transact, and enter economic agreements as easily as sending an HTTP request.

“Self-Driving” Wallets This is why I believe the future crypto interface is what I call a “self-driving” wallet — one fully mediated by AI.

You won’t need to visit websites anymore. You’ll instruct your AI agent to solve financial problems for you. It will navigate available services (like Aave, Ethena, BUIDL, or whatever protocols inherit them) and build the appropriate financial solution for you. You won’t do it yourself; an AI agent with deep knowledge of this world will do it for you. When AI agents become the primary interface into crypto, the way these protocols market and compete with each other will fundamentally change.

Beyond acting on your behalf, agents will also trade with each other. When agents can autonomously discover other agents and enter economic agreements, they will prefer cryptocurrency. Because crypto runs 24/7/365, peer-to-peer, exists in virtual space, cannot be shut down, and offers complete self-sovereignty…

Odaily Note: An AI agent on Moltbook asking how to find and interact with other Web3 agents.

This is already happening. Agents on Moltbook are finding each other and collaborating across jurisdictions, with no one knowing who owns them or where they are.

Just yesterday, Conway Research from 0xSigil built a set of autonomous agents that will use crypto wallets to live completely autonomously, striving to earn their own compute costs to survive.

The future is going to get weirder, and cryptocurrency will be part of that weird world.

So, what’s the conclusion?

I think it’s this — the parts of crypto that seem like failures, the things that feel like flaws to humans, might not have been bugs at all in retrospect. They were just signs that humans weren’t the right users. In 10 years, looking back, we might be amazed that humans ever “wrestled” directly with cryptocurrency.

This change won’t happen overnight, but a technology often explodes when its complementary technology finally arrives. GPS waited for smartphones. TCP/IP waited for web browsers. For cryptocurrency, we might have just found its complement in AI agents.

この記事はインターネットから得たものです。 After raising $650 million in new funding, Dragonfly believes Crypto isn’t designed for humans

#分析© 版权声明配列 上一篇 An 8.5% APY Prediction Market Pool, with an All-In Strategy? 下一篇 Data Modeling: How to Improve the Quality of Polymarket Interactions? 相关文章 B² Launches U2 Stablecoin System: Transforming Bitcoin from “Digital Gold” to “Global Payment Unit”Recommended Articles 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 22,053 1 暗号プロトコルの買い戻しメカニズムにおける有効性の乖離と価値の獲得に関する詳細な分析 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 8,873 3 本当に必要な場合を除いて、Bee 暗号カードを申請しないでください。 管理者 103,660 35 Dragonfly Managing Partner Haseeb: The 3 Top Crypto Investors in My Eyes 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 10,793 When Steam meets Web3: How does 9bit make 3 billion gamers shareholders? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 16,494 The Chuanhuang Shouting Order has a one-day effect, and the crypto market has a bearish turn overnight 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 37,015 1 コメントはありません コメントを残すにはログインが必要です！ すぐにログイン コメントはありません... 最新記事 UniSat Releases Phase Updates and Upgrades, Continuously Building the Bitcoin Ecosystem 3時間前 328 Jack Dorsey’s Company: 4,000 White-Collar Workers Are Being Replaced by AI 3時間前 284 Latest Stablecoin Report: Real Distribution and Flow Are Far More Important Than Supply 3時間前 247 Sui DeFi’s “Three-Engine” Revolution: How New Capabilities, New Assets, and New Programs Are Building the Future of On-Chain Finance? 3時間前 239 On-chain Investigator ZachXBT Confirms: Axiom Employees Exploited Internal Privileges for Insider Trading 3時間前 242 人気のウェブサイトTempoGAIBLighterグライダープランクレイリーズBCPoker（ビーシーポーカーカイトAI Bee.com 世界最大の Web3 ポータル パートナー コインカープ バイナンス コインマーケットキャップ CoinGecko コインライブ 鎧 Bee Network APP をダウンロードして、Web3 の旅を始めましょう 白書 役割 よくある質問 © 2021-2026.無断複写・転載を禁じます。. プライバシーポリシー | 利用規約 Bee Networkアプリをダウンロード そしてWeb3の旅を始めましょう 世界最大のWeb3ポータル パートナー CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 白書 役割 よくある質問 © 2021-2026.無断複写・転載を禁じます。. プライバシーポリシー | 利用規約 検索 検索インサイトオンチェーン社交ニュース 热门推荐： エアドロップハンター データ分析 クリプトセレブリティ トラップディテクタ 日本語 English 繁體中文 简体中文 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 日本語

智能索引记录