温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/zh/61516.html
点击访问原文链接

The whole story of MegaETH’s “slip of the hand”: Multiple signings 34 minutes early disrupted a $1 billion plan. | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
The whole story of MegaETH’s “slip of the hand”: Multiple signings 34 minutes early disrupted a $1 billion plan. | Bee Network Login 熱門新聞 Meme Launchpad AI 代理商 DeSci 熱門鏈瀏覽器 新人必讀 衝百倍幣 蜜蜂遊戲 必備網站 必備APP 必關大神 DePIN 新人必備 教我避坑 基本工具 深度網站 交易所 NFT 工具 你好， 登出 Web3宇宙 遊戲 DApp 蜂巢 增長平台 生態 搜尋 英語 Coins儲值 登入 下載 Web3大學 遊戲 DApp 蜂巢 生態 家•分析•正文 The whole story of MegaETH’s “slip of the hand”: Multiple signings 34 minutes early disrupted a $1 billion plan.分析3 个月前更新懷亞特 15,762 23 Author | Ethan ( @ethanzhang_web3 )

For MegaETH, which once had Vitalik Buterin’s endorsement and touted “100k TPS” and “sub-millisecond latency,” last night’s pre-deposit launch was undoubtedly a disastrous stress test.

In just a few hours, the community experienced the entire “drama” of website downtime, instant depletion of credit limits, unexpected execution of multi-signature agreements, and fluctuating credit limits. This turmoil, a mix of technical glitches and human error, ultimately ended with the forced locking of $500 million in deposits.

Circuit Breaker Triggered Immediately: Logical Flaws Behind Error Pop-ups
The story begins on the evening of November 25th. As planned , the USDm pre-deposit channel was supposed to open at 10 PM Beijing time, with an initial limit of $250 million. However, the surge in volume was more intense and chaotic than anticipated.

At startup, users waiting in front of the screen did not experience the smooth experience they had anticipated. Most were faced with a black screen displaying only the word “Data,” with a cold pink error message at the bottom: “THERE IS AN ERROR. PLEASE CHECK BACK LATER.” There was no explanation, no queue indication, only an unsettling uncertainty.

在 a post-mortem analysis, the MegaETH team admitted that this was not a simple traffic overload, but a typical “double backend incident”.

First, there was a fatal configuration error—a SaleUUID mismatch. The parameters written in the pre-deposit contract were inconsistent with the Sonar system responsible for KYC verification, causing all deposit requests to be rejected directly on-chain. Correcting this parameter wasn’t as simple as changing a line of code, as the contract was controlled by Safe multi-signature (4/6). This meant that in a time-sensitive situation, the team had to urgently coordinate on-chain interactions among the four signers, directly extending the downtime.

To make matters worse, the third-party service provider Echo (Sonar), responsible for verification, also encountered a problem. Due to an insufficiently configured rate limit, a flood of genuine user traffic was misjudged and blocked by the system. According to official sources, it took a full 23 minutes from discovering the problem to deploying a fix.

With the two major obstacles of UUID correction and rate limiting finally cleared, the system resumed automatic operation. The pent-up FOMO sentiment was instantly released, and the initial $250 million quota was snapped up in just 156 seconds .

Multiple signatures “accidentally”: an unexpected event 34 minutes early.
If the initial congestion was just “standard practice” for Web3, then the subsequent expansion episode was a completely man-made “black humor.”

After the initial allocation sold out instantly, in response to the overwhelming enthusiasm from the community, the MegaETH team decided to temporarily adjust its strategy , planning to significantly increase the limit to $1 billion to ensure more users could access USDm on the first day of mainnet launch. To implement this increase, the project initiated a multi-signature transaction involving the Safe address (0xCB…719) .

However, in a dramatic turn of events, on-chain data showed that the fourth signer (@chud_eth) unexpectedly executed the transaction 34 minutes before the scheduled start time. This was not just a simple “slip of the hand”; it directly caused the deposit channel to be prematurely opened without any warning.

Funds flooded in again, completely disrupting the official response. The team frantically tried to salvage the situation: initially attempting to limit the amount to $400 million as a trial, but it was too late; ultimately, they had to forcibly cap the limit at $500 million. Even so, the additional quota was filled instantly.

This dramatic back-and-forth quickly triggered a strong crisis of trust within the community. Disappointment and ridicule were intertwined, with some bluntly stating that this chaotic experience was “like visiting a poorly managed casino,” while other developers pointed out sharply that such basic engineering negligence was deeply disturbing for an infrastructure project envisioned for expansion.

Faced with overwhelming criticism, the MegaETH team quickly released a lengthy statement recounting the situation . While acknowledging their mistakes, they repeatedly emphasized their core principles: all contract code has been audited and is secure, posing no risk to funds. To appease public sentiment, the team also promised that users who successfully participated in the pre-deposit program will receive priority in future reward events.

The dust has settled: KYC issues forced the $1 billion plan to fall through.
After a night of turmoil, in the early hours of November 26, the MegaETH team finally settled the matter: officially abandoning the original $1 billion expansion plan and locking the total pre-deposit amount at $500 million.

The sudden halt wasn’t solely to quell public opinion, but rather stemmed from technical constraints. According to official disclosures, unresolved bugs still exist in the KYC verification process, preventing some compliant users from participating. Forcibly opening the floodgates to $1 billion before clearing these obstacles is clearly unwise.

Regarding the “stay or leave” issue that existing users are most concerned about, the team has provided a pragmatic solution. The official statement acknowledges that the experience was “unacceptable,” especially for early users who entered based on expectations of a “$250 million hard cap,” as the unexpected doubling of the limit objectively diluted their share and rights. To rectify this “default on expectations ,” the team promises to launch a withdrawal page in the coming days, giving users the choice.

Despite criticisms from many that the execution process was a “makeshift operation,” the sheer volume of money speaks for itself—following last month’s MEGA token sale of over $1.39 billion, this $500 million “sold out in seconds” once again confirms the market’s high expectations for MegaETH.

However, this incident also serves as a wake-up call for all Web3 projects that were born with a silver spoon in their mouths: the endorsement of Vitalik Buterin and Joe Lubin can determine how high your ceiling is, but the most basic engineering execution ability determines how far you can actually fly.

本文源自網路： The whole story of MegaETH’s “slip of the hand”: Multiple signings 34 minutes early disrupted a $1 billion plan.Recommended Articles

有關的： 空投 Weekly Report | Polymarket Confirms 代幣 Launch and Airdrop; Aster Uses 70-80% of S3 Fees for ASTER Buybacks (October 13-27)

作者：Golem ( @)web3_golem ) Odaily Planet Daily has reviewed the airdrop projects that can be claimed from October 13, 2025 to October 27, 2025, and also sorted out important airdrop information during this period. For detailed information, please see the main text. Monad Project and airdrop qualification introduction Monad, a high-performance L1 blockchain, announced its airdrop on October 14th. The airdrop will distribute tokens to 5,500 members of the Monad community and nearly 225,000 members of the broader crypto community. The airdrop targets five key user groups: Monad community members (the largest group), active on-chain users (including DEX traders, DeFi protocol participants, and NFT holders), members of the broader crypto community, crypto contributors (security researchers and educators), and Monad ecosystem builders. Active on-chain users primarily fall into the following…

#分析#市場#代幣# 網路3© 版權聲明文章版权归作者所有，未经允许请勿转载。 上一篇 BTC.b vs wBTC: In-depth comparison of technical architecture and market landscape 下一篇 Even the ex-boyfriend of the founder of OpenAI was hacked; crypto billionaires have become the number one target of "phy 相關文章 從程式碼到代理：AI如何重塑Web3新時代 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 37,796 2 SUN.io’s Breakthrough Plan for 2025: Simultaneous Development of DEX, Stablecoins, Memes, and Contracts, Driving a Leap 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 16,690 3 SIA: Building the Web3 Intelligent Transaction Layer for the AI Era – A Comprehensive Analysis of the Airdrop Campaign 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 17,386 3 熱的回顧 2024 年比特幣改變加密貨幣格局的關鍵時刻 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 35,451 2 Portrait of crypto gamblers: bait of luck, prisoner of K-line 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 31,096 3 A quick look at the new launchpad Heaven and its token LIGHT: With 100% revenue repatriation, can it challenge Pump.fun? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 26,870 1 暫無評論 您必須先登入才能發表評論！ 立即登入 暫無評論... Bee.com 全球最大的 Web3 入口網站 合作夥伴 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko 幣活 盔甲 下載Bee Network APP開啟您的Web3之旅 白皮書 角色 常問問題 © 2021-2026.版權所有。. 隱私政策 | 服務條款 下載蜜蜂網路APP 並開始 web3 之旅 全球最大的Web3入口網站 合作夥伴 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 白皮書 角色 常問問題 © 2021-2026.版權所有。. 隱私政策 | 服務條款 搜尋 搜尋站內鏈上社群媒體新聞 熱門推薦： 擼毛打金 數據分析 必關大神 教我避坑 繁體中文 English 简体中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 繁體中文

智能索引记录