温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/zh/59325.html
点击访问原文链接

Henan’s “Old Ties” Hold Up Half the Sky? Ethereum Nodes Revealed | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
Henan’s “Old Ties” Hold Up Half the Sky? Ethereum Nodes Revealed | Bee Network Login 熱門新聞 Meme Launchpad AI 代理商 DeSci 熱門鏈瀏覽器 新人必讀 衝百倍幣 蜜蜂遊戲 必備網站 必備APP 必關大神 DePIN 新人必備 教我避坑 基本工具 深度網站 交易所 NFT 工具 你好， 登出 Web3宇宙 遊戲 DApp 蜂巢 增長平台 生態 搜尋 英語 Coins儲值 登入 下載 Web3大學 遊戲 DApp 蜂巢 生態 家•分析•正文 Henan’s “Old Ties” Hold Up Half the Sky? Ethereum Nodes Revealed分析4 個月前更新懷亞特 16,819 13 Before we knew it, the total amount of Ethereum staked has reached approximately 35 million (data statistics vary somewhat between different websites). While it took about a year for this number to grow from 15 million to 25 million, it took twice as long to grow from 25 million to 35 million. It’s foreseeable that over time, the amount of Ethereum staked may reach a certain cap, entering a period of dynamic equilibrium between the amount of staked and unstaked.

The above image is from beaconcha.in, an open-source browser developed by BitFly, the developer of EtherMine, once the largest Ethereum PoW mining pool. This Austrian-based Ethereum ecosystem development company has developed several browsers, including ethernodes.org, a data website that provides information about Ethereum’s execution and consensus layer nodes. The data previously cited regarding the high number of Ethereum nodes hosted on AWS came from this website.

Two years ago, over 60% of hosted nodes were hosted on AWS. Today, both the node distribution and the cloud providers used have changed significantly. (All data below is current as of the time of writing and excludes unsynchronized nodes.)

Which clients do the nodes use?

Of the 10,475 execution-layer nodes surveyed, Geth accounts for 51.66% of the clients used, still representing an excessively high share. Nethermind, developed by Tomasz Stańczak, the newly appointed Executive Director of the Ethereum Foundation, follows closely behind with a 26.48% share. Besu, originally developed by ConsenSys and later migrated to the Hyperledger Foundation’s Github repository in 2019, accounts for 8.26%. Erigon (formerly known as Turbo-Geth, led by British developer Alexey Akhunov and renamed Erigon in May 2021), once considered one of Ethereum’s four major execution-layer clients, accounts for 6.1% and has been surpassed by Paradigm’s Reth (6.89%).

Reth has been fraught with controversy within the Ethereum community. Yearn core developer Banteg once claimed that Reth borrowed heavily from Akula (a Rust client) and copied the Erigon architecture, but Paradigm did not support these developers. Although Paradigm CTO Georgios Konstantopoulos responded by claiming that Reth “stands on the shoulders of giants,” the community disagreed, viewing it as a VC-style resource grab. This incident also led to Akula developers announcing they would no longer maintain the project, believing it could not compete with Paradigm.

Just a week ago, Ethereum core developer Federico Carrone also warned on X that as a for-profit company, Paradigm’s expansion (such as recruiting key researchers, funding open source libraries, and leading EIP and Reth) would pose a threat to Ethereum’s decentralization, but its dominant Ethrex only accounts for 0.2% of the execution layer clients.

As for consensus layer clients, Lighthouse, founded and maintained by Australian security firm Sigma Prime, holds the highest share of the 8,597 consensus-layer nodes surveyed, accounting for 45.66%. Prysm, with approximately 24%, was originally developed and maintained by blockchain infrastructure company Prysmatic Labs, which was acquired by Arbitrum developer Offchain Labs in 2022. Teku, ranked third with 11.91%, is developed by the same team as Besu. Nimbus, with 10.19%, is a project solely funded by the Ethereum Foundation and other organizations. It aims to improve resource efficiency, enabling node operators to easily run Ethereum client software on resource-constrained devices such as mobile phones and laptops.

In the Ethereum network, the top four execution layer clients and consensus layer clients account for 93.29% and 91.76% respectively, still showing a strong concentration. However, compared with the more exaggerated concentration level two or three years ago, the client diversification promoted by the Ethereum Foundation is still effective.

Where are the nodes? The location of Ethereum’s execution layer nodes and consensus layer nodes is very difficult to accurately identify. The website most likely determines the location through IP analysis, which is not very accurate, but it also gives us a rough outline of the distribution.

Over 30% of the IP addresses of nodes running execution-layer clients are located in the United States, with the highest concentration near Washington, D.C. There are also some nodes in cities like San Francisco, Los Angeles, and New York, with the remaining nodes scattered across Kansas, Iowa, Texas, Florida, and Massachusetts.

As for Europe, the data shows that Germany accounts for 13.13%, the UK accounts for 4.47%, France accounts for 4.28%, and Finland accounts for 3.78%. The map shows that the nodes are generally distributed in the core cities of each country, including Dublin, Ireland, Paris, France, Frankfurt, Germany, and Helsinki, Finland.

Nodes located in China account for less than 4% of all IP addresses, but their distribution is extremely broad, stretching from Changchun, Jilin Province in the north to Hainan in the south, Xining City in Qinghai Province in the west, and east to coastal Shanghai and Taiwan. Notably, based on IP addresses, Hong Kong has 103 nodes, Taiwan has 97, and the rest of China has only 204 nodes in total. The darkest point in the image below is the most concentrated, located in Zhengzhou City, Henan Province.

The distribution of consensus-layer client nodes in North America and Europe is similar to that of execution-layer client nodes. While China still has dozens of nodes in the data, it’s not clearly visible on the map. Regarding regional distribution, the United States and Germany rank in the top two for both execution-layer and consensus-layer nodes, but Ethereum nodes are found in nearly every region of the world, including small countries like Guatemala, Kuwait, Montenegro, and even Iceland in the far north.

What cloud services are the nodes using? “Half of the Ethereum nodes are using AWS” is also a well-known cliché in the industry. Maybe a few years ago, a large number of Ethereum nodes were indeed hosted on cloud services, but this situation has improved greatly now.

Among nodes running execution-layer clients, 49.1% are hosted, while 45% are self-hosted. Consensus-layer client nodes, likely due to the need for stability to prevent penalties, account for 58.5% of hosted nodes, but self-hosted nodes are a close second at 37.5%. Beyond the nature of the nodes, there are many other interesting details within this data.

First, for nodes running execution layer clients, among the Internet service providers that built their own nodes, China Unicom and China Telecom together accounted for 51.52%. In addition, they also included China Unicom Industrial Internet Backbone Network, China Mobile and China Education and Research Computer Network Center, China Unicom (Shenzhen), China Telecom Yunnan Province IDC1 Network, China Telecom Group, Beijing Baidu Netcom Technology Co., Ltd., etc.

This suggests that over 20% of execution-layer client nodes are actually operating in China, but likely using overseas IP addresses. In contrast, very few execution-layer client nodes utilize domestic network operators. Given that operating execution clients offers no stable returns, I speculate that this high percentage primarily serves the needs of RPC nodes, development, on-chain high-frequency trading, or strategy trading, which require rapid transaction broadcasting. This demonstrates that China remains a significant market for on-chain activity.

As for the data on the hosting nodes using various cloud services, it is relatively consistent with the geographical distribution.

Among hosted execution client nodes, 35.53% chose AWS, 13.75% chose German hosting provider Hetzner Online, and 9.69% chose French cloud provider OVHcloud. Google Cloud (7.02%) and Oracle Cloud (2.37%) ranked fourth and fifth, respectively. This aligns with the geographical distribution, which is primarily concentrated in the United States and Europe. Consensus layer client nodes follow a similar pattern, with the aforementioned five providers occupying the top five positions. Alibaba Cloud, Tencent Cloud, and Huawei Cloud also appear on the list, but with very small percentages.

Based on this calculation, the number of nodes hosted on AWS accounts for approximately 20% of the total, which is a reasonable proportion.

Overall, the over 10,000 nodes running execution-layer clients and the nearly 9,000 nodes running consensus-layer clients are not dominated by a single company, regardless of geographic distribution, network services, or hosting providers. The only risk of a dominant player in client selection is a gradual decline in this proportion. The Ethereum Foundation’s efforts to promote decentralization are gradually realizing its dream of becoming a “world computer.”

本文源自網路： Henan’s “Old Ties” Hold Up Half the Sky? Ethereum Nodes RevealedRecommended Articles

Related: Gemini’s stock plummeted after its first-day surge, signaling a post-Circle crypto IPO boom is over. Author｜jk On September 12th, the cryptocurrency exchange Gemini officially listed on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol GEMI, marking the fulfillment of a long-cherished IPO for the trading platform founded by the Winklevoss twins. However, initial market enthusiasm was quickly tempered by real financial data . After a dramatic surge on its opening day, the stock price quickly retreated, revealing that the company’s fundamentals had failed to win the confidence of retail US stock investors. The long road to listing: from a valuation of 7.1 billion to IPO Gemini’s road to an IPO has been fraught with twists and turns. Founded in 2014 by brothers Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, the cryptocurrency exchange began preparing for its IPO several years ago. The company reportedly spent approximately three years preparing for its…

#分析#以太坊#市場© 版權聲明文章版权归作者所有，未经允许请勿转载。 上一篇 24-Hour Hot Coins and News | The probability of a 25 basis point Fed rate cut in October is 97.3%; 下一篇 Trump enters the prediction market: Truth Predict faces off against Polymarket 相關文章 $300,000 Trump Gold Statue, a Crazy Memecoin Marketing Stunt 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 8,991 1 The siphon effect of the US crypto market is emerging, and many Asian countries are accelerating their layout to seize t 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 25,464 1 Gate.io Launches GateLive Space to Explore Real-Time Crypto Conversation Space 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 39,639 1 洞悉川普的交易藝術：所有衝突都是生意 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 33,560 2 The First Principles of Stablecoin Yield: Behind the Clarity Act and Davos Debates, Revisiting the Nature of On-Chain Interest 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 8,098 2026 Davos Annual Meeting: How Did Web3 Giants Discuss the Future? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 9,059 暫無評論 您必須先登入才能發表評論！ 立即登入 暫無評論... Bee.com 全球最大的 Web3 入口網站 合作夥伴 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko 幣活 盔甲 下載Bee Network APP開啟您的Web3之旅 白皮書 角色 常問問題 © 2021-2026.版權所有。. 隱私政策 | 服務條款 下載蜜蜂網路APP 並開始 web3 之旅 全球最大的Web3入口網站 合作夥伴 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 白皮書 角色 常問問題 © 2021-2026.版權所有。. 隱私政策 | 服務條款 搜尋 搜尋站內鏈上社群媒體新聞 熱門推薦： 擼毛打金 數據分析 必關大神 教我避坑 繁體中文 English 简体中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 繁體中文

智能索引记录