温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/zh/51752.html
点击访问原文链接

7 Million Wallets Have Experienced Rug Pulls, Are You Among Them? | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
7 Million Wallets Have Experienced Rug Pulls, Are You Among Them? | Bee Network Login 熱門新聞 Meme Launchpad AI 代理商 DeSci 熱門鏈瀏覽器 新人必讀 衝百倍幣 蜜蜂遊戲 必備網站 必備APP 必關大神 DePIN 新人必備 教我避坑 基本工具 深度網站 交易所 NFT 工具 你好， 登出 Web3宇宙 遊戲 DApp 蜂巢 增長平台 生態 搜尋 英語 Coins儲值 登入 下載 Web3大學 遊戲 DApp 蜂巢 生態 家•分析•正文 七百萬個錢包經歷過拉扯，您也在其中嗎？分析9 年前更新懷亞特 27,175 7 During the bull market, many people made a hundred times their money overnight by buying a certain project, but many people also lost all their money because the project owner ran away with the money. On June 11, the price of Aura (AURA) soared from $0.001 to a high of $0.008, an increase of 800% in a few hours, and the trading volume soared by more than 115,000% compared with the previous day. David, a well-known 加密貨幣currency scam analyst on the X platform, warned that the rise may be an organized scam – this criminal model known as Rug Pull is sweeping the cryptocurrency world in an industrialized assembly line form.

The average profit of a single Rug Pull project is about $1.65 million Through on-chain evidence collection of the contracts of the four major public chains, bitsCrunch data shows that as many as 304,000 tokens have experienced different degrees of rug pull, which is equivalent to hundreds of trap tokens being deployed on the network on average every day. Supporting this huge scam is an astonishingly large fraud gang – 266,000 independent deployer addresses are active on Ethereum, specializing in the creation and promotion of fraudulent tokens.

Data source: bitsCrunch.com

These developers used low-threshold coin issuance tools and a large user base to accurately lay bait. Although the average profit of a single scam project on Ethereum is about $1.65 million, its huge base makes the total income reach an astronomical figure of $502 billion.

Data source: bitsCrunch.com

Polygon and Linea had 530 and 399 Rug Pull incidents respectively. Of particular note is that there was a total profit of $10,140 from the attack on Polygon. 7,680 tokens were Rug Pulled, and behind them were 4,640 active fraudulent deployers. Although the emerging Linea chain has a relatively small amount of data, it has been recorded (hard Rug Pull part) that 4 contracts were completely drained of liquidity. According to bitsCrunch data, more than 7.05 million investors have become direct victims of the Rug Pull scam. This means that the wealth of millions of individuals and families has been wiped out in the Rug Pull trap.

Rug Pull Types and Time Periods Thoroughly looted hard rug pull
A hard rug pull is a complete robbery. Scammers subjectively suck the liquidity of the entire project by presetting malicious code and vulnerabilities in advance, such as 0xeeeeeb57642040be42185f49c52f7e9b38f8eeee on Avalanche (17 rugs/9 LPs, a ratio of 188.89%) and 0x8f006d1e1d9dc6c98996f50a4c810f17a47fbf19 on Polygon (88 rugs/6 LPs, a ratio of up to 1466.67%).

Multi-chain roaming crime

Some addresses (such as 0x8031c44b96ec8c9b66ab16c2c164e8deeb361a3f, 0x16eccfdbb4ee1a85a33f3a9b21175cd7ae753db4) have hard rug pull records on both Polygon and Avalanche. They took advantage of the characteristics of different chains to commit crimes and evade tracking, causing the token price to drop to zero in an instant and investors to lose all their money.

Data source: bitsCrunch.com

High frequency of crime and “shooting and moving to another place”

Many scam addresses show extremely high crime frequencies. For example, the address 0xb355f4f4cc84a9429a59d5c2b98d77016f7ec482 on Avalanche is associated with 45 Rug Pull tokens and 37 drained liquidity pools (LPs). The addresses 0x24bcb624082325eff357621a07353a0e38c054f0 on Polygon and 0x234b3fc3ab56f6d52fabb0cfd8efeb2477b0fd3d on Avalanche are both associated with 17 Rug tokens and 18 LPs, accounting for nearly 95%, showing a highly professional pattern of crime. These addresses are like locusts, deploying tokens in batches, draining them quickly, and then disappearing or changing their identities to start over.

代幣 Lifecycle

The token life cycle (token_txn_age) of a large number of hard Rug Pulls is extremely short, as short as 0 days (such as 0x b3 55 f 4 f 4…, 0x 6 3d c 3 ca 0…), 1 day (such as 0x 16 eccfd…), 3 days (such as 0x 55 b 1 a 124…, 0x 8 a 610 bf 3…). This confirms the scam model of Pixiu Disk and other scams – the scam is completed in a short time after the token is launched, without giving investors any time window to react and exit.

Boiled frog soft rug pull
Compared with the violence of the hard rug pull, the soft rug pull (usually refers to the withdrawal of about 50% of the liquidity) is more covert and insidious. It will not make the token price return to zero instantly, but create an illusion of slow decline or temporary adjustment by the project party. Scammers may make up various reasons (such as migrating contracts, upgrading systems, coping with market fluctuations), and some investors may fail to escape in time due to fluke or slow reaction, and eventually suffer heavy losses in the continuous decline. Although this mode does not seem to be as lethal as the hard rug pull in a single time, due to its concealment, it may affect a wider range and constitute a longer-term and chronic erosion of market confidence. According to bitsCrunch data, the figure below shows some cases of soft rug pull contract 50%.

Data source: bitsCrunch.com

Rug Pull token deployment will be the highest in 2023

Based on the annual Rug Pull data of bitsCrunch from 2020 to 2025, it can be observed that the deployment of fraud tokens on Ethereum in 2023 reached a historical peak of 125,759, accounting for 42.3% of the total in five years. However, the deployment volume dropped sharply to 69,154 in 2024 (a year-on-year decrease of 45%). There is a clear periodicity in fraudulent activities, with an average annual deployment of 48,721 on the four major chains during 2021/2023. The average life cycle of fraudulent contracts has been compressed from 356 days in 2021 to 3.8 days in 2025.

Data source: bitsCrunch.com

The number of fraudulent tokens and deployers, which is as high as hundreds of thousands, shows that Rug Pull is by no means a scattered petty theft, but a mature black industry chain with clear division of labor, toolization, and process. The cost of fraud is extremely low, and the potential return is huge. Users need to understand the common tactics of Rug Pull (promises of high returns, anonymous teams, no audits, suspicious or missing liquidity locks, social media hype, short-term pulls, etc.). Checking whether the contract is open source, whether it has been audited by a well-known auditing agency, whether the team background is verifiable, and the liquidity lock situation should be a necessary step before investing.

結論 Rug Pull’s data is shocking: hundreds of thousands of fraudulent tokens, hundreds of thousands of fraudsters, trillions of dollars in illegal gains, more than seven million victims… This is not just a case of investment losses, but a systematic attack on the foundation of the entire blockchain and cryptocurrency industry: trust. Exposing the dark truth of Rug Pull is not only to warn everyone to pay attention to risks, but also to inspire the entire industry to form a better regulatory system.

This article is sourced from the internet: 7 Million Wallets Have Experienced Rug Pulls, Are You Among Them?

Related: YZi Labs takes action, making two bets in seven years. Is hardware wallet still a good business? On June 5, YZi Labs tweeted that it had invested in open source hardware wallet company OneKey. This is the first time that Binance resources have supported a hardware wallet project again in 7 years after investing in SafePal in 2018 (Note: In 2022, Binance Labs announced a strategic investment in Belgian hardware wallet manufacturer NGRAVE. The amount was not disclosed. The attention in the Chinese-speaking region is relatively low, so this article does not cover it for the time being). It can be called restrained, so it is particularly worthy of attention, and it has once again heated up the industrys discussion on whether hardware wallets are a good business. From a timeline perspective, after the FTX incident in 2022, the importance of self-custody has been repeatedly verified. Binance’s…

#分析# 加密#以太坊#市場#代幣#工具© 版權聲明文章版权归作者所有，未经允许请勿转载。 上一篇 The Strange and Orthodox Ways of “Trump Family Stablecoin” USD1: Institutional Investment and Meme Liquidity Pool 下一篇 One-week token unlocking: ZKJ unlocked tokens account for 5% of the circulation 相關文章 A fractured prosperity: trade wars, the AI bubble, and political rifts 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 17,121 1 94,500 May Become Bitcoin’s Bull-Bear Watershed, Daily Chart Structure Enters Critical Observation Zone | Guest Analysis 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 10,211 The crypto IPO boom: A look at the new round of wealth opportunities 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 17,995 Understanding RaveDAO: Building a Cultural Layer for Cryptocurrencies 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 17,033 1 The market paid for the quarrel between Trump and Musk. What will be the subsequent trend? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 29,530 4 Web3 Beginner Series: Exploring New On-Chain Payment Protocols – x402 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 15,951 暫無評論 您必須先登入才能發表評論！ 立即登入 暫無評論... Bee.com 全球最大的 Web3 入口網站 合作夥伴 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko 幣活 盔甲 下載Bee Network APP開啟您的Web3之旅 白皮書 角色 常問問題 © 2021-2026.版權所有。. 隱私政策 | 服務條款 下載蜜蜂網路APP 並開始 web3 之旅 全球最大的Web3入口網站 合作夥伴 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 白皮書 角色 常問問題 © 2021-2026.版權所有。. 隱私政策 | 服務條款 搜尋 搜尋站內鏈上社群媒體新聞 熱門推薦： 擼毛打金 數據分析 必關大神 教我避坑 繁體中文 English 简体中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 繁體中文

智能索引记录