温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/zh/46962.html
点击访问原文链接

Penetrating Redstone’s pre-market red and black: airdrop controversy and abnormal price fluctuations | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
Penetrating Redstone’s pre-market red and black: airdrop controversy and abnormal price fluctuations | Bee Network Login 熱門新聞 Meme Launchpad AI 代理商 DeSci 熱門鏈瀏覽器 新人必讀 衝百倍幣 蜜蜂遊戲 必備網站 必備APP 必關大神 DePIN 新人必備 教我避坑 基本工具 深度網站 交易所 NFT 工具 你好， 登出 Web3宇宙 遊戲 DApp 蜂巢 增長平台 生態 搜尋 英語 Coins儲值 登入 下載 Web3大學 遊戲 DApp 蜂巢 生態 家•分析•Penetrating Redstone’s pre-market red and black: airdrop controversy and abnormal price fluctuations Penetrating Redstone’s pre-market red and black: airdrop controversy and abnormal price fluctuations分析11 年前更新懷亞特 32,5421 17 原作者：TechFlow

Red and Black are the interweaving of ambition and reality, and the collision of enthusiasm and coldness. –Red and Black

在 加密貨幣 market, the rise and fall of prices is a never-ending game; and the success or failure of a project is more like a contest between trust and suspicion.

As depicted in the famous novel The Red and the Black, red symbolizes passion and hope, while black represents shadow and crisis.

This “red and black” contrast is particularly striking when we turn our attention to the RedStone project that was recently launched on Binance Launchpool:

As a representative of the new cross-chain oracle, RedStone has previously attracted market attention with its innovative multi-chain architecture and strong investment background (including Coinbase Ventures and Blockchain Capital, etc.).

In the past week, this red stone has become a bright spot in the dull market, and the price of its token RED in the Binance pre-market market has once soared.

However, as the popularity of the cryptocurrency grew, issues such as the airdrop controversy and pre-market price fluctuations that have been hotly discussed on social media have gradually been exposed, causing this red stone to gradually become blackened in the eyes of some community members.

A battle between red and black, a test of community trust and market rules.

Redstone in the daily limit test In the crypto market, innovation is often the key to attracting attention.

The “Price Cap Mechanism” launched by Binance for RedStone (RED) has undoubtedly become the biggest highlight of this experiment.

On February 25, 2025, Binance announced that it would test this mechanism in pre-market trading on Launchpool, aiming to control volatility by limiting price increases and avoiding the Christmas tree-style violent fluctuations that have become commonplace in the early stages of token issuance.

Since RED was launched in the pre-market, this mechanism has quickly ignited market enthusiasm.

During the three consecutive days of trading, the price of RED repeatedly hit the upper limit of the daily price limit. After the price limit was lifted, it soared to US$1.4, becoming the focus of the pre-market.

As of now, RED is trading at $0.83, with a market value of $33 million and a fully circulated market value of $830 million. For a project that was just launched in a bear market, the initial performance is indeed impressive, and it also gives everyone a feeling that even the daily limit cannot stop the rise.

If you can make money, everyone will naturally like it.

The daily limit mechanism has indeed brought market popularity to RED, but its applicability remains to be tested.

While the continued rise in prices has attracted a lot of attention, it may also mask underlying issues that may be brewing in the community.

Black Spot in the 空投 Controversy The entanglement of interests is still the airdrop.

In the previous gameplay, RedStone launched three adventure activities through the Zealy and Discord platforms, requiring community members to complete different tasks, such as studying technical documents, writing analysis articles, producing image materials, and even continuously outputting content during the Spring Festival holiday.

These tasks are promoted as opportunities to “build an ecosystem together,” and community members earn RSG points by completing tasks. RedStone promises that these points will be key credentials for future RED token airdrops.

To put it more bluntly, this is a bit of a waste of money.

According to its token economics ( RED token economics ), RedStone plans to allocate 48.3% of tokens to the ecosystem and community, of which 10% will be used for initial community adoption, and is highly anticipated by community players.

However, on March 5, 2025, when RedStone announced the results of the airdrop, the community’s enthusiasm quickly cooled.

The official announcement stated that only 2.19% of the community members (4,386 people in total) received RED token rewards, and the RSG points of the remaining large number of players were judged invalid. It seemed that the hard-working players had nothing in the end.

What is worrying is not the lack of rewards but the inequality of rewards. You may get nothing by completing tasks, but you may get airdrops if you have status.

According to RedStones official post, the identity in Discord has become the key to obtaining airdrops. Eligible roles include Vein Master, Deep Miner, Professor, IRL (participated in offline activities), etc. However, public data shows that the proportion of people with the above roles in the project DC group is only 2%.

Therefore, based on the total community population of about 230,000, the number of people who can receive this airdrop is the 4,000+ mentioned above.

As soon as the airdrop results came out, dissatisfaction among community members began to spread on various social media.

Some netizens joked that if you didn’t get the RED airdrop, please don’t worry, because you will never walk alone.

The angrier players started to make complaints directly. For example, some negative posts were quickly forwarded in Chinese and English communities. The writing style was sharp and even the words were somewhat hostile, pointing out that RedStone was exploiting community users.

As a neutral observer, I have no way of verifying whether every word of the accusations in these posts is true; but the resentment in the community cannot be ignored. After all, the story of water being able to carry a boat but also being able to capsize it is frequently played out in the crypto world.

But at its core, the community’s anger, to put it bluntly, is still “I work hard but I’m not qualified.”

Even if many users have accumulated millions of points, they are still excluded and regarded as invalid labor: the reward ratio of only 2.19% highlights the problem of the old-fashioned airdrop PUA – that is, the project 指導s users to work through high-intensity tasks before the token is launched, but fails to fully fulfill its promises as expected.

When the efforts of community members are gradually devalued as victims of “digital indentured labor,” players in the game will naturally feel that they are being PUA’d into working and promoting the project for free, and in the end the fruits of the revolution are stolen by people with more status.

Pre-market price changes Given that the above-mentioned airdrop has displeased community members, if there are further abnormalities in the token price, it will obviously deepen everyone’s misunderstanding and distrust.

This afternoon, some community members posted screenshots showing that the price curve of RED in the pre-market showed an extremely outrageous oscillation, which was completely unlike the normal price trend.

Later, the well-known KOL @_FORAB also discovered a similar problem and speculated that there seemed to be a problem with REDs market maker, and a large number of pending orders were withdrawn, resulting in a large wave trend with a high price difference.

This situation can easily lead people to mistakenly believe that market makers are playing a one-man show, pushing prices back and forth without a proportional number of retail counterparties.

However, Stephen, the Chinese community manager of RedStone, later clarified in the comments that the problem was not caused by market makers. RED did not set up market makers in the pre-market, and the price change was actually caused by the trading rule design that each person could only trade 5,000 RED.

Subsequently, Binance officially responded that the RED/USDT limit order function malfunctioned between 11:39 and 12:09 on March 6, 2025, but the market order function worked normally and the platform has now completed the repair.

Judging from the results, although the incident did not originate from market maker manipulation, the sharp price fluctuations in the current RedStone community, given the already unstable sentiment, also caused the manipulation theory to spread rapidly in the community.

Although both RedStone and Binance have clarified the actual cause of the problem, in the crypto market, retail investors tend to believe conspiracy theories rather than technical explanations. This public opinion effect has further exacerbated the communitys distrust.

總結 With profit at the forefront, there is always a delicate relationship between project owners and communities in the crypto industry: they need each other, but sometimes they also feel that they are hurting each other.

From its innovative multi-chain architecture to Binance’s daily price limit mechanism, to airdrop controversies and price fluctuations, this project has experienced a high level of market attention in a short period of time, and has also suffered a severe test of community trust.

The results of RedStone’s airdrop disappointed most participants and even triggered questions about “PUA”-style exploitation. This sentiment is highly contagious in the crypto market, especially in an environment where the community is highly sensitive to fairness.

For RedStone, the future challenge lies in how to repair community relations and establish more transparent and robust mechanisms at the technical and operational levels.

Perhaps, looking at this round of crypto projects from a broader perspective, what is needed is not only technological innovation, but also a deep insight into community sentiment and comprehensive optimization of market rules.

Whoever wins the community wins the world.

This article is sourced from the internet: Penetrating Redstone’s pre-market red and black: airdrop controversy and abnormal price fluctuations

Related: Solana staking reward adjustment proposal, what impact will it have on SOL prices? Original article by: David Grider, Partner at FinalityCap Original translation: zhouzhou, BlockBeats Editor鈥檚 note: This article discusses the proposal for adjusting Solana鈥檚 staking rewards. There are problems with the arguments in the proposal, especially the impact of high staking rewards on DeFi returns and inflation on selling pressure. David countered that there is a close relationship between staking returns and network security and market demand, and that staking returns should be determined by the market. The following is the original content (for easier reading and understanding, the original content has been reorganized): I have serious concerns about Solanas proposed inflation reduction measure SIMD-0228, especially the current version proposed by TusharJain and Kankanivishal from multicoincap and MaxResnick 1, especially without addressing some key risks and issues. After listening to the latest…

#分析#空投# 加密#導軌#市場#代幣© 版權聲明文章版权归作者所有，未经允许请勿转载。 上一篇 24H Hot Coins and News | Fidelity will launch a tokenized fund that invests in U.S. Treasury bonds; Trump posted a messa 下一篇 MeMe Learning Notes From Yi He Binance 相關文章 24-Hour Hot Coins and News | The US Senate rejected the temporary funding bill for the 13th time, and the government shu 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 17,281 1 How can retail investors play with BNB amid the institutional accumulation wave?Recommended Articles 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 26,536 3 The “Midlife Crisis” of the Multi-Chain Ecosystem: Who Killed Cosmos, the King of Cross-Chain?Recommended Articles 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 26,326 1 From “Safe Harbor” to “Compliant Innovation”: An Analysis of the Impact of the SEC’s Innovation Exemption Policy 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 19,485 1 Bitcoin Ecosystem Revolution? The Turning Point from Meme Narrative to Value Precipitation 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 28,017 6 With a book loss of $1.3 billion, will Tom Lee’s Ethereum gamble collapse? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 14,478 1 則評論 您必須先登入才能發表評論！ 立即登入 喃 客人 徽杭古道

10 年前 最新的文章 UniSat Releases Phase Updates and Upgrades, Continuously Building the Bitcoin Ecosystem 8小時前 474 Jack Dorsey’s Company: 4,000 White-Collar Workers Are Being Replaced by AI 8小時前 474 Latest Stablecoin Report: Real Distribution and Flow Are Far More Important Than Supply 8小時前 380 Sui DeFi’s “Three-Engine” Revolution: How New Capabilities, New Assets, and New Programs Are Building the Future of On-Chain Finance? 8小時前 341 On-chain Investigator ZachXBT Confirms: Axiom Employees Exploited Internal Privileges for Insider Trading 8小時前 389 熱門網站TempoGAIBLighter滑翔機普朗克雷爾斯BCPokerVooi Bee.com 全球最大的 Web3 入口網站 合作夥伴 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko 幣活 盔甲 下載Bee Network APP開啟您的Web3之旅 白皮書 角色 常問問題 © 2021-2026.版權所有。. 隱私政策 | 服務條款 下載蜜蜂網路APP 並開始 web3 之旅 全球最大的Web3入口網站 合作夥伴 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 白皮書 角色 常問問題 © 2021-2026.版權所有。. 隱私政策 | 服務條款 搜尋 搜尋站內鏈上社群媒體新聞 熱門推薦： 擼毛打金 數據分析 必關大神 教我避坑 繁體中文 English 简体中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 繁體中文

智能索引记录