温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/vi/66062.html
点击访问原文链接

The End of Tokenization Illusion: How Vitalik’s Four Quadrants Rewrite the AI×Crypto Script | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
The End of Tokenization Illusion: How Vitalik’s Four Quadrants Rewrite the AI×Crypto Script | Bee Network Login Tin tức thịnh hành Nền tảng khởi chạy meme Các tác nhân trí tuệ nhân tạo (AI) DeSci TopChainExplorer Dành cho Newbee Tiền xu 100 lần Trò chơi Ong Trang web cần thiết ỨNG DỤNG Phải Có Người nổi tiếng về tiền điện tử DePIN Tân binh cần thiết Máy dò bẫy Công cụ cơ bản Trang web nâng cao Trao đổi Công cụ NFT CHÀO, Đăng xuất Vũ trụ Web3 Trò chơi Ứng dụng phi tập trung (DApp) Tổ ong Nền tảng phát triển QUẢNG CÁO Tìm kiếm Tiếng Anh Nạp xu Đăng nhập Tải xuống Đại học Web3 Trò chơi Ứng dụng phi tập trung (DApp) Tổ ong QUẢNG CÁO trang chủ•Phân tích•Văn bản chính The End of Tokenization Illusion: How Vitalik’s Four Quadrants Rewrite the AI×Crypto ScriptPhân tích3 tuần trước发布Wyatt 6.699 31 After two years, Vitalik has posted on Twitter again. Following up on the research report from two years ago, I’d like to share some thoughts. Even the date is exactly the same, February 10th.

Two years ago, Vitalik actually implicitly expressed that he wasn’t very optimistic about the various “Crypto Helps AI” trends that were popular at the time. The three major narratives in the circle back then were computing power assetization, data assetization, and model assetization. My research report two years ago mainly discussed some observed phenomena and doubts regarding these three narratives in the primary market. From Vitalik’s perspective, he was more bullish on “AI Helps Crypto”.

The examples he gave at the time were:

AI as a participant in games; AI as a game interface; AI as game rules; AI as a game objective; Over the past two years, we have made many attempts in “Crypto Helps AI”, but with little effect. Many sectors and projects ended up just – issuing a token and calling it a day, lacking real Product-Chợ Fit (PMF). I call this the “tokenization illusion”.

1. Computing Power Assetization – Most cannot provide commercial-grade Service Level Agreements (SLAs), are unstable, and frequently go offline. They can only handle simple, small-to-medium model inference tasks, mostly serving niche markets. Revenue is not linked to the token…

2. Data Assetization – High friction, low willingness, and high uncertainty on the supply side (retail users). The demand side (enterprises) requires structured, context-dependent professional data suppliers with trust and legal liability. It’s difficult for DAO-led Web3 projects to provide this.

3. Model Assetization – Models themselves are non-scarce, replicable, fine-tunable, rapidly depreciating process assets, not final-state assets. Hugging Face itself is a collaboration and dissemination platform, more like “GitHub for ML” rather than an “App Store for models”. Therefore, projects attempting to tokenize models via a “decentralized Hugging Face” have mostly ended in failure.

Additionally, over these two years, we have tried various forms of “verifiable inference”, which is a classic case of a solution looking for a problem. From ZKML to OPML to Game Theory, etc., even EigenLayer shifted its Restaking narrative to Verifiable AI.

But it’s largely similar to what happened in the Restaking sector – few AVSs (Actively Validated Services) are willing to pay continuously for extra verifiable security.

Similarly, verifiable inference is mostly about verifying “things that nobody really needs verified”. The threat model on the demand side is extremely vague – who exactly are we defending against?

AI output errors (model capability issues) far outnumber cases of AI output being maliciously tampered with (adversarial problems). As we’ve seen from various security incidents on platforms like OpenClaw and Moltbook recently, the real problems stem from:

Incorrect policy design Excessive permissions granted Unclear boundaries Unexpected interactions from tool combinations  … Scenarios like “the model being tampered with” or “the inference process being maliciously rewritten” are almost non-existent, imagined nails for the verifiability hammer.

I posted this chart last year, not sure if any old-timers remember.

The ideas Vitalik presented this time are clearly more mature than two years ago, also due to the progress we’ve made in various directions like privacy, X402, ERC8004, prediction markets, etc.

We can see that the four quadrants he outlined this time, half belong to “AI Helps Crypto” and the other half to “Crypto Helps AI”, no longer leaning heavily towards the former as it did two years ago.

Top-left and bottom-left – Utilizing Ethereum’s decentralization and transparency to solve AI’s trust and economic collaboration problems

 1.Enabling trustless and private AI interaction (Infrastructure + Survival): Using technologies like ZK, FHE to ensure the privacy and verifiability of AI interactions (not sure if the verifiable inference I mentioned earlier counts).

 2. Ethereum as an economic layer for AI (Infrastructure + Prosperity): Enabling AI agents to conduct economic payments, hire other bots, post collateral, or establish reputation systems through Ethereum, thereby building a decentralized AI architecture not limited to a single giant platform.

Top-right and bottom-right – Utilizing AI’s intelligent capabilities to optimize the user experience, efficiency, and governance of the mật mã ecosystem: 

3. Cypherpunk mountain man vision with local LLMs (Impact + Survival): AI as a user’s “shield” and interface. For example, local LLMs can automatically audit smart contracts, verify transactions, reducing reliance on centralized front-ends, and safeguarding individual digital sovereignty.

4. Make much better markets and governance a reality (Impact + Prosperity): AI deeply participating in prediction markets and DAO governance. AI can act as efficient participants, amplifying human judgment by processing information at scale, solving various market and governance issues like insufficient human attention, high decision-making costs, information overload, and voter apathy.

Previously, we were desperately trying to make Crypto Help AI, while Vitalik stood on the other side. Now we finally meet in the middle, though it seems unrelated to various XX tokenizations or so-called AI Layer1s. Hopefully, looking back at today’s post in two years, there will be some new directions and surprises.

Bài viết này được lấy từ internet: The End of Tokenization Illusion: How Vitalik’s Four Quadrants Rewrite the AI×Crypto Script

Phân tích #Tiền mã hóa ## ethereumThị trường #Mã thông báo #Công cụ ## web3© 版权声明Mảng 上一 hình ảnh Commercials during the American Spring Festival Gala all look like scams 下一 hình ảnh ICE, Parent Company of NYSE, Makes Major Moves with Index Futures Contracts and Predictive Market Sentiment Tools 相关文章 Pokémon card prices surge 40-fold, leveraging RWA to unlock global business opportunities 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 18.943 PNUT promotes the animal rescue narrative, Jorgie and the eagle become the new favorite memes 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 49.435 56 Weekly Editor’s Picks (November 1-7) 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 15.420 The Hong Kong stock market’s alt season is coming. Can crypto concept stocks support the backbone of the bull market? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 26.728 2 OKX Research Institute | Why will RWA become a key narrative in 2025? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 17.335 DeFi Under Strict Scrutiny: In-Depth Analysis of the USDX Stablecoin Crash 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 15.757 2 Miễn bình luận Bạn phải đăng nhập để co thể để lại một lơi nhận xét! Đăng nhập ngay lập tức Miễn bình luận... Bee.com Cổng thông tin Web3 lớn nhất thế giới Đối tác đồng xuCá chép Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Giáp Tải xuống Bee Network APP và bắt đầu hành trình web3 Giấy trắng Vai trò Câu hỏi thường gặp © 2021–2026. Tất cả quyền được bảo lưu. Chính sách bảo mật | Điều khoản dịch vụ Tải xuống ứng dụng Bee Network và bắt đầu hành trình web3 Cổng thông tin Web3 lớn nhất thế giới Đối tác CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors Giấy trắng Vai trò Câu hỏi thường gặp © 2021–2026. Tất cả quyền được bảo lưu. Chính sách bảo mật | Điều khoản dịch vụ Tìm kiếm Tìm kiếmTrong trang webOnChainXã hộiTin tức 热门推荐: Thợ săn airdrop Phân tích dữ liệu Người nổi tiếng về tiền điện tử Máy dò bẫy Tiếng Việt English 繁體中文 简体中文 日本語 العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский Tiếng Việt

智能索引记录