温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/ko/66173.html
点击访问原文链接

Testing the Waters of Prediction Market ETFs: A Step Toward Mainstream or Playing with Fire? | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
Testing the Waters of Prediction Market ETFs: A Step Toward Mainstream or Playing with Fire? | Bee Network Login 인기 뉴스 밈 런치패드 AI 에이전트 DeSci 탑체인 익스플로러 뉴비의 경우 100x 코인 꿀벌 게임 필수 웹사이트 필수 앱 암호화폐 유명인 드핀 루키 에센셜 함정 탐지기 기본 도구 고급 웹사이트 교환 NFT 도구 안녕, 로그아웃 웹3 유니버스 계략 DApp 꿀벌 하이브 성장하는 플랫폼 기원 후 찾다 영어 코인 충전 로그인 다운로드 웹3 유니 계략 DApp 꿀벌 하이브 기원 후 집•분석•본문 Testing the Waters of Prediction Market ETFs: A Step Toward Mainstream or Playing with Fire?분석1주 전업데이트와이엇 3,871 14 Author | DingDang (@XiaMiPP)

Recently, ETF issuers Bitwise Asset Management and GraniteShares have filed applications with the U.S. Securities and 교환 Commission (SEC) for prediction market ETFs. Among them, Bitwise submitted six products under the “PredictionShares” brand, and GraniteShares followed closely with a structurally similar proposal. Earlier, on February 13th, Roundhill Investments also filed a similar application.

The core of these ETFs is tracking the outcomes of U.S. political elections. They attempt to package the “probability of outcomes” of U.S. political elections into a financial product that can be directly traded within traditional securities accounts. Specifically, the underlying focus is on the 2028 presidential election (Democratic or Republican victory) and the control of the Senate and House of Representatives in the 2026 midterm elections.

In other words, investors in the future may no longer need to go to 암호화폐-native platforms like Polymarket or register with CFTC-regulated Kalshi. They could simply open a Robinhood or Fidelity account and bet on “who will win the White House” as easily as buying a stock.

Screenshot from @jason_chen998

What does this leap forward signify?

Why Are Prediction 시장s Always “One Step Ahead”? The “forward-looking” nature of prediction markets regarding political events is hardly new.

Prediction markets are essentially groups of people using real money to express judgments. Participants express their confidence in an event’s occurrence by buying and selling “Yes/No” contracts. The prices of these contracts fluctuate between $0 and $1, representing the market’s consensus on probability. For example, if you believe a candidate has a 70% chance of winning, you might buy a “Yes” contract for $0.70. If the event occurs, the contract’s value rises to $1; otherwise, it becomes worthless.

This is a form of capital-weighted collective judgment. Unlike mere verbal expression, participants must bear the profit and loss consequences of their judgments, which was vividly demonstrated during the 2024 U.S. election. Trading volumes on Polymarket and Kalshi surged rapidly, with political contracts becoming the absolute mainstay. Before Election Day, the cumulative trading volume on Polymarket for the single market “2024 Presidential Election Winner” was approximately $3.7 billion. Kalshi, a later entrant, won a key lawsuit against the CFTC in September 2024, allowing it to legally offer election-related contracts. By November, its monthly trading volume reached $127 million, with about 89% coming from political and election markets.

More noteworthy is the signal conveyed by the data itself. Weeks before the 2024 election, the probability of a Trump victory on Polymarket remained stable above 60%, while mainstream polls at the time showed a tight race, with Harris even slightly ahead. The result? The prediction market seemed to have “read” the electoral situation in advance.

This doesn’t mean prediction markets are “magically accurate,” but across multiple election cycles, they have indeed demonstrated strong information aggregation capabilities. Research suggests that with sufficient liquidity and broad participation, the statistical performance of prediction markets often surpasses that of traditional poll samples. The veteran platform PredictIt has also been regarded as an effective information aggregator on multiple occasions. In contrast, traditional polls are susceptible to factors like sample bias and expression bias.

The root of the difference lies in the incentive mechanism: polls express attitudes, while prediction markets bear the outcome. The former has no cost, the latter has clear profit and loss. This structural difference determines the different ways information is processed.

Although prediction markets cooled down after the election—Polymarket’s daily trading volume plummeted by about 84% after the results were announced—the number of prediction market projects grew rapidly in 2025. As of now in 2026, according to data from predictionindex.xyz, there are as many as 137 prediction market projects. The leading player, Polymarket, has a total trading volume exceeding $50 billion, with a monthly trading volume of $8 billion.

From a fringe experiment to a mainstream sector, prediction markets are now a different beast. Now, imagine if participation could be made easy through ETFs—this collective intelligence could more broadly influence public perception of political events.

How ETFs Package Prediction Markets So, how do these ETFs bring the mechanics of prediction markets to Wall Street?

What these issuers are essentially doing is translating the contract prices of prediction markets into a product structure understandable by the securities market. Dressed in the guise of an ETF, it allows you to buy and sell through a regular brokerage account, yet you’re still betting on the outcome of a political event.

Taking Bitwise’s six proposed ETFs as an example, four directly target the 2028 presidential election (Democrat/Republican winner), and the remaining two correspond to control of the Senate and House in the 2026 midterms. The structures of GraniteShares and Roundhill are largely similar. In simple terms, these ETFs directly map the price performance of those binary event contracts on platforms like Kalshi or Polymarket into tradable ETF shares.

Mechanically, the share price of these ETFs will fluctuate between $0 and $1, reflecting the market’s real-time consensus on event probability. At least 80% of the fund’s assets will be invested in derivatives linked to these political events, such as contracts obtained from CFTC-approved exchanges like Kalshi, or through synthetic swaps to replicate performance. The buying process is the same as buying a stock: through brokerage accounts like Robinhood or Fidelity, with an expected expense ratio between 0.5% and 1%, and likely trading on NYSE Arca.

Upon settlement, if the event occurs (e.g., a Democrat wins the presidency), the corresponding “Yes” ETF’s value approaches $1; otherwise, it approaches $0. Bitwise’s plan is for the fund to liquidate and terminate shortly after the event outcome is determined, distributing the remaining assets pro-rata to holders. Some products from GraniteShares and Roundhill are more “flexible,” potentially allowing a “roll” into the next election cycle.

Compared to the Bitcoin ETFs we are familiar with, there is a clear distinction. 비트코인 ETF, like BlackRock’s IBIT, track the price of Bitcoin, with unlimited upside or downside potential, making them suitable as part of an asset allocation. Prediction market ETFs, however, lean more towards binary probability bets, with a fixed upper limit of $1, similar to buying insurance or options—winner takes all, loser loses all.

The question is, when probability becomes a tradable asset, does it remain a pure information aggregation mechanism?

Mainstreaming, or Gamblification? If these ETFs are approved, prediction markets will truly enter the mainstream financial view.

Currently, political prediction markets are still concentrated among crypto users or professional traders. Once ETFs are listed, the participation barrier for institutional capital and traditional investors will be significantly lowered. Companies might use them to hedge against policy change risks, and portfolio managers might view them as macro risk management tools. Liquidity will be amplified, and price signals might become more acute.

But the issues on the other side are equally apparent. The 2024 election already proved that prediction market prices are cited by media, amplified on social platforms, and even influence public sentiment. When probability is packaged as “market consensus,” it is easily interpreted as an objective trend. If the scale of capital further expands, could there be deliberate price manipulation to influence public opinion? PredictIt was embroiled in legal disputes over compliance issues in its early years; such problems are not unfounded.

Regulation remains the biggest uncertainty. The SEC might worry that this is essentially the “gamblification” of finance, increasing the risk of manipulation or moral hazard. The approval process might come with conditions, such as trading limits or additional disclosures. Currently, the CFTC has allowed Kalshi to trade election futures, which is a positive signal, but the SEC’s stance remains unclear.

결론 From crypto-native markets to Wall Street ETFs, prediction markets are undergoing an identity transformation. However, before the regulatory framework is clear, the moves by issuers seem more like a probe—testing regulatory boundaries and the market’s acceptance of “probability as an asset.”

이 글은 인터넷에서 퍼왔습니다: Testing the Waters of Prediction Market ETFs: A Step Toward Mainstream or Playing with Fire?

Related: The Great Collapse! Who Killed the Tech Premium in the Crypto Market? This is not a simple cyclical correction. According to Coinglass data, within just 48 hours in early February, the total amount of liquidations across the network exceeded $2.58 billion. The price of Bitcoin once broke through the $76,000 mark, experiencing a drawdown of over 41% from its all-time high. However, compared to the flashing red numbers on the screen, a more hidden and critical signal was being transmitted on Wall Street trading desks—a historic divergence in correlation. Over the past five years, crypto assets were often seen as “leveraged Nasdaq,” moving in lockstep with tech growth stocks. But in this early 2026 adjustment, that anchoring relationship was broken. Crypto assets are being systematically stripped from “risk asset” portfolios, and their volatility characteristics are beginning to converge with those of gold…

# 분석# 비트코인# 암호# 교환# 마켓# 도구© 版权声명배열 上一篇 Data Modeling: How to Improve the Quality of Polymarket Interactions? 下一篇 Weekly Funding Roundup | 14 Projects Secured Funding, Total Raised $610 Million (2.9-2.22) 상关文章 Rising in Silence: Is Circle Undervalued in the Red Ocean of Stablecoins? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 8,330 Explore Sahara AI: A Comprehensive Guide to the SAHARA Token 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 32,387 3 BitMart Launches Pre-Market Trading, with Monad (MON) as the First Project Launched 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 16,995 1 BitMart Capital-Protected Copy Trading: Principal Protection Embedded in Contract Rules 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 7,608 GasFree Operation Guide | Lowering the participation threshold, TRON realizes direct payment of gas fees with stablecoin 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 32,370 3 Web3 Beginner Series: Introduction to Ethereum Rollups 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 26,442 2 댓글 없음 댓글을 남기시려면 로그인이 필요합니다! 즉시 로그인 댓글이 없습니다... Bee.com 세계 최대의 Web3 포털 파트너 코인카프 바이낸스 코인마켓캡 코인게코 코인라이브 갑옷 Bee Network 앱을 다운로드하고 web3 여정을 시작하세요 백지 역할 자주하는 질문 © 2021-2026. 모든 권리 보유. 개인 정보 정책 | 서비스 약관 꿀벌 네트워크 앱 다운로드 Web3 여정을 시작해보세요 세계 최대의 Web3 포털 파트너 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 백지 역할 자주하는 질문 © 2021-2026. 모든 권리 보유. 개인 정보 정책 | 서비스 약관 찾다 찾다사이트에온체인사회의소식 熱门推荐 : 에어드롭 헌터 데이터 분석 암호화폐 유명인 함정 탐지기 한국어 English 繁體中文 简体中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 한국어

智能索引记录