温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/ko/65833.html
点击访问原文链接

a16z: The “Super Bowl Moment” for Prediction Markets | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
a16z: The “Super Bowl Moment” for Prediction Markets | Bee Network Login 인기 뉴스 밈 런치패드 AI 에이전트 DeSci 탑체인 익스플로러 뉴비의 경우 100x 코인 꿀벌 게임 필수 웹사이트 필수 앱 암호화폐 유명인 드핀 루키 에센셜 함정 탐지기 기본 도구 고급 웹사이트 교환 NFT 도구 안녕, 로그아웃 웹3 유니버스 계략 DApp 꿀벌 하이브 성장하는 플랫폼 기원 후 찾다 영어 코인 충전 로그인 다운로드 웹3 유니 계략 DApp 꿀벌 하이브 기원 후 집•분석•본문 a16z: The “Super Bowl Moment” for Prediction Markets분석3주 전发布와이엇 7,113 23 Original Author: Scott Duke Kominers, a16z 암호화폐

원본 편집: Saoirse, 포사이트 뉴스

On February 8th, US time (7:30 AM Beijing time, February 9th), hundreds of millions of National Football League (NFL) fans were glued to their screens watching the Super Bowl. Many were also watching another screen closely—monitoring the trading activity on prediction markets, where the betting options are incredibly diverse, ranging from the championship winner and final score to the passing yards of each team’s quarterback.

Over the past year, the trading volume in US prediction markets has reached at least $27.9 billion, covering a vast array of subjects from sports event outcomes and economic policy decisions to new product launches. However, the nature of these markets has always been controversial: Are they a form of trading or gambling? Are they a tool for aggregating collective wisdom for news, or a means of scientific validation? And is the current development model the optimal solution?

As an economist who has long studied markets and incentive mechanisms, my answer begins with a simple premise: Prediction markets are, at their core, markets. And markets are fundamental tools for allocating resources and aggregating information. The logic of prediction markets is to create assets tied to specific events—traders holding these assets receive payouts when the event occurs. People trade based on their judgments about the event’s outcome, and this is where the core value of the market is realized.

From a market design perspective, referencing information from prediction markets is far more valuable than trusting the opinion of a single sports commentator, or even looking at Las Vegas betting odds. The primary goal of traditional sportsbooks is not to predict the outcome of a game, but to “balance the betting pool” by adjusting odds to attract money to the side with less betting volume at any given moment. Las Vegas betting aims to make players willing to bet on underdog outcomes, whereas prediction markets allow people to trade based on their genuine judgments.

Prediction markets also make it easier to extract meaningful signals from vast amounts of information. For example, if you want to gauge the likelihood of new tariffs being imposed, deriving this from soybean futures prices is an indirect process—as futures prices are influenced by multiple factors. But if you pose this question directly in a prediction market, you get a more straightforward answer.

The prototype of this model can be traced back to 16th-century Europe, where people even placed bets on “who the next Pope would be.” The development of modern prediction markets is rooted in contemporary theories of economics, statistics, mechanism design, and computer science. In the 1980s, Charles Plott of Caltech and Shyam Sunder of Yale University established its formal academic framework. Soon after, the first modern prediction market—the Iowa Electronic 시장s—was launched.

The mechanism of prediction markets is actually quite simple. Take a wager on “whether Seattle Seahawks quarterback Sam Darnold will throw a pass within one yard of the opponent’s end zone.” The market issues corresponding trading contracts; if the event occurs, each contract pays the holder $1. As traders continuously buy and sell this contract, its market price can be interpreted as the probability of the event occurring, representing the collective judgment of traders. For instance, a contract priced at $0.50 implies the market believes there’s a 50% chance the event happens.

If you judge the probability to be higher than 50% (say, 67%), you can buy the contract. If the event ultimately occurs, the contract you bought for $0.50 yields $1, resulting in a gross profit of $0.67. Your buying action pushes up the contract’s market price, and the corresponding probability estimate rises, signaling to the market that someone believes the current market underestimates the likelihood. Conversely, if someone believes the market overestimates the probability, selling activity will lower the price and probability estimate.

When prediction markets function well, they demonstrate significant advantages over other forecasting methods. Opinion polls and surveys only yield percentages of viewpoints; converting these into probability estimates requires statistical methods to analyze the relationship between the survey sample and the overall population. Furthermore, such survey results are often static snapshots in time, whereas information in prediction markets continuously updates with the entry of new participants and the emergence of new information.

More crucially, prediction markets have clear incentive mechanisms; traders are “skin in the game.” They must carefully process the information they possess and only invest capital and assume risk in areas they understand best. In prediction markets, people can convert their information and expertise into profits, which also incentivizes them to actively seek deeper understanding of relevant fields.

Finally, the coverage scope of prediction markets far surpasses other tools. For instance, someone with information affecting oil demand can profit by going long or short on crude oil futures. However, in reality, many outcomes we wish to predict cannot be realized through commodity or stock markets. Recently, specialized prediction markets have emerged attempting to aggregate various judgments to predict the timeline for solving specific mathematical problems—information crucial for scientific development and an important benchmark for measuring the progress of artificial intelligence.

Despite their significant advantages, for prediction markets to truly realize their value, numerous issues must be addressed. First, at the market infrastructure level, there are persistent questions to clarify: How to verify whether a specific event has truly occurred and achieve market consensus? How to ensure the transparency and auditability of market operations?

Second are the challenges of market design. For example, there must be participants with relevant information entering to trade—if all participants are uninformed, market prices cannot convey any meaningful signal. Conversely, various participants holding different relevant information need to be willing to trade; otherwise, the valuation in prediction markets can become biased. The prediction markets before the UK Brexit referendum serve as a classic counterexample.

Furthermore, the entry of participants with absolute insider information creates new problems. For instance, if the Seahawks’ offensive coordinator knows 디파이nitively whether Sam Darnold will pass within the one-yard line, or can even directly influence the outcome, participation by such individuals severely undermines market fairness. If potential participants believe there are insider traders in the market, they may rationally choose to exit, ultimately leading to market collapse.

Additionally, prediction markets face the risk of manipulation: someone might turn this tool, originally meant for aggregating collective judgment, into a means of manipulating public opinion. For example, a candidate’s campaign team, to create an atmosphere of “impending victory,” might use campaign funds to influence valuations in prediction markets. Fortunately, prediction markets possess a degree of self-correcting ability in this regard—if the probability estimate for a contract deviates from a reasonable range, there will always be traders choosing to take the opposite position, bringing the market back to rationality.

Given these various risks, prediction market platforms must focus on enhancing operational transparency and clearly disclosing rules regarding participant management, contract design, market operations, and other aspects. If these issues can be successfully resolved, we can foresee prediction markets playing an increasingly important role in the future of forecasting.

Original Link

이 글은 인터넷에서 퍼왔습니다: a16z: The “Super Bowl Moment” for Prediction Markets

Related: Brevis’s token launch is imminent: community incentives account for 32.2%, and airdrop registration is coming soon.

Author | Asher ( @Asher_0210 ) Yesterday, Brevis, who has been favored by Vitalik Buterin, published an article on the X platform announcing its token economic model. The total supply of its token, BREV, is 1 billion , with the following distribution: Ecosystem Development: 37% of the total token supply, or 370 million tokens, will be used for ecosystem development, research and development, strategic partners, initial market development, and long-term protocol expansion; Community incentives: 32.2% of the total token supply, or 322 million tokens, are used to reward validators, stakers, and community contributors, including different categories of initial airdrops to eligible contributors and community members; Team: 20% of the total token supply, or 200 million tokens, will be allocated to Brevis’s current and future core developers and contributors; Investors: 10.8%…

 

# 분석# 암호# 데피# 마켓# 도구© 版权声명배열 上一篇 The Day CZ Missed the Best Investment of His Life, Crypto Missed AI 下一篇 Will IBIT Really Trigger a Full Market Liquidation? 상关文章 Weekly Funding Roundup | 10 projects received funding, totaling $176 million (December 1-7) 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 20,221 Bitcoin price breaks through $118,000, and those who wait for a pullback are left empty-handed 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 25,668 2 24-Hour Hot Cryptocurrencies and News | Federal Reserve Reverses 2023 Policy Restricting Banks’ Cryptocurrency Activitie 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 19,099 Matrixport Market Observation: From the plunge to the reflux, are the bottom signals of the crypto market converging? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 15,563 Capital bets on the prediction market, who is better, Polymarket or Kalshi? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 31,086 1 Structural shift in the meme market: Solana’s retreat and the reshaping of BSC on-chain funds 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 18,230 댓글 없음 댓글을 남기시려면 로그인이 필요합니다! 즉시 로그인 댓글이 없습니다... Bee.com 세계 최대의 Web3 포털 파트너 코인카프 바이낸스 코인마켓캡 코인게코 코인라이브 갑옷 Bee Network 앱을 다운로드하고 web3 여정을 시작하세요 백지 역할 자주하는 질문 © 2021-2026. 모든 권리 보유. 개인 정보 정책 | 서비스 약관 꿀벌 네트워크 앱 다운로드 Web3 여정을 시작해보세요 세계 최대의 Web3 포털 파트너 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 백지 역할 자주하는 질문 © 2021-2026. 모든 권리 보유. 개인 정보 정책 | 서비스 약관 찾다 찾다사이트에온체인사회의소식 熱门推荐 : 에어드롭 헌터 데이터 분석 암호화폐 유명인 함정 탐지기 한국어 English 繁體中文 简体中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 한국어

智能索引记录