温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/ko/64236.html
点击访问原文链接

Tiger Research: Why Do Financial Institutions Prefer Selective Privacy? | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
Tiger Research: Why Do Financial Institutions Prefer Selective Privacy? | Bee Network Login 인기 뉴스 밈 런치패드 AI 에이전트 DeSci 탑체인 익스플로러 뉴비의 경우 100x 코인 꿀벌 게임 필수 웹사이트 필수 앱 암호화폐 유명인 드핀 루키 에센셜 함정 탐지기 기본 도구 고급 웹사이트 교환 NFT 도구 안녕, 로그아웃 웹3 유니버스 계략 DApp 꿀벌 하이브 성장하는 플랫폼 기원 후 찾다 영어 코인 충전 로그인 다운로드 웹3 유니 계략 DApp 꿀벌 하이브 기원 후 집•분석•Tiger Research: Why Do Financial Institutions Prefer Selective Privacy? Tiger Research: Why Do Financial Institutions Prefer Selective Privacy?분석2개월 전업데이트와이엇 11,473 34 주요 시사점 The core advantage of blockchain—transparency—can expose corporate trade secrets and investment strategies, posing substantial risks to businesses. Fully anonymous privacy models like Monero do not support KYC or AML, making them unsuitable for regulated institutions. Financial institutions require selective privacy that protects transaction data while remaining compatible with regulatory compliance. Financial institutions must determine how to connect with open Web3 markets for expansion. 1. Why is Blockchain Privacy Necessary? One of the core features of blockchain is transparency. Anyone can inspect on-chain transactions in real-time, including who sent funds, to whom, the amount, and when it was sent.

However, from an institutional perspective, this transparency presents obvious problems. Imagine a scenario where the market could observe exactly how much Nvidia transferred to Samsung Electronics, or the precise timing of a hedge fund’s capital deployment. This visibility would fundamentally alter competitive dynamics.

The level of information disclosure tolerable for individuals differs from what businesses and financial institutions can accept. A company’s transaction history and the timing of institutional investments constitute highly sensitive information.

Therefore, expecting institutions to operate on a blockchain where all activity is fully exposed is unrealistic. For these players, a system without privacy is less a practical infrastructure and more an abstract ideal with limited real-world application.

2. Forms of Blockchain Privacy Blockchain privacy is generally categorized into two types:

Fully Anonymous Privacy Selective Privacy The key difference lies in whether information can be disclosed when verification by another party is required.

2.1. Fully Anonymous Privacy Fully anonymous privacy, simply put, hides everything.

The sender, receiver, and transaction amount are all concealed. This model stands in direct opposition to traditional blockchains, which prioritize transparency by default.

The primary goal of fully anonymous systems is to prevent third-party surveillance. Rather than enabling selective disclosure, they aim to completely block external observers from extracting meaningful information.

원천: Tiger Research

The image above shows a Monero transaction record, a representative example of fully anonymous privacy. Unlike transparent blockchains, details like the transfer amount and counterparty are not visible.

Two characteristics illustrate why this model is considered fully anonymous:

Output Total: The ledger does not show specific numbers, instead displaying values as “confidential.” Transactions are recorded, but their content cannot be interpreted. Ring Signature Size: Although a single sender initiates the transaction, the ledger mixes it with multiple decoys, making it appear as if multiple parties are sending funds simultaneously. These mechanisms ensure transaction data remains opaque to all external observers, without exception.

2.2. Selective Privacy Selective privacy operates on a different assumption. Transactions are public by default, but users can choose to make specific transactions private by using designated privacy-enabled addresses.

Zcash provides a clear example. When initiating a transaction, users can choose between two address types:

Transparent Addresses: All transaction details are publicly visible, similar to Bitcoin. Shielded Addresses: Transaction details are encrypted and hidden.

원천: Tiger Research

The image above illustrates what elements Zcash can encrypt when using shielded addresses. Transactions sent to shielded addresses are recorded on the blockchain, but their content is stored in an encrypted state.

While the existence of the transaction remains visible, the following information is hidden:

Address Type: Uses a shielded (Z) address instead of a transparent (T) address. Transaction Record: The ledger confirms a transaction occurred. Amount, Sender, Receiver: All are encrypted and unobservable from the outside. Viewing Permission: Only parties granted a viewing key can inspect the transaction details. This is the core of selective privacy. The transaction remains on-chain, but the user controls who can view its content. When necessary, users can share a viewing key to prove transaction details to another party, while all other third parties remain unable to access that information.

3. Why Financial Institutions Prefer Selective Privacy Most financial institutions have Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) obligations for each transaction. They must retain transaction data internally and respond immediately to requests from regulators or supervisory bodies.

However, in an environment built on fully anonymous privacy, all transaction data is irreversibly hidden. Because the information cannot be accessed or disclosed under any condition, institutions are structurally unable to fulfill their compliance obligations.

A representative example is the Canton Network, which has been adopted by the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) and is currently used by over 400 companies and institutions. In contrast, Zcash, although also a selective privacy project, has seen limited real-world institutional adoption.

What causes this difference?

원천: Tiger Research

Zcash offers selective privacy, but users cannot choose which information to disclose. Instead, they must choose whether to disclose the entire transaction.

For example, in a transaction where “A sends $100 to B,” Zcash does not allow only the amount to be hidden. The transaction itself must be either fully hidden or fully disclosed.

In institutional transactions, different participants require different information. Not all parties need access to all data within a single transaction. However, Zcash’s structure forces a binary choice between full disclosure and full privacy, making it unsuitable for institutional transaction workflows.

In contrast, Canton allows transaction information to be managed as separate components. For instance, if a regulator only requests the transaction amount between A and B, Canton enables the institution to provide only that specific information. This functionality is achieved through Daml, the smart contract language used by the Canton Network.

Other reasons for institutional adoption of Canton are covered in more detail in previous Canton research.

4. Privacy Blockchains in the Institutional Era Privacy blockchains evolve as needs change.

Early projects like Monero aimed to protect individual anonymity. However, as financial institutions and corporations began entering the blockchain environment, the meaning of privacy shifted.

Privacy is no longer 디파이ned as making transactions invisible to everyone. Instead, the core objective has become protecting transactions while still meeting regulatory requirements.

This shift explains why selective privacy models like the Canton Network are gaining traction. Institutions need more than just privacy technology; they need infrastructure designed to match real-world financial transaction workflows.

In response to these demands, more institution-oriented privacy projects continue to emerge. Looking ahead, the key differentiator will be how effectively privacy technology can be applied to practical transaction environments.

Alternative forms of privacy that run counter to the current institution-driven trend may emerge. However, in the short term, privacy blockchains are likely to continue developing around institutional transactions.

원천: Tiger Research

이 글은 인터넷에서 퍼왔습니다: Tiger Research: Why Do Financial Institutions Prefer Selective Privacy?

Related: Solomon’s public offering results were manipulated; Polymarket predicts a trust crisis in the crypto market. Author｜Golem ( @웹3_golem ) Despite the recent spate of defaults in stablecoins, market enthusiasm for stablecoin protocols remains undiminished. On November 19th, Solomon Labs, a stablecoin protocol on Solana, announced the conclusion of its five-day public offering, raising over $102 million from 6,604 investors through MetaDao, making it the second-highest-funded project on MetaDao to date, second only to UmbraPrivacy. In a sluggish market, it’s usually cause for celebration that a project can secure substantial funding in the public market. However, Solomon Labs’ success has left some players on Polymarket feeling rather disappointed. This is all because there is a prediction on Polymarket called “Total commitments for the Solomon public sale on MetaDAO”, where players can bet on the probability of “Solomon ultimately raising no more than how much money”. On…

# 분석# 비트코인# 데피# 마켓# 웹3© 版权声명배열 上一篇 Predictive Markets Stir Up the Trillion-Dollar Gambling Industry, Facing Pursuit from the Old Order 下一篇 The Biggest Trading Theme of 2026: Trump Who Can't Afford to Lose, The End of the International Order 상关文章 With Powell’s allies setting the tone, a Fed rate cut in December is now highly probable. 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 14,298 Marc Andreessen, the operator of technology power in the White House 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 29,679 3 새로운Why Do 85% of Token Launches Ultimately Become Expensive “Funerals”? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 4,071 1 One-week token unlock: APT unlocks approximately $21 million worth of tokens. 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 20,526 4 The debate over single-use blockchains: Is Tempo a true blockchain? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 23,376 1 Bitcoin at $120,000: A capital feast without retail investors 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 55,786 2 최신 기사 Did Jane Street “Manipulate” BTC? Decoding the AP System, Understanding the Power Struggle Behind ETF Creation and Redemption Pricing 1시간 전 89 Stop Comparing Bitcoin to Gold—It’s Now a High-Volatility Software Stock 1시간 전 118 Matrixport Research: $25 Billion Gamma Unwinding Imminent, Liquidity Yet to Return Behind the Rebound 1시간 전 105 ERC-5564: Ethereum’s Stealth Era Has Arrived, Receiving Addresses No Longer ‘Exposed’ 1시간 전 104 Hong Kong Regulatory Green Light: Asseto Enables DL Holdings to Achieve Compliance for Two RWA Business Implementations 1시간 전 93 인기 있는 웹사이트TempoLighterGAIB글라이더PlanckRaylsBCPokerVooi Bee.com 세계 최대의 Web3 포털 파트너 코인카프 바이낸스 코인마켓캡 코인게코 코인라이브 갑옷 Bee Network 앱을 다운로드하고 web3 여정을 시작하세요 백지 역할 자주하는 질문 © 2021-2026. 모든 권리 보유. 개인 정보 정책 | 서비스 약관 꿀벌 네트워크 앱 다운로드 Web3 여정을 시작해보세요 세계 최대의 Web3 포털 파트너 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 백지 역할 자주하는 질문 © 2021-2026. 모든 권리 보유. 개인 정보 정책 | 서비스 약관 찾다 찾다사이트에온체인사회의소식 熱门推荐 : 에어드롭 헌터 데이터 분석 암호화폐 유명인 함정 탐지기 한국어 English 繁體中文 简体中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 한국어

智能索引记录