温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/ko/57102.html
点击访问原文链接

The debate over single-use blockchains: Is Tempo a true blockchain? | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
The debate over single-use blockchains: Is Tempo a true blockchain? | Bee Network Login 인기 뉴스 밈 런치패드 AI 에이전트 DeSci 탑체인 익스플로러 뉴비의 경우 100x 코인 꿀벌 게임 필수 웹사이트 필수 앱 암호화폐 유명인 드핀 루키 에센셜 함정 탐지기 기본 도구 고급 웹사이트 교환 NFT 도구 안녕, 로그아웃 웹3 유니버스 계략 DApp 꿀벌 하이브 성장하는 플랫폼 기원 후 찾다 영어 코인 충전 로그인 다운로드 웹3 유니 계략 DApp 꿀벌 하이브 기원 후 집•분석•The debate over single-use blockchains: Is Tempo a true blockchain? The debate over single-use blockchains: Is Tempo a true blockchain?분석6개월 전업데이트와이엇 23,3011 12 Original translation: Saoirse, Foresight News

“No one goes out of their way to buy a Swiss Army Knife; it’s usually a Christmas gift.” — Jensen Huang

Great companies start out more like a scalpel than a Swiss Army knife. Companies that focus on a single field are more likely to achieve excellence in that area and leave their core values clearly in the minds of users.

Take the internet industry in 1999 as an example: Yahoo’s homepage encompassed search, auctions, news, email, and instant messaging, yet its performance in each area was mediocre. Google’s homepage, on the other hand, focused solely on search, making its positioning immediately clear to users and ultimately establishing Google as the undisputed leader in search. Today, “Google” has become synonymous with “search,” while Yahoo’s focus is limited to niche features like hosted fantasy baseball leagues—a testament to the business principle that “excellence in one thing is far superior to mediocrity in many.”

그래서, does this logic also apply to blockchain?

Current situation: “Parallel development” of two blockchain models Bitcoin is a single-purpose blockchain whose sole function is to transfer Bitcoins, and its simplicity is perhaps the main reason for its huge success.

But Ethereum and Solana are general-purpose blockchains, and they have also achieved some success.

Moreover, the two models do not seem to erode each other: Bitcoin has not yet made a breakthrough in the DeFi field, and Ethereum has never become a mainstream currency.

It seems that perhaps the two models can coexist peacefully?

It may be too early to tell, as general-purpose blockchains will soon face a new competitor focused on a single area .

New variable: Tempo Last week, payments giant Stripe and investment firm Paradigm jointly announced the development of Tempo, a stablecoin-focused blockchain. Upon its unveiling, the new chain was hailed by the industry as a “potential winner in the 암호화폐 payments space,” with its core advantages addressing the pain points of general-purpose blockchains:

Predictable fees: settled in stablecoins, no need to hold native tokens Fast confirmation speed: Achieve “near-instant” transaction final confirmation Balancing privacy and compliance: Supporting “optional” privacy protection and compliance features Dedicated payment channel: Set up an independent “channel” to avoid congestion with other businesses High throughput: Optimized for payment scenarios, with processing efficiency far exceeding that of general chains Matt Huang, who is responsible for Tempo development, said: “Focusing on a single area allows the chain to iterate faster. We urgently need to meet the upcoming market demand while reducing dependence on other ecosystems (such as Ethereum L1).”

This “indirect challenge” to Ethereum makes people speculate that Tempo’s ambition may go beyond “payment” .

More notably, Matt Huang mentioned, “Although Tempo started as a ‘permissioned validator node,’ it has been permissionless from day one and will gradually advance decentralization.”

A blockchain that’s both decentralized and payments-savvy sounds like the ideal general-purpose blockchain. Will Tempo become a truly versatile rival to Ethereum and Solana?

Controversy: The “Expansion Paradox” of Single-Purpose Chains Judging from business cases, the success of “focusing on one thing first and then expanding” is not uncommon: Microsoft started with the BASIC programming language and gradually expanded into operating systems, office software, and cloud computing; Amazon started as an online bookstore and grew into an e-commerce giant covering all categories; Apple started with personal computers and has now built an ecosystem of “mobile phones + computers + wearable devices.” If Tempo can first gain a foothold in the payment field, it may be able to replicate this “horizontal expansion” path and become a more comprehensive blockchain than Ethereum.

But there are also counterexamples: In the past, specialized calculators far outperformed general-purpose computers in terms of computational speed. But who would buy a calculator these days? Far more people have Swiss Army knives in their drawers than Texas Instruments calculators. This suggests that if general-purpose technologies are continuously optimized, they may gradually render single-purpose technologies obsolete. So, will general-purpose blockchains also render specialized payment blockchains less valuable in the future?

There are also clear differences in industry views:

Max Resnick is optimistic about general-purpose blockchains: “Decentralized blockchains will ultimately surpass centralized systems, including single-purpose chains, in speed, scale, reliability, and even compliance.”

Mert Mumtaz questioned Tempo’s positioning: ” It’s not even a blockchain, let alone a general-purpose blockchain —how can there be a blockchain that’s ‘only for payments’?” He believes that decentralization is a core attribute of blockchain, and a truly decentralized blockchain must possess general capabilities. If Tempo promotes decentralization, it will inevitably attract meaningless projects like “junk coins,” leading to congestion in payment functions and degraded performance.

Mert Mumtaz further pointed out that there are only two viable paths for a “payment-only chain”: either it be “non-Turing complete” like Bitcoin (supporting only transfers and unable to run complex code), or it adopts a “permissioned” system (with centralized control over nodes) . If this is the case, Ethereum and Solana won’t have to worry about being replaced by Tempo—after all, Tempo is either “functionally limited” or “not decentralized enough.”

But the crux of the matter is: If Tempo can provide faster and cheaper payment services without being decentralized and become the main circulation scenario for stablecoins, will users still care whether it is a real blockchain?

Conclusion: A test of the value of decentralization Rather than a competition between single-purpose and general-purpose blockchains, this is a test of the value of decentralization: How much are users willing to pay for decentralization? Are they willing to accept slightly slower speeds and higher fees in exchange for the decentralized nature of blockchain? Or do they prefer efficient, low-cost services, even if they lack decentralization?

The emergence of Tempo may be the “touchstone” of this test.

이 글은 인터넷에서 퍼왔습니다: The debate over single-use blockchains: Is Tempo a true blockchain?Recommended Articles

# 분석# 비트코인# 암호# 데피# 이더리움# 교환# 마켓# 토큰© 版权声명배열 上一篇 Is L2 a detour for Ethereum? 下一篇 As the meme craze fades, prediction markets become a new battlefield for DeFi players 상关文章 Strategy snapped up 10,000 BTC in a single week. How many are still available on the market? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 16,984 Gate Research: The crypto market is consolidating and bottoming out, with AI and small-cap sectors showing structural divergence. 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 15,335 1 Solana CEO Interview: From Garage Startup to Top Public Chain, Talking about Solana’s Past and Future 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 47,688 12 Data Revealed: How Much Money Can MEV Bot Make from CEX-DEX Arbitrage?Recommended Articles 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 27,607 5 Ethereum proposes to raise Gas Limit to 60 million again, and the expansion path becomes clearer 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 29,210 1 트럼프의 대통령 취임 첫 해, 가족, “암호화폐 화폐 인쇄기” 출시” 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 7,576 댓글 1 개 댓글을 남기시려면 로그인이 필요합니다! 즉시 로그인 muran 손님 广告费

5개월 전 최신 기사 UniSat Releases Phase Updates and Upgrades, Continuously Building the Bitcoin Ecosystem 1일 전 1,503 Jack Dorsey’s Company: 4,000 White-Collar Workers Are Being Replaced by AI 1일 전 1,378 Latest Stablecoin Report: Real Distribution and Flow Are Far More Important Than Supply 1일 전 1,284 Sui DeFi’s “Three-Engine” Revolution: How New Capabilities, New Assets, and New Programs Are Building the Future of On-Chain Finance? 1일 전 1,226 On-chain Investigator ZachXBT Confirms: Axiom Employees Exploited Internal Privileges for Insider Trading 1일 전 1,146 인기 있는 웹사이트TempoLighterGAIB글라이더PlanckRaylsBCPokerVooi Bee.com 세계 최대의 Web3 포털 파트너 코인카프 바이낸스 코인마켓캡 코인게코 코인라이브 갑옷 Bee Network 앱을 다운로드하고 web3 여정을 시작하세요 백지 역할 자주하는 질문 © 2021-2026. 모든 권리 보유. 개인 정보 정책 | 서비스 약관 꿀벌 네트워크 앱 다운로드 Web3 여정을 시작해보세요 세계 최대의 Web3 포털 파트너 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 백지 역할 자주하는 질문 © 2021-2026. 모든 권리 보유. 개인 정보 정책 | 서비스 약관 찾다 찾다사이트에온체인사회의소식 熱门推荐 : 에어드롭 헌터 데이터 분석 암호화폐 유명인 함정 탐지기 한국어 English 繁體中文 简体中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 한국어

智能索引记录