温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/ko/58988.html
点击访问原文链接

Exposing the Polymarket DAO Mafia: Nepotism, Double Standards, and Abuse of Power | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
Exposing the Polymarket DAO Mafia: Nepotism, Double Standards, and Abuse of Power | Bee Network Login 인기 뉴스 밈 런치패드 AI 에이전트 DeSci 탑체인 익스플로러 뉴비의 경우 100x 코인 꿀벌 게임 필수 웹사이트 필수 앱 암호화폐 유명인 드핀 루키 에센셜 함정 탐지기 기본 도구 고급 웹사이트 교환 NFT 도구 안녕, 로그아웃 웹3 유니버스 계략 DApp 꿀벌 하이브 성장하는 플랫폼 기원 후 찾다 영어 코인 충전 로그인 다운로드 웹3 유니 계략 DApp 꿀벌 하이브 기원 후 집•분석•본문 Exposing the Polymarket DAO Mafia: Nepotism, Double Standards, and Abuse of Power분석4개월 전업데이트와이엇 19,060 3 Odaily Planet Daily Golem에서 편집( @웹3_골렘 )

Editor’s Note: Polymarket has been one of the most popular products in the 암호화폐 industry in recent years, boasting not only exceptional product-market fit but also immense practical significance. However, while the Polymarket team was battling on the market and product front lines, a fire broke out in their backyard. On October 23rd, ProMint, a Polymarket community contributor, published a lengthy article alleging that the Polymarket community was being manipulated by a self-proclaimed officially backed DAO team. This team engaged in favoritism, corruption, and a “secret purge” of members within the community, all with the connivance of two official members.

While the article included multiple chat screenshots as evidence, it was ultimately a unilateral accusation from ProMint. Following the publication of the article, Polymarket’s head of growth, LeGate, commented that ProMint had been caught selling Polymarket accounts, violating Polymarket’s regulations. ProMint subsequently denied this.

Regardless of the final truth, this dispute at least reflects the fact that Polymarket’s “backyard” is on fire. Odaily Planet Daily has compiled the full text of ProMint’s accusation against the Polymarket DAO mafia below. Please enjoy the melon~

This isn’t a blind accusation of “one banned user,” but rather a story about how a small number of people hijacked the Polymarket Ambassador ecosystem, exploiting its structure and punishing anyone who wasn’t part of their circle.

ProMint has been blocked by the Polymarket official creator community account

From open community to closed mafia I am one of the victims.

On October 21st, I received the Polymarket Community Certification badge, recognizing my years of active participation, creating educational content for Polymarket, and helping the community grow organically. I was thrilled to share the news publicly, and the post garnered over 7,000 reads, dozens of supportive comments, and genuine excitement from users who saw my work.

But after joining, I discovered that what was once an open community of traders and developers had quietly morphed into a controlled inner circle led by a DAO active in a Telegram group (led by Atlantis Liquidity ).

In their own announcement, Atlantis proudly wrote that they have “received the continued support of the Polymarket team” and a “DAO account badge.”

This support gave them informal power to report, influence, or even remove other members’ badges or access rights . They allowed the existence of “bot accounts” to help their close allies, while dozens of independent Polymarket community contributors were blocked or banned for no reason.

Community administrators who are supposed to maintain fairness, such as @0xTone 그리고 @williamlegate , have also become the “umbrella” of the Atlantis group. These two administrators are extremely unprofessional. They ignore the community and only obey the orders of the “mafia.”

The Hypocrisy of Atlantis Liquidity To make matters worse, this so-called “trusted DAO” had been disloyal to Polymarket from the start. Just a few months earlier, the group’s leader, Atlantis Liquidity, had publicly called Polymarket a “scam” on the X platform, promoted competing platforms like Limitless and PNP 교환, and even mocked Polymarket users.

Atlantis Liquidity claims Polymarket is a scam

Weeks later, this person has become the “official spokesperson” for the Polymarket builder community, controlling who can obtain badges or DAO membership roles. Now, he’s self-proclaimed leader of the Polymarket community, setting its rules. This isn’t leadership at all; it’s opportunism cloaked in authority.

They exploited loopholes in the Polymarket recommendation system to make a fortune. One of the mafia members , d1namit, published a post promoting a campaign that promised a $10 bonus to users who registered through his Polymarket link, but it was actually a new user acquisition trap that abused the Polymarket referral system and statistics.

These people, who usually despise others who rely on “fake hair” to build their status, are actually full-time fake hair with multiple accounts. They are hypocritical, while about 90% of the members of this inner group, including d1namit , Phosphen , Jasper and other close allies, secretly carry out the behavior they publicly condemn.

They post “airdrop 가이드s,” “exclusive rewards,” and “quick walkthroughs” in Telegram groups and on X, often with referral links and exaggerated claims like “$13.5 million in funding pool,” “$3,000+ in rewards,” or “Get $10,000 early.”

These activities are not community building at all, but are essentially freeloading and system rebate activities, disguised as “education” or “supporting Polymarket.” They repeat the same tactics over and over again, including promising free money, promoting fake ROI screenshots, asking for follows and reposts, and sanctimoniously accusing other independent creators of being “witches” when their influence grows faster.

And yet none of them have faced any consequences for doing so, a group that bans small creators for posting badges or sharing genuine tutorials, yet looks the other way when their own favorite creators abuse the system for influence and money.

Internal ridicule and intimidation of other members Leaked Telegram messages show that group members also mocked users who lost their Polymarket community badges and joked about reporting them to the team.

“Since you’re being removed today, what’s the point of a ruling?”

“Brother, I have sent the report to the team.”

This isn’t community management at all; it’s outright bullying. They even promoted the idea of ​​”undercover agents in the chatroom,” with five or six insiders secretly reporting others to the administrators. The entire community environment has become filled with hostility, paranoia, and anti-collaboration. Is this really how an official Polymarket ambassador with an official badge should behave? Should these people receive contracts and funding from Polymarket?

Selective punishment and suppression of dissenting voices When users who are not part of their inner circle (such as independent creators or former project leaders) try to participate in the community, they are immediately labeled as “witches.” There is no moderation, no discussion, and no transparency.

Even SUI community leader Nikita Vishnya was warned that his account “might be wiped out” before any investigation began. Even when Nikita tried to appeal the ban, they simply ignored him without giving any reason or providing any evidence.

Another example is Pazjik, who had publicly supported Polymarket and even interviewed d1namit on YouTube, but lost his collaboration opportunity because of an innocuous Telegram message.

The incident began when Basher published a 우편 exposing how insiders were exploiting the Polymarket affiliate program to profit by creating “zombie accounts,” circulating referrals, and siphoning off multiple bonuses. However, Atlantis and his group members ended up laughing in private chats and telling others to “ignore him.”

Admins and ambassadors react to a post exposing their fraudulent referral income scheme

Pazjik didn’t even post publicly, simply mentioning Basher’s findings in a private Telegram chat. Within 24 hours, his Polymarket community badge was revoked without warning or explanation. So, some people can get away with slandering the project for months, while others are punished for even pointing out obvious flaws in the ambassador system.

Meanwhile, those who actually farmed the airdrops have retained their privileges, a blatant abuse of power. KCC, a close friend of Jasper (who recently received a Polymarket badge), also commented in a post:

“Polymarket unlimited funding exploit, who knew?”

While the post was quickly deleted, they openly viewed Polymarket’s affiliate program as a way to make money, even brazenly joking about “unlimited profits” because they knew they would be fine.

Polymarket community administrators chose to remain silent I tried to contact both Polymarket community managers, @0xTone 그리고 @williamlegate , but received no response. There are no responses, no moderation, no internal processes, and when users raise questions, they are blocked; when they try to appeal, they are ignored.

This lack of transparency in community leadership severely damages Polymarket’s credibility, especially for a project built on transparency and a “시장 of truth.”

Nepotism disguised as DAO culture It is now clear what is happening in the Polymarket community: a DAO claiming to be “team-backed” acts as a gatekeeper for the community, rewarding close friends and punishing outsiders.

As shown above, a third party warned me before I was removed from the Polymarket ambassador list. Where did they get this information? The answer is obvious.

Recruitment rewards are distributed among a fixed group of people, critics are labeled “airdrop hunters,” and leadership turns a blind eye. This is the cryptocurrency version of nepotism, a small mafia organization operating under the banner of the DAO.

To Polymarket Leadership Polymarket is one of the most innovative projects in the Web3 ecosystem. Its vision of decentralized prediction markets driven by truth and incentives is revolutionary, but no amount of great technology can survive in a corrupt community.

But when trust is replaced by favoritism, when ambassadors are chosen based on friendship rather than merit, and when early supporters are penalized for raising questions, Polymarket loses the very qualities that originally distinguished Web3 from Web2.

My investigation isn’t aimed at Polymarket’s technology or founders, but rather serves as a wake-up call. Polymarket’s brand is being eroded from within. The real problem isn’t Polymarket’s critics, but those hired to represent it. The community deserves transparency, fairness, and accountability, not veiled censorship and cliques.

The Polymarket team has built one of the most innovative products in Web3, but your community is undermining its integrity. Fix this mess before Polymarket becomes another example of soulless tech.

Because right now, this platform that trades on truth is being run by people who shy away from the truth.

이 글은 인터넷에서 퍼왔습니다: Exposing the Polymarket DAO Mafia: Nepotism, Double Standards, and Abuse of PowerRecommended Articles

Related: UniSat founder interview: Monthly revenue down 90% from peak, but reserves can support ten years of R&DRecommended A By Golem ( @웹3_golem ) ” I originally worked in the gaming industry for more than a decade. I came to the Crypto industry in 2018 with a semi-retired mentality. I never thought about being successful or becoming the best in the industry ,” said founder Lorenzo in a conference room at UniSat’s Hong Kong office, looking back on UniSat’s entrepreneurial journey with a calm and peaceful look in his eyes. During Bitcoin Asia, I had the pleasure of interviewing UniSat founder Lorenzo. Born in the 1980s, Lorenzo was dressed simply, his eyes lacking the sharpness of an entrepreneur, but rather a casual, easygoing demeanor. He wouldn’t have been the type to draw attention in a crowd, but this also helped to draw us closer. Before the interview, Lorenzo was…

# 분석# 에어드롭# 암호# 교환# 가이드# 마켓# 마켓플레이스# 웹3© 版权声명배열 上一篇 A Crack in the Ideals: When Ethereum’s Soul Developers Leave 下一篇 Vitalik's full speech at the summit: Ethereum's new progress and future applications 상关文章 The average stock price soared by 438%, and the MicroStrategy Effect swept the US stock market 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 28,892 2 Death is the biggest “buyer” of cryptocurrencies. 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 18,061 Bybit proudly sponsors CCCC Bali 2025 Conference: Building a sustainable crypto content ecosystem 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 33,813 2 When Steam meets Web3: How does 9bit make 3 billion gamers shareholders? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 16,756 The GENIUS Act was voted through. Which crypto assets will benefit? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 34,250 AB (AceBitx): Building a comprehensive and robust one-stop crypto trading platform with compliance as its foundation and 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 17,804 5 댓글 없음 댓글을 남기시려면 로그인이 필요합니다! 즉시 로그인 댓글이 없습니다... Bee.com 세계 최대의 Web3 포털 파트너 코인카프 바이낸스 코인마켓캡 코인게코 코인라이브 갑옷 Bee Network 앱을 다운로드하고 web3 여정을 시작하세요 백지 역할 자주하는 질문 © 2021-2026. 모든 권리 보유. 개인 정보 정책 | 서비스 약관 꿀벌 네트워크 앱 다운로드 Web3 여정을 시작해보세요 세계 최대의 Web3 포털 파트너 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 백지 역할 자주하는 질문 © 2021-2026. 모든 권리 보유. 개인 정보 정책 | 서비스 약관 찾다 찾다사이트에온체인사회의소식 熱门推荐 : 에어드롭 헌터 데이터 분석 암호화폐 유명인 함정 탐지기 한국어 English 繁體中文 简体中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 한국어

智能索引记录