温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/ko/54713.html
点击访问原文链接

With the “fee switch” activated, will RESOLV become the next ENA?Recommended Articles | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
With the “fee switch” activated, will RESOLV become the next ENA?Recommended Articles | Bee Network Login 인기 뉴스 밈 런치패드 AI 에이전트 DeSci 탑체인 익스플로러 뉴비의 경우 100x 코인 꿀벌 게임 필수 웹사이트 필수 앱 암호화폐 유명인 드핀 루키 에센셜 함정 탐지기 기본 도구 고급 웹사이트 교환 NFT 도구 안녕, 로그아웃 웹3 유니버스 계략 DApp 꿀벌 하이브 성장하는 플랫폼 기원 후 찾다 영어 코인 충전 로그인 다운로드 웹3 유니 계략 DApp 꿀벌 하이브 기원 후 집•분석•본문 With the “fee switch” activated, will RESOLV become the next ENA?Recommended Articles분석7개월 전업데이트와이엇 25,896 49 저자｜아즈마 ( @아즈마_에스 )

On July 25, Beijing time, the interest-bearing stablecoin protocol Resolv officially announced that it will gradually turn on the “fee switch” and plans to transfer up to 10% of the daily protocol income to the foundation treasury for the long-term value creation of the protocol and to incentivize RESOLV staking users. Specifically, Resolv plans to gradually increase the income transfer ratio (2.5% → 5% → 7.5% → 10%) every week during the four-week period from July 31 to August 21, and finally reach the target value of 10%.

The so-called “fee switch” is a common term for fee allocation in DeFi protocols. Its popular understanding is “a built-in contract function that determines whether the protocol allocates revenue to native tokens”, but different protocols have different specific execution modes. Previously, well-known projects such as Uniswap and Ethena have also discussed the “fee switch” issue, but failed to activate it due to community allocation disputes and concerns about the maturity of conditions.

Generally speaking, the “fee switch” generally means a direct benefit to the protocol’s native token, because this will directly amplify the token’s value capture ability; but on the other hand, since the “fee switch” often transfers part of the income that originally belonged to the protocol users to the token holders, it will damage the interests of users to a certain extent, so the major protocols are always hesitant about whether to turn on the “fee switch” – for example, in the Uniswap scenario, the original liquidity provider (LP) can obtain all 0.3% of the transaction fee income, but after the “fee switch” is turned on, it has to transfer part of the income to UNI holders, and the interests of LP will be relatively damaged.

Resolv’s Positioning and Considerations Back to Resolv, similar to Ethena’s USDe, the USR issued by Resolv is also an interest-bearing stablecoin collateralized by equal amounts of spot longs and contract shorts. Its income mainly comes from “the staking income of spot longs” and “the funding rate income of contract shorts.”

However, compared to Ethena, Resolv has also made some additional mechanism designs, such as introducing a risk grading mechanism through the insurance pool RLP, which enables USR to achieve a higher excess collateral rate; another example is the access to a larger proportion of liquidity derivative tokens, which achieves higher spot staking returns. Under Resolv’s mechanism design, the protocol has achieved an annualized rate of return of about 9.5% since its inception, which is quite outstanding among a number of emerging stablecoins.

At the end of May, Resolv officially launched the governance token RESOLV. Although Resolv has tried to empower RESOLV by “providing high staking returns” and “accelerating the accumulation rate of points for the second season airdrop”, the performance of RESOLV after its launch is still not ideal. Perhaps it is precisely to boost the price of the coin that Resolv has set its sights on the “fee switch”.

In the official announcement about turning on the “fee switch”, Resolv mentioned that “the timing and architecture are now ripe” – the protocol has achieved real, non-theoretical traction; the protocol has a clear value distribution framework; the protocol has demonstrated resilience – therefore it was decided not to postpone the launch of the “fee switch”.

As mentioned above, Resolv plans to gradually increase the income transfer ratio over four weeks, and will eventually increase it to 10%. As for the specific use of this part of the income, Resolv stated that it will be used to “expand the value that Resolv provides to users and stakers” , including: 1) Supporting new integrations between DeFi, Fintech, and institutional venues; 2) Funding ecosystem grants and product development; 3) Promoting buybacks and other token-related initiatives. Resolv also mentioned that a dedicated dashboard will be launched in the future to track the use of income.

Resolv also made a rough assumption about the distribution of protocol revenue after the “fee switch” is turned on. Based on the current protocol’s TVL of $500 million and an average rate of return of 10%, it is expected to achieve $50 million in revenue per year. After the “fee switch” is turned on, $45 million will still flow directly to users through product revenue, and the protocol will retain $5 million for long-term value creation.

Compared to ENA, is RESOLV more cost-effective? In last week’s article “ Up nearly 50% in a week, will ENA be the biggest Beta of ETH? ”, we analyzed the logic behind ENA’s recent strong rise; afterwards, Ethena launched a treasury reserve mechanism similar to “micro-strategy” around ENA, further boosting the price of ENA.

With the early launch of ENA, more and more people have begun to turn their attention to Resolv, an interest-bearing stablecoin project with a similar mechanism. So, is RESOLV really more cost-effective than ENA?

From the static figures, the current TVL of Ethena is US$7.781 billion, the ENA circulating market value (MC) is US$4.016 billion (MC/TVL ratio is 0.51), and the full circulation valuation (FDV) is US$9.48 billion (FDV/TVL ratio is 1.22); the current TVL of Resolv is US$527 million, the RESOLV circulating market value (MC) is US$57.28 million (MC/TVL ratio is 0.108), and the full circulation valuation (FDV) is US$205 million (FDV/TVL ratio is 0.39).

Judging from the comparison of MC/TVL and FDV/TVL alone, RESOLV is indeed better than ENA in terms of static cost performance. Although ENA is currently supported by the treasury reserve strategy, considering that RESOLV will be the first to open the “fee switch”, the currency prices of both parties are expected to be supported in the short term.

However, objectively speaking, the current application scope and network effect of USR are far less than that of USDe. In addition, in addition to USDe, Ethena also has a second business line USDtb. From the perspective of protocol potential, Resolv still has a large gap compared to Ethena.

Another point worth noting is that Resolv’s statement on the “fee switch” revenue mentioned above is that “will be used to expand the value that Resolv provides to users and stakers”, but it did not mention how much of the 10% revenue will flow to RESOLV stakers, so it is difficult to speculate on the scale of additional value capture by RESOLV after the “fee switch” is turned on.

In general, considering that RESOLV’s market value is at a relatively low level, the current RESOLV is a great alternative option after ENA surges, but the long-term development prospects of the Resolv protocol itself are still to be evaluated, and the detailed income distribution plan after the “fee switch” is turned on is yet to be disclosed. Whether it is worth building a position, you still need to DYOR.

이 글은 인터넷에서 퍼왔습니다: With the “fee switch” activated, will RESOLV become the next ENA?Recommended Articles

Related: The UAE’s Cryptocurrency Strategy: Empire or Mirage? Original author: Thejaswini MA Original translation: Block unicorn Preface Over the past five years, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has built a remarkable digital empire: processing $30 billion in cryptocurrency transactions annually, hosting more than 700 blockchain companies, and attracting the worlds largest cryptocurrency exchange to make Dubai its headquarters. Empires are built on resources, and the UAE’s digital empire relies on a resource far more valuable than oil: the tax obligations of others. Binance founder Changpeng Zhao, who is worth $33 billion, lives in Dubai. So too have executives at dozens of other major cryptocurrency companies, who have discovered that running their multibillion-dollar digital asset businesses in the UAE offers a significant advantage: They can keep more of their wealth. The UAE’s digital transformation story is a model of…

# 분석# 에어드롭# 데피# 마켓# 토큰© 版权声명배열 上一篇 BNB breaks through $860 to set a new record high. Who is the biggest winner?Recommended Articles 下一篇 A complete review of the 15 projects shortlisted for Binance MVB Season 10Recommended Articles 상关文章 트레이딩 전초기지: 중앙화된 거래소가 프리마켓에 영향을 미치는 방법 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 36,504 2 Odaily Editorial Team Tea Talk (January 7th) 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 12,357 3 24-Hour Hot Cryptocurrencies and News | UK to Hold Court Today to Discuss Handling of Qian Zhimin’s 60,000 Bitcoins; 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 16,876 Arthur Hayes’ latest podcast: He got the script for next year and has already fired 90% of the shots. 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 18,871 2 Exploring Arc Miner: An Innovative Passive Income Cloud Mining Solution 관리자 20,989 1 Can stock tokenization become the next grand narrative? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 26,162 2 댓글 없음 댓글을 남기시려면 로그인이 필요합니다! 즉시 로그인 댓글이 없습니다... Bee.com 세계 최대의 Web3 포털 파트너 코인카프 바이낸스 코인마켓캡 코인게코 코인라이브 갑옷 Bee Network 앱을 다운로드하고 web3 여정을 시작하세요 백지 역할 자주하는 질문 © 2021-2026. 모든 권리 보유. 개인 정보 정책 | 서비스 약관 꿀벌 네트워크 앱 다운로드 Web3 여정을 시작해보세요 세계 최대의 Web3 포털 파트너 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 백지 역할 자주하는 질문 © 2021-2026. 모든 권리 보유. 개인 정보 정책 | 서비스 약관 찾다 찾다사이트에온체인사회의소식 熱门推荐 : 에어드롭 헌터 데이터 분석 암호화폐 유명인 함정 탐지기 한국어 English 繁體中文 简体中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 한국어

智能索引记录