温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/ja/65711.html
点击访问原文链接

When Migration Becomes the Norm: Why “Your Own EVM Chain” Is Becoming Standard | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
When Migration Becomes the Norm: Why “Your Own EVM Chain” Is Becoming Standard | Bee Network Login トレンドニュース ミーム・ローンチパッド AIエージェント デサイ トップチェーンエクスプローラー 初心者向け 100x コイン ビーゲーム 重要なウェブサイト 必須のアプリ クリプトセレブリティ デピン ルーキーズ・エッセンシャル トラップディテクタ 基本的なツール 高度な Web サイト 交換 NFTツール こんにちは、 サインアウト Web3 ユニバース ゲーム ダップ ミツバチの巣 成長するプラットフォーム 広告 検索 英語 コインをリチャージする ログイン ダウンロード Web3 ユニ ゲーム ダップ ミツバチの巣 広告 ホーム-分析-本文 When Migration Becomes the Norm: Why “Your Own EVM Chain” Is Becoming Standard分析4週間前更新ワイアット 8,225 17 Noble’s pivot is a classic case. As one of the most successful stablecoin infrastructure projects within the Cosmos ecosystem, it was responsible for the issuance and cross-chain distribution of native USDC, connecting numerous chains and stablecoin settlement scenarios via IBC. However, when it announced its migration to an independent EVM L1 and deeply integrated its stablecoin product with network value capture mechanisms, the signal was clear enough: the main battleground for stablecoins, settlement, and application distribution remains within the EVM ecosystem. Stablecoin market share is highly concentrated in EVM, and its developer tools and wallet/dApp ecosystems are more mature. But this doesn’t mean that “going to EVM” is synonymous with “squeezing onto a general-purpose chain” and calling it a day. On the contrary, while more and more teams are moving towards EVM, they are beginning to reデフィne a fundamental question: Are we choosing a chain, or are we choosing a growth model?

Why are “Own EVM Chains” Becoming More Common? First, the advantages of EVM remain clear: larger stablecoin and asset volumes, more comprehensive integration targets, and more mature developer tools. This determines that many applications ultimately still want to achieve growth and distribution within the EVM ecosystem. On the other hand, on general-purpose chains, applications often have to accept a series of exogenous constraints: fee volatility, congestion, shared sequencing environments, unified upgrade schedules, and the resulting uncontrollable user experience. The appeal of appchains/rollups lies in “internalizing” these constraints—teams can select more suitable block times, execution models, RPC, and infrastructure configurations tailored to their business characteristics, and more tightly bind transaction revenue and incentive designs to their own network and product growth.

In other words, the industry is shifting from “choosing a chain and adapting to it” to “choosing an architecture and shaping it.” As the cost of this path is significantly reduced, “having your own EVM chain” increasingly resembles a replicable product strategy rather than a high-stakes gamble.

Rollup as a Service is Turning “Building Your Own Chain” from a Capital-Intensive Endeavor into a Standard Practice What hinders the widespread adoption of the appchain model is not “unclear value,” but “prohibitively expensive construction and operation.” From chain setup, security, operation, and monitoring to cross-chain interoperability, bridging, message passing, and user onboarding paths, each component entails high human and time costs. For most teams, even if they acknowledge “the chain as a product,” they might be deterred by engineering complexity. This is also the backdrop for the rise of Rollup as a Service (RaaS): it productizes deployment, hosting, maintenance, and part of the security engineering, allowing teams to refocus their energy on the application itself—features, ecosystem partnerships, growth, and commercialization.

Taking Caldera as an example, its core narrative and roadmap are quite typical: initially lowering the barrier to rollup deployment to a more manageable level through its Rollup Engine; and as the number of rollups grew rapidly, further shifting focus to “how to smooth out fragmentation.” Caldera refers to this layer as the Metalayer: aiming to equip new chains with more complete interconnectivity capabilities from the outset, including fast bridging, aggregation, and developer SDKs, reducing the integration and time costs teams incur from separately interfacing with multiple vendors. Underlying this is a pragmatic assessment: the real bottleneck for the appchain model is not “can we build a chain,” but “does having our own chain negatively impact user experience?” If user onboarding, cross-chain, and interaction paths are smooth enough, the sovereignty and controllable experience of an appchain/rollup become more attractive; conversely, interoperability and liquidity fragmentation can negate the benefits of “lower gas fees and higher performance.”

After the Distribution Logic Changes, “Interconnectivity” Becomes Growth Infrastructure When the barrier to “building your own chain” is lowered by RaaS, a new problem becomes more prominent: chains can be created more easily, but users and capital may not flow in as easily. For most applications, the real growth friction often occurs before usage—how many steps for onboarding, how long to wait for cross-chain transfers, whether fees are transparent, what happens if it fails. Capital is scattered across the Ethereum mainnet, various L2s, exchanges, and other ecosystems; user entry points also come from wallets, aggregators, centralized channels, or dApp referrals. In this distribution landscape, cross-chain and onboarding paths are essentially part of the conversion funnel. The greater the friction, the more likely new users are lost “before they even reach the product.”

Precisely because interconnectivity now impacts conversion and retention, the competitive focus of RaaS is shifting from “can you launch a chain with one click” to “can you prevent the chain from becoming an island.” Some infrastructure teams are also extending their focus from deployment capabilities to productizing the interconnectivity layer. Taking Caldera as an example, beyond providing rollup deployment and operational capabilities, it has also made interconnectivity a core direction with its Metalayer, aiming to pre-integrate and standardize cross-chain, bridging, and related toolchain integrations as much as possible. This allows new chains to launch with smoother asset onboarding and cross-network flow paths, rather than patching them together piecemeal post-launch. For project teams, this means fewer vendor assemblies, shorter integration cycles, and more controllable user experiences; for users, it means fewer “multiple-choice questions” and less operational friction. Only when interconnectivity friction decreases can the sovereignty and controllable experience of appchains/rollups not be offset by cross-chain complexity, making them easier to replicate successfully on a larger scale.

The Next-Generation Standard is Not “Where to Migrate,” But “Taking Growth into Your Own Hands” As more and more projects gravitate towards EVM, the industry’s decision-making focus is also changing: from “which chain to align with” to “choosing a more effective growth and delivery method.” EVM’s advantage as a distribution market still holds, but if a business remains on a general-purpose chain long-term, its key experiences become more dependent on the external environment: fee volatility caused by congestion, queuing and failure rates due to shared execution, and upgrade and parameter constraints under unified schedules. These uncertainties might be acceptable in the early stages; once scaling begins, they directly impact conversion and commercialization, making growth feel more like “relying on market conditions.”

The reason “own EVM chain/rollup” is increasingly becoming a standard is not that every project wants to become infrastructure, but because it makes growth variables more controllable: fees and performance are more stable, confirmation and execution environments are better tailored to the business, upgrade schedules can follow product cycles, and it’s easier to create a closed loop between chain-layer revenue, incentives, resource investment, and product operations. More importantly, RaaS lowers the cost of building and operating a chain, while interconnectivity layers like Metalayer reduce cross-chain and integration friction, ensuring that “having your own execution environment” no longer equates to “sacrificing distribution and liquidity.” When both types of costs decline simultaneously, owning an EVM chain/rollup transforms from a bespoke option for a few leading players into a replicable, standard solution for more applications during their scaling phase.

この記事はインターネットから得たものです。 When Migration Becomes the Norm: Why “Your Own EVM Chain” Is Becoming Standard

Related: 2026 Potential エアドロップ Projects Compilation and Tutorial (Part 2)

Author | Asher (@Asher_ 0210) The inspiration for this article comes from the compilation “69 airdrops to farm in 2026” by Scribbler (@Defi_Scribbler). With the arrival of 2026, the “airdrop farming” season is once again underway, making it necessary to systematically review the projects worth participating in and the angles for interaction this year. However, the original article is more of a project list compilation, with less coverage of specific interaction paths and practical strategies. Based on this, this article will further supplement and refine the interaction ideas and participation methods for each project within its framework. It is recommended to bookmark this article for future reference, and I will continue to update more specific project strategies under this column. Due to the extensive content, Odaily will share it in…

 

#分析# デフィ# イーサリアム# 交換# マーケット# ツール© 版权声明配列 上一篇 CZ Zhao Targeted by Gray Industry 下一篇 Is It a Crypto Winter Now? Market Transformation After Regulatory Reform 相关文章 Last night, tens of millions of dollars were betting on whether Trump could survive until the sun this morning.Recommend 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 22,896 Hong Kong’s cryptocurrency world: rift, confrontation, and integrationRecommended Articles 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 23,025 2 2026 Potential Airdrop Projects Compilation and Tutorial (Part 2) 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 10,044 新しいCRCL Surges 35%: Circle’s Q4 EPS Exceeds Expectations by 169%, AI + Stablecoin Moat Continues to Deepen 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 3,810 1 BTC Returns to $93,000, Did the Fed Inject $16 Billion to Rescue the Market? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 275,792 1285 It’s 2025 already, why are people still buying NFTs? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 16,329 コメントはありません コメントを残すにはログインが必要です！ すぐにログイン コメントはありません... Bee.com 世界最大の Web3 ポータル パートナー コインカープ バイナンス コインマーケットキャップ CoinGecko コインライブ 鎧 Bee Network APP をダウンロードして、Web3 の旅を始めましょう 白書 役割 よくある質問 © 2021-2026.無断複写・転載を禁じます。. プライバシーポリシー | 利用規約 Bee Networkアプリをダウンロード そしてWeb3の旅を始めましょう 世界最大のWeb3ポータル パートナー CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 白書 役割 よくある質問 © 2021-2026.無断複写・転載を禁じます。. プライバシーポリシー | 利用規約 検索 検索インサイトオンチェーン社交ニュース 热门推荐： エアドロップハンター データ分析 クリプトセレブリティ トラップディテクタ 日本語 English 繁體中文 简体中文 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 日本語

智能索引记录