温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/ja/60165.html
点击访问原文链接

“The Godfather of Gold” Debates with CZ: Who is the Real “Digital Gold”? A Trust Battle Spanning TradeFi and Crypto | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
“The Godfather of Gold” Debates with CZ: Who is the Real “Digital Gold”? A Trust Battle Spanning TradeFi and Crypto | Bee Network Login トレンドニュース ミーム・ローンチパッド AIエージェント デサイ トップチェーンエクスプローラー 初心者向け 100x コイン ビーゲーム 重要なウェブサイト 必須のアプリ クリプトセレブリティ デピン ルーキーズ・エッセンシャル トラップディテクタ 基本的なツール 高度な Web サイト 交換 NFTツール こんにちは、 サインアウト Web3 ユニバース ゲーム ダップ ミツバチの巣 成長するプラットフォーム 広告 検索 英語 コインをリチャージする ログイン ダウンロード Web3 ユニ ゲーム ダップ ミツバチの巣 広告 ホーム-分析-本文 “The Godfather of Gold” Debates with CZ: Who is the Real “Digital Gold”? A Trust Battle Spanning TradeFi and Crypto分析4ヶ月前更新ワイアット 16,660 1 As we all know, gold is a symbol of “hard currency” in the world of TradeFi, and Bitcoin is also regarded as “digital gold” in the world of Crypto. Therefore, as gold is rapidly put on the blockchain, the boundary between the two is becoming more blurred than ever before (further reading: ” From Trustless BTC to Tokenized Gold, Which is the Real ‘Digital Gold’? “).

Against this backdrop, an interesting debate reignited the discussion – Peter Schiff, the “godfather of gold,” formally challenged CZ on the topic of “Bitcoin vs. トークンized Gold.” The clash of these two viewpoints actually reveals a larger issue:

In the new era where RWA is gradually integrating into Web3, can “trust” truly be completely replaced by code?

The debate between “Golden Godfather” and CZ
Looking back at past statements, Peter Schiff is undoubtedly one of the most stubborn critics of Bitcoin.

In his view, Bitcoin is merely an illusion for speculators, while gold represents the true return to currency. “Tokenized gold” serves as a bridge for the gold standard to further enter the digital age—possessing both the physical backing of gold and the advantages brought by blockchain.

This also means that Peter Schiff firmly stands on the side of “intrinsic value” and “physical reliability.” CZ’s response, however, was direct and sharp, pinpointing the fundamental weakness of tokenized gold: “Tokenized gold is not true on-chain gold; it is still built on trust. Users trust that the issuer will fulfill its obligations in the future, rather than the code directly guaranteeing it.”

To put it bluntly, even for projects like Tether Gold (XAUT) backed by Tether and others, users still need to rely on the continuation of the traditional system in extreme situations such as war, management changes, or regulatory conflicts.

Objectively speaking, CZ is not wrong. Tokenized gold projects like XAUT are essentially a type of asset mapping based on institutional credit, and cannot completely escape centralized dependence. However, Schiff’s view is not entirely wrong either, because he is taking the perspective of “intrinsic value and physical reliability”.

Ultimately, the debate between Schiff and CZ is not a matter of right or wrong in value judgments, but essentially a clash between two different “reliability models”: the former is physical reliability (based on the scarcity of gold), and the latter is system reliability (based on the distrustlessness of code).

To gain a deeper understanding of the positioning of tokenized gold as a mapped asset and the limitations of its reliability, we must first review how traditional finance deals with physical gold.

From paper gold to tokenized gold: Evolution and compromise
In fact, long before tokenized gold products like XAUT appeared, TradFi had already begun to try to “certify” gold, the most typical way being “paper gold”.

As the name suggests, paper gold is a bank’s gold savings account or a gold ETF without physical delivery. It can be simply understood as a credit certificate, meaning that users no longer directly own gold, but hold a “credit commitment” from the bank. Gold or other precious metals are bought and sold through a paper gold account without any physical delivery.

This solves the problems of physical gold being difficult to divide and inconvenient to carry, making gold lighter and more tradable. For example, the “paper gold” products launched by various banks have indeed given many users convenient opportunities to invest in and hold gold.

Source: Bank of China (Hong Kong)

Ultimately, however, this type of model is still based on “centralized single-point trust,” because it relies on the credit endorsement of financial institutions, allowing banks to issue certificates exceeding their actual gold reserves (i.e., over-issuance). Furthermore, during financial crises or large-scale bank runs, holders of paper gold may be unable to redeem the full amount of physical gold, facing credit and redemption risks.

Unless it’s a product backed by strong credit, like those from large state-owned banks, this risk can be minimized. In other words, paper gold allows users to sacrifice certainty for liquidity and convenience.

The emergence of tokenized gold such as XAUT can be seen as a blockchain upgrade of “paper gold”: it continues the mapping logic of “gold reserves + digital certificates” and moves the certificates from the bank ledger to a public chain that anyone can view. Taking Tether’s XAUT as an example, each XAUT is said to represent one ounce of gold stored in a Swiss vault, and users can hold, transfer or trade these tokens through their wallets 24/7.

The biggest advantage of this model is that it provides gold with 24/7 global liquidity. In other aspects, it is not much different from “paper gold”. That is, users no longer have to bear the storage and transportation costs of gold bars. Finally, small investors can also hold gold through fragmented tokens.

However, Tether Gold is not a “completely trustless” system. Its security and stability still depend on Tether’s own reserve disclosure, custody arrangements, and legal framework. Although Tether claims that every XAU₮ is backed by physical gold, it remains difficult for outsiders to independently verify the actual condition of the vault, the independence of the audit, or even the redeemability under extreme circumstances.

In summary, XAUT is a disruptive upgrade to the paper gold model, combining direct ownership of physical gold (committed to full reserves) with the efficient transfer of 暗号 (on-chain tokens), but still retaining the institutional credit risk brought about by centralized issuance.

RWA’s Fate: The Inescapable Trade-off of Centralization
This reliability dilemma of tokenized gold can also be traced back to the fundamental difference between all RWA/mapped assets and on-chain native assets, which fully reflects the contradiction between efficiency and ideals in the development of Web3.

This includes stablecoins, especially the long-standing debate between “centralized stablecoins” and “decentralized stablecoins,” which has been a central theme in the crypto narrative for many years.

Algorithmic stablecoins (such as UST): attempt to completely break away from centralization and create value with algorithms, but their rapid rise and collapse prove that pure code trust is extremely fragile when it lacks physical support. Centralized stablecoins (such as USDC): The Silicon Valley Bank crisis in 2023 dealt a heavy blow to USDC, exposing its over-reliance on the traditional banking system and centralized regulation. Decentralized stablecoins (DAI/USDS): For a long time, they have tried to maintain decentralization by over-collateralizing crypto assets, but in order to improve scale and stability, they have had to gradually introduce RWA assets as collateral, which is itself a compromise to trust in the real world. It can be said that, apart from BTC and ETH, whether it is a stablecoin, XAUT, or other RWA assets, their fate is that they cannot escape centralization.

Because the essence of RWA is to “map the value of off-chain assets to on-chain”, this process necessarily requires the issuing entity to promise 1:1 redemption, while a regulated custodian institution securely stores physical assets, and the legal framework must also ensure that token holders have legal recourse.

The final trade-off is actually quite straightforward— XAUT is more conservative in terms of asset value and has physical backing than BTC; however, BTC is more censorship-resistant and more decentralized in terms of system architecture than XAU₮.

From this perspective, neither Schiff nor CZ is wrong; they are simply defending two different models of the future.

Schiff’s Future (RWA): “Digital efficiency + physical reliability,” sacrificing decentralization but ensuring value endorsement; CZ’s future (BTC): “Code trust + decentralization,” sacrificing intrinsic value but ensuring system resistance to censorship; This also indicates that Web3 will not be a purely code-based world, but rather an ecosystem where code trust and entity trust coexist.

この記事はインターネットから得たものです。 “The Godfather of Gold” Debates with CZ: Who is the Real “Digital Gold”? A Trust Battle Spanning TradeFi and CryptoRecommended Articles

Related: Weekly Funding Update | 7 Projects Received Funding, Total Funding Reaching $81.4 Million (September 29-October 5)Recomm The largest single financing this week was the social media platform X.me’s announcement of a $30 million strategic financing round, followed by the payment company xMoney’s announcement of a $21.5 million strategic financing round. The following are specific financing events (Note: 1. Sorted by the size of the announced amount; 2. * indicates companies in “traditional” fields whose businesses partially involve blockchain): Web 3 social media platform X.me completes $30 million in funding, led by Tido Capital On October 1st, X.me, the social media platform and Web 3 equivalent of TikTok, announced the completion of a $30 million strategic funding round. This round was led by Tido Capital, with participation from Genesis Capital, Alpha Capital, Rollman Management, Parallel Ventures, WAGMi ventures, and Web 3 Vision. The funds will be primarily…

#分析#ビットコイン#暗号# デフィ#トークン#ウェブ3© 版权声明配列 上一篇 One-week token unlock: LINEA unlocked to 16.4% of circulating supply. 下一篇 Stable's Fundraising Chaos: Why I Missed the FOMO Train 相关文章 AIミームはオカルトに発展したのか？オカルトミームの簡単な概要 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 36,272 8 Volatility Weekly Review (June 2-June 9) 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 29,471 2 The DAT strategy suffered another blow, and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange said no to “pure coin hoarding companies” 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 17,871 Is Bitcoin poised for a breakout? Three key factors for a December price surge. 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 15,898 R2 Vaults Upgrade: Officially Launching a Clear Two-Tier Revenue Structure 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 14,281 3 Revisiting Ethereum: What are the reasons to be bullish? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 24,183 2 コメントはありません コメントを残すにはログインが必要です！ すぐにログイン コメントはありません... Bee.com 世界最大の Web3 ポータル パートナー コインカープ バイナンス コインマーケットキャップ CoinGecko コインライブ 鎧 Bee Network APP をダウンロードして、Web3 の旅を始めましょう 白書 役割 よくある質問 © 2021-2026.無断複写・転載を禁じます。. プライバシーポリシー | 利用規約 Bee Networkアプリをダウンロード そしてWeb3の旅を始めましょう 世界最大のWeb3ポータル パートナー CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 白書 役割 よくある質問 © 2021-2026.無断複写・転載を禁じます。. プライバシーポリシー | 利用規約 検索 検索インサイトオンチェーン社交ニュース 热门推荐： エアドロップハンター データ分析 クリプトセレブリティ トラップディテクタ 日本語 English 繁體中文 简体中文 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 日本語

智能索引记录