温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/ja/58501.html
点击访问原文链接

Reflections after October 11th: How do exchanges balance “relative fairness” and “absolute transparency”? | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
Reflections after October 11th: How do exchanges balance “relative fairness” and “absolute transparency”? | Bee Network Login トレンドニュース ミーム・ローンチパッド AIエージェント デサイ トップチェーンエクスプローラー 初心者向け 100x コイン ビーゲーム 重要なウェブサイト 必須のアプリ クリプトセレブリティ デピン ルーキーズ・エッセンシャル トラップディテクタ 基本的なツール 高度な Web サイト 交換 NFTツール こんにちは、 サインアウト Web3 ユニバース ゲーム ダップ ミツバチの巣 成長するプラットフォーム 広告 検索 英語 コインをリチャージする ログイン ダウンロード Web3 ユニ ゲーム ダップ ミツバチの巣 広告 ホーム-分析-本文 Reflections after October 11th: How do exchanges balance “relative fairness” and “absolute transparency”?分析5ヶ月前更新ワイアット 19,487 19 By Golem ( @ウェブ3_ゴーレム )

While the epic October 11th sell-off has concluded and the market is gradually recovering, the record single-day liquidation of $19.3 billion set during that plunge still casts a shadow over the market. Many investors believe that Trump, known for his outspokenness, bears the primary blame. Others point the finger at Binance, arguing that the decoupling of the USDE, BNSOL, and WBETH prices is the primary cause of the further decline.

Binance officially explained the decoupling issue as a brief technical failure of some platform modules due to the overall market setback. As for the extremely low prices of some spot trading pairs, they were mainly caused by historical limit orders being triggered under unilateral liquidity and UI display accuracy issues.

Binance has assumed platform responsibility, compensating users who lost collateral due to the depegging of USDE, BNSOL, and WBETH, totaling $283 million. Despite this, some investors remain unconvinced, arguing that Binance is also responsible for the collapse of altcoins and reiterating concerns about centralized exchanges being “market manipulation,” “data black boxes,” and “deliberately unplugging.”

On October 13th, Hyperliquid co-founder Jeff.hl also engaged in a heated exchange with Binance founder CZ on social media. Jeff.hl initially と述べた all Hyperliquid orders, trades, and liquidations are executed on-chain, ensuring transparency and verifiability. He also argued that some centralized exchanges (CEXs) significantly underreport their liquidation data, specifically calling out Binance.

In response to this, Binance founder CZ also quickly responded to all doubts, saying that “when others choose to ignore, hide, shirk responsibility or attack competitors, key BSC ecosystem participants (including Binance, Venus, etc.) pay hundreds of millions of dollars out of their own pockets to protect users” and believes that this is a different value system.

There are many different opinions in the market, and no single solution can satisfy all market participants. During this sensitive period, Jeff.hl’s public questioning of Binance essentially reflects the different trade-offs between CEX and DEX between “relative fairness” and “absolute transparency.”

Performance is no longer the main difference between DEX and CEX In the past, while DEXs were considered the ultimate form of 暗号 exchanges, CEXs still dominated the market share, primarily due to the significant performance gap between DEXs and CEXs. Issues such as high transaction latency, limited market depth, low capital efficiency, and poor transaction execution accuracy have consistently impacted traders’ experience on DEXs. Consequently, despite the persistent criticism of CEXs for centralization risks and even recent debacles (such as the FTX incident), traders ultimately gravitate towards the low latency and ease of use offered by CEXs.

However, by 2025, these performance issues are no longer the primary obstacle hindering DEX market expansion. Take Hyperliquid, a DEX that boasts CEX-level performance, for example. Its on-chain central limit order book (CLOB) model offers a significant performance improvement compared to previous AMM DEXs, with an average transaction confirmation time of just 0.07 seconds, comparable to CEXs. Furthermore, while some niche tokens on Hyperliquid still face issues with insufficient liquidity and high slippage, Hyperliquid’s transaction slippage for mainstream tokens like BTC and ETH is now below 0.1%, comparable to CEXs.

As the performance gap gradually narrows, the trend of funds and traders migrating to DEX has indeed been happening since 2025.

データによると The Block , in the spot market, compared with CEX, the market share of DEX will generally increase in 2025, reaching 19% in the third quarter of 2025.

In the perpetual contract market, DEX’s market share grew even faster, from only 4.9% of CEX’s contract market at the end of 2024 to 14.33% in October 2025.

Even under extreme market conditions, today’s DEXs have withstood the test. Following the October 11th crash, Hyperliquid officially 述べた , “Despite record-breaking platform traffic and transaction volumes during these extreme market conditions, the Hyperliquid blockchain experienced no downtime or latency.”

On the same day, Binance, the world’s largest exchange, experienced a partial system outage due to technical issues. However, this doesn’t necessarily mean Hyperliquid is currently performing better than Binance, as the systems they face are under different pressures. On October 11th, Hyperliquid’s perpetual contract trading volume exceeded $10 billion, while Binance’s volume was over 10 times that. Data from The Block shows that in September, Hyperliquid’s contract trading volume was $282.47 billion, while Binance’s was $2.34 trillion, representing only 12% of Binance’s.

The market is always “relatively fair” When performance is no longer the primary difference between CEXs and DEXs, will all investors truly choose DEXs? Despite the criticism leveled against Binance following the October 11th crash, post-2000s trader Vida remains vocal in his support for Binance, arguing that it remains committed to its users at all times.

Some investors complained that Vida’s comments were due to Binance’s bias. During extreme market conditions, the exchange compensated and appeased stakeholders like large traders and “Binance users,” while ignoring the impacted retail investors and other market participants. Binance’s growth was built on the bodies of countless silent victims, with the wealthy being paid back in full and the common people’s money split 70-30.

However, aside from the “conspiracy theories” surrounding CEXs, fairness in this market is always relative. Even DEXs, which champion decentralization and fairness, can falter in the face of a crisis . On March 26th of this year, Hyperliquid faced its biggest crisis since its founding. A whale manipulated the price of the meme coin JELLY, forcing Hyperliquid (HLP) to take on a large short position and risk losing $240 million. However, Hyperliquid opted for a “plug-and-drag” approach by delisting the JELLY contracts, resulting in a $700,000 profit for HLPs, which were expected to lose money.

Hyperliquid’s move also caused a public outcry, making a mockery of decentralization and fairness. This wasn’t the first time traders had exploited Hyperliquid’s vulnerabilities for profit. Other incidents included “a whale’s forced liquidation caused a $4 million loss in HLP” and “a series of XPL liquidations reaped $46 million.” Hyperliquiquid failed to compensate users in these incidents.

This made investors understand that Hyperliquid did not adhere to decentralization and fairness, but chose to “do nothing” before the crisis spread to itself. It can be said that every upgrade and improvement of Hyperliquid was stepped on countless “corpses” .

The market needs “absolute transparency” The trading market is never truly fair. Frankly speaking, if one party makes money, another party will inevitably lose money. Whether it is a DEX or a CEX, it is impossible for them to be responsible for everyone. But even if fairness is relative, transparency can be absolute.

During extreme market conditions, CEXs are often embroiled in conspiracy theories. The primary reason is that CEXs are inherently tamper-resistant “black boxes.” Even with enhanced regulatory and compliance measures, a lack of transparency persists, fostering public distrust. Investors rely solely on exchange announcements for their so-called truth. While authoritative, these statements can also be easily challenged. For example, Hyperliquid co-founder Jeff.hl has accused Binance of fabricating its clearing data, and Binance would have to “cut open its belly and show how many bowls of noodles it’s had” to prove its claims.

While Hyperliquid’s values differ from Binance’s, the transparency and verifiability of its on-chain transaction data are undeniable. This transparent settlement mechanism not only significantly reduces the possibility of market manipulation by the platform but also provides peace of mind for investors, mitigating the risk of conspiracy theories. For example, during several Hyperliquid crises, people watched the actions of the “whales” on-chain, while investors suffered losses and lamented their losses. Despite Hyperliquiquid’s indifference, few believed the platform was behind the incident.

While mechanisms aren’t perfect, transparent, open, and automated trading mechanisms within established rules will always reduce controversy compared to the black boxes and chaos of centralized exchanges. Even DEXs can be subject to suspicion if they lack transparency. For example, the previously popular Prep DEX Aster was accused of fraudulent trading and data fabrication due to its private order features. DeFiLlama even temporarily delisted Aster.

With the development of the crypto market, CEXs and DEXs are no longer mutually exclusive. The boundaries between CEXs and DEXs are narrowing, with DEX experiences becoming more similar to CEXs. CEXs are also expanding their on-chain businesses through exchange user wallets. Both CEXs and DEXs have their own risk quadrants. CEXs can provide a safety net for users in the event of a real crisis, but investors criticize their power. DEXs, while adhering to the principle of “code is law,” do not impose excessive restrictions on user behavior, but investors appreciate the benefits of centralized compensation in the event of a crisis.

But from the trend point of view, “transparency and openness” is the foundation of Crypto and one of its development trends. Even if the value systems of CEX and DEX are different, both should move in this direction: higher verifiability, clearer responsibility boundaries, and more sound crisis response mechanisms.

関連資料 Is it possible for DEX to replace CEX?

この記事はインターネットから得たものです。 Reflections after October 11th: How do exchanges balance “relative fairness” and “absolute transparency”?Recommended Articles

Related: Is the end of traditional banks approaching? Tether’s $500 billion valuation challenges OpenAI. Original Source: BitpushNews The financing news of stablecoin giant Tether is enough to make the entire traditional financial circle hold its breath. According to Bloomberg, the “central bank of the crypto world,” which manages nearly $173 billion in USDT, is seeking a massive $15-20 billion private equity round at a valuation of up to $500 billion. What does this figure signify? It means Tether’s size is on par with top global tech unicorns like OpenAI and SpaceX. Its $4.9 billion in quarterly net profit dwarfs the earnings of many established financial institutions. This isn’t just about raising capital; it’s about a “hidden whale” rising from the crypto world, making a formal declaration of value to the traditional financial system. $500 billion valuation: a bold numbers game Tether’s bold valuation stems…

#分析#暗号# デフィ# 交換# マーケット# ミームコイン#トークン#ウェブ3© 版权声明配列 上一篇 RWA Weekly Report | RWA Asset Holders Increase Nearly 60,000 Weekly; 下一篇 The Curve team is starting a new business. Will Yield Basis become the next phenomenal DeFi application? 相关文章 Academics make a comeback: Small-town professor Waller becomes the most popular candidate for Federal Reserve Chairman 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 22,081 1 Death is the biggest “buyer” of cryptocurrencies. 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 18,120 YZi Labs’ first biotech investment: Renewal Bio Investment 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 17,660 3 From “whoever pays, gets paid” to “only the right people”: The next generation of Launchpad is poised to reshape the landscape. 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 16,164 1 Huiwang Paymentの閉鎖危機：暗号決済業界のコンプライアンス危機と世界の規制当局の警告 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 18,732 3 Has Bitcoin’s four-year cycle failed? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 18,286 コメントはありません コメントを残すにはログインが必要です！ すぐにログイン コメントはありません... Bee.com 世界最大の Web3 ポータル パートナー コインカープ バイナンス コインマーケットキャップ CoinGecko コインライブ 鎧 Bee Network APP をダウンロードして、Web3 の旅を始めましょう 白書 役割 よくある質問 © 2021-2026.無断複写・転載を禁じます。. プライバシーポリシー | 利用規約 Bee Networkアプリをダウンロード そしてWeb3の旅を始めましょう 世界最大のWeb3ポータル パートナー CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 白書 役割 よくある質問 © 2021-2026.無断複写・転載を禁じます。. プライバシーポリシー | 利用規約 検索 検索インサイトオンチェーン社交ニュース 热门推荐： エアドロップハンター データ分析 クリプトセレブリティ トラップディテクタ 日本語 English 繁體中文 简体中文 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 日本語

智能索引记录