From hoarding to forced price increases: BitMine’s 35-day blitz and the shift in ETH pricing powerRecommended Articles | Bee Network

From hoarding to forced price increases: BitMine’s 35-day blitz and the shift in ETH pricing powerRecommended Articles | Bee Network Login トレンドニュース ミーム・ローンチパッド AIエージェント デサイ トップチェーンエクスプローラー 初心者向け 100x コイン ビーゲーム 重要なウェブサイト 必須のアプリ クリプトセレブリティ デピン ルーキーズ・エッセンシャル トラップディテクタ 基本的なツール 高度な Web サイト 交換 NFTツール こんにちは、 サインアウト Web3 ユニバース ゲーム ダップ ミツバチの巣 成長するプラットフォーム 広告 検索 英語 コインをリチャージする ログイン ダウンロード Web3 ユニ ゲーム ダップ ミツバチの巣 広告 ホーム-分析-本文 From hoarding to forced price increases: BitMine’s 35-day blitz and the shift in ETH pricing powerRecommended Articles分析7ヶ月前更新ワイアット 25,8461 35 BitMine, the company behind the project represented by Tom Lee, did it: this small company, which was once unknown on the Nasdaq, increased its ETH holdings from zero to 830,000 through a PIPE financing and three rounds of structured increases, completing a comeback against SharpLink and becoming the world’s largest ETH treasury.

This isn’t just a battle of numbers; it’s a clash of capital between two distinct lines of thought: SharpLink, a “暗号 OG,” slowly hoards coins and waits for a rise; BitMine, a “Wall Street power,” cashes out while pushing prices higher. Low cost versus high leverage, a hoarding mentality versus narrative strategies—these are two worldviews in direct conflict.

They are not just different in the way of buying coins, but are vying for the answer to a question: in the next stage of crypto finance, who has the right to デフィne the “price” of ETH?

We try to understand this quiet but drastic industry shift from multiple perspectives.

Why two lineages of ETH? If BitMine represents a Wall Street-style structural raid, then the existence of SharpLink is precisely a continuation of the “ETH native” logic.

The difference between these two companies lies not only in their holding rhythms, disclosure methods, and narrative styles, but more importantly, they represent two completely different origins and purposes.

SharpLink — OGs have been hoarding their coins for too long and moving too slowly. A breakdown of SharpLink’s shareholder base reveals a nearly complete spectrum of capital across the Ethereum ecosystem.

The first category is the original pedigree camp: ConsenSys (founded by Ethereum co-founder Joseph Lubin) controls core infrastructure such as MetaMask and Infura, and Lubin serves as Chairman of the Board of SharpLink. The second category is the infrastructure camp: Pantera, Arrington, Primitive, and others are deeply engaged in Layer 2, DeFi protocols, and cross-chain infrastructure. The third category is the financialization camp: Galaxy Digital, GSR, Ondo Finance, and others directly operate in the institutionalization, derivatives, and custody businesses of Ethereum, turning their holdings into manageable and value-added institutional assets.

This capital binding not only amplifies SharpLink’s “ETH treasury” narrative, but also provides it with resource leverage in buying, staking, reducing positions, etc., and becomes a bridge for Wall Street to understand ETH.

The initial ETH holding structure also reflects this “OG attribute”: it comes from internal transfers within the team wallet rather than the open market; the single purchase size is small, but the distribution cycle is extremely long; it emphasizes security, liquidity management and audit coordination.

According to financial reports and on-chain estimates, SharpLink’s ETH holding costs ranged from $1,500 to $1,800, with some early holdings costing less than $1,000. As a result, its shareholder structure is highly structured by hoarders, making it unsurprising to see a natural sell-off when the price returns to around $4,000.

Moreover, as early as June 12, SharpLink submitted a document called S-ASR, the core content of which is that after the registration takes effect, the shares can be sold immediately.

This approach isn’t wrong, but it naturally brings three problems: the OG team’s “hoarding coin” mentality makes them more focused on the cost-benefit ratio, and once the coin price rises sharply, they are likely to trigger the urge to reduce their holdings; the information flow under the OG network is more closed-loop and cautious, and they are not inclined to actively play the narrative card; with on-chain operations as the priority, they lag behind in terms of financial report disclosure efficiency and capital market operations.

This is precisely the underlying reason why SharpLink seemed to be a step behind when faced with BitMine’s rhythmic “disclosure – financing – increasing holdings – price increase” strategy in the third quarter of 2025.

Vitalik Buterin Image source: coingecko

In contrast, BitMine entered the Ethereum market as a typical Wall Street investor. First, the PIPE financing structure itself is steeped in financial engineering: it utilizes a combination of cash, warrants, and ETH subscriptions; participants include mainstream US equity investors such as Galaxy Digital, ARK Invest, and Founders Fund; and its transparent chip distribution and lock-up period contribute to a stable valuation model.

The backgrounds of its board members offer a glimpse into this dynamic—many of them hail from investment banks, private equity firms, and hedge funds, and are familiar with PIPE financing, regulatory arbitrage, and the operation of refinancing cycles. In their eyes, ETH isn’t a “digital currency,” but rather a new type of financial asset that’s “priceable, tradable, and cashable.”

The difference between OG and Wall Street is not just a difference in rhythm, but also a conflict of motivation.

This forced Sharplink to start thinking, is OG’s ETH alone not enough?

They seem to have given a new answer to this question – starting on August 7, they introduced new Wall Street institutional investors to participate in their $200 million registered private placement.

This is a “power transfer” of the Ethereum narrative: from the hands of OG, it gradually shifts to the hands of capital that can explain clear financial reports, tell good stories, and run a smooth structure.

BitMine may not necessarily dominate the future, but what is foreseeable is that the next round of ETH pricing will no longer be determined by the OGs in the cryptocurrency circle, but by whoever controls the narrative structure and can obtain more financing from Wall Street, whoever will have more “narrative chips.”

How to seize the ETH leader throne in 35 days? On July 1, 2025, BitMine’s ETH holdings were zero; on August 5, its disclosed holdings reached 833,137. In just 35 days, this company, previously unidentified in the public market for crypto, went from obscurity to the world’s largest Ethereum treasury, surpassing SharpLink.

Let’s take a detailed look at what BitMine is doing.

BitMine’s timing was incredibly precise. During its 35-day surge, there were announcements almost every seven days, each one akin to a premeditated playbook: Week 1 (July 1–7): A $250 million PIPE financing round was completed, with the public disclosure of the initial purchase of approximately 150,000 ETH. Week 2 (July 8–14): An additional 266,000 ETH was purchased, bringing total holdings to over 560,000. Week 3 (July 15–21): An additional 272,000 ETH was purchased, bringing cumulative holdings to over 830,000.

These three rounds of disclosures were not made through routine updates in quarterly reports. Instead, they were inserted through media, official websites, investor relations letters, and other means to send a clear signal to the market: “We are continuing to buy ETH on a large scale, and we are the leader in the growth of institutional holdings.”

This approach overturns the traditional disclosure logic of treasury companies of “waiting for the financial report results to come out” and turns to a rhythmic offense dominated by “narrative”.

More importantly, its position-building rhythm is highly aligned with market trends. BitMine’s average purchase price isn’t a blind buy-in, but rather a strategy of leveraging market corrections to buy at low prices. According to PIPE filings, its average ETH purchase price was $3,491, avoiding the previous high while navigating the sensitive range before ETH enters a new upward trend.

This precise layout is not accidental, but is in line with the complete tool chain of “OTC structure design + on-chain delivery + custody settlement” provided by Galaxy Digital, which enables it to efficiently absorb large amounts of ETH without causing drastic price fluctuations.

At the same time, BitMine’s stock price exploded in tandem with the disclosure, rising from $4 in early July to $41 in early August, a gain of over 900%. Its total market capitalization also jumped from less than $200 million to over $3 billion.

Even more striking is that after each BitMine holdings update, not only does its stock price rise, but the ETH spot market also sees a simultaneous surge in volume. The market has begun to view “BitMine purchases—ETH price increases” as a logically related set of events, further strengthening the narrative’s closed loop.

This positive cycle of “market expectations – structure disclosure – asset purchases – price feedback” is viewed by Wall Street as a classic case of market capitalization reshaping. However, it not only reshapes company valuations but also, in a narrative way, reshapes the market dominance of the ETH treasury.

BitMine is no longer just a token-holding company; it is becoming a key hub in the institutionalization of Ethereum. In this process, it doesn’t wait for market approval; instead, it actively seeks to create it through its cadence, disclosures, rhetoric, structure, and pricing model.

To sum it up in one sentence: This is not a “waiting for the price to rise” position building, but a “forced rise” structure.

From nothing to something, from buying coins to pushing up valuations, from disclosure to dominating pricing, BitMine created a “structural rise” template in 35 days.

And it may also be the earliest financial prototype to appear in the next Ethereum bull market narrative.

Tom Lee: New Banker Spokesperson As co-founder and head of research at Fundstrat Global Advisors, Tom Lee is one of the most influential figures bridging the gap between the US stock market and the crypto market. He understands both macroeconomic data and public opinion manipulation, and more importantly, he knows how to articulate the concept of a “rising stock” in a way that is both plausible and compelling.

His fame stems not from accurate predictions but from his frequency, compelling narratives, and dominant positioning. A popular saying goes, “Tom Lee may not always be right, but he always says it early, loudly, and in a way that sticks with you.”

His most representative tool is the Bitcoin Misery Index (BMI) – a “market sentiment indicator” designed by him, which quantifies the market’s “pain index” by integrating data such as trading volume, return rate, volatility, etc.

The greatest significance of this index isn’t predicting price fluctuations, but rather providing “data backing” for his bullish pronouncements. For example, when the BMI is extremely low (80), he’ll say, “This signals the arrival of a structural bull market.” If prices fall, he’ll say, “Sentiment hasn’t fully released yet.” If prices rise, he’ll say, “The on-chain structure is recovering.”

No matter whether the market goes up or down, there is always something to say; no matter what the market conditions are like, you can always call for more.

Tom Lee Image source: coingape

Tom Lee’s “structured call” style has several notable features.

Always providing a new target price. In 2017, he predicted Bitcoin would reach $250,000 in 2022, then revised his prediction in 2021 to $200,000 in 2024. When the market underperforms, he cites factors like the halving cycle, inflation adjustments, and Federal Reserve policy to “delay” his forecasts, while also updating his logic.

He’s a frequent guest on CNBC’s “Fast Money” and a regular commentator on Bloomberg. He updates his Twitter account (@fundstrat) almost daily, posting interviews on YouTube and using short video summaries and charts to convey his views. He also regularly posts data summaries with charts on the Fundstrat website for media recitation.

Emotions drive investors, and narratives drive institutions. Retail investors listen to him calling for a bottom; institutions listen to him explaining the structure. He can, within the same model, create psychological expectations that suit different demographics, forming a “multi-layered narrative.” For example, during a price plunge, he repeatedly emphasized the “institutional buying window” while simultaneously urging retail investors to “not miss the opportunity to get on board before the halving.”

He went from being a predictor to a faith-maker. He didn’t just say “it will rise,” he told you “the structure of the rise is reasonable,” “ETH will become the new anchor for tech stocks,” and “BTC is the next generation of digital gold.” He transformed his “results-oriented” bullish calls into “faith-driven” asset revaluations.

In the construction of the Ethereum narrative for 2024–2025, Tom Lee once again became a key driving force. He not only predicted that ETH would rise, but also stated that “ETH would become part of corporate balance sheets.” This view directly provided public support for narrative-type operations like BitMine.

In the process of BitMine’s rise, we can almost see the deep shadow of Tom Lee’s rhetoric logic: using “structural indicators” such as ETH-per-share to measure fundamentals; using “cyclical logic” to explain the rationality of rapid rises; using “institutional entry” to cover up the aggressive strategy behind high-cost purchases.

Tom Lee is definitely the king of Narrative, he doesn’t rely on seeing right, but on speaking right.

end In traditional financial markets, profitability and cash flow determine asset prices; but in today’s world of crypto assets, prices often exist before value, and narratives often dominate the generation of valuations.

The rise of BitMine isn’t just a change in the number of ETH on a company’s balance sheet; it’s a reshaping of the narrative around how to make institutions understand ETH. While SharpLink adheres to old logic, slowly hoarding tokens on-chain, BitMine, driven by structure and sentiment, rapidly achieves a consensus turnover.

This is not a question of who is more honest, but who can explain “crypto assets” as “financial assets” faster, more clearly and more structured.

Behind the scenes, a larger narrative race is quietly brewing: Who will be ETH’s “long-term valuation anchor” on Wall Street? Who will build the next mainstream “ETH-per-share” model? Who can turn liquidity narratives into structural income? And who will ultimately become the next dominant voice in institutional pricing?

The market will give the answer, but one thing is certain: this round of battle for Ethereum’s treasury is no longer just a relay of faith on the chain.

The ceiling of Ethereum’s pricing no longer belongs to the OGs who were the first to call for more, but to the Wall Street capital that is the best at telling stories.

この記事はインターネットから得たものです。 From hoarding to forced price increases: BitMine’s 35-day blitz and the shift in ETH pricing powerRecommended Articles

Related: Unveiling the two key figures behind ETH’s recent surge: Tom Lee vs. Joseph RubinRecommended Articles Author: Azuma ( @azuma_eth ) ETH has become the biggest focus in this round of market recovery, and ETH treasury reserve companies represented by BitMine (BMNR) and Sharplink Gaming (SBET) are undoubtedly the biggest driving force behind this round of ETH surge. Data from the Strategic ETH Reserve shows that as of July 29th (Beijing time), BitMine and Sharplink Gaming held 566,800 and 368,000 ETH, respectively, valued at $2.14 billion and $1.36 billion, making them the only two entities with holdings exceeding that of the Ethereum Foundation. It’s no exaggeration to say that BitMine and Sharplink Gaming now have a greater influence on ETH prices than the Ethereum Foundation, and their respective leaders, Tom Lee and Joseph Rubin, can be considered the true voices in the current ETH price trend.…

#分析#ビットコイン#暗号# デフィ# イーサリアム# マーケット#トークン# ツール© 版权声明配列 上一篇 600x growth in 7 days! Will this dog be the harbinger of AI Season 2.0?Recommended Articles 下一篇 24-Hour Hot Coins and News | China and the United States issued a joint statement on the Stockholm trade talks, suspendi 相关文章 Can XPL, which was snapped up by wealthy investors during its public sale, break the $1 mark when it goes online?Recomme 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 23,024 1 When stablecoins start building chains, does Ethereum still have a chance? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 20,104 The Rise of a New RWB Narrative: From “Asset Tokenization” to “Business Tokenization” 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 21,070 The DeFi Punk Era Has Begun? A Quick Look at the Ethereum Foundation Treasury Policy 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 29,658 In the era of narrative collisions, is volatility the real asset?Recommended Articles 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 22,834 3 BitMart Weekly Market Report (October 27 – November 2) 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 16,435 1件のコメント コメントを残すにはログインが必要です！ すぐにログイン 匿名 ゲスト güzel bir paylaşım olmuş emeğinize sağlık.

7ヶ月前 Bee.com 世界最大の Web3 ポータル パートナー コインカープ バイナンス コインマーケットキャップ CoinGecko コインライブ 鎧 Bee Network APP をダウンロードして、Web3 の旅を始めましょう 白書 役割 よくある質問 © 2021-2026.無断複写・転載を禁じます。. プライバシーポリシー | 利用規約 Bee Networkアプリをダウンロード そしてWeb3の旅を始めましょう 世界最大のWeb3ポータル パートナー CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 白書 役割 よくある質問 © 2021-2026.無断複写・転載を禁じます。. プライバシーポリシー | 利用規約 検索 検索インサイトオンチェーン社交ニュース 热门推荐： エアドロップハンター データ分析 クリプトセレブリティ トラップディテクタ 日本語 English 繁體中文 简体中文 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 日本語