温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/id/57047.html
点击访问原文链接

Who controls USDH? The crypto war behind Hyperliquid’s $5.6 billion treasury | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
Who controls USDH? The crypto war behind Hyperliquid’s $5.6 billion treasury | Bee Network Login Berita Trending Meme Launchpad Agen AI DeSci Penjelajah Rantai Atas Untuk Newbee 100x Koin Permainan Lebah Situs Web Penting APLIKASI yang Harus Dimiliki Selebriti Kripto DePIN Pemula Penting Detektor Perangkap Alat Dasar Situs Web Tingkat Lanjut Pertukaran Alat NFT Hai, Keluar Alam Semesta Web3 permainan DApp Sarang lebah Platform Berkembang IKLAN Mencari Bahasa inggris Isi Ulang Koin Gabung Unduh Universitas Web3 permainan DApp Sarang lebah IKLAN rumah-Analisis-Teks utama Who controls USDH? The crypto war behind Hyperliquid’s $5.6 billion treasuryAnalisis6 bulan yang lalu更新Wyatt 20,910 28

Terjemahan asli: TechFlow

Hyperliquid is one of the fastest-growing perpetual swap exchanges in the DeFi space, locking up billions of dollars in capital. With a seamless user experience and a rapidly expanding user base, the exchange has become a leading platform for on-chain derivatives trading. Currently, its trading engine is powered by over $5.6 billion in stablecoins, the vast majority of which is Circle’s USDC.

This capital has generated a significant income stream through the underlying reserve, but currently those returns have gone to external institutions. Now, the Hyperliquid community is working to reclaim them.

On September 14th, Hyperliquid faces a decisive battle. Its validators will conduct a crucial vote to determine who will hold the keys to USDH—the platform’s first native stablecoin. This vote is about more than just the ownership of a single token; it’s about control of a financial engine capable of reintroducing hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue back into the ecosystem. This process is similar to a multi-billion dollar request for quote (RFQ) or government bond auction, but it will be conducted transparently on-chain. By staking HYPE to secure the network, validators also serve as a “hiring committee,” deciding who will mint USDH and how billions of dollars in revenue will be redistributed.

The difference between the contenders is stark – on one side are teams of kripto-native developers promising complete alliance, and on the other are institutional financial giants with deep pockets and established operational mechanisms.

Mature Model: $220 Million Annual Potential Opportunity

To understand the significance of this competition, we must first understand where capital flows are occurring. Currently, USDC reigns supreme among stablecoins. Its issuer, Circle, has quietly built its fortune by investing its reserves in US Treasuries and earning returns, generating $658 million in revenue in just one quarter. This is precisely the business model Hyperliquid aims to emulate.

By replacing third-party stablecoins with its native stablecoin, USDH, the platform can avoid value outflows and redirect capital flows inward. Based on existing balances, the USDH reserve alone could potentially generate $220 million in revenue annually. This marks Hyperliquid’s transformation from a “tenant” to a “landlord”—no longer a client of external stablecoins, but rather a holder of its own financial infrastructure. For Circle, this competition is crucial: losing Hyperliquid’s reserves could instantly reduce its revenue by as much as 10%, exposing its heavy reliance on interest income.

The only question facing the community is not whether to pursue this prize, but who to trust to make it happen.

However, Circle wasn’t about to give up its position easily. Even before the USDH plan surfaced, Circle had already taken steps to solidify its position within Hyperliquid, announcing the launch of native USDC and CCTP V2 in late July. This upgrade promised seamless USDC transfers between supported blockchains, improving capital efficiency—no wrapper tokens or traditional cross-chain transactions. Circle also introduced its institutional-grade fiat on- and off-ramps through Circle Mint. The message was clear: as the listed issuer of USDC, Circle wasn’t about to cede Hyperliquid’s liquidity to a competitor.

Candidates: A Clash of Ideas

Several different visions surrounding USDH have emerged, each representing a different strategic path for Hyperliquid.

Following USDH’s announcement, the Hyperliquid native team , Native Pasars, quickly joined the race, proposing a GENIUS Act-compliant stablecoin specifically for the platform. Their plan included integrating a fiat gateway to streamline on- and off-ramps, and sharing revenue with the Hyperliquid Assistance Fund. The team included veterans like MC Lader, former president of Uniswap Labs, but some community members questioned the timing and funding of their proposal. The team positioned itself as the most local option—combining regulatory compliance, on-chain expertise, and a commitment to returning value to the ecosystem. The advantages were clear: a credible local project committed to regulatory compliance and close alignment with $HYPE. The disadvantages came from some community members who questioned the timing and the team’s resources to deliver at scale.

One proposal gaining significant momentum is Agora , a stablecoin infrastructure provider that has assembled a consortium of established partners. Agora is backed by MoonPay, a cryptocurrency deposit service provider with more licensed jurisdictions and KYC users than Stripe.

Rain , which provides seamless on-chain spending and card services; and Lapisan Nol , which provides optimal cross-chain interoperability.

Backed by a recent $50 million round led by Paradigm, Agora emphasizes regulatory compliance through proof of reserves and positions itself as fully aligned with Hyperliquid’s interests. Its reserves will be custodied by State Street, managed by VanEck, and proof of reserves provided by Chaos Labs. The team has also pledged to provide at least $10 million in initial liquidity through partners such as Cross River and Customers Bank. Its proposal offers a proven model backed by institutions and a core commitment: every dollar of net income from the USDH reserve will flow back into the Hyperliquid ecosystem. In practice, this means that the stablecoin’s growth will directly translate into returns for HYPE holders. Its advantages lie in institutional credibility, capital backing, and distribution capabilities. However, reliance on banks and custodians could reintroduce the off-chain bottlenecks that USDH sought to avoid.

Garis , through its $1.1 billion acquisition of Menjembatani , is proposing a proposal to establish USDH as the backbone of a global stablecoin payments network. Bridge’s infrastructure already enables businesses to accept and settle stablecoin payments (such as USDC) with low fees and near-instantaneity in over 100 countries. The integration with Stripe brings regulatory credibility, a developer-friendly API stack, and seamless card/payment connectivity. The company also plans to launch its own fiat-backed stablecoin, USDB, within the Bridge ecosystem, aiming to circumvent external blockchain costs and create a defensive moat. The advantages are clear: Stripe’s scale, brand, and distribution capabilities could bring USDH into mainstream commerce. However, the risk lies in strategic control: vertically integrated fintech companies with their own public blockchains (Tempo) and wallets (Privy) could ultimately control Hyperliquid’s core currency layer.

Other contenders have chosen different paths. Paxos , a regulated trust company headquartered in New York, offers the most conservative option: compliance first. Paxos pledges to use 95% of interest earned on USDH reserves directly for HYPE repurchases. Paxos also promises to list HYPE on the networks it supports (including PayPal, Venmo, and MercadoLibre)—an institutional distribution channel that other contenders cannot match. Although the US regulatory environment has become more friendly under the Trump administration, Paxos remains the preferred choice for those who see durability and regulatory approval as the cornerstones of USDH’s long-term legitimacy. Its weakness lies in its complete reliance on fiat currency custody, exposing it to US banking and regulatory risks—a vulnerability that led to the failure of BUSD.

Sebaliknya, Frax Finance offers a DeFi-native solution. Born within the crypto ecosystem, Frax’s proposal prioritizes on-chain mechanisms, deep community governance, and a revenue-sharing strategy that appeals to crypto purists. Their campaign is a bet on the future of USDH, a more decentralized, community-centric vision. Its design sees USDH backed 1:1 by frxUSD and treasury bonds managed by asset giants like BlackRock, with seamless convertibility into USDC, USDT, frxUSD, and fiat. Frax also promises to distribute 100% of its revenue directly to Hyperliquid users, with governance fully controlled by validators. Its strength lies in a proven, high-yield, community-driven model that aligns closely with crypto ideals. Its weakness lies in its reliance on frxUSD and off-chain treasury bonds, which may introduce external risks and limit its adoption relative to traditional fiat institutions.

Konelia , a smaller and lesser-known entrant in the USDH competition, submitted its bid through the same on-chain auction process as its larger competitors. Its proposal emphasized compliant issuance, reserve management, and ecosystem alignment tailored for Hyperliquid’s high-performance Layer 1. Unlike top contenders, its proposal lacked public details and attracted limited community attention. Despite being officially recognized as a valid bidder, Konelia was viewed more as a peripheral player in the competition than a frontrunner. While its strengths lay in its formal qualifications and customized Layer 1 proposal, its lack of details, brand recognition, and community support put it at a disadvantage compared to its more well-capitalized competitors.

Finally, the xDFi team, comprised of DeFi veterans from SushiSwap and LayerZero, has proposed USDH, a fully crypto-collateralized, cross-chain stablecoin, covering 23 EVM chains from day one. Backed by assets such as ETH, BTC, USDC, and AVAX, balances will be natively synchronized between chains via the xD infrastructure, avoiding cross-chain and fragmentation. The design allocates 69% of revenue to $HYPE governance, 30% to validators, and 1% for protocol maintenance, making USDH community-owned and free from banks or custodians. Its appeal lies in its censorship-resistant, crypto-pure design, which deepens Hyperliquid’s role as a liquidity hub. However, its risks lie in its reliance on volatile crypto collateral for stability and the lack of regulatory support for mainstream adoption.

Melengkung takes a different approach, positioning itself as a partner rather than a competitor. Based on its crvUSD LLAMMA mechanism, Curve proposes a dual stablecoin system: a regulated USDH backed by Paxos or Agora, and a decentralized dUSDH backed by HYPE and HLP but running on Curve’s CDP infrastructure and governed by Hyperliquid. This setup unlocks looping, leverage, and yield strategies while creating a powerful flywheel for HYPE and HLP value. Curve points to crvUSD’s resilience and stable peg in volatile markets, along with flexible licensing terms. It emphasizes that its CDP model has generated annual revenue of $2.5 million to $10 million at a scale of $100 million. Its strengths lie in its balanced “best of breed”—regulatory coverage with decentralized options. Its weaknesses lie in the potential for liquidity and brand damage from a split between the two tokens, as well as the reflexive risks of using Hyperliquid’s own assets as collateral.

Decentralized authorization

The final decision will be made by Hyperliquid’s validators through an on-chain vote. In an important move to ensure a fair and community-driven outcome, the Hyperliquid Foundation has announced that it will abstain from the vote.

By committing to support the majority opinion, the Foundation is choosing to let go – alleviating concerns about centralization and making it clear that decision-making rests entirely with stakeholders.

September 14th will be more than just a vote — it will be a test of how far DeFi governance has evolved, from a token fee-switch debate to the awarding of multi-billion dollar contracts decided by community vote.

Artikel ini bersumber dari internet: Who controls USDH? The crypto war behind Hyperliquid’s $5.6 billion treasuryRecommended Articles

Related: Hyperliquid founder Jeff Yan: quietly building a crypto empire with a team of 10 Original author: Thejaswini MA Original translation: Luffy, Foresight News Jeff Yan has a soft spot for chameleons. Not in the metaphorical sense of changing color to blend in, but in the animal itself. His Twitter handle is @chameleon_jeff, and in a recent podcast, he explained this obsession: Chameleons can turn their eyes in different directions independently, two claws forward and three claws backward, which shows a very interesting evolutionary trajectory, and have powerful tongue-shooting abilities. Theyre a bit like aliens on Earth, he said. This may seem like a strange opening, but it gives you a good idea of this man, who built one of the world’s largest trading platforms with a team of 10 and zero venture capital. Hyperliquid has traded $1.8 trillion in the past 12 months. The…

Analisis ## kriptoDefinisi #Pertukaran #Pasar ## Tanda© 版权声明Array 上一篇 From tenant to broker: The crypto business in Trump Tower 下一篇 Amidst the crossroads of waiting for the Monad mainnet launch: Should the ecosystem move forward or remain where it is?R 相关文章 Stablecoin public chain: competition and opportunities for the next generation of encrypted payment network 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 19,405 Behind the $50,000 bet, why is Polygons new coin KAT unpopular? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 33,310 24H Hot Coins and News | PENGU tokens may be launched in the next 48 hours; Peanut owner is suspected of filing an infri 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 40,631 1 Weekly Editors Picks (0118-0124) 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 36,566 Analysis of mETH Protocol: The most efficient choice for users under the “re-staking” narrativeRecommended Articles 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 34,717 6 Why did the New York Stock Exchange invest $2 billion in Polymarket? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 19,834 2 Tidak ada komentar Anda harus login untuk meninggalkan komentar! Segera masuk Tidak ada komentar... Bee.com Portal Web3 terbesar di dunia Mitra KoinCarp binance KoinMarketCap KoinGecko hidup koin Armor Unduh Aplikasi Bee Network dan mulai perjalanan web3 Kertas putih Peran Pertanyaan Umum © 2021-2026. Semua Hak Cipta Dilindungi Undang-Undang. Kebijakan pribadi | Ketentuan Layanan Unduh Aplikasi Jaringan Lebah dan memulai perjalanan web3 Portal Web3 terbesar di dunia Mitra CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors Kertas putih Peran Pertanyaan Umum © 2021-2026. Semua Hak Cipta Dilindungi Undang-Undang. Kebijakan pribadi | Ketentuan Layanan Mencari MencariDi dalam SitusDi RantaiSosialBerita 热门推荐： Pemburu Airdrop Analisis data Selebriti Kripto Detektor Perangkap Bahasa Indonesia English 繁體中文 简体中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 हिन्दी اردو Русский Bahasa Indonesia

智能索引记录