温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/hi/60165.html
点击访问原文链接

“The Godfather of Gold” Debates with CZ: Who is the Real “Digital Gold”? A Trust Battle Spanning TradeFi and Crypto | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
“The Godfather of Gold” Debates with CZ: Who is the Real “Digital Gold”? A Trust Battle Spanning TradeFi and Crypto | Bee Network Login ट्रेंडिंग न्यूज़ मीम लॉन्चपैड एआई एजेंट डेस्सी टॉपचेनएक्सप्लोरर न्यूबी के लिए 100x सिक्के मधुमक्खी खेल आवश्यक वेबसाइटें एपीपी अवश्य होना चाहिए क्रिप्टो हस्तियाँ डेपिन नौसिखिया आवश्यक ट्रैप डिटेक्टर बुनियादी उपकरण उन्नत वेबसाइटें एक्सचेंजों एनएफटी उपकरण नमस्ते, साइन आउट वेब3 यूनिवर्स खेल डीऐप मधुमुखी का छत्ता बढ़ता हुआ मंच विज्ञापन खोज अंग्रेज़ी रिचार्ज सिक्के लॉग इन करें डाउनलोड करना वेब3 यूनी खेल डीऐप मधुमुखी का छत्ता विज्ञापन घर•विश्लेषण•मुख्य पाठ “The Godfather of Gold” Debates with CZ: Who is the Real “Digital Gold”? A Trust Battle Spanning TradeFi and Cryptoविश्लेषण4 महीने पहलेहाँव्याट 16,651 3 As we all know, gold is a symbol of “hard currency” in the world of TradeFi, and Bitcoin is also regarded as “digital gold” in the world of Crypto. Therefore, as gold is rapidly put on the blockchain, the boundary between the two is becoming more blurred than ever before (further reading: ” From Trustless BTC to Tokenized Gold, Which is the Real ‘Digital Gold’? “).

Against this backdrop, an interesting debate reignited the discussion – Peter Schiff, the “godfather of gold,” formally challenged CZ on the topic of “Bitcoin vs. टोकनized Gold.” The clash of these two viewpoints actually reveals a larger issue:

In the new era where RWA is gradually integrating into Web3, can “trust” truly be completely replaced by code?

The debate between “Golden Godfather” and CZ
Looking back at past statements, Peter Schiff is undoubtedly one of the most stubborn critics of Bitcoin.

In his view, Bitcoin is merely an illusion for speculators, while gold represents the true return to currency. “Tokenized gold” serves as a bridge for the gold standard to further enter the digital age—possessing both the physical backing of gold and the advantages brought by blockchain.

This also means that Peter Schiff firmly stands on the side of “intrinsic value” and “physical reliability.” CZ’s response, however, was direct and sharp, pinpointing the fundamental weakness of tokenized gold: “Tokenized gold is not true on-chain gold; it is still built on trust. Users trust that the issuer will fulfill its obligations in the future, rather than the code directly guaranteeing it.”

साफ शब्दों में कहें तो, even for projects like Tether Gold (XAUT) backed by Tether and others, users still need to rely on the continuation of the traditional system in extreme situations such as war, management changes, or regulatory conflicts.

Objectively speaking, CZ is not wrong. Tokenized gold projects like XAUT are essentially a type of asset mapping based on institutional credit, and cannot completely escape centralized dependence. However, Schiff’s view is not entirely wrong either, because he is taking the perspective of “intrinsic value and physical reliability”.

Ultimately, the debate between Schiff and CZ is not a matter of right or wrong in value judgments, but essentially a clash between two different “reliability models”: the former is physical reliability (based on the scarcity of gold), and the latter is system reliability (based on the distrustlessness of code).

To gain a deeper understanding of the positioning of tokenized gold as a mapped asset and the limitations of its reliability, we must first review how traditional finance deals with physical gold.

From paper gold to tokenized gold: Evolution and compromise
In fact, long before tokenized gold products like XAUT appeared, TradFi had already begun to try to “certify” gold, the most typical way being “paper gold”.

As the name suggests, paper gold is a bank’s gold savings account or a gold ETF without physical delivery. It can be simply understood as a credit certificate, meaning that users no longer directly own gold, but hold a “credit commitment” from the bank. Gold or other precious metals are bought and sold through a paper gold account without any physical delivery.

This solves the problems of physical gold being difficult to divide and inconvenient to carry, making gold lighter and more tradable. For example, the “paper gold” products launched by various banks have indeed given many users convenient opportunities to invest in and hold gold.

Source: Bank of China (Hong Kong)

Ultimately, however, this type of model is still based on “centralized single-point trust,” because it relies on the credit endorsement of financial institutions, allowing banks to issue certificates exceeding their actual gold reserves (i.e., over-issuance). Furthermore, during financial crises or large-scale bank runs, holders of paper gold may be unable to redeem the full amount of physical gold, facing credit and redemption risks.

Unless it’s a product backed by strong credit, like those from large state-owned banks, this risk can be minimized. In other words, paper gold allows users to sacrifice certainty for liquidity and convenience.

The emergence of tokenized gold such as XAUT can be seen as a blockchain upgrade of “paper gold”: it continues the mapping logic of “gold reserves + digital certificates” and moves the certificates from the bank ledger to a public chain that anyone can view. Taking Tether’s XAUT as an example, each XAUT is said to represent one ounce of gold stored in a Swiss vault, and users can hold, transfer or trade these tokens through their wallets 24/7.

The biggest advantage of this model is that it provides gold with 24/7 global liquidity. In other aspects, it is not much different from “paper gold”. That is, users no longer have to bear the storage and transportation costs of gold bars. Finally, small investors can also hold gold through fragmented tokens.

However, Tether Gold is not a “completely trustless” system. Its security and stability still depend on Tether’s own reserve disclosure, custody arrangements, and legal framework. Although Tether claims that every XAU₮ is backed by physical gold, it remains difficult for outsiders to independently verify the actual condition of the vault, the independence of the audit, or even the redeemability under extreme circumstances.

In summary, XAUT is a disruptive upgrade to the paper gold model, combining direct ownership of physical gold (committed to full reserves) with the efficient transfer of क्रिप्टो (on-chain tokens), but still retaining the institutional credit risk brought about by centralized issuance.

RWA’s Fate: The Inescapable Trade-off of Centralization
This reliability dilemma of tokenized gold can also be traced back to the fundamental difference between all RWA/mapped assets and on-chain native assets, which fully reflects the contradiction between efficiency and ideals in the development of Web3.

This includes stablecoins, especially the long-standing debate between “centralized stablecoins” and “decentralized stablecoins,” which has been a central theme in the crypto narrative for many years.

Algorithmic stablecoins (such as UST): attempt to completely break away from centralization and create value with algorithms, but their rapid rise and collapse prove that pure code trust is extremely fragile when it lacks physical support. Centralized stablecoins (such as USDC): The Silicon Valley Bank crisis in 2023 dealt a heavy blow to USDC, exposing its over-reliance on the traditional banking system and centralized regulation. Decentralized stablecoins (DAI/USDS): For a long time, they have tried to maintain decentralization by over-collateralizing crypto assets, but in order to improve scale and stability, they have had to gradually introduce RWA assets as collateral, which is itself a compromise to trust in the real world. It can be said that, apart from BTC and ETH, whether it is a stablecoin, XAUT, or other RWA assets, their fate is that they cannot escape centralization.

Because the essence of RWA is to “map the value of off-chain assets to on-chain”, this process necessarily requires the issuing entity to promise 1:1 redemption, while a regulated custodian institution securely stores physical assets, and the legal framework must also ensure that token holders have legal recourse.

The final trade-off is actually quite straightforward— XAUT is more conservative in terms of asset value and has physical backing than BTC; however, BTC is more censorship-resistant and more decentralized in terms of system architecture than XAU₮.

From this perspective, neither Schiff nor CZ is wrong; they are simply defending two different models of the future.

Schiff’s Future (RWA): “Digital efficiency + physical reliability,” sacrificing decentralization but ensuring value endorsement; CZ’s future (BTC): “Code trust + decentralization,” sacrificing intrinsic value but ensuring system resistance to censorship; This also indicates that Web3 will not be a purely code-based world, but rather an ecosystem where code trust and entity trust coexist.

यह लेख इंटरनेट से लिया गया है: “The Godfather of Gold” Debates with CZ: Who is the Real “Digital Gold”? A Trust Battle Spanning TradeFi and CryptoRecommended Articles

Related: Weekly Funding Update | 7 Projects Received Funding, Total Funding Reaching $81.4 Million (September 29-October 5)Recomm The largest single financing this week was the social media platform X.me’s announcement of a $30 million strategic financing round, followed by the payment company xMoney’s announcement of a $21.5 million strategic financing round. The following are specific financing events (Note: 1. Sorted by the size of the announced amount; 2. * indicates companies in “traditional” fields whose businesses partially involve blockchain): Web 3 social media platform X.me completes $30 million in funding, led by Tido Capital On October 1st, X.me, the social media platform and Web 3 equivalent of TikTok, announced the completion of a $30 million strategic funding round. This round was led by Tido Capital, with participation from Genesis Capital, Alpha Capital, Rollman Management, Parallel Ventures, WAGMi ventures, and Web 3 Vision. The funds will be primarily…

# विश्लेषण# बिटकॉइन# क्रिप्टो# डेफी# टोकन# वेब3© 版权声明सरणी 上一篇 One-week token unlock: LINEA unlocked to 16.4% of circulating supply. 下一篇 Stable's Fundraising Chaos: Why I Missed the FOMO Train 相关文章 The acceleration of U.S. encryption policy: 9 actions in 20 days, which areas will benefit?Recommended Articles 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 25,222 Behind the $50,000 bet, why is Polygons new coin KAT unpopular? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 33,460 The barriers between “trading and interest-earning” have been broken down, and the CEX financial management paradigm is 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 22,373 1 Lessons learned from the $180 million investment: The current entry point for Web3 is not social networking, but the wallet. 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 17,155 5 With a price-to-sales ratio of only 12 times, is HYPE, which just hit a new high, still undervalued?Recommended Articles 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 21,551 3 When War Is Settled Before the News: How Prediction Markets “Priced” Maduro’s Arrest Operation 6 Days Early 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 12,437 2 कोई टिप्पणी नहीं टिप्पणी करने के लिए आपको लॉगिन होना होगा! तुरंत लॉगइन करें कोई टिप्पणी नहीं... Bee.com दुनिया का सबसे बड़ा Web3 पोर्टल भागीदारों कॉइनकार्प बिनेंस कॉइनमार्केटकैप कॉइनगेको कॉइनलाइव कवच बी नेटवर्क ऐप डाउनलोड करें और वेब3 यात्रा शुरू करें सफेद कागज भूमिकाएँ सामान्य प्रश्न © 2021-2026. सर्वाधिकार सुरक्षित।. गोपनीयता नीति | सेवाओं की शर्तें बी नेटवर्क ऐप डाउनलोड करें और वेब3 यात्रा शुरू करें दुनिया का सबसे बड़ा Web3 पोर्टल भागीदारों CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors सफेद कागज भूमिकाएँ सामान्य प्रश्न © 2021-2026. सर्वाधिकार सुरक्षित।. गोपनीयता नीति | सेवाओं की शर्तें खोज खोजइनसाइटऑनचेनसामाजिकसमाचार उत्तर: एयरड्रॉप शिकारी डेटा विश्लेषण क्रिप्टो हस्तियाँ ट्रैप डिटेक्टर हिन्दी English 繁體中文 简体中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia اردو Русский हिन्दी

智能索引记录