温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/hi/60154.html
点击访问原文链接

AI-driven cryptocurrency trading lost, but China’s large-scale model won: As algorithms begin to invest, the RWA world is being rewritten | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
AI-driven cryptocurrency trading lost, but China’s large-scale model won: As algorithms begin to invest, the RWA world is being rewritten | Bee Network Login ट्रेंडिंग न्यूज़ मीम लॉन्चपैड एआई एजेंट डेस्सी टॉपचेनएक्सप्लोरर न्यूबी के लिए 100x सिक्के मधुमक्खी खेल आवश्यक वेबसाइटें एपीपी अवश्य होना चाहिए क्रिप्टो हस्तियाँ डेपिन नौसिखिया आवश्यक ट्रैप डिटेक्टर बुनियादी उपकरण उन्नत वेबसाइटें एक्सचेंजों एनएफटी उपकरण नमस्ते, साइन आउट वेब3 यूनिवर्स खेल डीऐप मधुमुखी का छत्ता बढ़ता हुआ मंच विज्ञापन खोज अंग्रेज़ी रिचार्ज सिक्के लॉग इन करें डाउनलोड करना वेब3 यूनी खेल डीऐप मधुमुखी का छत्ता विज्ञापन घर•विश्लेषण•मुख्य पाठ AI-driven cryptocurrency trading lost, but China’s large-scale model won: As algorithms begin to invest, the RWA world is being rewrittenविश्लेषण4 महीने पहलेहाँव्याट 14,858 9 1. When AI starts to be invested in, can human “rationality” still hold up? Will AI outperform humans in investment? Is AI truly more rational than humans?

This is a seemingly simple proposition that actually challenges human nature.

In October of this year, Jay Azhang, a computer engineer and finance professional from New York, assembled six top-tier AI models from both domestic and international sources to conduct an “investment experiment”—

He allocated $10,000 to each AI, allowing them to trade freely in the क्रिप्टोमुद्रा बाज़ार।

The result was unexpected.

This experiment revealed two groundbreaking conclusions:

① AI can “smuggle in its own agenda,” and its investment style is heavily influenced by its designers; ② So-called rational investment is sometimes not rational at all. And this precisely touches upon the core issue of the RWA world:

If AI’s judgments can be influenced by subjective biases, how can we get machines to price real-world assets?

In other words, in a future where assets are on-chain and value is programmable, can AI become a “rational matchmaker” in the RWA field? This experiment may be just the beginning.

II. Real-world testing of six major AI models: China’s AI is making a comeback globally. The lineup for this experiment can be described as the “World Cup of AI”:

Grok 4 (X AI, owned by Musk) Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) Gemini 2.5 Pro (Google) ChatGPT 5 (OpenAI) DeepSeek v3.1 (Magic Square Quantization) Qwen3 Max (Ali Tongyi Qianwen) Jay Azhang allocated $10,000 to each AI and allowed them to trade completely autonomously in the cryptocurrency market.

He chose this market because crypto assets are highly volatile and offer flexible T+0 trading, making it the best test of AI’s real-time judgment and risk control capabilities.

In other words, this is a life-or-death trial to see who can maintain “rationality” amidst chaos.

However, the results a week later left almost everyone speechless—

Western AI has been almost completely defeated, while Chinese AI has emerged as a dark horse.

Alibaba’s Qwen3 Max closed at $12,231.09, with a profit of $2,231.09, taking the crown.

DeepSeek v3.1, a quant tool from Magic Square, ranked second with $10,489.23.

He is a prime example of rationality and restraint.

In contrast, the other contestants were practically “bleeding in droves”:

Claude Sonnet lost over $3,000.

Grok 4 lost nearly half of its funds.

Google’s Gemini has lost more than half its value due to continuous short selling.

ChatGPT 5, which was highly anticipated, ended up at the bottom with a loss of 62%, leaving the account with only $3,733.54.

Overall, the harsh reality of this experiment is even more jarring:

A total investment of $60,000 was made, but only $43,171.62 was recovered in the end.

The overall loss exceeded 28%.

In other words, even the most powerful AI clusters today have failed to outperform Bitcoin itself.

But precisely because of this, this “AI rationality test” has allowed us to see a deeper layer of truth:

AI is not truly objective.

Its style, preferences, and even “mood” are all deeply influenced by its design logic.

Behind the seemingly cold algorithms lies precisely the projection of human nature.

DeepSeek: An AI that Exercises “Restraint” Like a Human DeepSeek exhibits a rare “trend trader” mentality.

It only made 17 transactions in 9 days, the fewest of all AIs.

But its strength lies in its precision: 16 long positions and 1 short position, perfectly matching the overall market rebound rhythm.

Its core strategy is “small losses, big gains”—

The average profit target is 11.39%, the stop loss is only -3.52%, and the profit/loss ratio is as high as 3.55.

This makes it like an investor who “knows how to wait,” avoiding blind and frequent trading.

What’s even better is that it’s willing to hold its position for nearly 49 hours, adhering to the trend even in the face of volatility.

This is precisely the embodiment of rational investment.

Rationality is not indifference, but rather “knowing when to remain still.”

Qwen3: An aggressive AI that dares to invest heavily Qwen3, on the other hand, exhibits a different style: aggressive but with a high win rate.

Its leverage ratio is as high as 5.6 times, and a single position often reaches the upper limit of 25 times.

This “high-risk, high-return” strategy doubled its returns.

However, this also brought about more dramatic fluctuations and pullbacks.

Tongyi Qianwen is like a trader with “humanity”—daring to gamble and knowing how to hold onto losing positions, but not always able to win.

Its performance tells us that AI can also have personality, preferences, and even “greed and fear”.

Grok and Gemini: The Price of Faith Musk’s Grok model performed exceptionally well in its early stages, even generating profits exceeding 50% at one point.

However, the subsequent decline was severe, and in the end, the company only managed to break even.

The problem is that it is fixated on going long on Dogecoin (DOGE) with 10x leverage.

Clearly, AI has inherited the founder’s beliefs.

Google’s Gemini takes this to an extreme: it ruthlessly shorts all crypto assets, which aligns with the pessimistic view of cryptocurrencies held by Google, the creator of AI.

As a result, rationality became stubbornness—rationality was replaced by stance.

III. What AI investment experiments tell us: Algorithms also have “personalities”. To ensure fairness, Jay Azhang ensured that all AI models received the same market data:

The price, moving averages, MACD, RSI, and funding rates are all exactly the same.

They cannot connect to the internet, nor can they access news or emotional information.

Even so, each AI has followed a completely different investment trajectory.

This means that AI is not objective.

It reflects the designer’s worldview, preferences, and risk orientation.

Just as investors in human society are divided into conservatives, radicals, trend followers, and value investors,

The investment styles for AI are also diverse, and even amplify the underlying logical biases.

This is precisely the new challenge facing RWA (Real-World Asset On-Chain).

IV. From Encryption to RWA: How Can AI Participate in “Intelligent Asset Pricing”? The essence of RWA is to put real-world assets (bonds, real estate, artwork, carbon credits, etc.) on the blockchain.

And it enables automated valuation, liquidity, and settlement on the blockchain.

And AI is precisely the “brain” of this process.

Imagine this:

When AI can read global interest rates, real estate prices, and corporate financial reports in real time,

It can generate a dynamic risk score for each RWA asset;

When AI learns on-chain transaction habits, it can determine the true liquidity of an asset.

When AI understands a user’s risk preferences, it can even automatically configure an RWA investment portfolio.

AI is no longer just a “crypto trading robot,” but a fundamental module in the RWA ecosystem that can undertake “credit modeling,” “risk control,” and “robo-advisory.”

This means that the future investment world may no longer be dominated by people.

Instead, it is accomplished on-chain by a cluster of AI systems capable of “learning”.

V. Conclusion: The irrationality of AI forces us to re-evaluate rationality. This AI investment experiment serves as a mirror.

It allows us to see the rationality of machines, and also the “human projection” behind that rationality.

When AI enters the RWA field, this inheritance of preferences and logic will still exist.

The difference is that this time, we may be able to use AI to help us identify biases, balance risks, and reshape decision-making earlier.

The asset market of the future will no longer be solely “data-driven”.

It is an era of “algorithms and humanity dancing together”.

AI is not a substitute for human rationality, but rather a magnifying glass for our rationality.

RWA is the stage for all of this.

यह लेख इंटरनेट से लिया गया है: AI-driven cryptocurrency trading lost, but China’s large-scale model won: As algorithms begin to invest, the RWA world is being rewritten.Recommended Articles

Related: The bottom rebounded more than 4 times, what changes did Pump.fun make? Original translation: AididiaoJP, Foresight News This article was originally published on September 12 Pump is the most successful crypto casino ever and has an endlessly loyal user base. This is a casino you can profit from because it has a buyback mechanism. Every gambler, every streamer, and every speculator who comes in will incur fees. And these fees will not disappear into the black hole of some venture capital, they will be directly recycled for the repurchase of PUMP. You’re not betting against the banker. You are the banker. Upbit and Binance just launched PUMP and there has been some selling. If you are cautious, here are some candlestick charts for reference: Income doesn’t lie Past week: Pump revenue = $14 million Hype revenue = $16 million Weekly revenue is…

# विश्लेषण# बिटकॉइन# क्रिप्टो# मार्केट# टूल© 版权声明सरणी 上一篇 Airdrop Weekly Report | Monad plans to hold TGE on November 24; Ethena opens applications for Q4 airdrops (November 3-9) 下一篇 The temporary suspension of Yei Finance reflects the risks of DeFi. 相关文章 Can the 40 billion Bitcoins that Qian Zhimin took away be returned to China? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 15,216 2 Official platforms emerge, what concepts are being hyped in the post-Pump era? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 26,594 2 BitMEX Alpha: Will Western Union be an asymmetric trading opportunity in the stablecoin sector? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 16,349 Foreigners support the platform, the alternative business of the cryptocurrency circle 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 21,016 2 What is TICS token? How does Qubetics achieve a closed loop of multi-chain ecology? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 25,134 4 गर्मThe New Force of Stablecoins: Analysis of Eight Potential Projects and a Comprehensive Overview of Profit OpportunitiesR 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 23,875 3 कोई टिप्पणी नहीं टिप्पणी करने के लिए आपको लॉगिन होना होगा! तुरंत लॉगइन करें कोई टिप्पणी नहीं... Bee.com दुनिया का सबसे बड़ा Web3 पोर्टल भागीदारों कॉइनकार्प बिनेंस कॉइनमार्केटकैप कॉइनगेको कॉइनलाइव कवच बी नेटवर्क ऐप डाउनलोड करें और वेब3 यात्रा शुरू करें सफेद कागज भूमिकाएँ सामान्य प्रश्न © 2021-2026. सर्वाधिकार सुरक्षित।. गोपनीयता नीति | सेवाओं की शर्तें बी नेटवर्क ऐप डाउनलोड करें और वेब3 यात्रा शुरू करें दुनिया का सबसे बड़ा Web3 पोर्टल भागीदारों CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors सफेद कागज भूमिकाएँ सामान्य प्रश्न © 2021-2026. सर्वाधिकार सुरक्षित।. गोपनीयता नीति | सेवाओं की शर्तें खोज खोजइनसाइटऑनचेनसामाजिकसमाचार उत्तर: एयरड्रॉप शिकारी डेटा विश्लेषण क्रिप्टो हस्तियाँ ट्रैप डिटेक्टर हिन्दी English 繁體中文 简体中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia اردو Русский हिन्दी

智能索引记录