温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/hi/59777.html
点击访问原文链接

Tracing the Decoupling of $XUSD: Balancer Vulnerability and the Butterfly Effect of DeFi Leverage | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
Tracing the Decoupling of $XUSD: Balancer Vulnerability and the Butterfly Effect of DeFi Leverage | Bee Network Login ट्रेंडिंग न्यूज़ मीम लॉन्चपैड एआई एजेंट डेस्सी टॉपचेनएक्सप्लोरर न्यूबी के लिए 100x सिक्के मधुमक्खी खेल आवश्यक वेबसाइटें एपीपी अवश्य होना चाहिए क्रिप्टो हस्तियाँ डेपिन नौसिखिया आवश्यक ट्रैप डिटेक्टर बुनियादी उपकरण उन्नत वेबसाइटें एक्सचेंजों एनएफटी उपकरण नमस्ते, साइन आउट वेब3 यूनिवर्स खेल डीऐप मधुमुखी का छत्ता बढ़ता हुआ मंच विज्ञापन खोज अंग्रेज़ी रिचार्ज सिक्के लॉग इन करें डाउनलोड करना वेब3 यूनी खेल डीऐप मधुमुखी का छत्ता विज्ञापन घर•विश्लेषण•Tracing the Decoupling of $XUSD: Balancer Vulnerability and the Butterfly Effect of DeFi Leverage Tracing the Decoupling of $XUSD: Balancer Vulnerability and the Butterfly Effect of DeFi Leverageविश्लेषण4 महीने पहलेहाँव्याट 33,325 8

मूल लेखक: Omer Goldberg

Original article translated by: Deep Tide TechFlow

संक्षेप

Hours after the vulnerability attack on the multi-chain platform @Balancer caused widespread uncertainty in the DeFi field, @berachain urgently executed a hard fork, and @SonicLabs froze the attacker’s wallet.

Subsequently, the price of Stream Finance’s xUSD stablecoin deviated significantly from its target range, exhibiting a clear de-pegging phenomenon.

Long-standing problems resurface

The long-standing controversy surrounding leverage, oracle construction, and the transparency of proof-of-reserves (PoR) has once again come into focus.

This is a typical example of a “reflexive stress event” that we outlined in our article “The Black Box/Vault of DeFi” last Friday.

What happened? /Background

The Balancer v2 vulnerability has been exposed on multiple chains, and for a considerable period of time, it remains unclear which liquidity pools are affected and which networks or integration protocols are directly exposed to the risk.

Capital panic in the information vacuum

In the information vacuum, capital reacts as always: depositors scramble to withdraw liquidity from anywhere they believe they may be directly or indirectly affected, including Stream Finance.

Controversy over lack of transparency

Stream Finance does not currently maintain a full transparency dashboard or proof of reserve; however, it provides a link to the Debank Bundle to display its on-chain positions.

However, these simple disclosures failed to clearly address the risk exposure issue after the vulnerability was exposed: the price of xUSD (Stream’s overlay yield USD product) fell from the target price of $1.26 to $1.15, and has now rebounded to $1.20, while users reported that withdrawals were suspended.

Risks and Controversies of Stream Finance

Stream is an on-chain capital allocation platform that uses user funds to run high-return, high-risk investment strategies.

Its portfolio construction employs significant leverage, making the system more resilient under stress. However, the protocol has recently come under public scrutiny due to controversy surrounding its recursive loop/minting mechanism.

While the current situation does not directly indicate a liquidity crisis, it reveals the market’s high sensitivity. When negative news emerges and confidence is questioned, the shift from “maybe it’s okay” to “redeem immediately” is often very rapid.

xUSD is used as collateral and is distributed across Curated बाज़ारs on multiple chains, including Euler , Morpho , और Silo , which cover ecosystems such as Plasma , Arbitrum , और Plume .

The protocol itself has significant risk exposure in these markets, the largest of which was an $84 million USDT loan secured by xUSD on Plasma.

Collateral Mechanism and Risk Buffer

When the market price of xUSD falls below its book value, the related positions are not immediately liquidated. This is because many markets do not link the value of the collateral to the spot AMM (Automated Market Maker) price, but instead rely on hard-coded or “underlying value” price feeds that track the reported asset backing rather than the current secondary market price.

During calm periods, this design can mitigate tail risk liquidation caused by short-term volatility, especially in stable products. This is one of the reasons why DeFi protocols outperformed centralized platforms during the liquidation wave on October 10th.

However, this design could also quickly turn price discovery into trust discovery: choosing a base (or hard-coded) oracle requires thorough due diligence, including the authenticity, stability, and risk characteristics of the asset backing.

In short, this mechanism only applies if there is a comprehensive proof of reserve and redemption can be completed within a reasonable timeframe. Otherwise, the risk lies in the possibility that lenders or depositors may ultimately bear the consequences of bad debts.

Stress testing on Arbitrum

Taking Arbitrum as an example, the current market price on the MEV Capital Curated xUSD Morpho Market is below the LLTV (Minimum Lending-to-Value Ratio). If the xUSD peg price fails to recover, the market could deteriorate further with utilization reaching 100% and lending rates soaring to 88%.

We are not against basic oracles; on the contrary, they play a crucial role in preventing unfair liquidations caused by short-term volatility. Similarly, we are not against tokenized or even centralized yield-generating assets. However, we advocate for basic transparency and modern, systematic, and professional risk management when deploying money markets around these assets.

Curated markets can be engines of responsible growth, but they should not become a race to the top where safety and rationality are sacrificed in pursuit of high returns.

If the structure is complex and prone to a domino effect, then its collapse should not be surprising when the first gust of wind blows. As the industry becomes more specialized and some revenue-generating products become more structured (though potentially more obscure for end users), stakeholders must raise their standards.

While we hope to eventually resolve the issue properly for affected users, this incident should serve as a wake-up call for the entire industry.

मूल लिंक

यह लेख इंटरनेट से लिया गया है: Tracing the Decoupling of $XUSD: Balancer Vulnerability and the Butterfly Effect of DeFi LeverageRecommended Articles

Related: How does the ERC-8004, the best partner for x402, solve the trust problem of AI agents? Original translation by Chopper, Foresight News In the past few days, as the x402 narrative has gained traction, attention has surged for AI agents as a payment method. But have you heard of ERC-8004? You may have missed the x402 hype, but don’t miss this important protocol. What is ERC-8004? ERC-8004 is an Ethereum-based protocol designed to establish a trust, identity, discoverability, and reputation system for AI agents, complementing the existing x402 agent payment infrastructure. In short: x402 → Automating AI-Powered Micro-Payment Tasks ERC-8004 → Provides on-chain identity and reputation tracking functionality for AI agents Why is ERC-8004 important? ERC-8004 aims to create a distributed agent economy to help AI development break free from centralized control. It will build a permissionless, decentralized, censorship-resistant, and privacy-protecting AI system, making Ethereum the…

# विश्लेषण# डेफी# मार्केट# टोकन© 版权声明सरणी 上一篇 Balancer hacked, vulnerability analysis 下一篇 XT.com and Dash discuss: Instant settlement, blockchain mechanisms, and privacy innovation. 相关文章 Metrics Ventures Market Watch: Deep Adjustment in its Midpoint 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 16,224 1 GT destruction frenzy: the path to market value breakthrough behind scarcity 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 38,229 2 10,000-word research report: Bullish on Ethereum, the new oil of the digital age 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 29,199 4 zkVerify launches mini-game, which may be the last chance to earn money for free before TGE 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 24,759 1 गर्मएनिमेकॉइन आ गया है: एयरड्रॉप के अवसर, अज़ुकी एनएफटी रिवॉर्ड्स और ट्रेडिंग प्लेटफॉर्म्स के लिए एक गाइड 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 46,851 4 24-Hour Hot Coins and News | Jack Ma indirectly holds ETH; Trump delivers live speech, dispelling rumors of critical ill 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 23,239 कोई टिप्पणी नहीं टिप्पणी करने के लिए आपको लॉगिन होना होगा! तुरंत लॉगइन करें कोई टिप्पणी नहीं... नवीनतम लेख Did Jane Street “Manipulate” BTC? Decoding the AP System, Understanding the Power Struggle Behind ETF Creation and Redemption Pricing 20 घंटे पहले 629 Stop Comparing Bitcoin to Gold—It’s Now a High-Volatility Software Stock 20 घंटे पहले 703 Matrixport Research: $25 Billion Gamma Unwinding Imminent, Liquidity Yet to Return Behind the Rebound 20 घंटे पहले 633 ERC-5564: Ethereum’s Stealth Era Has Arrived, Receiving Addresses No Longer ‘Exposed’ 20 घंटे पहले 549 Hong Kong Regulatory Green Light: Asseto Enables DL Holdings to Achieve Compliance for Two RWA Business Implementations 20 घंटे पहले 629 लोकप्रिय वेबसाइटेंTempoLighterजीएआईबीग्लाइडरप्लांकरेल्सबीसीपोकरवूई Bee.com दुनिया का सबसे बड़ा Web3 पोर्टल भागीदारों कॉइनकार्प बिनेंस कॉइनमार्केटकैप कॉइनगेको कॉइनलाइव कवच बी नेटवर्क ऐप डाउनलोड करें और वेब3 यात्रा शुरू करें सफेद कागज भूमिकाएँ सामान्य प्रश्न © 2021-2026. सर्वाधिकार सुरक्षित।. गोपनीयता नीति | सेवाओं की शर्तें बी नेटवर्क ऐप डाउनलोड करें और वेब3 यात्रा शुरू करें दुनिया का सबसे बड़ा Web3 पोर्टल भागीदारों CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors सफेद कागज भूमिकाएँ सामान्य प्रश्न © 2021-2026. सर्वाधिकार सुरक्षित।. गोपनीयता नीति | सेवाओं की शर्तें खोज खोजइनसाइटऑनचेनसामाजिकसमाचार उत्तर: एयरड्रॉप शिकारी डेटा विश्लेषण क्रिप्टो हस्तियाँ ट्रैप डिटेक्टर हिन्दी English 繁體中文 简体中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia اردو Русский हिन्दी

智能索引记录