Warning: SimpleXMLElement::asXML(C:\phpstudy_pro\WWW\sitemaps\sitemap_1.xml.tmp): failed to open stream: Permission denied in C:\phpstudy_pro\WWW\dd.php on line 1346
Tracing the Decoupling of $XUSD: Balancer Vulnerability and the Butterfly Effect of DeFi Leverage | Bee Network - AI智能索引
温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/ar/59777.html
点击访问原文链接

Tracing the Decoupling of $XUSD: Balancer Vulnerability and the Butterfly Effect of DeFi Leverage | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
Tracing the Decoupling of $XUSD: Balancer Vulnerability and the Butterfly Effect of DeFi Leverage | Bee Network Login الأخبار الشائعة منصة إطلاق ميمي وكلاء الذكاء الاصطناعي ديسي مستكشف السلسلة الأعلى لنوبي 100x عملات معدنية لعبة النحل المواقع الأساسية يجب أن يكون لديك التطبيق مشاهير التشفير ديبين الناشئين الأساسية كاشف الفخ الأدوات الأساسية المواقع المتقدمة التبادلات أدوات NFT أهلاً، خروج عالم الويب 3 ألعاب تطبيق خلية نحل منصة النمو إعلان يبحث إنجليزي إعادة شحن العملات تسجيل الدخول تحميل ويب 3 يوني ألعاب تطبيق خلية نحل إعلان بيت•تحليل•Tracing the Decoupling of $XUSD: Balancer Vulnerability and the Butterfly Effect of DeFi Leverage Tracing the Decoupling of $XUSD: Balancer Vulnerability and the Butterfly Effect of DeFi Leverageتحليلمنذ 4 أشهرجديدوايت 32٬985 2

المؤلف الأصلي: Omer Goldberg

Original article translated by: Deep Tide TechFlow

لخص

Hours after the vulnerability attack on the multi-chain platform @Balancer caused widespread uncertainty in the DeFi field, @berachain urgently executed a hard fork, and @SonicLabs froze the attacker’s wallet.

Subsequently, the price of Stream Finance’s xUSD stablecoin deviated significantly from its target range, exhibiting a clear de-pegging phenomenon.

Long-standing problems resurface

The long-standing controversy surrounding leverage, oracle construction, and the transparency of proof-of-reserves (PoR) has once again come into focus.

This is a typical example of a “reflexive stress event” that we outlined in our article “The Black Box/Vault of DeFi” last Friday.

What happened? /Background

The Balancer v2 vulnerability has been exposed on multiple chains, and for a considerable period of time, it remains unclear which liquidity pools are affected and which networks or integration protocols are directly exposed to the risk.

Capital panic in the information vacuum

In the information vacuum, capital reacts as always: depositors scramble to withdraw liquidity from anywhere they believe they may be directly or indirectly affected, including Stream Finance.

Controversy over lack of transparency

Stream Finance does not currently maintain a full transparency dashboard or proof of reserve; however, it provides a link to the Debank Bundle to display its on-chain positions.

However, these simple disclosures failed to clearly address the risk exposure issue after the vulnerability was exposed: the price of xUSD (Stream’s overlay yield USD product) fell from the target price of $1.26 to $1.15, and has now rebounded to $1.20, while users reported that withdrawals were suspended.

Risks and Controversies of Stream Finance

Stream is an on-chain capital allocation platform that uses user funds to run high-return, high-risk investment strategies.

Its portfolio construction employs significant leverage, making the system more resilient under stress. However, the protocol has recently come under public scrutiny due to controversy surrounding its recursive loop/minting mechanism.

While the current situation does not directly indicate a liquidity crisis, it reveals the market’s high sensitivity. When negative news emerges and confidence is questioned, the shift from “maybe it’s okay” to “redeem immediately” is often very rapid.

xUSD is used as collateral and is distributed across Curated سوقs on multiple chains, including Euler , مورفو ، و Silo , which cover ecosystems such as Plasma , التحكيم ، و Plume .

The protocol itself has significant risk exposure in these markets, the largest of which was an $84 million USDT loan secured by xUSD on Plasma.

Collateral Mechanism and Risk Buffer

When the market price of xUSD falls below its book value, the related positions are not immediately liquidated. This is because many markets do not link the value of the collateral to the spot AMM (Automated Market Maker) price, but instead rely on hard-coded or “underlying value” price feeds that track the reported asset backing rather than the current secondary market price.

During calm periods, this design can mitigate tail risk liquidation caused by short-term volatility, especially in stable products. This is one of the reasons why DeFi protocols outperformed centralized platforms during the liquidation wave on October 10th.

However, this design could also quickly turn price discovery into trust discovery: choosing a base (or hard-coded) oracle requires thorough due diligence, including the authenticity, stability, and risk characteristics of the asset backing.

In short, this mechanism only applies if there is a comprehensive proof of reserve and redemption can be completed within a reasonable timeframe. Otherwise, the risk lies in the possibility that lenders or depositors may ultimately bear the consequences of bad debts.

Stress testing on Arbitrum

Taking Arbitrum as an example, the current market price on the MEV Capital Curated xUSD Morpho Market is below the LLTV (Minimum Lending-to-Value Ratio). If the xUSD peg price fails to recover, the market could deteriorate further with utilization reaching 100% and lending rates soaring to 88%.

We are not against basic oracles; on the contrary, they play a crucial role in preventing unfair liquidations caused by short-term volatility. Similarly, we are not against tokenized or even centralized yield-generating assets. However, we advocate for basic transparency and modern, systematic, and professional risk management when deploying money markets around these assets.

Curated markets can be engines of responsible growth, but they should not become a race to the top where safety and rationality are sacrificed in pursuit of high returns.

If the structure is complex and prone to a domino effect, then its collapse should not be surprising when the first gust of wind blows. As the industry becomes more specialized and some revenue-generating products become more structured (though potentially more obscure for end users), stakeholders must raise their standards.

While we hope to eventually resolve the issue properly for affected users, this incident should serve as a wake-up call for the entire industry.

الرابط الأصلي

هذا المقال مصدره من الانترنت: Tracing the Decoupling of $XUSD: Balancer Vulnerability and the Butterfly Effect of DeFi LeverageRecommended Articles

Related: How does the ERC-8004, the best partner for x402, solve the trust problem of AI agents? Original translation by Chopper, Foresight News In the past few days, as the x402 narrative has gained traction, attention has surged for AI agents as a payment method. But have you heard of ERC-8004? You may have missed the x402 hype, but don’t miss this important protocol. What is ERC-8004? ERC-8004 is an Ethereum-based protocol designed to establish a trust, identity, discoverability, and reputation system for AI agents, complementing the existing x402 agent payment infrastructure. In short: x402 → Automating AI-Powered Micro-Payment Tasks ERC-8004 → Provides on-chain identity and reputation tracking functionality for AI agents Why is ERC-8004 important? ERC-8004 aims to create a distributed agent economy to help AI development break free from centralized control. It will build a permissionless, decentralized, censorship-resistant, and privacy-protecting AI system, making Ethereum the…

تحليل ## ديفي# السوقرمز #© 版权声明المصفوفة 上一篇 Balancer hacked, vulnerability analysis 下一篇 XT.com and Dash discuss: Instant settlement, blockchain mechanisms, and privacy innovation. 相关文章 Last night, tens of millions of dollars were betting on whether Trump could survive until the sun this morning.Recommend 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 22٬827 The most exciting cryptocurrency product war in 2025, who will have the last laugh? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 22٬297 Grayscale Q3 Research Report: Bitcoin’s Market Cap Reaches a New Height of $3.5 Trillion, Giving Way to “Altcoin Season” 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 21٬160 2 Messari: When BTC is disciplined, ZEC’s hedging potential is beyond imagination. 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 14٬439 Pantera Capital, a 12-year veteran in crypto, is entering a new battlefield in crypto-stocks 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 24٬861 11 The acceleration of U.S. encryption policy: 9 actions in 20 days, which areas will benefit?Recommended Articles 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 25٬161 بدون تعليقات يجب عليك تسجيل الدخول لتترك تعليق! تسجيل الدخول على الفور بدون تعليقات... أحدث المقالات Did Jane Street “Manipulate” BTC? Decoding the AP System, Understanding the Power Struggle Behind ETF Creation and Redemption Pricing منذ 9 ساعات 419 Stop Comparing Bitcoin to Gold—It’s Now a High-Volatility Software Stock منذ 9 ساعات 545 Matrixport Research: $25 Billion Gamma Unwinding Imminent, Liquidity Yet to Return Behind the Rebound منذ 9 ساعات 512 ERC-5564: Ethereum’s Stealth Era Has Arrived, Receiving Addresses No Longer ‘Exposed’ منذ 9 ساعات 468 Hong Kong Regulatory Green Light: Asseto Enables DL Holdings to Achieve Compliance for Two RWA Business Implementations منذ 9 ساعات 507 المواقع الشعبيةTempoLighterGAIBطائرة شراعيةبلانكرايلزبوكر BCPokerفوي Bee.com أكبر بوابة Web3 في العالم الشركاء كوين كارب بينانس CoinMarketCap كوين جيكو كوين لايف الدروع قم بتنزيل تطبيق Bee Network وابدأ رحلة web3 ورق ابيض الأدوار التعليمات © 2021-2026. جميع الحقوق محفوظة. سياسة الخصوصية | شروط الخدمة تحميل تطبيق Bee Network وابدأ رحلة web3 أكبر بوابة Web3 في العالم الشركاء CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors ورق ابيض الأدوار التعليمات © 2021-2026. جميع الحقوق محفوظة. سياسة الخصوصية | شروط الخدمة يبحث يبحثفي الموقععلى تشيناجتماعيأخبار العنوان: صيادو الإنزال الجوي تحليل البيانات مشاهير التشفير كاشف الفخ العربية English 繁體中文 简体中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский العربية

智能索引记录