温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/ar/58501.html
点击访问原文链接

Reflections after October 11th: How do exchanges balance “relative fairness” and “absolute transparency”? | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
Reflections after October 11th: How do exchanges balance “relative fairness” and “absolute transparency”? | Bee Network Login الأخبار الشائعة منصة إطلاق ميمي وكلاء الذكاء الاصطناعي ديسي مستكشف السلسلة الأعلى لنوبي 100x عملات معدنية لعبة النحل المواقع الأساسية يجب أن يكون لديك التطبيق مشاهير التشفير ديبين الناشئين الأساسية كاشف الفخ الأدوات الأساسية المواقع المتقدمة التبادلات أدوات NFT أهلاً، خروج عالم الويب 3 ألعاب تطبيق خلية نحل منصة النمو إعلان يبحث إنجليزي إعادة شحن العملات تسجيل الدخول تحميل ويب 3 يوني ألعاب تطبيق خلية نحل إعلان بيت•تحليل•النص الرئيسي Reflections after October 11th: How do exchanges balance “relative fairness” and “absolute transparency”?تحليلمنذ 5 أشهرجديدوايت 19٬526 19 By Golem ( @web3_غولم )

While the epic October 11th sell-off has concluded and the market is gradually recovering, the record single-day liquidation of $19.3 billion set during that plunge still casts a shadow over the market. Many investors believe that Trump, known for his outspokenness, bears the primary blame. Others point the finger at Binance, arguing that the decoupling of the USDE, BNSOL, and WBETH prices is the primary cause of the further decline.

Binance officially explained the decoupling issue as a brief technical failure of some platform modules due to the overall market setback. As for the extremely low prices of some spot trading pairs, they were mainly caused by historical limit orders being triggered under unilateral liquidity and UI display accuracy issues.

Binance has assumed platform responsibility, compensating users who lost collateral due to the depegging of USDE, BNSOL, and WBETH, totaling $283 million. Despite this, some investors remain unconvinced, arguing that Binance is also responsible for the collapse of altcoins and reiterating concerns about centralized exchanges being “market manipulation,” “data black boxes,” and “deliberately unplugging.”

On October 13th, Hyperliquid co-founder Jeff.hl also engaged in a heated exchange with Binance founder CZ on social media. Jeff.hl initially stated that all Hyperliquid orders, trades, and liquidations are executed on-chain, ensuring transparency and verifiability. He also argued that some centralized exchanges (CEXs) significantly underreport their liquidation data, specifically calling out Binance.

In response to this, Binance founder CZ also quickly responded to all doubts, saying that “when others choose to ignore, hide, shirk responsibility or attack competitors, key BSC ecosystem participants (including Binance, Venus, etc.) pay hundreds of millions of dollars out of their own pockets to protect users” and believes that this is a different value system.

There are many different opinions in the market, and no single solution can satisfy all market participants. During this sensitive period, Jeff.hl’s public questioning of Binance essentially reflects the different trade-offs between CEX and DEX between “relative fairness” and “absolute transparency.”

Performance is no longer the main difference between DEX and CEX In the past, while DEXs were considered the ultimate form of تشفير exchanges, CEXs still dominated the market share, primarily due to the significant performance gap between DEXs and CEXs. Issues such as high transaction latency, limited market depth, low capital efficiency, and poor transaction execution accuracy have consistently impacted traders’ experience on DEXs. Consequently, despite the persistent criticism of CEXs for centralization risks and even recent debacles (such as the FTX incident), traders ultimately gravitate towards the low latency and ease of use offered by CEXs.

However, by 2025, these performance issues are no longer the primary obstacle hindering DEX market expansion. Take Hyperliquid, a DEX that boasts CEX-level performance, for example. Its on-chain central limit order book (CLOB) model offers a significant performance improvement compared to previous AMM DEXs, with an average transaction confirmation time of just 0.07 seconds, comparable to CEXs. Furthermore, while some niche tokens on Hyperliquid still face issues with insufficient liquidity and high slippage, Hyperliquid’s transaction slippage for mainstream tokens like BTC and ETH is now below 0.1%, comparable to CEXs.

As the performance gap gradually narrows, the trend of funds and traders migrating to DEX has indeed been happening since 2025.

وفقا للبيانات من الكتلة , in the spot market, compared with CEX, the market share of DEX will generally increase in 2025, reaching 19% in the third quarter of 2025.

In the perpetual contract market, DEX’s market share grew even faster, from only 4.9% of CEX’s contract market at the end of 2024 to 14.33% in October 2025.

Even under extreme market conditions, today’s DEXs have withstood the test. Following the October 11th crash, Hyperliquid officially صرح , “Despite record-breaking platform traffic and transaction volumes during these extreme market conditions, the Hyperliquid blockchain experienced no downtime or latency.”

On the same day, Binance, the world’s largest exchange, experienced a partial system outage due to technical issues. However, this doesn’t necessarily mean Hyperliquid is currently performing better than Binance, as the systems they face are under different pressures. On October 11th, Hyperliquid’s perpetual contract trading volume exceeded $10 billion, while Binance’s volume was over 10 times that. Data from The Block shows that in September, Hyperliquid’s contract trading volume was $282.47 billion, while Binance’s was $2.34 trillion, representing only 12% of Binance’s.

The market is always “relatively fair” When performance is no longer the primary difference between CEXs and DEXs, will all investors truly choose DEXs? Despite the criticism leveled against Binance following the October 11th crash, post-2000s trader Vida remains vocal in his support for Binance, arguing that it remains committed to its users at all times.

Some investors complained that Vida’s comments were due to Binance’s bias. During extreme market conditions, the exchange compensated and appeased stakeholders like large traders and “Binance users,” while ignoring the impacted retail investors and other market participants. Binance’s growth was built on the bodies of countless silent victims, with the wealthy being paid back in full and the common people’s money split 70-30.

However, aside from the “conspiracy theories” surrounding CEXs, fairness in this market is always relative. Even DEXs, which champion decentralization and fairness, can falter in the face of a crisis . On March 26th of this year, Hyperliquid faced its biggest crisis since its founding. A whale manipulated the price of the meme coin JELLY, forcing Hyperliquid (HLP) to take on a large short position and risk losing $240 million. However, Hyperliquid opted for a “plug-and-drag” approach by delisting the JELLY contracts, resulting in a $700,000 profit for HLPs, which were expected to lose money.

Hyperliquid’s move also caused a public outcry, making a mockery of decentralization and fairness. This wasn’t the first time traders had exploited Hyperliquid’s vulnerabilities for profit. Other incidents included “a whale’s forced liquidation caused a $4 million loss in HLP” and “a series of XPL liquidations reaped $46 million.” Hyperliquiquid failed to compensate users in these incidents.

This made investors understand that Hyperliquid did not adhere to decentralization and fairness, but chose to “do nothing” before the crisis spread to itself. It can be said that every upgrade and improvement of Hyperliquid was stepped on countless “corpses” .

The market needs “absolute transparency” The trading market is never truly fair. Frankly speaking, if one party makes money, another party will inevitably lose money. Whether it is a DEX or a CEX, it is impossible for them to be responsible for everyone. But even if fairness is relative, transparency can be absolute.

During extreme market conditions, CEXs are often embroiled in conspiracy theories. The primary reason is that CEXs are inherently tamper-resistant “black boxes.” Even with enhanced regulatory and compliance measures, a lack of transparency persists, fostering public distrust. Investors rely solely on exchange announcements for their so-called truth. While authoritative, these statements can also be easily challenged. For example, Hyperliquid co-founder Jeff.hl has accused Binance of fabricating its clearing data, and Binance would have to “cut open its belly and show how many bowls of noodles it’s had” to prove its claims.

While Hyperliquid’s values differ from Binance’s, the transparency and verifiability of its on-chain transaction data are undeniable. This transparent settlement mechanism not only significantly reduces the possibility of market manipulation by the platform but also provides peace of mind for investors, mitigating the risk of conspiracy theories. For example, during several Hyperliquid crises, people watched the actions of the “whales” on-chain, while investors suffered losses and lamented their losses. Despite Hyperliquiquid’s indifference, few believed the platform was behind the incident.

While mechanisms aren’t perfect, transparent, open, and automated trading mechanisms within established rules will always reduce controversy compared to the black boxes and chaos of centralized exchanges. Even DEXs can be subject to suspicion if they lack transparency. For example, the previously popular Prep DEX Aster was accused of fraudulent trading and data fabrication due to its private order features. DeFiLlama even temporarily delisted Aster.

With the development of the crypto market, CEXs and DEXs are no longer mutually exclusive. The boundaries between CEXs and DEXs are narrowing, with DEX experiences becoming more similar to CEXs. CEXs are also expanding their on-chain businesses through exchange user wallets. Both CEXs and DEXs have their own risk quadrants. CEXs can provide a safety net for users in the event of a real crisis, but investors criticize their power. DEXs, while adhering to the principle of “code is law,” do not impose excessive restrictions on user behavior, but investors appreciate the benefits of centralized compensation in the event of a crisis.

But from the trend point of view, “transparency and openness” is the foundation of Crypto and one of its development trends. Even if the value systems of CEX and DEX are different, both should move in this direction: higher verifiability, clearer responsibility boundaries, and more sound crisis response mechanisms.

قراءة ذات صلة Is it possible for DEX to replace CEX?

هذا المقال مصدره من الانترنت: Reflections after October 11th: How do exchanges balance “relative fairness” and “absolute transparency”?Recommended Articles

Related: Is the end of traditional banks approaching? Tether’s $500 billion valuation challenges OpenAI. Original Source: BitpushNews The financing news of stablecoin giant Tether is enough to make the entire traditional financial circle hold its breath. According to Bloomberg, the “central bank of the crypto world,” which manages nearly $173 billion in USDT, is seeking a massive $15-20 billion private equity round at a valuation of up to $500 billion. What does this figure signify? It means Tether’s size is on par with top global tech unicorns like OpenAI and SpaceX. Its $4.9 billion in quarterly net profit dwarfs the earnings of many established financial institutions. This isn’t just about raising capital; it’s about a “hidden whale” rising from the crypto world, making a formal declaration of value to the traditional financial system. $500 billion valuation: a bold numbers game Tether’s bold valuation stems…

تحليل #عملة # المشفرة# ديفيتبادل ## السوقعملة ميم #رمز ## ويب 3© 版权声明المصفوفة 上一篇 RWA Weekly Report | RWA Asset Holders Increase Nearly 60,000 Weekly; 下一篇 The Curve team is starting a new business. Will Yield Basis become the next phenomenal DeFi application? 相关文章 فتح العملة الرمزية لأسبوع واحد: تمثل عملات ZKJ التي تم إلغاء قفلها 5% من التداول 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 30٬426 4 Learning from history: Summary and enlightenment of the bear markets in the U.S. stock market over the past 50 years 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 35٬472 3 How to build a Polymarket passive income robot from scratch 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 16٬690 2026 Privacy Asset Landscape: Which Projects Are Truly Gaining Market Patience? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 9٬122 1 The traditional payment model is about to collapse, and a trillion-dollar stablecoin financial company is about to be bo 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 27٬437 1 Odaily Exclusive Interview with ETH Treasury Company Bit Digital: How to Become the Only Leveraged Ethereum Player? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 16٬609 بدون تعليقات يجب عليك تسجيل الدخول لتترك تعليق! تسجيل الدخول على الفور بدون تعليقات... Bee.com أكبر بوابة Web3 في العالم الشركاء كوين كارب بينانس CoinMarketCap كوين جيكو كوين لايف الدروع قم بتنزيل تطبيق Bee Network وابدأ رحلة web3 ورق ابيض الأدوار التعليمات © 2021-2026. جميع الحقوق محفوظة. سياسة الخصوصية | شروط الخدمة تحميل تطبيق Bee Network وابدأ رحلة web3 أكبر بوابة Web3 في العالم الشركاء CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors ورق ابيض الأدوار التعليمات © 2021-2026. جميع الحقوق محفوظة. سياسة الخصوصية | شروط الخدمة يبحث يبحثفي الموقععلى تشيناجتماعيأخبار العنوان: صيادو الإنزال الجوي تحليل البيانات مشاهير التشفير كاشف الفخ العربية English 繁體中文 简体中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский العربية

智能索引记录