温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/66227.html
点击访问原文链接

ETF Outflows $4.5 Billion: Will BTC Drop Another 30% in the Next 3 Months? | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
ETF Outflows $4.5 Billion: Will BTC Drop Another 30% in the Next 3 Months? | Bee Network Login Trending News Meme Launchpad AI Agents DeSci TopChainExplorer For Newbee 100x Coins Bee Game Essential Websites Must-Have APP Crypto Celebrities DePIN Rookies Essential Trap Detector Basic Tools Advanced Websites Exchanges NFT Tools Hi, Sign out Web3 Universe Games DApp Bee Hive Growing Platform AD Search English Recharge Coins Login Download Web3 Uni Games DApp Bee Hive AD home•Analysis•Main text ETF Outflows $4.5 Billion: Will BTC Drop Another 30% in the Next 3 Months?Analysis4dys agoUpdateWyatt 2,981 17

The article cross-validates using three sets of data from Glassnode, Santiment, and CryptoQuant, proposing three future scenarios, providing a suitable reference framework for judging BTC’s current trajectory.

The full text is as follows:

Bitcoin’s network activity has been weakening for six consecutive months, but this trend is not reflected in the core metrics that many traders first look at.

The clearer signal is not trading volume—which has remained largely stable—but the breadth of participation. Even as the network continues to process a similar number of transactions, the number of active on-chain addresses has been steadily declining.

In a market where price discovery increasingly occurs on ETFs and derivatives, this split is crucial. It means: Bitcoin’s on-chain footprint is narrowing, while market exposure remains active elsewhere.

As the bear market persists, this trend has become increasingly difficult to ignore.

Glassnode data shows that in mid-August 2025, the 8-day moving average of Bitcoin active addresses was approximately 778,680. As of February 23, this number has dropped to about 535,942, a decline of roughly 31%.

CryptoQuant has also flagged low network activity for six consecutive months, describing the current phase as a period of sustained weakness in on-chain participation.

Bitcoin Active Addresses Momentum，Source: CryptoQuant

The last time the market exhibited a similar pattern was in 2024—Bitcoin subsequently experienced a correction of approximately 30%.

This doesn’t guarantee a repeat now, but it reinforces a historical pattern: prolonged network weakness often coincides with phases of weakening market confidence.

Breadth Declines, But Throughput Hasn’t Collapsed

Bitcoin’s transaction count has not declined in sync with the number of active addresses.

In mid-August 2025, the average daily transaction count was about 444,000. Blockchain.com data shows the 30-day average is currently around 439,000.

Intraday data still fluctuates, ranging from about 289,000 to 702,000 transactions, but the overall throughput trend has not collapsed.

This divergence is key to understanding the current situation.

If transaction volume remains stable while active addresses decrease, it indicates that fewer entities are responsible for the same amount of on-chain activity.

This situation has multiple causes, none of which require a retail influx. Exchanges and custodians can batch withdrawals; large holders can consolidate transfers; institutional fund flows can be handled through fewer wallets; operational activities can also cause temporary spikes in transaction counts without representing a genuine return of users.

The result is: the chain still appears busy, but the underlying number of participants is shrinking.

This is why the decline in breadth is more telling than raw throughput. Stable transaction counts may mask a market where activity is increasingly concentrated among repeat traders, large institutions, and operational fund flows.

In this landscape, Bitcoin’s chain still functions normally, but the breadth of user participation it represents is becoming less genuine.

Blockchain analytics firm Santiment provides a more direct description from a longer time perspective.

The firm states that since February 2021, the number of unique addresses initiating Bitcoin transactions has decreased by 42%, and the number of new addresses created has decreased by 47%.

Santiment does not characterize this as evidence that crypto is dead or that a multi-year bear market is locked in, but it does describe a bearish divergence that persisted through 2025—market capitalization rose while Bitcoin’s utility metrics weakened.

This tension is now evident in the six-month trend. Price and market narratives can continue, but the chain itself is becoming quieter.

Low Fees Point to Shrinking Block Space Demand

Fee data further confirms that Bitcoin’s Layer 1 is in a state of weak demand.

Data from mempool.space shows the network’s recent average transaction fee is approximately $0.24, equivalent to about 1.8 sats/vB.

For a network that experienced sustained block space competition during peak periods of past cycles, this is a low level. At the current transaction pace, this fee level implies the network’s daily fee revenue is less than $100,000.

In contrast, the block subsidy is still approximately 450 BTC per day, with fee revenue constituting a minimal portion.

Bitcoin Average Block Fees，Source: Mempool.space

This is not an immediate security issue, nor does it mean Bitcoin’s security model is under near-term pressure.

This is because the block subsidy still dominates miner revenue. But it does point to a long-term reality that Bitcoin has not yet been forced to confront at this stage of the cycle.

The topic of transitioning to a fee-supported security budget resurfaces every cycle, but in the current environment, this transition is not being tested—because fee demand itself is weak.

Practically speaking, the quiet fee market is postponing this discussion further.

The chain is not under pressure from sustained congestion, and users are not fiercely bidding to get their transactions included. This could change rapidly during volatility events, speculative waves, or new demand shocks, but it hasn’t happened yet.

For now, block space is clearly in a state of low usage compared to past bull market phases, aligning with the broader context of declining participation breadth.

Bitcoin’s Empty Mempool，Source: Mononaut

CryptoQuant’s assessment also aligns with this fee environment—low network activity is typically associated with declining market interest in the asset and periods of widespread losses.

When interest wanes, new participants decrease, self-initiated transfers decline, and fee pressure subsides.

Bitcoin can still be actively traded as a financial asset, but the chain itself no longer reflects broad user participation.

Macro Environment and ETF Flows Are Changing How Bitcoin Trades

The macro backdrop helps explain why this trend persists.

Bitcoin is increasingly behaving like a macro-sensitive, high-beta asset, particularly standing out during risk-off periods.

Over the past year, US inflation has cooled, with the January 2026 CPI year-over-year growth rate at 2.4%; the Federal Reserve’s target rate range was cited as 3.50% to 3.75% at the end of January.

In a simpler market environment, cooling inflation might support a clearer risk asset rebound.

However, market attention is focused on multiple volatility catalysts—including uncertainty around tariff policies. This factor has driven sharp fluctuations in interest rates and the US dollar, keeping overall risk appetite persistently unstable.

In such an environment, both retail and institutional investors tend to reduce their operational frequency. Retail participation declines, trader turnover decreases. Institutions can maintain exposure but prefer adjusting positions through products that don’t require on-chain movement of coins.

This is precisely why spot Bitcoin ETFs have become the protagonist of a key narrative.

Coinperps data shows that US Bitcoin ETFs have seen net outflows for multiple consecutive weeks, with cumulative outflows of approximately $3.8 billion over the past five weeks and about $4.5 billion year-to-date.

2026 US Bitcoin ETF Daily Fund Flows, Source: Coinperps

This shifts activity from self-custody wallets to brokerage accounts.

It also explains how the market can remain active while the chain grows quieter. Exposure is still changing hands, but more of this turnover is happening off-chain.

This is a significant shift in Bitcoin’s role. It is increasingly resembling a financial product wrapped in an institutional shell, while Layer 1 is used more selectively for settlement, storage, and periodic transfers.

Meanwhile, the daily trading energy within the crypto space is increasingly concentrated elsewhere, particularly in stablecoins.

Coin Metrics identifies stablecoins as a core driver of on-chain activity, with the total stablecoin supply nearing $300 billion and transaction volumes continuing to climb.

If stablecoin rails on other chains absorb more daily settlement demand, Bitcoin’s Layer 1 naturally becomes more functionally singular.

This does not inherently weaken Bitcoin’s investment thesis, but it does change its form.

Three Scenarios for the Next Three to Six Months

The current six-month decline in network breadth outlines three possible paths for Bitcoin’s future trajectory.

The first is a continuation of apathy, which looks like the baseline scenario in a risk-averse market environment.

In this scenario, active addresses remain low (in the 450k to 600k range), transaction counts remain volatile but don’t collapse, fees stay low, and ETF flows remain flat or slightly negative.

Here, Bitcoin could still experience sharp volatility due to macro headlines, but on-chain participation does not confirm a broad recovery. The asset trades more like a macro instrument than a network entering a new expansion phase.

The second is a liquidity thaw, the more optimistic path.

If inflation continues to cool and easing expectations stabilize risk appetite, ETF flows could shift from net outflows to sustained net inflows. In this environment, growth in active addresses would become a key confirmation signal.

A rebound to 650k to 800k active addresses would signify that participation breadth is recovering, not just price momentum returning. This looks more like a classic cyclical recovery—price increases supported by growth in on-chain user participation.

The third is a structural substitution scenario, perhaps the most noteworthy.

In this scenario, Bitcoin’s price rises, but on-chain breadth remains persistently weak. ETFs, derivatives, and custodial settlements continue to dominate, while stablecoins absorb more trading demand elsewhere in the crypto space.

Here, Bitcoin increasingly resembles a digital macro asset and settlement layer, rather than a chain with broad daily retail activity.

This scenario would mark an evolution in Bitcoin’s role, reflecting the deep changes it has undergone compared to many years ago.

This article is sourced from the internet: ETF Outflows $4.5 Billion: Will BTC Drop Another 30% in the Next 3 Months?

Related: Left Hand Exposes Millions in Black Money, Right Hand Launches 600k to Zero: Beaver’s Double Life In the English-speaking crypto community, Beaver is a relatively well-known meme coin player, so his victory was celebrated. However, the day before yesterday, Bubblemaps posted a tweet accusing him of being a “serial rugger,” alleging he profited $600,000 through price manipulation. Bubblemaps stated that they discovered a linked address “2mQB8o” from Beaver’s public Solana address, which launched the token $SIAS on pump.fun. $SIAS rapidly reached a market cap of $6 million within 7 minutes of deployment, only to crash to zero just 10 minutes later after a large sell-off by the dev. After the crash, the token’s X account was also deleted. Based on further on-chain analysis, Bubblemaps pointed out that Beaver was not only the dev but also used four other addresses to snipe the token, making a total…

# Analysis# bitcoin# crypto# Exchange# Market© Copyright NoticeThe copyright of the article belongs to the author, please do not reprint without permission. Pre Crypto's New Path: Building the Next Generation of Permissionless New Banks Next Fan culture is becoming a differentiating variable in prediction markets Related articles Since LTC was positioned as a Meme coin, it has soared. What can ordinary people do in the Meme super cycle? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 43,037 3 From a dream of becoming a queen to imprisonment, Qian Zhimin’s absurd scam involving 60,000 bitcoins. 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 15,493 1 24-Hour Hot Cryptocurrencies and News | Fed Meeting Minutes Reveal Growing Divergence on Rate Cuts; Kraken Submits Draft IPO Registration Statement to the US SEC (November 20) 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 16,938 Kyle Criticizes Hyperliquid, Arthur Hayes Responds with a $100K Bet 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 6,821 1 OKX Friends Issue 04 | From Losses to Profits of 6 Million: Top Trader Benson’s Trading Methods 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 37,938 1 Why Must Banks Suppress Stablecoin Yields? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 8,189 No comments You must be logged in to leave a comment! Login immediately No comments... Bee.com The world's largest Web3 portal Partners CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors Download Bee Network APP and start the web3 journey White Paper Roles FAQ © 2021—2026. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Services Download Bee Network APP and start the web3 journey The world's largest Web3 portal Partners CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors White Paper Roles FAQ © 2021—2026. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Services Search SearchInSiteOnChainSocialNews Hot to you: Airdrop Hunters Data Analysis Crypto Celebrities Trap Detector English 繁體中文 简体中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский English

智能索引记录