温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/66209.html
点击访问原文链接

The War Between Stablecoins and Banking May Not Actually Exist | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
The War Between Stablecoins and Banking May Not Actually Exist | Bee Network Login Trending News Meme Launchpad AI Agents DeSci TopChainExplorer For Newbee 100x Coins Bee Game Essential Websites Must-Have APP Crypto Celebrities DePIN Rookies Essential Trap Detector Basic Tools Advanced Websites Exchanges NFT Tools Hi, Sign out Web3 Universe Games DApp Bee Hive Growing Platform AD Search English Recharge Coins Login Download Web3 Uni Games DApp Bee Hive AD home•Analysis•The War Between Stablecoins and Banking May Not Actually Exist The War Between Stablecoins and Banking May Not Actually ExistAnalysis6dys agoUpdateWyatt 3,634 18 Compiled by | Odaily (@OdailyChina)

Translated by | Wenser (@wenser2010)

Editor’s Note: The crypto industry and traditional financial market banks have long been in a state of tense confrontation. The proposal and stalled progress of stablecoin regulation bills like the GENIUS ACT and crypto structure bills like the CLARITY ACT are, to some extent, highly related to this adversarial state. For traditional banks, they fear that stablecoins will erode their deposit share and massive user base, thereby threatening their industry position and survival space. For the crypto industry, finding a path of harmonious coexistence with traditional banking to introduce the massive liquidity of traditional financial markets has become one of the few “lifelines.”

The truth of the matter is that perhaps this war of opposition between the two does not exist. As Noah Levine, a partner at a16z Crypto, stated: “Just like the ‘Javon’s Paradox’ that once existed between ATMs and bank tellers, the development of the crypto industry may help traditional banking find a new path forward.” Odaily has specially compiled his long-form article below, offering readers perspectives from both the supply and demand sides to re-examine this industry contradiction.

The “Jevons Paradox” Sweeping the Financial Industry: The Machine That “Stole Jobs” Ultimately Created More Employment
(According to previous assumptions), bank tellers should have been replaced by ATMs.

In reality? ATMs drastically reduced the operating costs of bank branches, leading banks to open more branches. Over forty years, the number of bank teller positions doubled.

In 1865, William Stanley Jevons observed the same pattern in the British coal economy—the more efficient steam engines became, the more coal was consumed, not less, because the applications for coal expanded. This phenomenon was named after him. Today, it is reshaping the financial services industry from both the supply and demand sides.

Supply Side: The Collapse and Rebuilding of Infrastructure To operate its business in the United States, Venmo needed five banking partners, licenses in 49 states, and middleware connecting over 12,000 financial institutions—and it could only be used in one country.

Every major market requires its own self-built system: some rely on government-led channels like PIX and UPI; others leverage private internet platforms like M-Pesa and Alipay. Currently, about 80 countries worldwide have real-time payment systems, but they are almost entirely disconnected from each other.

The root cause of the regionalization dilemma in the fintech industry lies in each independent market having its own payment channels, banking APIs, and compliance license barriers.

Blockchain replaces this fragmented puzzle with an open ledger, and self-custody wallets eliminate the hassle of finding compliant banking partners market by market. This is precisely why companies like Sling Money can build a global payment product with a team of 23 people and 3 compliance licenses—though currently still limited to about 70 countries with fiat on-ramps. Sling CEO Mike Hudack succinctly stated: “Stablecoins transform payments from a ‘pre-funding and reconciliation problem’ into an ‘interoperability problem.'”

It’s not just startups betting on this wave of reform.

Stripe acquired the stablecoin issuance platform Bridge and wallet service provider Privy for $1.1 billion, subsequently launching stablecoin financial accounts in 101 countries, far exceeding its previous market coverage of 46 countries. Notably, the same Bridge infrastructure supports both Sling’s virtual accounts and operates within the ecosystem of this giant processing $1.4 trillion in payments annually.

An exporter in Nairobi is a microcosm of this infrastructure: she receives payments from US importers via a virtual dollar account, spends stablecoins linked to a bank card at over 150 million merchants, and earns 4% to 7% yield on idle balances through on-chain lending protocols.

No bank account, no bank.

Three years ago, this was just a vision on a PowerPoint slide; today, every piece is operational, built by different teams, and with increasingly impressive composability.

World Bank data shows about 1.3 billion adults are unbanked—this doesn’t mean they don’t need financial services, but because the cost of serving them exceeds the revenue service providers can charge. (Odaily Note: This means a low return on investment; the cost of serving one person far exceeds the revenue/profit that person can provide.) The average fee for a $200 remittance to Sub-Saharan Africa can soar to 8.45%, nearly $17—for a family with a monthly income of just $150, this represents a week’s worth of food, a child’s school fees, or life-saving medicine.

What changes when the cost of transferring money plummets?

Precedents already exist: M-Pesa pushed mobile payment costs in Kenya close to zero, and the country’s financial inclusion rate jumped from 27% to 85%. IMF research found this was incremental growth, not a zero-sum game. India’s UPI started with near-zero fees, and digital payment transaction volume exploded from 18 million to 228 billion in less than a decade.

This means more service providers, broader markets, and more mature products, because the entry cost has been compressed to the limit.

This is the Jevons Paradox on the supply side.

Cost Side: The Burden of Compliance and the Shared Ledger Solution Now, look inside banks.

In North America alone, the financial industry spends $61 billion annually on financial crime compliance.

C-suite executives at large banks spend 42% of their time dealing with regulatory matters, and compliance-related employee hours grew by 61% between 2016 and 2023.

In other words, the reality reflected in the data is—banks are no longer “financial institutions that also do compliance,” but rather “compliance institutions that also provide financial services.”

These expenditures, whether compliance or technology costs, are largely spent on restoring or preserving information that “should never have been lost in the first place.”

Step into a bank audit, and you’ll see what auditors are really doing: reconciling accounts, verifying if correspondent bank account balances match; navigating the opaque bilateral relationships across three or four intermediary banks to trace a transaction that no single party can clearly identify end-to-end.

(The blockchain industry’s) shared ledger directly solves this problem.

When all transacting parties write to the same ledger, the reconciliation step disappears—not because compliance requirements are lowered, but because that ledger information was already there.

JPMorgan’s Kinexys platform processes over $2 billion daily and has settled more than $2 trillion since launch. Its core use case is a multinational corporation using JPMorgan in over a dozen markets needing to transfer funds between internal accounts in real-time. Traditional core banking ledgers operate in silos and can only run in batch processes. Kinexys overlays this, making funds programmable, compressing settlement from end-of-day to seconds, and releasing idle funds previously trapped between batch processing intervals. Currently, JPMorgan has begun launching JPM Coin on the Canton Network, with institutions like Goldman Sachs, DTCC, and Broadridge announcing participation. Banks may prefer tokenized deposits over stablecoins, but the underlying logic is the same: shared infrastructure eliminates the reconciliation layer.

For the demand side, as the unit cost of compliance falls, institutions can serve more clients and cover more markets in an economically viable way.

Convergence: Two Forces, One Direction For the banking industry, external entrants are increasing because the original cost barriers are collapsing. Simultaneously, for the many platforms and native forces in the crypto market, internal operational costs are decreasing because infrastructure is continuously upgrading.

As regulatory frameworks like the GENIUS Act and MiCA gradually clarify the rules, the two forces point to the same outcome: more people will gain access to more financial services at lower costs. (Odaily: i.e., so-called “financial inclusion”)

In the real world, cloud computing did not (as people once imagined) eliminate data centers but allowed anyone with an API key to tap into its computing power. Now, stablecoins are doing the same to banking: this mature system will not disappear. Instead, it will become part of the infrastructure, allowing others to build more products on top of it.

During the steam revolution, Jevons watched steam engine efficiency improve and coal consumption rise accordingly, calling it a “paradox.” In fact, it wasn’t a paradox but a pattern: when the unit cost of a foundational service drops low enough, the market doesn’t shrink; instead, it reaches everyone previously excluded by the old structural costs.

In 2026, we are about to see just how many people lie behind that boundless market.

This article is sourced from the internet: The War Between Stablecoins and Banking May Not Actually Exist

Related: Will History Repeat for the Fourth Time, Is BTC About to Start a New Super Bull Run?Why Aren’t Other Assets Falling? Recently, the crypto market and other global markets seem to be worlds apart. Throughout 2025, gold rose over 60%, silver surged 210.9%, and the US Russell 2000 index gained 12.8%. Bitcoin, however, closed the year in the red after briefly hitting new highs. This divergence has intensified at the start of 2026. On January 20th, gold and silver raced to new highs again, the Russell 2000 index outperformed the S&P 500 for 11 consecutive days, and China’s STAR 50 index gained over 15% in a single month. In stark contrast, Bitcoin, on January 21st, recorded its sixth consecutive negative day, falling headlong from $98,000 back below $90,000. Silver’s performance over the past year Capital seems to have decisively left the crypto market after 10/11. BTC has been oscillating below $100,000…

# Analysis# crypto# Market# Startups# Token© Copyright NoticeThe copyright of the article belongs to the author, please do not reprint without permission. Pre Structural Choices Amid Continued Volatility: Bitcoin Range Trading and HYPE Swing Opportunities | Invited Analysis Next Pharos Establishes RealFi Alliance to Promote Institutional-Grade Standardization for On-Chain RWA Execution Related articles AI Agent Weekly Report | ALCH V3 is officially launched; VVV’s weekly increase is nearly 160% (2.3-2.9) 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 40,228 1 Is the “Gold Standard” Making a Comeback? Let’s Imagine: How Can Web3 Rebuild a “Gold-Denominated” Payment Loop? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 8,780 Crypto fever in the US stock market is escalating, and the “copycat Summer” market is about to explode 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 24,676 6 The Latest Practical Strategies for Participating in Binance Alpha: From Beginner to Mastery 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 21,276 2 Don’t be fooled by the rebound! Bitcoin may retest the lows at any time | Invited Analysis 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 19,729 On the eve of the new “Roaring Age”: Decoding the logic of risk asset allocation during the interest rate cut cycle 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 20,701 1 No comments You must be logged in to leave a comment! Login immediately No comments... Latest Articles Did Jane Street “Manipulate” BTC? Decoding the AP System, Understanding the Power Struggle Behind ETF Creation and Redemption Pricing 8hrs ago 310 Stop Comparing Bitcoin to Gold—It’s Now a High-Volatility Software Stock 8hrs ago 445 Matrixport Research: $25 Billion Gamma Unwinding Imminent, Liquidity Yet to Return Behind the Rebound 8hrs ago 416 ERC-5564: Ethereum’s Stealth Era Has Arrived, Receiving Addresses No Longer ‘Exposed’ 8hrs ago 356 Hong Kong Regulatory Green Light: Asseto Enables DL Holdings to Achieve Compliance for Two RWA Business Implementations 8hrs ago 390 Popular WebsitesTempoLighterGAIBGliderPlanckRaylsBCPokerVooi Bee.com The world's largest Web3 portal Partners CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors Download Bee Network APP and start the web3 journey White Paper Roles FAQ © 2021—2026. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Services Download Bee Network APP and start the web3 journey The world's largest Web3 portal Partners CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors White Paper Roles FAQ © 2021—2026. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Services Search SearchInSiteOnChainSocialNews Hot to you: Airdrop Hunters Data Analysis Crypto Celebrities Trap Detector English 繁體中文 简体中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский English

智能索引记录