温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/zh_cn/64263.html
点击访问原文链接

Developer’s Firsthand Account: I Wasted Three Years on Base | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
Developer’s Firsthand Account: I Wasted Three Years on Base | Bee Network Login 热门新闻 备忘录启动板 人工智能代理 德西 TopChainExplorer 给 Newbee 100 倍金币 蜜蜂游戏 重要网站 必备应用程序 加密货币名人 德平 新手必备 陷阱探测器 基本工具 高级网站 交流 NFT 工具 你好、, 签出 Web3 宇宙 游戏 DApp 蜂巢 成长平台 生态 搜索 英语 充值金币 登录 下载 Web3 大学 游戏 DApp 蜂巢 生态 家•分析•Developer’s Firsthand Account: I Wasted Three Years on Base Developer’s Firsthand Account: I Wasted Three Years on Base分析2 个月前更新怀亚特 10,303 Original Author: @weretuna

Original Compilation: Peggy, BlockBeats

Editor’s Note: Base once attracted countless developers with the slogan “Build on Base. We will support you.” However, there is often a layer of silence between promises and reality.

The author of this article, @weretuna, is the co-founder of @pndmdotorg, a studio focused on creating viral Ponzi-style on-chain games on Solana. Using his team’s three-year personal experience as a thread, this article narrates their journey from investment and waiting to disappointment, and then the turning point of rapid growth after migrating to Solana: what ultimately determines the success or failure of an ecosystem is never slogans, but who is willing to provide real resources and attention to applications. For all builders still “waiting for support,” this is a stark reminder of reality.

The following is the original text:

“Build on Base. We will support you.”

That was their promise. We believed it for three whole years. During those three years, we launched over 10 products: games, AI agents, prediction markets, zkTLS-related products. We poured almost our entire lives into developing on Base.

And what did we get in return?

Nothing. Not a single retweet. Not a single reply. Not even a group chat.

Last year, we created @infecteddotfun—the most breakout, viral game on Base. We grew a brand new account to 50,000 followers in a month. It was blowing up across all platforms, people couldn’t stop talking about it.

But Base didn’t even retweet our launch tweet.

At that moment, I finally understood completely: something was wrong.

And it was seriously wrong.

Why We Believed When I first discovered Base, it was almost a “no-brainer” choice. Back then, L2 fragmentation was a complete mess. Building a product was hard enough, choosing which chain to build on was even harder.

Then Base launched—backed by Coinbase, with built-in “friend.tech.” Jesse and the team pushed the “app-first” narrative incredibly hard. For the first time in a long while, it felt like someone finally cared about applications, not just infrastructure.

It looked like a chain that truly “put builders first.” They said they cared about developers. They said they’d help with marketing. They said they were different.

Looking back, it was just better marketing. And we fell for it.

The Slow Awakening As time went on, my faith in Base began to crack.

The first real fissure was when they started pushing Farcaster and Zora hard—not because those products were necessarily the best, but because they had invested in those companies. That’s when I understood how the game really works.

"(《世界人权宣言》) 加密 industry loves to pretend blockchains are “permissionless, open”: anyone can come, the best products win. Because so few applications ever achieve true PMF, I always thought this space encouraged experimentation, encouraged diversity.

But the reality is: either you build what they like, or you’re in the in-crowd. Everyone else is just “set dressing” to bring attention and liquidity to the chain.

Yet on X, they’d still say: “Build on Base, we’ll help you break out.”

And we believed. We spent 3 years building. We launched over 10 apps. We bet our lives on it.

But they never replied to us on X. Not on Discord. Not on Telegram. We couldn’t even get a group chat.

Support? Zero.

I think the reason is simple: we weren’t building what they liked.

Doing It Ourselves So we decided to stop waiting. Fine, we’ll break out on our own.

We spent months brainstorming, and finally created @infecteddotfun—a game about “going viral on the blockchain.”

It exploded.

A brand new account, 50k followers in a month. Became one of the most breakout games on Base.

Only then did the Base team finally start replying to us. They said: “We’ll support your launch.” They said: “Leave it to us.” They said: “Just wait.”

So we waited.

Launch day came. Guess what? Still, nothing.

No tweet. No retweet. No support.

Imagine: you spend 5 months building a product, finally get it hot enough for them to promise “support,” and then at the crucial moment, that support just vanishes.

When I asked why, the answers were vague, political, and made no sense.

Watch What They Do, Not What They Say The worst part isn’t what happened to us.

The worst part is, it’s happening to everyone. But no one dares to speak up. Because once you’re on Base, you’re a “hostage.” You don’t want to burn bridges, what if you need them someday? So you stay silent.

And Base keeps pretending they support developers.

If you only want to support a few handpicked projects, fine. Just say that. Don’t pick “favorites” while cosplaying as the chain that “supports all builders.” What they say and what they do are completely different things.

So we left.

After Leaving, Everything Changed We migrated to Solana.

6 months later, we built @addicteddotfun, the biggest crypto game of 2025. $4M in revenue in 48 hours.

We didn’t suddenly get smarter. We just left a chain that treats developers like NPCs. Our next game, @jaileddotfun, is also launching soon on Solana. All future games will be built on Solana.

We will never build another product on Base or Ethereum again.

Conclusion I used to think the competition between Ethereum and Solana was good. Developers should build wherever they want. But after wasting 3 years of my life, I think it’s actually a net negative for the industry.

Too many great builders are still stuck in ecosystems like Base. I’m not surprised at all: many would see 10x, even 100x growth just by moving to Solana, just like we did.

Developers should go where the users are. And right now, the users and liquidity are on Solana. This isn’t a “chain maximalist” stance, it’s outcome-oriented—based on our own data and the experiences of our friends.

I’ve wasted enough time on Base.

So you don’t have to.

Original Link

本文来源于互联网： Developer’s Firsthand Account: I Wasted Three Years on Base

Related: Boxing champion Andrew Tate’s “zero” story after losing $720,000 in Hyperliquid. Original translation by Luffy, Foresight News Former world boxing champion and billionaire Andrew Tate deposited $727,000 into the cryptocurrency exchange Hyperliquid over the past year without making any withdrawals. After a series of highly leveraged liquidations, his account was wiped out on November 18, and all his funds vanished. According to Arkham’s on-chain ledger records, Tate earned approximately $75,000 in referral commissions by inviting other traders to join the platform, which he then reinvested in his trading positions, ultimately leading to his own liquidation. This incident serves as a prime example of how high leverage, low win rates, and the habit of doubling down can turn a six-figure sum into a public farce, especially when traders publicly share every trade on social media in real time. Tate’s trading activity on…

#分析# 加密# 以太坊# 市场© 版权声明文章版权归作者所有，未经允许请勿转载。 上一篇 The Fed's Independence Crisis: White House Interest Rate Game Behind Powell's Criminal Investigation 下一篇 2026 Potential Airdrop Projects Compilation and Tutorial (Part 2) 相关文章 Behind the Million-Dollar Long-Form Article Bounty: Musk’s Anxiety, Platform Wars, and the Super App Dream 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 9,712 Is building your own Layer 2 public chain the ultimate strategy for Ethereum DAT to increase mNAV? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 17,915 The Argentine President issued Meme coins and then denied it, which caused public outrage. Who benefited and who was cut 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 41,096 1 Say goodbye to the flood of money, has the “blind buying” counterfeit season become history? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 18,358 1 The TRON ecosystem enters a new era of decentralized trading: SunPerp launches with a revolutionary new Chinese brand, “ 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 21,115 3 From dislocation to simultaneous decline: the cryptocurrency-stock linkage reaches a crossroadsRecommended Articles 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 21,320 1 最新文章 Did Jane Street “Manipulate” BTC? Decoding the AP System, Understanding the Power Struggle Behind ETF Creation and Redemption Pricing 1小时前 113 Stop Comparing Bitcoin to Gold—It’s Now a High-Volatility Software Stock 1小时前 142 Matrixport Research: $25 Billion Gamma Unwinding Imminent, Liquidity Yet to Return Behind the Rebound 1小时前 131 ERC-5564: Ethereum’s Stealth Era Has Arrived, Receiving Addresses No Longer ‘Exposed’ 1小时前 142 Hong Kong Regulatory Green Light: Asseto Enables DL Holdings to Achieve Compliance for Two RWA Business Implementations 1小时前 126 热门网站TempoLighterGAIB滑翔机普朗克雷尔斯BCPokerVooi Bee.com 全球最大的 Web3 门户网站 合作伙伴 硬币卡 Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive 装甲 下载蜜蜂网络APP，开始web3之旅 白皮书 角色 常见问题 © 2021-2026.保留所有权利。. 隐私政策 | 服务条款 下载蜜蜂网络 APP 并开始 web3 之旅 全球最大的 Web3 门户网站 合作伙伴 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 白皮书 角色 常见问题 © 2021-2026.保留所有权利。. 隐私政策 | 服务条款 搜索 搜索InSite链上社会新闻 热门推荐： 空投猎人 数据分析 加密货币名人 陷阱探测器 简体中文 English 繁體中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 简体中文

智能索引记录