温馨提示：本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务，不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容，所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源：http://www.bee.com/zh_cn/63045.html
点击访问原文链接

After thirteen ministries and seven associations issued a document to prevent the risks of virtual currencies, where is | Bee Network

进入原网站 导航首页
After thirteen ministries and seven associations issued a document to prevent the risks of virtual currencies, where is | Bee Network Login 热门新闻 备忘录启动板 人工智能代理 德西 TopChainExplorer 给 Newbee 100 倍金币 蜜蜂游戏 重要网站 必备应用程序 加密货币名人 德平 新手必备 陷阱探测器 基本工具 高级网站 交流 NFT 工具 你好、, 签出 Web3 宇宙 游戏 DApp 蜂巢 成长平台 生态 搜索 英语 充值金币 登录 下载 Web3 大学 游戏 DApp 蜂巢 生态 家•分析•正文 After thirteen ministries and seven associations issued a document to prevent the risks of virtual currencies, where is分析2 个月前更新怀亚特 17,952 1 Many people have asked me in the comments: Attorney Sha, is RWA completely finished in mainland China?

As Web3 lawyers, we believe the answer to this question is not a simple “yes” or “no.” The core of RWA is to digitize and tokenize offline assets using blockchain technology, then facilitate secondary market trading and financing. However, under the current regulatory context in mainland China, any tokenization activity attempting to link with public transactions essentially challenges the red line set by the “9.24 Notice” of 2021. The “Risk Warning” from the seven associations is more like adding several more gleaming padlocks to that already tightly closed iron gate.

I. Why the Mainland “Cannot Do It”: Risk Isolation Under the Bottom-Line Thinking The risk warning explicitly states: “Currently, my country’s financial regulatory authorities have not approved any real-world asset tokenization activities (in mainland China).” Conducting RWA in mainland China faces three major legal hurdles:

The document characterizes domestic RWA issuance and financing as illegal financial activities, including suspected illegal fundraising and unauthorized public offering of securities. In mainland China, any financing activity that bypasses the franchise is extremely risky. A complete blockade by financial institutions: Banks, payment institutions, and internet platforms are all prohibited from providing settlement and promotional support for such businesses. Without deposit channels and traffic entry points, RWA within China has become a resource without a source. The strong position of legal tender: The stablecoin involved in RWA does not have legal tender status in mainland China, and its attempt to anchor asset returns to the currency touches a nerve regarding monetary sovereignty. Using the bottom-line thinking commonly used in criminal defense: conducting RWA (Real-Warranty Assurance) in mainland China might not be a question of “whether it will be shut down,” but rather “how many years will be sentenced.” However, from a governance perspective, this high-pressure approach is actually an “emergency brake” from regulators before they have figured out effective monitoring methods. As mentioned in the dialogue, this is largely to protect society and prevent the entire society from experiencing a systemic financial disaster similar to P2P lending again.

II. Overseas “Oases”: “Outlets” in a Macro Narrative
Since the mainland is off-limits, attention naturally turns to offshore markets such as Hong Kong and Singapore. Although the seven associations mentioned that “it is also illegal for overseas service providers to conduct business in the mainland,” they did not issue a clear “one-size-fits-all” ban on purely overseas business.

Hidden here is a profound macro-narrative: China’s domestic economic cycle ultimately needs to connect with the international cycle. The mainland’s “strict control” and Hong Kong’s “resolute opening up” are actually two sides of the same coin. The mainland needs such an “outlet” to allow assets to enter the international market within a compliant framework.

As long as a project can be truly “fully offshore”—from the underlying assets to the funding source, from the servers to the compliant entities, all located overseas, and without involving any outflow of RMB from within China—mainland regulatory authorities typically lack the incentive to enforce regulations across borders. Under this model, if you are doing very well overseas and comply with local regulations (such as obtaining a Hong Kong VASP license), that’s your prerogative.

III. The theoretical “access” and the practical “chasm”: Timing is paramount.
At this point, some mainland business owners may have an idea: Can I take the revenue rights of my factories and mines in China to Hong Kong to do RWA?

In theory, establishing a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) through an ODI (Outward Direct Investment) structure to transfer equity to an overseas entity is a feasible approach. However, in practice, this is comparable to the treacherous Shu Road described in Li Bai’s poem, or even a near-impossible obstacle:

First, there are compliance constraints on asset outflows: cross-border asset ownership verification is complex and can easily be suspected of being an asset transfer. Secondly, the “circuit breaker” for capital repatriation: the foreign exchange settlement process faces extremely strict currency-related scrutiny, and account freezing is often the least severe outcome; more serious cases may involve fines or even suspicion of illegal fundraising. Finally, the legal risks for “domestic residents”: If a person operates an overseas currency-related business in mainland China, law enforcement agencies can still crack down on it (whether it is the boss or management or an ordinary employee, it is considered illegal financial activity). The core issue regarding RWA (Real-Time Exploitation) business is actually timing. Currently, we believe that at the regulatory level, multiple ministries are in agreement, and China is in a period of intense scrutiny, cracking down on typical cases. Even in Hong Kong, due to the cautious considerations of listed companies and licensed institutions regarding their relationship with government and business, the current stance is largely one of “even if it’s not prohibited by law, please wait.” The best strategy for existing projects at this stage is to respond to the “window guidance”—either halt operations altogether or completely switch to a fully overseas solution; avoid defying the regulations.

IV. Conclusion
RWA hasn’t died out in mainland China; it’s just that it never truly “figured out” the business. The document issued by thirteen ministries and seven associations reiterated the red lines for domestic operations.

But for ambitious mainland companies, RWA’s real opportunity lies in the deep waters of the “offshore” market. This is no longer a disguised form of illegal fundraising in mainland China, but a high-difficulty acrobatic exercise involving legal compliance, foreign exchange management, and international private equity.

Our advice is: if you want to engage in RWA (Real Money 市场 Fund) activities, please first sever all ties with the domestic RMB, ordinary retail investors, and promotional channels. When it comes to red lines, survival is more important than speed. Legal red lines are never meant to be played like a game of hopscotch.

The current lull is for future standardization. If you are planning to launch RWA business overseas and need legal compliance assessments or architectural design, please contact us for in-depth consultation.

Special Note: This article is an original work by the CryptoShaLaw team and represents only the author’s personal views. It does not constitute legal advice or counsel on any specific matter. For reprint authorization, please contact shajunlvshi via private message.

本文来源于互联网： After thirteen ministries and seven associations issued a document to prevent the risks of virtual currencies, where is RWA headed?

Related: BTC ETFs are facing selling pressure, but it’s not a bear market yet. Market Context: Is it a fading trend or a necessary adjustment? One of the main reasons for the current slowdown in Bitcoin prices is undoubtedly the outflow of funds from spot Bitcoin ETFs. Unlike volatility driven by retail investors, ETF fund flows primarily originate from large asset allocators—family offices, pension funds, and institutional investors allocating capital across multiple global markets. Bitcoin’s price briefly touched the $120,000 range in October, followed by a sharp drop in early November, which, in the eyes of traditional capital, altered the risk-reward balance. With the return of safer investment options such as bonds and gold regaining its market dominance, some funds naturally withdrew from the Bitcoin market. Despite these fluctuations, the market structure does not signal the start of a new multi-year bear market. Instead,…

#分析# 加密# 交易所# 市场# 代币# web3© 版权声明文章版权归作者所有，未经允许请勿转载。 上一篇 Crypto prophet Redphone: The Silicon Age is Coming, Crypto is the "Last Free Port" 下一篇 US stocks sprint toward "never closing": Why did Nasdaq launch a "5x23-hour" trading experiment? 相关文章 SignalPlus Macro Analysis Special Edition: Quiet Calm 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 29,470 2 Chen Yizhou, who brought Renren.com to its knees, turned around and invested in the first crypto bank in the United Stat 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 17,569 Interpreting the US CLARITY Act, a major step towards clarifying digital asset regulation 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 28,451 3 Gate founder Dr. Han: CEX and DEX are driving the dual development to accelerate the large-scale adoption of Web3Recomme 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 23,835 1 MIRAs Christmas miracle, a true moment of meme 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 171,459 94 Bitcoin Network Hashrate Drops 15% from Peak, Are Miners Being Lured Away by AI? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 8,702 Bee.com 全球最大的 Web3 门户网站 合作伙伴 硬币卡 Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive 装甲 下载蜜蜂网络APP，开始web3之旅 白皮书 角色 常见问题 © 2021-2026.保留所有权利。. 隐私政策 | 服务条款 下载蜜蜂网络 APP 并开始 web3 之旅 全球最大的 Web3 门户网站 合作伙伴 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 白皮书 角色 常见问题 © 2021-2026.保留所有权利。. 隐私政策 | 服务条款 搜索 搜索InSite链上社会新闻 热门推荐： 空投猎人 数据分析 加密货币名人 陷阱探测器 简体中文 English 繁體中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 简体中文

智能索引记录