温馨提示:本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务,不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容,所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源:http://www.bee.com/zh/63676.html
点击访问原文链接

Messari’s 2026 Cryptocurrency Thesis: Power Struggles, Stablecoins, and Skepticism (Part Two) | Bee Network

Messari’s 2026 Cryptocurrency Thesis: Power Struggles, Stablecoins, and Skepticism (Part Two) | Bee Network Login 熱門新聞 Meme Launchpad AI 代理商 DeSci 熱門鏈瀏覽器 新人必讀 衝百倍幣 蜜蜂遊戲 必備網站 必備APP 必關大神 DePIN 新人必備 教我避坑 基本工具 深度網站 交易所 NFT 工具 你好, 登出 Web3宇宙 遊戲 DApp 蜂巢 增長平台 生態 搜尋 英語 Coins儲值 登入 下載 Web3大學 遊戲 DApp 蜂巢 生態 分析•正文 Messari’s 2026 Cryptocurrency Thesis: Power Struggles, Stablecoins, and Skepticism (Part Two)分析2 个月前更新懷亞特 16,332 18 These sections are less about where capital is flowing and more about where capital wants to flow, further exploring where value capture is quietly leaking away and why some long-held assumptions may no longer hold.

Report Link

Ethereum’s Identity Crisis One of the most striking sections of the report is Messari’s deep dive into Ethereum’s strategic dilemma. The report poses a thought-provoking question: Is Ethereum gradually becoming a “settlement dumping ground” for its own Layer 2 ecosystem?

Context is important to understand this concern.

The Ethereum Dencun upgrade and EIP-4844 introduced blobs, significantly reducing data availability costs for L2s. From a user and scalability perspective, this upgrade was highly successful. Transaction fees dropped, and the operational costs for Rollups also decreased substantially.

However, the economic side effects of this are far less favorable for Ethereum itself.

Before blobs, applications like Uniswap required users to transact directly on the Ethereum mainnet, consuming ETH and participating in fee burning. Post-upgrade, most of this transaction activity migrated to L2s, where… according to which fees are collected at the rollup level. Ethereum still receives settlement fees, but only a fraction of what it used to collect.

Consequently, Ethereum’s gas consumption has declined, the ETH burn rate has slowed, and by 2025, the asset is projected to shift from being deflationary to inflationary. This is not merely a technical footnote—it directly impacts Ethereum’s monetary narrative.

Messari argues that unless Ethereum can restore its economic gravity through mechanisms like shared sequencers, mainnet execution upgrades, or some form of native sharding, its valuation will increasingly rely on the “digital gold” narrative.

And in that competition, Ethereum faces a structural disadvantage. As a monetary asset, it cannot win. Bitcoin’s success hinges on its simplicity, immutability, and brand clarity. If execution layer relevance cannot be restored, Ethereum risks being squeezed between Bitcoin’s monetary dominance and L2s’ application dominance.

Yield-Bearing Stablecoins and the Shift to Shadow Banking Another major theme of the report is the shift of stablecoins from passive settlement tools to active yield-generating instruments.

Messari predicts that interest-bearing stablecoins will increasingly eat into the market share of Tether. The reason is simple: institutions are no longer willing to forgo a 5% risk-free yield to hold non-yielding digital dollars.

The report introduces the concept of “risk-free yield extraction.” Historically, USDT holders essentially gifted their yield to Tether, which reinvested its reserves, capturing billions in profit annually. In a high-interest-rate environment, this inefficiency becomes glaringly obvious and untenable.

The protocol Ethena directly challenges this model. Ethena combines liquid staking tokens with a delta-neutral hedging strategy, distributing the underlying yield to stablecoin holders. Importantly, USDe’s listing on major centralized exchanges in 2025 grants it genuine settlement utility, not just DeFi composability.

However, Messari does not ignore the risks.

Since USDe is a synthetic stablecoin backed by derivative hedges, it carries a structural depeg risk in extreme market conditions. Its yield primarily stems from two sources: staking rewards from LSTs and funding rates paid by perpetual futures traders.

In a bull market, long traders subsidize the entire system, allowing USDe holders to “collect rent.” In a prolonged bear market, the flow reverses, and the system must pay to maintain its hedge. Thus, the yield is cyclical, not fixed.

Messari’s optimism implicitly assumes persistent leverage demand and a favorable Bitcoin market regime. LST premium trends are a key metric to watch; sustained distortions often signal rising pressure beneath the surface.

Backtesting and Healthy Skepticism Despite the depth and historical accuracy of Messari’s research, it should not be treated as gospel.

As a research platform with institutional stakeholders, Messari inevitably reflects portfolio exposures and strategic biases. The report maintains a consistently optimistic tone. Its positioning on Solana, for example, aligns closely with its disclosed holdings. This doesn’t invalidate the thesis but does warrant a critical distance.

To test this, I conducted an AI-assisted backtest of Messari’s major predictions in recent years.

The results were mixed but illuminating. In late 2023, Messari’s prediction that Solana was the only L1 token with a real shot at challenging Ethereum proved remarkably accurate, with SOL’s price soaring from around $20 to over $200 in 2024. Its relatively bearish stance on Ethereum was also validated, with the ETH/BTC ratio weakening throughout 2025.

Predictions on DePIN were partially correct. Major projects like Render and Helium performed well, but many smaller ones ultimately failed. Stablecoin predictions were more accurate, with yield-bearing stablecoins poised to be one of the most stable growth areas in 2025.

Overall, the hit rate is high—but not perfect.

This reinforces a broader point: the best way to read Messari reports is as a directional compass, not a trading manual. They excel at identifying structural shifts early, but they do not account for liquidity timing, narrative decay, or retail-driven reflexivity.

Ethereum’s Identity Crisis One of the most striking sections of the report is Messari’s deep dive into Ethereum’s strategic dilemma. The report poses a thought-provoking question: Is Ethereum gradually becoming a “settlement dumping ground” for its own Layer 2 ecosystem?

Context is important to understand this concern.

The Ethereum Dencun upgrade and EIP-4844 introduced blobs, significantly reducing data availability costs for L2s. From a user and scalability perspective, this upgrade was highly successful. Transaction fees dropped, and the operational costs for Rollups also decreased substantially.

However, the economic side effects of this are far less favorable for Ethereum itself.

Before blobs, applications like Uniswap required users to transact directly on the Ethereum mainnet, consuming ETH and participating in fee burning. Post-upgrade, most of this transaction activity migrated to L2s, where… according to which fees are collected at the rollup level. Ethereum still receives settlement fees, but only a fraction of what it used to collect.

Consequently, Ethereum’s gas consumption has declined, the ETH burn rate has slowed, and by 2025, the asset is projected to shift from being deflationary to inflationary. This is not merely a technical footnote—it directly impacts Ethereum’s monetary narrative.

Messari argues that unless Ethereum can restore its economic gravity through mechanisms like shared sequencers, mainnet execution upgrades, or some form of native sharding, its valuation will increasingly rely on the “digital gold” narrative.

And in that competition, Ethereum faces a structural disadvantage. As a monetary asset, it cannot win. Bitcoin’s success hinges on its simplicity, immutability, and brand clarity. If execution layer relevance cannot be restored, Ethereum risks being squeezed between Bitcoin’s monetary dominance and L2s’ application dominance.

Yield-Bearing Stablecoins and the Shift to Shadow Banking Another major theme of the report is the shift of stablecoins from passive settlement tools to active yield-generating instruments.

Messari predicts that interest-bearing stablecoins will increasingly eat into the market share of Tether. The reason is simple: institutions are no longer willing to forgo a 5% risk-free yield to hold non-yielding digital dollars.

The report introduces the concept of “risk-free yield extraction.” Historically, USDT holders essentially gifted their yield to Tether, which reinvested its reserves, capturing billions in profit annually. In a high-interest-rate environment, this inefficiency becomes glaringly obvious and untenable.

The protocol Ethena directly challenges this model. Ethena combines liquid staking tokens with a delta-neutral hedging strategy, distributing the underlying yield to stablecoin holders. Importantly, USDe’s listing on major centralized exchanges in 2025 grants it genuine settlement utility, not just DeFi composability.

However, Messari does not ignore the risks.

Since USDe is a synthetic stablecoin backed by derivative hedges, it carries a structural depeg risk in extreme market conditions. Its yield primarily stems from two sources: staking rewards from LSTs and funding rates paid by perpetual futures traders.

In a bull market, long traders subsidize the entire system, allowing USDe holders to “collect rent.” In a prolonged bear market, the flow reverses, and the system must pay to maintain its hedge. Thus, the yield is cyclical, not fixed.

Messari’s optimism implicitly assumes persistent leverage demand and a favorable Bitcoin market regime. LST premium trends are a key metric to watch; sustained distortions often signal rising pressure beneath the surface.

Backtesting and Healthy Skepticism Despite the depth and historical accuracy of Messari’s research, it should not be treated as gospel.

As a research platform with institutional stakeholders, Messari inevitably reflects portfolio exposures and strategic biases. The report maintains a consistently optimistic tone. Its positioning on Solana, for example, aligns closely with its disclosed holdings. This doesn’t invalidate the thesis but does warrant a critical distance.

To test this, I conducted an AI-assisted backtest of Messari’s major predictions in recent years.

The results were mixed but illuminating. In late 2023, Messari’s prediction that Solana was the only L1 token with a real shot at challenging Ethereum proved remarkably accurate, with SOL’s price soaring from around $20 to over $200 in 2024. Its relatively bearish stance on Ethereum was also validated, with the ETH/BTC ratio weakening throughout 2025.

Predictions on DePIN were partially correct. Major projects like Render and Helium performed well, but many smaller ones ultimately failed. Stablecoin predictions were more accurate, with yield-bearing stablecoins poised to be one of the most stable growth areas in 2025.

Overall, the hit rate is high—but not perfect.

This reinforces a broader point: the best way to read Messari reports is as a directional compass, not a trading manual. They excel at identifying structural shifts early, but they do not account for liquidity timing, narrative decay, or retail-driven reflexivity.

本文源自網路: Messari’s 2026 Cryptocurrency Thesis: Power Struggles, Stablecoins, and Skepticism (Part Two)

Related: Strategy strongly defends MSCI: DAT’s “identity defense battle” The struggle over the development of the digital asset treasury (DAT) industry continues. In October, global index provider MSCI proposed excluding companies with digital asset holdings of 50% or more of their total assets from its global investable market indices. This move directly threatens the market position of digital asset treasury companies like Strategy, and could even reshape the capital flows of the entire digital asset treasury sector. According to data compiled by Bitcoin for Corporations, 39 companies may be excluded from the MSCI World Investable 市場 Index. JPMorgan analysts previously warned that the removal of Strategy alone could result in nearly $2.8 billion in passive capital outflows, and if other index providers follow suit, it could cause outflows of up to $8.8 billion. Currently, MSCI’s consultation period for this…

#分析#比特幣# 加密# 脫機#以太坊#交換#市場#代幣#工具© 版權聲明文章版权归作者所有,未经允许请勿转载。 上一篇 In-Depth Analysis of the Crypto Compensation Report: Huh? These Guys Earn That Much? 下一篇 Web3 Lawyer's In-depth Policy Analysis|Hong Kong's New Regulations for Virtual Asset Trading Platforms (Part 2): New Circular Issued, Are the Boundaries of Virtual Asset Business Redefined? 相關文章 What to watch next week | Market focus on February CPI data; Movement public mainnet launch (3.10-3.16) 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 41,845 1 Analysis of mETH Protocol: The most efficient choice for users under the “re-staking” narrativeRecommended Articles 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 34,779 6 Is It a Crypto Winter Now? Market Transformation After Regulatory Reform 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 8,974 1 Trump signed an executive order on the strategic reserve of Bitcoin. Why did the market plummet? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 34,401 3 From “Safe Harbor” to “Compliant Innovation”: An Analysis of the Impact of the SEC’s Innovation Exemption Policy 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 19,866 1 A hacker attack caused Flow to be cut short, and the rollback plan sparked an internal conflict within the ecosystem. 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 18,335 1 Bee.com 全球最大的 Web3 入口網站 合作夥伴 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko 幣活 盔甲 下載Bee Network APP開啟您的Web3之旅 白皮書 角色 常問問題 © 2021-2026.版權所有。. 隱私政策 | 服務條款 下載蜜蜂網路APP 並開始 web3 之旅 全球最大的Web3入口網站 合作夥伴 CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors 白皮書 角色 常問問題 © 2021-2026.版權所有。. 隱私政策 | 服務條款 搜尋 搜尋站內鏈上社群媒體新聞 熱門推薦: 擼毛打金 數據分析 必關大神 教我避坑 繁體中文 English 简体中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia हिन्दी اردو Русский 繁體中文

智能索引记录