With TGE imminent, what is a reasonable valuation for Lighter? | Bee Network

With TGE imminent, what is a reasonable valuation for Lighter? | Bee Network Login ट्रेंडिंग न्यूज़ मीम लॉन्चपैड एआई एजेंट डेस्सी टॉपचेनएक्सप्लोरर न्यूबी के लिए 100x सिक्के मधुमक्खी खेल आवश्यक वेबसाइटें एपीपी अवश्य होना चाहिए क्रिप्टो हस्तियाँ डेपिन नौसिखिया आवश्यक ट्रैप डिटेक्टर बुनियादी उपकरण उन्नत वेबसाइटें एक्सचेंजों एनएफटी उपकरण नमस्ते, साइन आउट वेब3 यूनिवर्स खेल डीऐप मधुमुखी का छत्ता बढ़ता हुआ मंच विज्ञापन खोज अंग्रेज़ी रिचार्ज सिक्के लॉग इन करें डाउनलोड करना वेब3 यूनी खेल डीऐप मधुमुखी का छत्ता विज्ञापन घर•विश्लेषण•With TGE imminent, what is a reasonable valuation for Lighter? With TGE imminent, what is a reasonable valuation for Lighter?विश्लेषण2 महीने पहलेहाँव्याट 14,791 25 Original author: @chuk_xyz

Original translation by Peggy, BlockBeats

Editor’s Note: As Lighter prepares for its TGE (Trading on Expectations), the market’s divergence in valuation stems not from sentiment, but from differing understandings of its product positioning and growth path. Is it merely another perpetual contract exchange, or a trading infrastructure with the potential to support greater distribution and asset classes? The answer will determine its valuation ceiling.

This article attempts to move beyond the lazy framework of “simple benchmarking” and return to the more verifiable facts themselves: the actual TVL and transaction volume, proven revenue capabilities, the first-mover advantage in the RWA sector, and a product expansion roadmap pointing to 2026. Based on this, the author presents a valuation range division that is independent of sentiment, using “bandwidths” rather than “target prices” to address uncertainty.

The following is the original text:

With Lighter’s TGE approaching, there is a clear divergence in the market regarding “how much it is really worth”.

On the one hand, some people simply categorize it as “yet another perpetual contract exchange,” believing that it will be difficult for it to beat Hyperliquid in the competition; but on the other hand, some real market signals have emerged, showing that its size and potential influence may be far more than just an ordinary Perp DEX launch.

TL;DR: The current market pricing for Lighter is still mainly concentrated in the low single-digit billions of dollars FDV range; however, if the fundamentals continue to materialize and key catalysts come to fruition, its reasonable repricing range may be closer to $6 billion to $12.5 billion, or even higher.

Disclosure: I am an early user of Lighter (644.3 points) and am highly likely to receive the airdrop. This article represents only my personal research and opinions and does not constitute any investment advice.

My Lighter Points

In my view, the current situation is roughly as follows: Based on trading on Polymarket, the market’s implied valuation of Lighter is approximately between $2 billion and $3 billion (at least based on the price signals currently being traded).

In the over-the-counter (OTC) market, Lighter tokens are traded for around $90; based on approximately 11.7 million tokens, the corresponding airdrop value is approximately $1.05 billion.

If this airdrop accounts for approximately 25% of the total token supply, then working backwards, Lighter’s fully diluted valuation (FDV) would be around $4.2 billion.

Lighter previously completed a $68 million funding round, valuing the company at approximately $1.5 billion, led by Founders Fund and Ribbit (according to Fortune).

Founders Fund has a long and distinguished track record of early-stage betting on category-level companies, having invested in iconic businesses such as Facebook, SpaceX, Palantir, Stripe, and Airbnb.

Additionally, the pre-market pricing of $LIT roughly corresponds to an FDV of approximately $3.5 billion, which can be considered a real-time market reference signal (although it is still in its early stages and not entirely accurate).

Therefore, my framework for judging it is actually very simple: $1.5 billion can be regarded as the lower limit of valuation (bearish range, anchored by VC funding round pricing). $3 billion to $4.2 billion belongs to the bear market to the benchmark range (predicted market, pre-market prices, and valuations derived from inverse correlations are roughly concentrated in this range).

The real core question is: based on fundamentals and catalysts, does Lighter deserve a revaluation to $6 billion to $12.5 billion or even higher?

The purpose of this analysis is to try to explain these issues logically: what exactly is Lighter, what signals does the data release, which valuation frameworks are reasonable, and what catalysts may drive it to be revalued further.

1. A key misconception: Lighter and Hyperliquid are not the same type of product. The clearest mental model I’ve found so far is:

Hyperliquid is building a Web3 native liquidity layer, with its primary monetization method coming from retail transaction fees (plus network effects at the ecosystem level).

Lighter is building a decentralized trading infrastructure with the long-term goal of connecting fintech companies, brokerages, and professional market makers, while keeping execution costs extremely low on the retail side (some spot markets even offer 0% commission).

From this perspective, the problems they solve, the customer groups they serve, and their long-term business paths are fundamentally different.

The business model of Lighter vs Hyperliquid is sourced from: @eugene_bulltime

This distinction is important because it directly determines the upper limit of valuation.

If Lighter is just “yet another perpetual contract exchange,” then it’s logically not surprising that it’s priced like other Perp DEXs. But if it’s essentially a trading infrastructure that can be accessed by large distribution channels (brokerages/fintech companies), then the valuation ceiling it faces is a completely different game.

2. Where is the Lighter currently located? (The truly important data) Let’s look at the most crucial set of indicators first:

TVL: $1.44 billion

LLP TVL: $698 million (Lighter’s liquidity pool, used for trade execution and system stability)

Open Interest: $1.7 billion

Trading volume: 24 hours: $5.41 billion / 7 days: $44.4 billion / 30 days: $248.3 billion

Revenue: Last 30 days: Approximately $13.8 million / Last year: Approximately $167.9 million

The “quality” conveyed by these numbers is important in itself: this is a real scale. A monthly trading volume of $248 billion is definitely not something an exchange is “dabbling in”.

The size of open interest (OI) is considerable, but not to the point that “a single extreme liquidation could trigger systemic chaos.”

With a sufficiently high TVL, Lighter can reasonably position itself as a stable trading venue capable of handling large transactions—and reliability is one of the core elements most valued by institutions.

Risk rationality verification: OI / TVL (Open Interest / Total Locked Positions)

A quick way to measure the fit between leverage and liquidity is to calculate OI/TVL (Open Interest divided by TVL). Based on current snapshot data:

Lighter: 1.71B / 1.44B ≈ 1.18

Hyperliquid：7.29B / 4.01B ≈ 1.82

Aster：2.48B / 1.29B ≈ 1.92

Intuitively, Lighter’s OI/TVL is significantly lower, meaning it has a more ample liquidity buffer at a relatively controllable leverage level. This structure does not pursue extreme efficiency, but rather leans towards robust execution and system resilience—which is consistent with its positioning as an “infrastructure-type trading system.”

Key findings: Lighter already has a considerable amount of open interest, but compared to its liquidity level, it has not been overstretched; compared to the closest leading products in the same category, its risk structure is more restrained and stable.

3. Spot बाज़ार: Key to Further Upside Potential for TVL Lighter recently launched spot trading, and the importance of this may have been significantly underestimated by the market.

While perpetual contracts can indeed generate huge trading volumes, it is often the spot market that truly retains “sticky funds”—especially when trading platforms have a clear advantage in execution efficiency and cost.

At the same time, spot trading has significantly broadened the potential user base: for new users, spot trading is a lower barrier to entry; for market makers, spot trading provides more reasons to hold and allocate inventory on the platform for the long term.

Currently, ETH is the only listed spot asset. This is not a limitation, but a starting point. The truly noteworthy signal is that the “track” for spot trading has been established, and the product itself has the structural foundation to expand smoothly as more assets are listed.

Lighter spot token value chart (WETH) (Source: DeFiLlama)

Even though only ETH is currently listed, data from DeFiLlama shows that Lighter has accumulated approximately $32.33 million in WETH value on the spot side (snapshot date: 2025/12/18).

This is still in its early stages, but the signal is correct: funds have begun to “park” on the spot side.

If Lighter follows the publicly hinted path and gradually introduces dozens (or even hundreds) of spot assets, then spot trading will become a substantial driver of TVL growth, rather than just a “nice-to-have” feature module.

More importantly, the 0% transaction fee for ETH spot trading is a powerful wedge in itself. As long as execution quality remains stable (spreads converge, execution is reliable), it will naturally attract active traders and institutions to route high-frequency strategies and spot-perpetual basis trading to Lighter. The result is very direct: more trades → more inventory → deeper liquidity, forming a self-reinforcing positive feedback loop.

The conclusion is clear: the launch of spot trading is a significant milestone. ETH is just the first step; the real upside potential comes from the expansion of the spot asset catalog, as the platform gradually becomes the default venue for on-chain “trading + holding”.

4. RWA: The unlock point in 2026 (and why Lighter is already ahead) One of the clearest signs that Lighter is not “yet another Perp DEX” comes from RWA (Real World Assets).

RWA (टोकनized Stocks, Forex, Commodities, Indices, etc.) is essentially a bridge between क्रिप्टो trading and traditional markets. If tokenized assets continue to migrate on-chain by 2026, the trading platforms that first win in RWA will gain not only more trading volume, but also a completely new growth curve that most Perp DEXs are not prepared for.

The key isn’t the narrative, but the scoreboard. And judging from the data, Lighter is already ahead.

RWA Leadership: The Data Speaks Lighter is already leading in both open interest (OI) and trading volume for on-chain RWA perpetual contracts. This combination is crucial:

OI reflects the size of a trader’s long-term exposure;

Transaction volume reflects the intensity and activity of daily usage.

When a trading venue leads in two metrics simultaneously, it usually means that traders are not just “testing the waters,” but are already using it as their main platform for that product line.

This is why RWA is more like a structural opportunity for Lighter: it’s not about chasing trends, but about positioning itself in an emerging market.

RWA Open Interest: Lighter Leads the Way (Source: PerpetualPulse.xyz)

In the current snapshot, the open interest of RWA perpetual contracts is approximately:

Lighter: Approximately $273 million

Hyperliquid: Approximately $249 million

This gap is significant because RWA is still in its early stages. In early markets, liquidity is often highly concentrated.

When a trading venue first gathers large-scale liquidity, spreads will converge, transaction quality will improve, and the better execution experience will in turn attract more funds and trading volume, forming a self-reinforcing positive feedback loop.

From this perspective, Lighter’s lead in RWA OI is not just a static ranking, but more like the starting point of a potential compounding effect.

RWA trading volume: Lighter also leads in activity (Source: PerpetualPulse.xyz)

Looking at trading volume, this trend becomes even clearer:

Lighter: Approximately $484 million

Hyperliquid: Approximately $327 million

This is a typical scenario for early-stage Product-Market Fit (PMF): a new category begins to take shape, and one trading venue initially attracts a disproportionate amount of trading activity. As usage frequency and execution experience accumulate on the same platform, the leading advantage is often amplified further.

The market size is underestimated. It’s worth taking a broader perspective: tokenized RWA is not a niche market. On public blockchains, it’s already a multi-billion dollar market, and the growth curve is still upward.

This means that platforms that are the first to establish liquidity, execution quality, and user habits are not only winning in terms of current trading volume, but also securing a long-term growth path that is still expanding.

“Global Market Overview” dashboard (Source: rwa.xyz)

The tokenized RWA has reached a scale of over $18.9 billion on public blockchains and is still in its early stages.

This is important because RWA is one of the few narratives that doesn’t need to “compete for attention” within the crypto space: it can expand outwards, bringing real-world assets and real-world transactions onto the chain, directly creating incremental growth rather than engaging in involution.

Why this is a major valuation catalyst RWA perpetual contracts have validated real demand; but the bigger unlocking point lies in the next step: RWA spot trading.

Perpetual contracts are good for speculation;

Spot trading is key to expanding the user base.

If Lighter can be among the first to provide trusted RWA spot trading (tokenized stocks/forex/commodities) on-chain, while simultaneously achieving strong execution quality and institutional-grade reliability, it will not just be adding a new feature, but substantially expanding the market available for service (TAM).

This is also directly related to Robinhood’s aligned narrative: once tokenized shares become a true product distribution channel, the value of the “back-end exchange/infrastructure layer” will be significantly amplified—because in the trading field, distribution capability is the most difficult moat to build.

The roadmap is supporting this direction. Looking at the product roadmap, Lighter is clearly pointing towards 2026: deeper RWA expansion, and the supporting capabilities needed to scale it up (mobile, portfolio margin, prediction markets, etc.).

This is not a one-off narrative, but a continuously expanding product curve.

Chainlink × Lighter Seoul Offline Event “2026 – Expansion” Roadmap Slideshow

If RWA is one of the most important themes in 2026, then getting in early and already leading in OI and trading volume is a very strong starting point.

The conclusion is clear: RWA is not a “side quest” for Lighter. Rather, it is the clearest path to achieving excess growth in 2026–2027—because this path will expand Lighter from the purely crypto-native perpetual contract market to the broader world of tokenized financial products.

5. Robinhood Aligns Narratives: Why Distribution Will Change Everything Robinhood is currently the cleanest and most imaginative distribution wedge on the table: approximately 26 million funded accounts and approximately $333 billion in assets under management (AUM).

A mature model: routing order flows to large market makers (a typical Citadel-style traffic structure).

Once Robinhood becomes the true distribution channel for tokenized assets, the back-end trading infrastructure that provides execution and settlement channels will become extremely valuable—because in the trading world, distribution capability has always been the most difficult moat to build.

If Lighter can become one of the back-end tracks for tokenized assets/perpetual contracts/settlement-like traffic (even if it’s only partially involved), its impact won’t be “more crypto users,” but rather: introducing entirely new liquidity to the on-chain market through a familiar front-end UI.

The significance of this for valuation is that it directly attacks the biggest ceiling faced by most Perp DEXs: Web3 native liquidity is large, but it still has an upper limit compared to the distribution capacity of traditional finance.

The market often doesn’t wait for everything to settle down. Even if this narrative only has a “certain probability of going mainstream,” it’s enough to trigger repricing—because the crypto market prices probability, not certainty itself.

Lighter’s positioning as a “TradFi & Fintech” infrastructure (Source: X @Eugene_Bulltime)

6. Valuation: A simplified framework that doesn’t rely on “faith” I prefer to use anchor points plus reality validation for valuation.

Valuation anchor (information already provided by the market) $1.5 billion FDV: Lower limit/bear market anchor (based on VC pricing from a $68 million funding round). Falling below this level means the funding round was unrealized from the outset.

Approximately $4.2 billion in FDV: Market-implied anchor (OTC points pricing + reverse projection of approximately 25% of the community quota).

Real-world verification #1: FDV / TVL comparison If we price Lighter at ~5 × TVL: 1.44 billion TVL × 5 ≈ 7.2 billion USD FDV

This wasn’t just a random guess; it aligns with the clustering patterns of similar platforms.

Hyperliquid: ~5.8× FDV/TVL

Aster: ~4.2× FDV/TVL

Therefore, as long as TVL can be maintained and Lighter continues to prove its leading position in trading volume and OI, $7-8 billion FDV is a reasonable “fair value” range.

Real-world verification #2: Income comparison (imperfect, but very important) Revenue is not the only valuation method in crypto (narrative is equally important), but it is one of the hardest anchors of reality that can test whether “usage has really turned into cash flow”.

Annualized income (1 year) estimate:

Hyperliquid: ~$900 million

Aster: ~$513 million

Lighter: ~$167.9 million

dYdX: ~10.9 million US dollars

Two conclusions can be drawn simultaneously: the income gap is real. Lighter’s current income is lower than Hyperliquid and Aster, which is a reasonable reason for the market’s current discount on it. If someone were to price Lighter as “the next Hyperliquid,” income would be the most direct point of rebuttal.

For a platform that hasn’t issued its own token and whose products aren’t fully launched, this revenue is still very solid. An annualized revenue of ~168 million USD is not “common.” It doesn’t automatically justify a higher FDV, but it clearly demonstrates that Lighter isn’t relying on hype; it’s running a real, monetizable business.

How to determine the valuation range Bear/Benchmark (USD 1.5–7.5 billion FDV):

As long as TVL remains stable and continues to demonstrate its leading position in terms of trading volume/OI, this range can be maintained even if there is a revenue gap.

Bull Market (US$7.5-12.5 billion + FDV):

A catalyst is needed to reach a consensus, specifically including:

(a) Faster income growth;

(b) Higher and more sustainable activity levels; or

(c) The mainstream distribution narrative for which the market is willing to price in advance.

In short: Revenue is a “proof question.” It puts pressure on short-term growth multiples, but it is also a strong signal that Lighter already has real traction; the upside potential depends on whether revenue growth significantly increases after product expansion.

7. Scenario Assumptions (A Truly “Makes Sense” FDV Range) Bear Market Scenario: $1.5-4.2 Billion FDV

Assumptions: Weak market + TGE selling pressure + lack of narrative. Price will hover around the lower bound of VC or slightly above the integral implied value.

Baseline scenario: $4.2-7.5 billion FDV

Assumptions: Pricing reverts to fundamentals. TVL remains above $1 billion, and the volume-to-input ratio remains high, with pricing based on comparable multiples.

Bull Market Scenario: $7.5-12.5 billion + FDV

Hypothesis: A consensus is reached on catalysts, including:

RWA momentum continues + a clear RWA spot path; and/or

The Robinhood-style distribution narrative is widely accepted (even though it is not yet fully confirmed).

8. Roadmap Signals: Why 2026 Could Be a Real Year of Expansion Considering both product pacing and narrative path, 2026 seems to be a pivotal year for Lighter’s growth trajectory:

The enhancements to RWA, including its deepening, spot expansion, mobile platform integration, and portfolio margin features, are not isolated functionalities but rather all pointing towards the same goal of wider distribution and higher monetization efficiency.

Lighter 2026 Expansion Roadmap (Slideshow from Seoul Offline Event)

Lighter has already demonstrated impressive traction by 2025, but what will truly change its valuation ceiling is what’s going to happen next.

At the Chainlink × Lighter Seoul Meetup, a roadmap labeled “2026 – Expansion” was leaked, which included:

ZK EVM, RWA Perps, RWA Spot, Portfolio Margin, Mobile App, Prediction Markets, S3 / Tokenomics… and more.

Even if we consider it as “information before official confirmation,” when you connect it with Lighter’s proven capabilities—stable execution, rapid delivery, and clear momentum in RWA—this line of thought is highly self-consistent.

Why this roadmap is important for valuation 1) Expand product offerings (more growth paths for TVL and sales volume)

A DEX can grow large solely on perpetual contracts; however, adding spot trading, especially the path to RWA spot trading, will significantly widen the funnel.

Spot trading is more “sticky” and more conducive to TVL accumulation, which will also attract a type of user who does not focus on 50x leverage.

2) Improve capital efficiency (portfolio margin is key)

Portfolio margins may not sound sexy, but they are what institutions and professional traders really care about.

It allows funds to work together across different positions and reduces fragmentation, thereby increasing activity even with disproportionate increases in new deposits.

3) Upgraded distribution (mobile)

Most retail transactions take place on mobile phones.

If Lighter wants to become a viable alternative to the “one-click transaction” experience of Binance and Robinhood, a native mobile app is not a bonus, but a direct growth lever.

4) Emphasize the strongest narrative (RWA)

RWA is not just a new market, but also the clearest bridge to non-crypto native needs.

The roadmap explicitly states RWA Perps + RWA Spot, which is tantamount to declaring that this is a core strategy, not a peripheral feature.

5) Increase optionality (predicting markets + “more”)

Prediction markets have repeatedly validated demand in the crypto space.

Integrating it into a larger transaction stack could create a new product line with high engagement, improve retention, and keep users within the same ecosystem.

9. Risks that need to be taken seriously Market Environment: The current total market capitalization of cryptocurrencies is approximately $2.96 trillion, significantly lower than the $4.27 trillion ATH projected for October 2025. If the macroeconomic environment continues to weaken, all assets will come under pressure.

Post-TGE behavior: Short-term selling pressure is almost certain; the key observation point is whether TVL/volume stabilizes after the initial fluctuations.

Competition is real: Hyperliquid has strong product capabilities, and other platforms will quickly replicate its features.

Narrative vs. Confirmation: If the timeline of narratives like Robinhood/RWA spot trading is extended, there may be overheating and a pullback.

Final Reflections A lazy valuation method is: “It’s a Perp DEX → benchmark against Hyperliquid → discount it → done.”

A better approach is to acknowledge these differences:

The scale is already real (TVL, transaction volume, revenue).

RWA appears to be a structural wedge rather than a side mission.

Product direction is shifting towards a broader market (Perps → Spot → Margin → New Vertical).

Once fintech/brokerage distribution is even partially implemented, the ceiling will no longer be “just another crypto exchange”.

Therefore, my framework is: $1.5 billion is the bottom, and ~$4.2 billion is the cleanest market anchor point derived from points pricing; as long as TVL is stable and catalysts continue to materialize, discussions on fair value should begin from ~$7 billion and above.

How I’m thinking about the zones (This is not investment advice, but rather a personal plan)

$LIT Valuation Scenario Analysis

To maintain my discipline, I treat these FDV ranges as “zones” rather than precise target prices.

Bear market range ($1.5 billion – $4.2 billion FDV)

If the price fluctuates within this range after TGE, I will consider it an “opportunity range”.

Holding the airdrop here puts me at the least psychologically; and for those who truly agree with this logic, it’s also the area with the cleanest risk-reward ratio—because the traction of TVL, trading volume, and RWA are already visible and verifiable facts.

Baseline range ($4.2 billion – $7.5 billion FDV)

If Lighter can maintain its TVL and continue to operate at a top-tier scale, I would consider this range to be its fair value.

If prices reach this level, I personally would consider taking partial profits (“recovering costs first”), but would still maintain an open position. The reason is simple: the 2026 roadmap is the kind of allocation that can gradually raise the valuation ceiling—including RWA, spot expansion, portfolio margin, mobile, etc.

Bull market range ($7.5 billion – $12.5 billion + FDV)

This is a range where “catalysts have become a consensus”.

If Lighter trades here, it often means that RWA momentum is becoming undeniable, and/or the distribution narrative (fintech/brokerage alignment) is starting to be taken seriously by the market.

In this situation, I would be more proactive in taking risks during an uptrend, because this is precisely where the crypto market is prone to overshooting and rapid reversals.

In short: I’m not trying to time the market top. I just want a plan that allows me to navigate volatility, take profits without regret, and maintain an open position if Lighter successfully executes its strategy until 2026.

मूल लिंक

यह लेख इंटरनेट से लिया गया है: With TGE imminent, what is a reasonable valuation for Lighter?

Related: USDe issuance plummeted by $6.5 billion; will Ethena still dare to use it? Author｜Azuma ( @azuma_eth ) Ethena is experiencing the largest outflow of funds since its inception. On-chain data shows that the circulating supply of Ethena’s main stablecoin product, USDe, has fallen to 8.395 billion, a decrease of about 6.5 billion from the peak of nearly 14.8 billion in early October . Although it cannot be described as a “halving”, the decline is still quite alarming. Coinciding with the recent spate of DeFi security incidents, especially the collapses of two interest-bearing stablecoins, Stream Finance (xUSD) and Stable Labs (USDX), which claimed to use a similar Delta neutral model to Ethena, there are rumors that the trigger for their collapses may have been the forced disruption of their neutral balance by the CEX’s ADL during the bloodbath on October 11. Coupled with the…

# विश्लेषण# एयरड्रॉप# क्रिप्टो# डेफी# एक्सचेंज# मार्केट# टोकन# वेब3© 版权声明सरणी 上一篇 One-week token unlock: 3 projects unlock tokens worth over ten million US dollars 下一篇 Is a strict “principal” for Bitcoin arriving? If he takes the helm of the Federal Reserve, the crypto frenzy may come to an end. 相关文章 Underground Argentina: Jewish banks, Chinese supermarkets, destitute young people, and the impoverished middle class 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 19,422 1 Top 10 Crypto-Friendly Countries and Crypto-Illegal Regions 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 47,455 4 बाजार में सुधार और रणनीतिक प्रतिक्रिया: बिटकॉइन के अवसरों को जब्त करना और छूट पर स्थिति खोलना | साप्ताहिक बाजार 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 134,267 3 The Biggest Trading Theme of 2026: Trump Who Can’t Afford to Lose, The End of the International Order 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 9,956 2 Launched today, how much should WLFI be worth?Recommended Articles 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 23,422 4 From AI framework to x402, who will be “massively enriched” by the second wave of crypto AI? 6086cf14eb90bc67ca4fc62b 16,928 1 नवीनतम लेख Blockchain etabliert sich als Schlüsseltechnologie in klassischen Branchen 14 घंटे पहले 692 Polymarket vs Kalshi: Who is the King of Prediction Markets? 23 घंटे पहले 855 CRCL Surges 35%: Circle’s Q4 EPS Exceeds Expectations by 169%, AI + Stablecoin Moat Continues to Deepen 23 घंटे पहले 710 Jane Street Halts “10 AM Dump,” BTC Stages Strong V-Shaped Rebound, Surging Toward $70K 23 घंटे पहले 759 From Terra’s Collapse to the “10 AM Smash”: How Jane Street Played Both Continents’ Markets? 23 घंटे पहले 671 लोकप्रिय वेबसाइटेंTempoजीएआईबीLighterग्लाइडरप्लांकरेल्सबीसीपोकरकाइट एआई Bee.com दुनिया का सबसे बड़ा Web3 पोर्टल भागीदारों कॉइनकार्प बिनेंस कॉइनमार्केटकैप कॉइनगेको कॉइनलाइव कवच बी नेटवर्क ऐप डाउनलोड करें और वेब3 यात्रा शुरू करें सफेद कागज भूमिकाएँ सामान्य प्रश्न © 2021-2026. सर्वाधिकार सुरक्षित।. गोपनीयता नीति | सेवाओं की शर्तें बी नेटवर्क ऐप डाउनलोड करें और वेब3 यात्रा शुरू करें दुनिया का सबसे बड़ा Web3 पोर्टल भागीदारों CoinCarp Binance CoinMarketCap CoinGecko Coinlive Armors सफेद कागज भूमिकाएँ सामान्य प्रश्न © 2021-2026. सर्वाधिकार सुरक्षित।. गोपनीयता नीति | सेवाओं की शर्तें खोज खोजइनसाइटऑनचेनसामाजिकसमाचार उत्तर: एयरड्रॉप शिकारी डेटा विश्लेषण क्रिप्टो हस्तियाँ ट्रैप डिटेक्टर हिन्दी English 繁體中文 简体中文 日本語 Tiếng Việt العربية 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia اردو Русский हिन्दी